Received: from spf1.us4.outblaze.com (spf1.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.23]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAI0TFI2021827 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:29:15 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2BC5374A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:29:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUaJb-0002Gu-Ut for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:38:23 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUaJB-0002Fp-Dv for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:37:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUaJA-0002FU-SV for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:37:57 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUaJA-0002FK-Nc for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:37:56 -0500 Received: from [129.255.60.186] (helo=ct.radiology.uiowa.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUa9l-0004od-03 for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:28:13 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (12-217-241-0.client.mchsi.com [12.217.241.0]) by ct.radiology.uiowa.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAI0SB322448; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:28:11 -0600 Message-ID: <419BEC97.1030800@arbash-meinel.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:28:07 -0600 From: John A Meinel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexey N. Solofnenko" Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla References: <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <419BE4BB.4080302@mdl.com> In-Reply-To: <419BE4BB.4080302@mdl.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1766017723==" Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 2988 Lines: 81 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============1766017723== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAC2BF7E691D81E2DC65A75D4" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAC2BF7E691D81E2DC65A75D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: > I tried native Windows and Cygwin TLA some time ago and they both failed > with long path limitation. Also native Windows TLA crashed while trying > to download a big repository from internet. **Maybe** these problems are > already fixed, but there is no official Windows TLA build. Even more, it > looks like Windows support is distributed between several third-party > repositories and none of them seem finished. > > Now, Windows does support long files names. It is even possible to call > Win32 functions from Cygwin programs. I think, unless Windows patches > are merged into main repository, Windows support will never be > stabilized enough to be really usable. (Personally I think TLA relies > too much on GNU command line tools that were not supported on Windows > very well). > > - Alexey. > Well, I'm specifically trying to get my branch merged into mainline. Windows supports long filenames, but Visual Studio, Explorer, Notepad, Wordpad, GVim, SciTE, and lots of other programs do not. In fact, I haven't found a single program that does support it yet. My work should get 90% of the way there. Right now I depend on cygwin, because I use it, and it's no big deal. Probably the code would compile on Msys/Mingw. I haven't tried. See my other email for the dependencies, it really isn't all that great. You are right, tla's windows support isn't top notch. It may not be where darcs is at. (Though I just tried darcs and after "darcs get; darcs diff" it told me every line of every file had changed because of line ending problems.) So darcs isn't 100% there yet either. John =:-> --------------enigAC2BF7E691D81E2DC65A75D4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBm+yXJdeBCYSNAAMRAup7AJ90w/EbqgDaiL0qjJ21nelEo9VqVwCfRSSO QTdA+LVgNMwNdvgRKQ3uOBs= =t0od -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAC2BF7E691D81E2DC65A75D4-- --===============1766017723== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ --===============1766017723==--