Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAIMOWFi022303 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:26:07 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9E877196 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:24:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUuqV-0000py-Hb for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:33:43 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUupk-0000ph-Ab for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:32:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUupi-0000pP-D3 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:32:56 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUupi-0000pM-A6 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:32:54 -0500 Received: from [203.22.251.251] (helo=mg2.works.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CUugV-00059P-H7 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:23:24 -0500 Received: from aardvark.ozdial.net.au (aardvark.ozdial.net.au [203.22.251.121]) by mg2.works.net.au (8.12.11/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iAIMN4IW022832; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:23:04 +1100 Received: from lifelesswks.robertcollins.net (dsl-78.1.240.220.rns01-kent-syd.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.1.78]) by aardvark.ozdial.net.au (8.12.8/linuxconf) with ESMTP id iAIMMvjU021546; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:22:58 +1100 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (helo=lifelesslap.robertcollins.net ident=Debian-exim) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUug4-0004m7-M9; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:22:56 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=robertc) by lifelesslap.robertcollins.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUug5-0003Jn-Tl; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:22:57 +1100 Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla From: Robert Collins To: John A Meinel In-Reply-To: <419D1B34.2030405@arbash-meinel.com> References: <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118064240.7a57bf81.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <20041118103925.5b32b707.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419BEB98.3030207@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118173352.613955dc.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> <419CCC40.9090200@arbash-meinel.com> <419D0E01.9070904@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118214019.GH3484@wisq.net> <419D1B34.2030405@arbash-meinel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:22:57 +1100 Message-Id: <1100816577.7038.49.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MG2-Works-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MG2-Works-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.285, required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.53, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.09) X-MailScanner-From: rbcollins@cygwin.com Cc: Arch Users , Erik de Castro Lopo , Adrian Irving-Beer X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1315318038==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1578 Lines: 59 --===============1315318038== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PtoKm6S+/12TLyB5/bph" --=-PtoKm6S+/12TLyB5/bph Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 15:59 -0600, John A Meinel wrote: > > Does Windows literally only run files with a .exe extension? I haven't > > used Cygwin or Windows in years. >=20 > Windows will only run files with a .exe, .com, .bat, maybe a couple=20 > more. Windows determines what is executable from the extension (it has=20 > no X bit) It has an X bit. And the system can run any arbitrarily named file. However.. the shells both UI and command line use a registry of file extensions to choose an interpreter, rather than a hashbang and file magic. Rob --=-PtoKm6S+/12TLyB5/bph Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBnSDBM4BfeEKYx2ERAsF+AJ0QilLoCB7HHzoef0mUMfx+hhi5DgCcCyzI Aso66Iul4usc3qGwKfj0UMs= =xiW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PtoKm6S+/12TLyB5/bph-- --===============1315318038== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============1315318038==--