Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAIMhiFi024356 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:44:02 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F372453893 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUv97-0002Bb-Qa for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:52:57 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUv8A-00027i-3Y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:51:58 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUv88-00027A-Vb for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:51:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUv88-00026v-NF for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:51:56 -0500 Received: from [203.22.251.250] (helo=mg1.works.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CUuyY-0007wg-Cs for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:42:02 -0500 Received: from aardvark.ozdial.net.au (aardvark.ozdial.net.au [203.22.251.121]) by mg1.works.net.au (8.12.11/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iAIMfg72021726; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:41:42 +1100 Received: from lifelesswks.robertcollins.net (dsl-78.1.240.220.rns01-kent-syd.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.1.78]) by aardvark.ozdial.net.au (8.12.8/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iAIMffjU022398; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:41:42 +1100 Received: from [192.168.1.15] (helo=lifelesslap.robertcollins.net ident=Debian-exim) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUuyC-0004p3-PV; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:41:40 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUuyE-0003N1-1u; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:41:42 +1100 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla From: Robert Collins To: John A Meinel In-Reply-To: <419D2329.7070000@arbash-meinel.com> References: <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118064240.7a57bf81.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <20041118103925.5b32b707.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419BEB98.3030207@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118173352.613955dc.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419CCC40.9090200@arbash-meinel.com> <419D0E01.9070904@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118214019.GH3484@wisq.net> <419D1B34.2030405@arbash-meinel.com> <1100816577.7038.49.camel@localhost> <419D2329.7070000@arbash-meinel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:41:41 +1100 Message-Id: <1100817701.7038.52.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-MG1-Works-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MG1-Works-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MG1-Works-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.285, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.53, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.09) X-MailScanner-From: rbcollins@cygwin.com Cc: Arch Users , Erik de Castro Lopo , Adrian Irving-Beer X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2038834663==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1931 Lines: 71 --===============2038834663== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eNpPSnvhmBsjWrt++X4i" --=-eNpPSnvhmBsjWrt++X4i Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:33 -0600, John A Meinel wrote: > > It has an X bit. And the system can run any arbitrarily named file. > > However.. the shells both UI and command line use a registry of file > > extensions to choose an interpreter, rather than a hashbang and file > > magic. > >=20 > > Rob >=20 > Can you mark a .exe as non-executable? Yes. offhand - I haven't used this tool in years -=20 setacl /D everyone:execute foo.exe > I could be wrong, and ACL's might have something about whether or not=20 > this item can be executed by a person. I know they have read/write. But=20 > I certainly don't think you can say "double clicking this file will not=20 > run word, but opening word and opening this file will work". I'm not=20 > sure about .exe/com/bat etc. .doc files are not executed, because of the file type lookup, I'm pretty sure that denying execute on them will have no effect. Rob --=-eNpPSnvhmBsjWrt++X4i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBnSUlM4BfeEKYx2ERAi6UAJ9qWjNW+aMdZaROn+D1jKhufMB8AQCfXTFs Wg6KtKmP8pL+YlFontSe12M= =5t0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eNpPSnvhmBsjWrt++X4i-- --===============2038834663== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============2038834663==--