To: gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
From: Mark Stosberg <mark@summersault.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrncpmsrq.68v.mark@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20041116213258.GA16695@suffields.me.uk> <419A7430.8050300@mdl.com>
	<77F65340-381A-11D9-A1EA-000A959B67D6@seyza.com>
	<419ABADB.5020506@arbash-meinel.com>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux)
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
Precedence: list
Sender: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Errors-To: gnu-arch-users-bounces+migo=homemail.com@gnu.org
Status: RO
Content-Length: 962
Lines: 20
On 2004-11-17, John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>
> But really for windows what you want is a gui.

Why? At least 'darcs for windows' is really a DOS application from what
I've seen. The target audience is still programmers, who should be less
fearful of the command line.  

I suppose GUIs are more a part of Windows culture than Linux, if that's
what you are implying. 

> I can't say why this would be hard with darcs. Though I know last I 
> checked they didn't have pre/post commit hooks, or other such goodies 
> which also let you nice things.

pre and post hooks were discussed recently as a feature that darcs users
and the author have an interest in. I wouldn't be surprised if they
appear in the short term. 

    Mark


_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users

GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/