Received: from spf3.us4.outblaze.com (spf3.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.25]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHHkJFn007831 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:46:19 GMT Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by spf3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE4253767 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:46:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUU0s-0004Yg-Fo for migo@homemail.com; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:54:38 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUU0U-0004YL-8k for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:54:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CUU0T-0004Xv-CL for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:54:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUU0T-0004Xr-9T for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:54:13 -0500 Received: from [205.149.2.136] (helo=xl2.seyza.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CUTrN-0000FT-7U for gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:44:50 -0500 Received: from xl2.seyza.com (localhost.seyza.com [127.0.0.1]) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAHHigc8009838; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lord@xl2.seyza.com) Received: (from lord@localhost) by xl2.seyza.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iAHHift3009833; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:44:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lord) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:44:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200411171744.iAHHift3009833@xl2.seyza.com> From: Thomas Lord To: asuffield@debian.org In-reply-to: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk> (message from Andrew Suffield on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:32:58 +0000) Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla References: <20041116204346.GA4854@vagabond> <419A6857.2030701@mdl.com> <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk> Cc: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-BeenThere: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org Status: RO Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 40 > From: Andrew Suffield > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: > > For me a Windows support is much more important and in darcs world=20 > > Windows is a first class citizen. Unless you do the same people will=20 > > standardize on something else than tla. > Yadda yadda yadda, free software is impossible, linux doesn't exist. > It's empirically false. That line stopped being funny back in the > 1990s (when it became blatantly apparent that no matter how many > vendors you pay off, people will *not* shift from unix platforms). Heh. It's also the case that the bar for "first class windows support" keeps getting lower and lower. Many can and many more will be able to host virtual unix boxes on a windows environment: run arch there and cross mount the filesystem. Bonus points if you can pop up X windows on your Windows screen. This is a perfectly "first class" approach. The network, however virtual, is the computing system, so to speak. With that approach, when you run into bugs like /Windows/ programs that can't handle a deep path even if the underlying (Windows) OS can? Well, that's not an arch bug... -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/