From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #693 Dead-Flames Digest #693, Volume #48 Thu, 27 Oct 05 20:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: Phil at Bimbo's ("Steve Terry") garcia's attorney ("Alex Scartun") Re: garcia's attorney ("Richard Morris") Re: Phil at Bimbo's ("Richard Morris") ") Re: Thank you, Mr. Postman ("Richard Morris") Re: Is there a good copy of 5/8/77? ("Steve Terry") Re: White Sox Win ("k sturm") Re: White Sox Win ("Steve Terry") Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! ("Gerry Lintonice") Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! ("DevsVult") Re: White Sox Win ("k sturm") Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! ("Roger") Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) ("Ray") Re: anyone see mickey hart last nite? ("Cozmik Charlie T") Re: Thank you, Mr. Postman (The Lord of Eltingville) Fillmore 69 Box Set vs 2004 Archive SHN Versions ? (A Dude) Re: Fillmore 69 Box Set vs 2004 Archive SHN Versions ? (n9ck@earthlink.net) Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) ("Carlisle") Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! ("Roger") Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) ("Roger") Re: shes gone ("Carlisle") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Phil at Bimbo's Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:08:00 -0700 "Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message news:1130458855.018286.312380@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > Dave Kelly wrote: >> Looks like I'm working Bimbos tonite. >> The regular bathroom attendant wanted the nite off, >> so I picked up his shift. >> Look for me....I'l be the guy in the tuxedo handing out >> moist towels and snake dancing on the urinals. > > Dude, I had no idea you were a spade. Shh .... Dave is passing. R. ------------------------------ From: jerrygrau@nospam.nyc.rr.com (Jerry Grau) Subject: Re: Is there a good copy of 5/8/77? Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:12:58 GMT On 27 Oct 2005 05:25:52 -0700, "Dylanstubs" wrote: > >The "oddity" you refer to is no mere accident. Audio experts have >reviewed this recording and there is apparently a low-level modulation >due to an embedded carrier wave in the 60-70 hz region. Its purpose is >unknown, but it closely resembles emissions known to be used by the CIA >when interrogating terror suspects; emissions which cause the synaptic >connections to completely collapse and the subject to become quite numb >and jello-like. > >I would recommend you NOT listen to this recording. Recordings from the >Summer '84 tour, especially soundboards, are a known antidote for any >ill effects you may have suffered. > Gee, I wonder what it does to dogs. jg Jerry Grau Poetry Is Dead http://home.nyc.rr.com/poetryisdead/ ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: shes gone Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:13:50 -0700 "Carlisle" wrote in message news:1130421738.080299.189100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Richard Morris wrote: >> "Carlisle" wrote in message >> news:1130419894.096239.316340@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> > My first reaction was to laugh. >> > Her nomination deserved the drubbing it got. >> > Nominate someone of stature, substance and a paper trail... >> > Not a crony, a quota pick or a person totally devoid of opinions on >> > constitutional matters. At least, let's have a real debate. >> > Harriet Miers-that was pathetic. >> > word. >> >> What conclusions do you draw about Bush from his supreme court >> nominations? >> >> R. > > 1)How bad am I going to have to talk about our President in order to > satisfy you?! ;-() > 2)You feeling any better, Richard?? Seriously, ((((get well)))). . . > Run for the Roses. > Carrie I don't care if you talk bad about him ... I just want you to think about how he defines himself though his actions, and who he is. As for the rest, thank you so much for your good wishes. I am diabetic. I control what I eat very strictly, and it is all designed to reduce blood sugar levels. As a result, I have been experiencing uricemia for about the last two months, which causes gout: deposits of uric acid crystals in the joint which bring on an autoimmune kind of arthritic response. The law of unintended consequences has body slammed me. Very painful. So I am kind of caught between a rock and a hard place. If the thunder don't get you, the lightning will ... and I can't go forward and I can't go back. I decided to compromise and take medication to control the gout. I hate that. More than you wanted to know, eh? But thank you so much, just the same. R. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: shes gone Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:15:34 -0700 "leftie" wrote in message news:djr650$2v4j$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > Ben wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:56:33 -0700, "Richard Morris" >> wrote: >> >>>"Carlisle" wrote in message >>>news:1130419894.096239.316340@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >>> >>>>My first reaction was to laugh. >>>>Her nomination deserved the drubbing it got. >>>>Nominate someone of stature, substance and a paper trail... >>>>Not a crony, a quota pick or a person totally devoid of opinions on >>>>constitutional matters. At least, let's have a real debate. >>>>Harriet Miers-that was pathetic. >>>>word. >>> >>>What conclusions do you draw about Bush from his supreme court >>>nominations? >> >> He's more interested in overturning Roe v. Wade than in the >> Constitution. > > That's not true! He's clearly interested in overturning the Constitution > too! Heh ... remind me to buy you a beer some time. R. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Thank you, Mr. Postman Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:18:48 -0700 "ba ba booie" wrote in message news:5242-43613885-340@storefull-3274.bay.webtv.net... Thank you, Mr. Postman jrmorris@trouserscomcast.net (Richard Morris) wrote: I sent some discs to..... bbb wrote: I got them, did you get yours? booie........ I think so, booie ... I sent stuff to both you and TEd, and someone sent me back something. Not sure who, though :) R. ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: Is there a good copy of 5/8/77? Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:33:04 -0500 "Jerry Grau" wrote in message: > Gee, I wonder what it does to dogs. It gives them the uncontrollable urge to lick themselves between their legs. ------------------------------ From: "k sturm" Subject: Re: White Sox Win Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:33:51 GMT "Steve Terry" wrote in message news:djro79$124l$1@news.iquest.net... > > "Olompali4" wrote in message > news:1130387230.551508.166830@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> SSIA > > Let's hear some reports from ground zero. Sean, Roxanne, Paul or Kathy? > Was there a lot of celebrating in your respective neighborhoods? > Whatsthescoop? C'mon, inquiring minds want to know. > Well, in my neighborhood, there were a lot of people celebrating, but none of that overturning cars or burning businesses stuff. My dad even broke out the bottle of wine that he saves for his friend, Henry. Tomorrow is the official celebration downtown and I'll be there with my kid, the real White Sox fan of this family, who came home from college a day early just to go. He's got to be the most ecstatic person on earth right about now . . . k~ ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: White Sox Win Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:39:39 -0500 "k sturm" wrote in message: > Well, in my neighborhood, there were a lot of people celebrating, but none > of that overturning cars or burning businesses stuff. My dad even broke > out the bottle of wine that he saves for his friend, Henry. > > Tomorrow is the official celebration downtown and I'll be there with my > kid, the real White Sox fan of this family, who came home from college a > day early just to go. He's got to be the most ecstatic person on earth > right about now . . . Glad to hear it. I told ya back in April that the Sox were looking pretty good. Didn't I? Your dad deserves a little vino after this I think. Congrats to all the longtime Sox fans! ------------------------------ From: "Gerry Lintonice" Crossposted-To: cz.zamestnani.hledam Subject: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! Date: 27 Oct 2005 18:42:34 -0700 Yes, seems to be nazi music from the Third Reich. ------------------------------ From: "DevsVult" Crossposted-To: cz.zamestnani.hledam Subject: Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:44:59 -0400 "Gerry Lintonice" wrote in message news:1130463754.861524.230430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Yes, seems to be nazi music from the Third Reich. > Path: border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!koehntop p.de!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for -mail From: "Gerry Lintonice" Newsgroups: rec.music.gdead,cz.zamestnani.hledam Subject: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! Date: 27 Oct 2005 18:42:34 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 2 Message-ID: <1130463754.861524.230430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 148.244.150.58 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1130463763 16954 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2005 01:42:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:42:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Attack of the GAY Megacocks from outer space !!!,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=148.244.150.58; posting-account=OXqUIA0AAADRxk6GletNEGMd3Ti-CeDe Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.music.gdead:848253 cz.zamestnani.hledam:2593 Go get him! ------------------------------ From: "k sturm" Subject: Re: White Sox Win Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:44:31 GMT "Steve Terry" wrote in message news:djrvsb$14fq$1@news.iquest.net... > > "k sturm" wrote in message: > >> Well, in my neighborhood, there were a lot of people celebrating, but >> none of that overturning cars or burning businesses stuff. My dad even >> broke out the bottle of wine that he saves for his friend, Henry. >> >> Tomorrow is the official celebration downtown and I'll be there with my >> kid, the real White Sox fan of this family, who came home from college a >> day early just to go. He's got to be the most ecstatic person on earth >> right about now . . . > > Glad to hear it. I told ya back in April that the Sox were looking pretty > good. Didn't I? Your dad deserves a little vino after this I think. > Congrats to all the longtime Sox fans! > All I remember you talking about (sportswise, anyway) back then was YOUR Indiana Pacers . . . ------------------------------ From: "Roger" Crossposted-To: cz.zamestnani.hledam Subject: Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! Date: 27 Oct 2005 18:46:26 -0700 Gerry Lintonice wrote: > Yes, seems to be nazi music from the Third Reich. Well, of course it does. What did you expect? ### Roger ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) Date: 27 Oct 2005 18:52:41 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > > > Here's a good source for well researched information that Ray and I > > > both have turned to in our moments of doubt and pain-- > > > http://www.opinionjournal.com/ > > > > Carlisle, I have repeatedly demonstrated to you where an > > opinionjournal.com that you cited a couple of days ago was factually > > incorrect. What part of this do you still not understand? > > "OpinionJournal.com is not the same thing as WJS editorials - > OpinionJournal.com has a much wider range of voices than just the > notoriously right-wing WSJ editors." > Ray, this is a quote from you on October 20th. WSJ editorials are one part of OpinionJournal.com, and they are not "well-research information" - they are disinformation. The non-WSJ editorial essays at OpinionJournal.com are a mixed bag - how much "well researched information" they contain depends on the author. OpinionJournal.com is a mixed bag of disinformation, opinion, and fact. To believe that an essay is "well researched information" merely because it is published at OpinionJournal.com is folly, and WSJ editorials are proof. HTH, Ray ------------------------------ From: "Cozmik Charlie T" Subject: Re: anyone see mickey hart last nite? Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:56:18 -0700 "Alex Scartun" wrote in message news:__d8f.9545$Zv5.2057@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net... > i didn't think so.... > > lol! ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: Thank you, Mr. Postman Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:37:29 -0400 Richard Morris wrote: > > "ba ba booie" wrote in message > news:5242-43613885-340@storefull-3274.bay.webtv.net... > > Thank you, Mr. Postman > > jrmorris@trouserscomcast.net (Richard Morris) wrote: > I sent some discs to..... > > bbb wrote: > I got them, did you get yours? > > booie........ > > I think so, booie ... I sent stuff to both you and TEd, and someone sent me > back something. Not sure who, though > > :) > > R. I haven't been to the post office in a couple days, but am planning on heading there in the morning. Now, I'm really looking forwad to my trip... =o) ~Ted ------------------------------ From: A Dude Subject: Fillmore 69 Box Set vs 2004 Archive SHN Versions ? Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:00:00 GMT Hi ! I was just wondering if there are known to be any substantive differences between the limited 10 disk Fillmore 69 Box Set and the previously available SHN downloads at Archive/Etree (that were pulled some months ago) ?? Were both made from the same tapes, or were there better quality tapes in the vault that were not used for the Archive/Etree downloads ? Thanks, A ------------------------------ From: n9ck@earthlink.net Subject: Re: Fillmore 69 Box Set vs 2004 Archive SHN Versions ? Date: 27 Oct 2005 19:16:22 -0700 Well, substantive is in the ear of the beholder, but I believe any time you can get a commercially released recording, it is gonna be better. ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) Date: 27 Oct 2005 19:25:23 -0700 Ray wrote: > Carlisle wrote: > > > > Here's a good source for well researched information that Ray and I > > > > both have turned to in our moments of doubt and pain-- > > > > http://www.opinionjournal.com/ > > > > > > Carlisle, I have repeatedly demonstrated to you where an > > > opinionjournal.com that you cited a couple of days ago was factually > > > incorrect. What part of this do you still not understand? > > > > "OpinionJournal.com is not the same thing as WJS editorials - > > OpinionJournal.com has a much wider range of voices than just the > > notoriously right-wing WSJ editors." > > Ray, this is a quote from you on October 20th. > > WSJ editorials are one part of OpinionJournal.com, and they are not > "well-research information" - they are disinformation. > > The non-WSJ editorial essays at OpinionJournal.com are a mixed bag - > how much "well researched information" they contain depends on the > author. > > OpinionJournal.com is a mixed bag of disinformation, opinion, and fact. > To believe that an essay is "well researched information" merely > because it is published at OpinionJournal.com is folly, and WSJ > editorials are proof. > > HTH, > Ray OpinionJournal & the WSJ are generally reliable sources. The paper is run by human beings and mistakes will be made. In the grand scheme of things, the WSJ has a distinguished reputation among the mainstream media, notwithstanding that the *official* editorials have a conservative pro-business slant. I mean, it IS the Wall Street Journal. Not your cup of meat apparently, but far from a "rag of disinformation". The thing you seem to be hung up on right now is the the Journal stated that Valerie Plame was not "covert". By this I assumed they meant>>on assignment, overseas, and/or in harm's way. They did not make that point clear enough. If it turns out that they were mistaken, they will need to make a public correction or their reputation will suffer and they will lose subscribers. It's that simple. Carrie "We always did feel the same we just saw it from a different point of view..." ------------------------------ From: "Roger" Crossposted-To: cz.zamestnani.hledam Subject: Re: Grateful Dead sounds like Adolf Hitler & Joseph Goebbels ! Date: 27 Oct 2005 19:34:27 -0700 Gerry Lintonice wrote: > Yes, seems to be nazi music from the Third Reich. Well, of course it does. What did you expect? ### Roger ------------------------------ From: "Roger" Subject: Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) Date: 27 Oct 2005 19:47:14 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Ray wrote: > > Carlisle wrote: > > > > > Here's a good source for well researched information that Ray and I > > > > > both have turned to in our moments of doubt and pain-- > > > > > http://www.opinionjournal.com/ > > > > > > > > Carlisle, I have repeatedly demonstrated to you where an > > > > opinionjournal.com that you cited a couple of days ago was factually > > > > incorrect. What part of this do you still not understand? > > > > > > "OpinionJournal.com is not the same thing as WJS editorials - > > > OpinionJournal.com has a much wider range of voices than just the > > > notoriously right-wing WSJ editors." > > > Ray, this is a quote from you on October 20th. > > > > WSJ editorials are one part of OpinionJournal.com, and they are not > > "well-research information" - they are disinformation. > > > > The non-WSJ editorial essays at OpinionJournal.com are a mixed bag - > > how much "well researched information" they contain depends on the > > author. > > > > OpinionJournal.com is a mixed bag of disinformation, opinion, and fact. > > To believe that an essay is "well researched information" merely > > because it is published at OpinionJournal.com is folly, and WSJ > > editorials are proof. > > > > HTH, > > Ray > > OpinionJournal & the WSJ are generally reliable sources. The paper is > run by human beings and mistakes will be made. In the grand scheme of > things, the WSJ has a distinguished reputation among the mainstream > media, notwithstanding that the *official* editorials have a > conservative pro-business slant. I mean, it IS the Wall Street Journal. > Not your cup of meat apparently, but far from a "rag of > disinformation". The thing you seem to be hung up on right now is the > the Journal stated that Valerie Plame was not "covert". By this I > assumed they meant>>on assignment, overseas, and/or in harm's way. They > did not make that point clear enough. If it turns out that they were > mistaken, they will need to make a public correction or their > reputation will suffer and they will lose subscribers. It's that > simple. > Carrie Editorials are opinion pieces, and I doubt the WSJ will apologize or correct any unsubtantiated claims made on their editorial page. The distinction you seem to have trouble with is that of fact vs opinion. The WSJ's actual reporting is first-rate. Their editorial page twists and distorts whatever facts necessary to substantiate their opinion. Ray is right, it's not just bias, it's actual distortion and lies. The WSJ is not alone in this, other papers do the same to one degree or another. Just take the editorial page with a very large grain of salt. Roger ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: shes gone Date: 27 Oct 2005 19:50:51 -0700 Richard Morris wrote: > "Carlisle" wrote in message > news:1130421738.080299.189100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > Richard Morris wrote: > >> "Carlisle" wrote in message > >> news:1130419894.096239.316340@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > >> > My first reaction was to laugh. > >> > Her nomination deserved the drubbing it got. > >> > Nominate someone of stature, substance and a paper trail... > >> > Not a crony, a quota pick or a person totally devoid of opinions on > >> > constitutional matters. At least, let's have a real debate. > >> > Harriet Miers-that was pathetic. > >> > word. > >> > >> What conclusions do you draw about Bush from his supreme court > >> nominations? > >> > >> R. > > > > 1)How bad am I going to have to talk about our President in order to > > satisfy you?! ;-() > > 2)You feeling any better, Richard?? Seriously, ((((get well)))). . . > > Run for the Roses. > > Carrie > > I don't care if you talk bad about him ... I just want you to think about > how he defines himself though his actions, and who he is. > > As for the rest, thank you so much for your good wishes. I am diabetic. I > control what I eat very strictly, and it is all designed to reduce blood > sugar levels. As a result, I have been experiencing uricemia for about the > last two months, which causes gout: deposits of uric acid crystals in the > joint which bring on an autoimmune kind of arthritic response. The law of > unintended consequences has body slammed me. Very painful. So I am kind of > caught between a rock and a hard place. If the thunder don't get you, the > lightning will ... and I can't go forward and I can't go back. > > I decided to compromise and take medication to control the gout. I hate > that. > > More than you wanted to know, eh? > > But thank you so much, just the same. > > R. your welcome, R... My dear cousin got Type 1 diabetes as a young child and I've learned through him the toll it takes. take it easy, Carrie ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .