Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAIMYmFi011408 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:34:49 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E075398A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:34:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUv0V-00065x-7H for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:44:03 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUuzu-000615-KS for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:43:27 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUuzr-00060H-4s for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:43:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUuzq-0005zS-R0 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:43:22 -0500 Received: from [129.255.60.186] (helo=ct.radiology.uiowa.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUuq7-0006Xv-4p for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:33:19 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (12-217-241-0.client.mchsi.com [12.217.241.0]) by ct.radiology.uiowa.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAIMXG331164; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:33:16 -0600 Message-ID: <419D2329.7070000@arbash-meinel.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:33:13 -0600 From: John A Meinel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla References: <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118064240.7a57bf81.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <20041118103925.5b32b707.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419BEB98.3030207@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118173352.613955dc.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419CCC40.9090200@arbash-meinel.com> <419D0E01.9070904@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118214019.GH3484@wisq.net> <419D1B34.2030405@arbash-meinel.com> <1100816577.7038.49.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1100816577.7038.49.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Cc: Arch Users , Erik de Castro Lopo , Adrian Irving-Beer X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0311303550==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 2549 Lines: 77 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0311303550== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5E7DA089CF9413D03F40320" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5E7DA089CF9413D03F40320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:59 -0600, John A Meinel wrote: > >>>Does Windows literally only run files with a .exe extension? I haven't >>>used Cygwin or Windows in years. >> >>Windows will only run files with a .exe, .com, .bat, maybe a couple >>more. Windows determines what is executable from the extension (it has >>no X bit) > > > It has an X bit. And the system can run any arbitrarily named file. > However.. the shells both UI and command line use a registry of file > extensions to choose an interpreter, rather than a hashbang and file > magic. > > Rob Can you mark a .exe as non-executable? I understand that you have a registry of associations, but I don't think you can mark a file executable without an associated registry entry, or mark it non-executable with one. (Hence no X bit, just a global is associated, is not associated.) I could be wrong, and ACL's might have something about whether or not this item can be executed by a person. I know they have read/write. But I certainly don't think you can say "double clicking this file will not run word, but opening word and opening this file will work". I'm not sure about .exe/com/bat etc. John =:-> --------------enigE5E7DA089CF9413D03F40320 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBnSMpJdeBCYSNAAMRAqpqAJ9Sq04/IYR/FHVASrOnOvgffORsagCfcmsj 0KTcmcJZM4evIcnfmCp//JQ= =lWFi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5E7DA089CF9413D03F40320-- --===============0311303550== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============0311303550==--