Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAI6lZiW009438 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:47:35 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A247653D2E for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:47:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUgDj-000804-L7 for migo@homemail.com; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:56:43 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUgDO-0007zz-R8 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:56:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUgDO-0007zn-EL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:56:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUgDO-0007zk-Bd for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:56:22 -0500 Received: from [204.152.189.135] (helo=kechara.flame.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CUg4D-0007R4-Nm for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:46:54 -0500 Received: (qmail 2269 invoked by uid 323); 18 Nov 2004 06:46:52 -0000 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: trained dependency References: <87actzvpnb.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> <1099438163.10774.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1099448957.10774.118.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87u0s6n8da.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <1099516340.10774.153.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200411041956.iA4Ju6T2055477@xl2.seyza.com> <87bre82m56.fsf@flame.org> <200411082342.iA8Ngp6s084852@xl2.seyza.com> <20041109143737.GD19804@wisq.net> From: Matthew Dempsky Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:48:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20041109143737.GD19804@wisq.net> (Adrian Irving-Beer's message of "Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:37:37 -0500") Message-ID: <871xerbqke.fsf@flame.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1393 Lines: 38 Adrian Irving-Beer writes: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:42:51PM -0800, Thomas Lord wrote: >> >> > > So, is there something /inherent/ in public schooling that >> > > makes it evil? >> >> > Is there something /inherent/ in socialism that makes it evil? >> >> Not that I can see, no there isn't. I gather that you regard >> public schooling as socialism? And that you do think there is >> something inherently evil about socialism? I didn't mean to say that public schooling is socialism, simply parallel the two very government controlled systems (unless by public schooling you possibly meant to include privately funded schools that are open to the public). And, no, I don't think there's anything inherently evil about socialism. It's neat and all, just abysmally unsuccessful. > I read the original post as 'there isn't a whole lot inherently wrong > with the raw concept of socialism, but everyone to attempt a system > based on it in the past has gone badly wrong'. > > I further assumed that anecdotal vs. theoretical divide was being > compared to the same divide in implementing public schooling. Right on both accounts. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/