Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAJ2gREt029353 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:42:29 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E665A77404 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:42:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUys9-0000Ym-WB for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:51:42 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUyrq-0000YW-PO for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:51:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUyrq-0000YJ-CV for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:51:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUyrq-0000YG-9O for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:51:22 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUyic-000181-HO for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:41:50 -0500 Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUyib-0006LT-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:41:49 +0100 Received: from 216.132.219.34 ([216.132.219.34]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:41:49 +0100 Received: from seitz by 216.132.219.34 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:41:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org From: Matt Seitz Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:23:50 -0800 Organization: NeoPath Networks Message-ID: References: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk> <419A7430.8050300@mdl.com> <77F65340-381A-11D9-A1EA-000A959B67D6@seyza.com> <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <419B8347.3060401@arbash-meinel.com> <419B9909.3030504@arbash-meinel.com> <2CE15774-39A8-11D9-8075-000393CFE6B8@spy.net> <1100818446.3025.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.132.219.34 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040927 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 564 Lines: 8 Stefan Monnier wrote: > It's a worthy goal to have "one way that's known to work". But trying to > enforce that it be the only way is just being dogmatic. I once read a design guideline that said it's OK to have more than one way to do something. But one should try to make it clear which way is the best way to achieve a particular goal. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/