Received: from spf5.us4.outblaze.com (spf5.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.27]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHJm9Vo009076 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:48:10 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf5.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F397B76F5B for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVvZ-0004cS-K7 for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:57:17 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVv6-0004af-Ky for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:56:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVv5-0004a8-DR for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:56:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVv5-0004Zu-6N for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:56:47 -0500 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CUVm9-0004Cx-8j for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:47:33 -0500 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUVm8-00054S-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:47:32 +0100 Received: from simba.summersault.com ([12.161.105.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:47:32 +0100 Received: from mark by simba.summersault.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:47:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org From: Mark Stosberg Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk> <419A7430.8050300@mdl.com> <77F65340-381A-11D9-A1EA-000A959B67D6@seyza.com> <419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com> <419B7885.9030903@arbash-meinel.com> <20041118064240.7a57bf81.erikd-tla@mega-nerd.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: simba.summersault.com X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 870 Lines: 16 On 2004-11-17, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:12:53 -0600 > John A Meinel wrote: > >> 2) cmd.exe isn't a great shell, so depending on cygwin is okay. They >> actually made it quite a bit better than command.com, but bash is >> still far better. > > The best shell I've found under windows is the one that ships with > Msys/MinGW. Its actually an RXVT ported to run as a native windows > GUI app. By default it then runs bash with some extra mods to > so that C:\Windows\System\ becomes /c/Windows/System. The the darcs Windows build is built using Msys/MinGW. Mark _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/