Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHNuqsa013674 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:56:53 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEE276FD4 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:56:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUZoH-0000zW-M6 for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:06:01 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUZmF-0000i8-Gz for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:03:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUZmE-0000hH-5P for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:03:54 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUZmD-0000h4-NR for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:03:53 -0500 Received: from [208.200.221.8] (helo=mail.mdli.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUZdL-0007mC-9y for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:54:43 -0500 Received: from exch-sl02.mdli.com (exch-sl02.mdli.com [172.16.3.10]) by mail.mdli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB1DB5E65 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.46.18] (172.16.46.18 [172.16.46.18]) by exch-sl02.mdli.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id W13ALBM5; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:54:41 -0800 Message-ID: <419BE4BB.4080302@mdl.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:54:35 -0800 X-Sybari-Trust: 490288bc 1e849ab0 d37507dc 0000013d From: "Alexey N. Solofnenko" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9+ (Windows/20041116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla References: <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> In-Reply-To: <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1700 Lines: 49 I tried native Windows and Cygwin TLA some time ago and they both failed with long path limitation. Also native Windows TLA crashed while trying to download a big repository from internet. **Maybe** these problems are already fixed, but there is no official Windows TLA build. Even more, it looks like Windows support is distributed between several third-party repositories and none of them seem finished. Now, Windows does support long files names. It is even possible to call Win32 functions from Cygwin programs. I think, unless Windows patches are merged into main repository, Windows support will never be stabilized enough to be really usable. (Personally I think TLA relies too much on GNU command line tools that were not supported on Windows very well). - Alexey. John A Meinel wrote: >I was arguing 3 things: > >1) tla will run under cygwin, so there is a windows version available. >2) cmd.exe isn't a great shell, so depending on cygwin is okay. They > actually made it quite a bit better than command.com, but bash is > still far better. >3) the general windows philosophy is to use gui's for things. > >The main 2 reasons tla doesn't run on windows is that it had a tendency >to abuse path names (make them too long) this is what I work on. The >second is that it is written as a POSIX application, and windows isn't >generally posix compliant. (They use file handles instead of small >integers, for instance.) >... > > >John >=:-> > > > > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/