Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAJ0MPLo010652 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:22:26 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9498676F65 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:22:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUwgW-0004jW-RP for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:31:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUwe4-00041k-N0 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:29:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUwe2-0003yn-8m for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:28:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUwe0-0003xc-PS for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:28:56 -0500 Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUwUo-0005S8-1X for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:19:26 -0500 Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985D98282E2; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:19:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26C4AC4A8; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:19:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3684E8CA69; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:19:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org References: <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <419B8347.3060401@arbash-meinel.com> <419B9909.3030504@arbash-meinel.com> <2CE15774-39A8-11D9-8075-000393CFE6B8@spy.net> <20041118214742.GA17009@fencepost> <87oehuredt.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> From: Stefan Monnier Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:19:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87oehuredt.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> (Bruce Stephens's message of "Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:17:18 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 743 Lines: 23 > But if someone's happy using "tla mv", "tla add", "tla rm" all the > time, then adding tag lines to all the files is surely a waste of > time? It sometimes comes in handy when your file also has a life outside of the Arch repository. Of course, this again only works for those files that can have a tagline, but it's better than nothing. And it wouldn't take any extra time to use taglines if `tla add' knew how to add a tagline rather than a .arch-ids/foo.id. C-x v i in Emacs's VC does exactly that. Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/