From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #679 Dead-Flames Digest #679, Volume #48 Wed, 26 Oct 05 12:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: My 10-22-2005 Steve Kimock experience. (brew ziggins) Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong (leftie) Re: cheney = traitor (leftie) Re: moe. mule-- a micro review (Kelly Humphries) Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("Ray") Re: cheney = traitor (DG) Re: moe. mule-- a micro review ("Olompali4") Re: moe. mule-- a micro review (Kelly Humphries) Re: cream bt ("GemAmber") Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) (Kelly Humphries) Re: OK, They've Gone Too Far Now (NDC) (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Kelly Humphries) Re: "God" is great (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: cheney = traitor ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: cheney = traitor ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: cream bt (kpnnews@yahoo.com) Re: cheney = traitor (kpnnews@yahoo.com) Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("Ray") Re: cheney = traitor ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: (NDC) I Think the Chicago White Sox....... ("Rick L") Re: rhino fillmore compilation (DB) Re: cheney = traitor (leftie) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Ray") Re: Condi v Hillary 2008? ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: cheney = traitor (JC Martin) Re: cheney = traitor (leftie) Re: cheney = traitor (leftie) Re: rhino fillmore compilation ("mr rapidan") Re: moe. mule-- a micro review (JC Martin) Re: cream bt (JC Martin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: My 10-22-2005 Steve Kimock experience. Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:01 -0400 Thus spake no@spam.com... > ba ba booie wrote: > > > All the time I was thinking if this guy might have slipped someting in > > my drink. That was going through my mind for a bit. > > > > I mean seriously, if somone offers you a beer that you never met before > > and he goes and gets the beer with out you seeing him, do you drink the > > beer? > > > > I mean, it is one of the chances that I rarely take. Why did I take the > > chance? > > > > The guy was set up right next to me. > > We were talking for a bit. I was studying his character. He seemed like > > a nice fellow. But you never know. > > > > Are people still sliping *Mickeys* in drinks these days. I hear of > > things happening like this. It just makes me concerned thats all. > > This from a guy who once reported having followed a pretty gal into a > stall in the women's room and snorted a fat line of... he has no idea > what... without asking first! ;-) "booie" and "sound judgement" are not very well aquainted. -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:32:42 -0700 Ray wrote: > Sparky the Wonder Dog wrote: > >>Rick you trolling sack of scumbag shit. I don't argue with >>anti-Semites. > > > So asking you a question that you refuse to answer now makes the person > who asks the question an 'anti-Semite'?!? > > Keep digging your hole, Sparky. Guys, please don't feed the Wonder Troll. ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:35:33 -0700 JC Martin wrote: > I'd put large sums of money up to bet that Cheney won't be indicted. > It's a left wing pipe dream, let's face it. Many of us would love to > see it, but it ain't gonna happen. It's a left-wing pipe dream... that US News and World Report attributes to "government officials and advisers." http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/051018/18whwatch.htm ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: moe. mule-- a micro review Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:37:32 -0700 Also sprach "neurodancer" : > joker4153@comcast.net wrote: > > > Local color: walking back to the car, passing an alley we notice some > > guy getting a blow job. Laughing at that, we look up and nearly bump > > into Al Schnier, one of moe.'s guitarists, standing outside his hotel > > lobby at 5th and Mission. No connection between these random events > > that I'm aware of. Just life in the big city. > > Great review, thanks. So Al was getting a blowjob in an SF alley? That's not what he wrote. ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 26 Oct 2005 10:37:27 -0700 Sparky the Wonder Dog wrote: > However, for disinterested readers I invite them to read prior posts > and determine for themselves whether Rick's repeated McCarthyite > accusations of "dual loyalty" have not. in fact, been answered > repeatedly They have not, in fact, been answered at all. Are you an Israeli citizen, Sparky? Since you claim to have served in the IDF that is far from a remote possibility. > --but the clown is free to repeat his "have you stopped > beating your wife" accusation until the cows come home. This, from a guy who writes: "Ray, are you going to stop making excuses for Islamic terrorism first or stop subordinating American foreign policy to the dictates of Arab shieks first?" Keep digging your hole Sparky. Ray ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:43:02 -0700 JC Martin wrote: >leftie wrote: >> Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> >> > Its a small potatoes crime >> >>> regarding knowingly leaking a covert agent's name (which she was >>> not--it was no secret what she did---sit behind a Washington desk >>> shuffling papers). >> >> >> You keep repeating the Republican contention that Plame was not a covert >> agent, but if it was true the CIA wouldn't have demanded the >> investigation and/or the grand jury would have been disbanded ages ago. > > > >I think he's saying that she wasn't in the field necessarily. A covert op in a foreign country is in the field. >I contend >that there would be no investigation if she wasn't classified as a >covert agent though. There wouldn't be a crime. What do these scummy guys do in that case? >It's really up to the CIA to decide this, not >political spinsters. And given that Plame's neighbors apparently didn't >know what her job was, it seems she was indeed keeping her status >confidential. btw, who sent poison letters to democrats? ------------------------------ From: "Olompali4" Subject: Re: moe. mule-- a micro review Date: 26 Oct 2005 10:43:50 -0700 > Personally, I'd rather listen to nonsense lyrics than hearing a band try > to write legitimate songs without the talent to do so Complete opposite here. Anyone can write nonsense. Too much art is throwaway because few want to try for "legitmate." ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: moe. mule-- a micro review Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:45:26 -0700 Also sprach "Neil X." : > joker4153 wrote: > > > I've been seeing moe. since 1997 and have > > never seen a moe. gig I didn't like...a lot. > > Amazing. I've never seen a .moe show that wasn't, IMO, numbingly bad. > When it comes to jambands, I'm pretty much a bottom feeder, I can find > something of value in most of them. But Rusted Root and .moe, I just > don't get it. Rusted Root: never seen 'em that I know of, so if I *have* seen 'em before, they apparently didn't impress me. moe.: Seen 'em maybe 3 or 4 times, always fun. I suppose I could yammer about tight musicianship, rhythm, sense of humor and whatnot, but more likely it's just as Neil says, one of those "different strokes" things. ------------------------------ From: "GemAmber" Subject: Re: cream bt Date: 26 Oct 2005 10:50:21 -0700 So, who's jumping on this to offer up for the challenged??? just curious..... ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: what political Blogs do you read? (nDc) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:54:08 -0700 Also sprach "Steve Terry" : > rec.music.gdead *heh* HRYK. Why go to other websites when it all gets forwarded here eventually?#### I'm not much into reading blogs for the redeeming social value, which probably explains the appeal of wonkette.com. Locally, I've also pretty much given up on reading the "letters to the editor" section of the newspaper, because it's become a rehash of whatever chain mail is being passed around this week or repeated ad nauseum on talk radio. At least the editorial columns, for the most part, can demonstrate usage of facts and supporting evidence. ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: OK, They've Gone Too Far Now (NDC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:35:57 -0400 tim_ratdog wrote: > > The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed how some of BushCo's most vocal buttmonkeys > > (Buck, Chunk, Shelby, and even crazy ol' Marky Williams) have grown > > unusually quiet over the past month or so? > > Bad form. This is like saying (while on the road) "gee my car hasn't > broken down in a while" :-) Not really. It's pointing out that people who were fervently defending something that was blatantly bad have suddenly shut their pieholes now that the rest of the country is discovering that the "sore losers" just may have been correct all along. http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=19757 > > I guess it must be pretty embarrassing to be a republican these days... > > Only if folks feel like keeping the divide in the country and possibly > making it worse. I personally don't feel that the Republican voters are > responsible for the crimes committed by the administration. Rather than > rub a smelly "I told you so" in anyone's face I think we need to talk > about dealing with criminal politicians. Whoever voted for Bush and Cheney last year certainly deserves some of the blame for the current state of affairs. It's not like people hadn't been pointing out the foolish/insane/criminal stuff the current administration's been doing since day one, but instead of doing a bit of independent research to find out what might really be happening, the boneheads I listed above (and others of their ilk) chose to jam their fingers another knuckle deeper into their earholes while parroting whatever crap the White House (and their flunkie "news" agencies like Fox and newsmax) was squeezing out. A lot of people *have* been trying to talk about the criminal politicians since 2000, but there were a large number of people who refused to even consider the possibility that they voted for the wrong party (I believe a lot of people voted for the party, not the candidate). Thankfully, that number's getting smaller as it's becoming increasingly difficult to justify the arrogance, stupidity, and greed that have become the Bush administration's hallmark. So, given that...a few big, brown, smelly, peanut-filled "I told you sos" are to be expected. Maybe the residual stink will help remind them to be a bit smarter when deciding who to vote for in 2008. ~Ted (who's not affiliated with any political party) ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:03:46 -0700 Also sprach Tom Beck : > Ben wrote: > > > By the same token, I have ridden in the back of the cab and felt the > > contempt of the cabbie because he had waited at the airport 3 hours > > for a fare and I wasn't going more than 10 miles. > > > > It's not my fault he waited at the airport for 3 hours - maybe there > > are too many cabbies to begin with. > > No. He chose to play the airport rather > than answer radio calls (which I always > preferred). "You makes your choices, you > takes your chances" was a common saying > back when I did it. And, no, there are > not too many cabbies. Try out that saying > on a cold, blustery Friday night which > happens to fall on the first day of the > month. Exactly. Cabbies who hang around the airport are hoping for the big trip to some far-flung suburb, but they know that it doesn't always work like that. Back in the early 90's when I drove a cab (for a total of about six months), I would sometimes park myself next to the blood bank and get whatever refrigerated packages were being sent to area hospitals. It was usually enough to pay the nut and keep my income steady, and sometimes I'd get a nice trip to Tacoma or Olympia. The real benefit was that padded mailers filled with blood packs would never argue about the route I was taking, or pull out a gun instead of money. And if by chance a driver got the "beans run," (taking some old lady and her six bags of groceries about four blocks), the dispatcher would put that driver back at the top of the list for whatever call came next when it was done. Just depends on how the individual driver wants to play it. ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: "God" is great Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:39:26 -0400 Tim Ujin wrote: > > I thoroughly enjoyed the Cream show last night. Clapton sounded > fabulous, in some ways better than ever. [...] For $200+ per ticket, he *should* have sounded great. Hell, for that price, he should have laid down onstage and let all the male audience members teabag him.during his solos... ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:34:08 -0700 "Seth Jackson" wrote in message news:fqevl1tq81o4976kr1tljq0q98hbl240jq@4ax.com... > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:13:40 -0700, "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" > wrote: > >> >>> The outing of a CIA agent is the thread that can be pulled to open up >>> the whole "lies for war" campaign. >> >>No one in the world outside left wing blogs will believe it or care about >>it. Its way too small an issue to have any such traction in and of >>itself. >> >>You're dreaming. > You're joking, right? If the Vice President were to be indicted, you > honestly believe the nation wouldn't sit up and take notice? Sure they would. They would also sit up and take notice if the sky was yellow and the sun was blue. But neither image comes to pass without ingesting psychedelics first. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:36:28 -0700 "JC Martin" wrote in message news:IWO7f.1014$te3.16602@typhoon.sonic.net... > And given that Plame's neighbors apparently didn't know what her job was, > it seems she was indeed keeping her status confidential. Only her hairdresser knew for sure. EGBH ------------------------------ From: kpnnews@yahoo.com Subject: Re: cream bt Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:13:40 -0700 GemAmber wrote: > So, who's jumping on this to offer up for the challenged??? > > just curious..... I saw it, but I had to make a decision since my hard drive was nearing full capacity. I opted for a 72 McCoy Tyner show a la the Atlantis period. I think I made a wise choice. Kurt ------------------------------ From: kpnnews@yahoo.com Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:15:31 -0700 Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:IWO7f.1014$te3.16602@typhoon.sonic.net... > > > And given that Plame's neighbors apparently didn't know what her job was, > > it seems she was indeed keeping her status confidential. > > Only her hairdresser knew for sure. That's pretty funny, really. Madge? Kurt ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:17:04 -0700 leftie wrote: > Guys, please don't feed the Wonder Troll. I don't think he's a troll. He's delusional if he thinks he's winning any converts with his 'anti-semite' accusations and the like, certainly, but I don't think he's a troll. Sparky might however be anti-Israeli right-wing. Because delusional pro-Isreali right-wing characteratures who accuse those who disagree with them and their pro-settlement agenda of being 'anti-Semites' and terrorist apologists and the like do nothing to help the Israeli-right agenda, but instead undermine it. Which is to say that Sparky may intentionally be digging his own hole. Which makes sense - after all, he's a dog. Ray __________________ "How can you possibly expect immigration from Western liberal democrats when what you project through the settlements is the kind of aggressive lack of consideration of minority rights and all kinds of other things which tarnish the image of Israel and can only encourage anti-Semitism abroad? Because the way you treat your minorities is how Jewish minorities will be treated. What right will we American Jews have to claim to be treated well as a minority?" So this Gush Emunim [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gush_Emunim ] guy smiled from ear to ear. "Sir," he said, "you don't understand what you're saying. Anti-Semitism is the means through which massive aliya [immigration] will come, so if we can contribute by enabling you in the West to see all the anti-Semites around you, it will encourage you to emigrate... That is what we want." (Thomas Friedman, "From Beirut to Jerusalem", p 467) ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:35:44 -0700 "leftie" wrote in message news:djoc8b$24iu$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > > > Its a small potatoes crime >> regarding knowingly leaking a covert agent's name (which she was not--it >> was no secret what she did---sit behind a Washington desk shuffling >> papers). > You keep repeating the Republican contention that Plame was not a covert > agent, but if it was true the CIA wouldn't have demanded the investigation > and/or the grand jury would have been disbanded ages ago. They're investigating; there will probably be some indictments. That doesn't change the inherent small potates nature of the leak case, no matter what this half-retired desk jockey's status was. This is about as big a scandal as Bert Lance. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Rick L" Subject: Re: (NDC) I Think the Chicago White Sox....... Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:24:34 -0700 Another night of great Sox ------------------------------ From: DB Subject: Re: rhino fillmore compilation Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:21:16 -0400 mr rapidan wrote: > I've looked on deaddisc, I've looked at the dead store, I've searched > the rmgd archives, and I just can't find the show sources for the 3 > disc rhino compilation. I know I've seen it! Could someone please > help!? Thanks! > It's in the "pre-sale" section of the GDstore. DB ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:25:38 -0700 kpnnews@yahoo.com wrote: > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > >>"JC Martin" wrote: >> >>>And given that Plame's neighbors apparently didn't know what her job was, >>>it seems she was indeed keeping her status confidential. >> >>Only her hairdresser knew for sure. > > That's pretty funny, really. Madge? You're soaking in it. ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:27:20 -0700 JC Martin wrote: > Excerpt from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9824067/: > > > Interviews include agent's neighbors > Fitzgerald has been in Washington since Monday and over the last two > days dispatched FBI agents to conduct some 11th-hour interviews, > according to lawyers close to the investigation, who spoke on condition > of anonymity because of the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. > > One set of interviews occurred in the neighborhood of Bush > administration critic Joseph Wilson, whose wife Valerie Plame was outed > as an undercover CIA officer. Agents asked neighbors whether they had > any inkling that Plame works for the CIA. > > "They wanted to know how well we knew her, which is very well," said > neighbor David Tillotson. "Did we know anything about her position > before the story broke? Absolutely not." > ------------------- > > > But she really wasn't covert! #### :-P You mean that the WSJ editorial page, the National Review, Rush Limbaugh, and other right-wing propaganda organs were LYING when they repeatedly insisted that she was definitely not a covert agent? I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you. Ray ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: Condi v Hillary 2008? Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:30:48 -0700 wrote in message news:1130344363.586183.156800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> wrote in message >> news:1130340819.108824.276380@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> >> > And what does not being married have to do with it? >> >> The primitive religionists will interpret that as being a lesbian. >> >> A black lesbian with a fancy college education. >> >> That pretty much rules her out as a Republican presidential candidate. > I don't think they would mind her having an advanced degree. George W. > Bush not only has an advanced degree, but an Ivy League advanced > degree, and not just any Ivy League advanced degree, but a Harvard MBA. But Bush is obviously as stupid as the American Taliban, no matter what school he skated through. Rice is obviously very bright; a smart, well educated, black (lesbian?) member of the east (and west) coast elite who goes to churches where blacks were bombed by good ole boys instead of a church where snakes are handled and strychine drunk. > But instead of arguing about whether or not Condi could get elected or > reading Dick Moris' book, why not just look at the polls? What do they tell us? EGBH ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:34:44 GMT leftie wrote: > JC Martin wrote: > >> I'd put large sums of money up to bet that Cheney won't be indicted. >> It's a left wing pipe dream, let's face it. Many of us would love to >> see it, but it ain't gonna happen. > > > It's a left-wing pipe dream... that US News and World Report attributes > to "government officials and advisers." > > http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/051018/18whwatch.htm I read that story already. US News and World Report pretty piss poor in terms of accuracy in my book and I see no other source that implies Cheney would resign OR be indicted. It ain't gonna happen leftie. You wanna lose some money on this or something? -JC ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:36:52 -0700 Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > "leftie" wrote: >>You keep repeating the Republican contention that Plame was not a covert >>agent, but if it was true the CIA wouldn't have demanded the investigation >>and/or the grand jury would have been disbanded ages ago. > > They're investigating; there will probably be some indictments. > > That doesn't change the inherent small potates nature of the leak case, no > matter what this half-retired desk jockey's status was. We'll just have to agree to disagree. To me, this investigation is the public face of a behind the scenes war between the intelligence gathering agencies and the administration that began when BushCo tried to blame the CIA for 9/11, and really picked up steam when BushCo "discarded entire reams" of data provided to them when they cooked the intel to drum up support for the Iraq invasion. That they of all people would out a CIA agent for political gain is just beyond the pale. ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: cheney = traitor Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:37:39 -0700 JC Martin wrote: > leftie wrote: > >> JC Martin wrote: >> >>> I'd put large sums of money up to bet that Cheney won't be indicted. >>> It's a left wing pipe dream, let's face it. Many of us would love to >>> see it, but it ain't gonna happen. >> >> It's a left-wing pipe dream... that US News and World Report >> attributes to "government officials and advisers." >> >> http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/051018/18whwatch.htm > > I read that story already. US News and World Report pretty piss poor in > terms of accuracy in my book and I see no other source that implies > Cheney would resign OR be indicted. It ain't gonna happen leftie. You > wanna lose some money on this or something? Fitzmas is Friday. Let's just wait and see. ------------------------------ From: "mr rapidan" Subject: Re: rhino fillmore compilation Date: 26 Oct 2005 11:38:34 -0700 DB wrote: > mr rapidan wrote: > > I've looked on deaddisc, I've looked at the dead store, I've searched > > the rmgd archives, and I just can't find the show sources for the 3 > > disc rhino compilation. I know I've seen it! Could someone please > > help!? Thanks! > > > > It's in the "pre-sale" section of the GDstore. > > DB Well, I think they removed the darn source info! I do think that this is where I saw it, previously, but I can't find it now. Here's what's there (or at least this is what I found): (so I'm still looking for the proper info!) Track listing Disc One 1 Morning Dew 11:05 (Rose, Dobson) 2 Good Morning Little Schoolgirl 11:00 (Williamson) 3 Doin' That Rag 6:56 (Garcia, Hunter) 4 I'm A King Bee 7:31 (Moore, Arr. By Grateful Dead) 5 Cosmic Charlie 6:02 (Garcia, Hunter) 6 Turn On Your Lovelight 19:09 (Scott, Malone) Disc Two 1 Dupree's Diamond Blues 4:48 (Garcia, Hunter) 2 Mountains Of The Moon 4:52 (Garcia, Hunter) 3 Dark Star > 19:43 (Garcia, Kreutzmann, Lesh, McKernan, Weir, Hart, Hunter) 4 St. Stephen > 7:51 (Garcia, Lesh, Hunter) 5 The Eleven > 15:13 (Lesh, Hunter) 6 Death Don't Have No Mercy 9:58 (Davis) Disc Three 1 That's It For The Other One 23:30 Cryptical Envelopment (Garcia) The Other One (Kreutzmann, Weir) Cryptical Envelopment (Garcia) 2 Alligator > 4:00 (McKernan, Hunter) 3 Drums > 6:52 (Hart, Kreutzmann) 4 Jam > 25:31:00 (Grateful Dead) 5 Caution (Do Not Stop On Tracks) > 9:13 (Grateful Dead) 6 Feedback > 7:54 (Grateful Dead) 7 We Bid You Goodnight 2:01 (Trad. Arr. By Grateful Dead) ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: moe. mule-- a micro review Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:40:46 GMT Olompali4 wrote: >>Personally, I'd rather listen to nonsense lyrics than hearing a band try >>to write legitimate songs without the talent to do so > > > Complete opposite here. > Anyone can write nonsense. > Too much art is throwaway because few want to try for "legitmate." Phish wrote nonsense lyrics, yet their compositions were sophisticated, hooky and as an improvising unit, they were a cut above the rest in their field. If you can't write good lyrics, please don't try. That doesn't elevate art. And then there's Zappa. Not exactly a world class lyricist. -JC ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: cream bt Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:41:39 GMT kpnnews@yahoo.com wrote: > GemAmber wrote: > >>So, who's jumping on this to offer up for the challenged??? >> >>just curious..... > > > I saw it, but I had to make a decision since my hard drive was nearing > full capacity. I opted for a 72 McCoy Tyner show a la the Atlantis > period. I think I made a wise choice. Solo or full band? -JC ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .