From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #661 Dead-Flames Digest #661, Volume #48 Mon, 24 Oct 05 16:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: Ocktoberfest jam!!!!! ("volkfolk") Re: Listen to the new Garcia plays Dylan disc here! (fogdog) Re: It's not dead. It's pining for the fjord. (leftie) Re: Ocktoberfest jam!!!!! ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Ray") Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) (Wayne) Re: (NDC) Album/Box Set Review - Miles Davis - The Cellar Door Sessions (John Metzger) Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Brian Beuchaw) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Ray") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("pbleers@hotmail.com") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Carlisle") Re: (NDC) Album/Box Set Review - Miles Davis - The Cellar Door Sessions (JC Martin) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Ray") Re: ANyone now why The Dead didn't tour last Spring or Summer? ("Richard Morris") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Carlisle") jams you enjoy other than gdead (fogdog) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) (JC Martin) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Ray") Re: jams you enjoy other than gdead ("RickNBarbInSD") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "volkfolk" Subject: Re: Ocktoberfest jam!!!!! Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:28:16 -0400 "Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message news:1130157889.008723.267630@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > volkfolk wrote: >> This past Saturday night, I had the distinct pleasure of finally having >> the >> opportunity to make music with our own Iron Muffin. >> >> The Place: Neil X's Octoberfest party (More specificly the room where >> green >> leave substances were turned into carbon molecules >> >> Boy did I (we?) have fun!!!!!!! >> >> I will leave it to others to determine the quality of the music, but I >> sure >> did have a good time. Snorkey is one hell of a great guy. It was a >> pleasure >> to finally meet him. >> >> More details to follow. > > I'm so bummed that I wasn't able to attend this soiree and meet the > Muffin man (and many others) for myself, but family obligations > prevented me from doing the Jamaica Plain shuffle....damn! Yeah you are. It was quite a little shindig. Piles of Pork, Perrogies, Bratwurst and many adult beverages. The company didn't suck either. > Did Neil end up naked and passed out in the living room again? Unfortunately Jane developed a migraine, and we left before Neil lost his pants Scot > Mark > ------------------------------ From: fogdog Subject: Re: Listen to the new Garcia plays Dylan disc here! Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:25:59 -0400 imsjry wrote: > This is so sweet! > > http://music.aol.com/songs/new_releases_full_cds.adp > The default page I got was a full length "destiny's child". I thought this was some sort of sick joke. ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: It's not dead. It's pining for the fjord. Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:38:32 -0700 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > Debbie Reynolds, Britain's chief veterinary official, told reporters Well at least we now know what Debbie Reynolds is up to these days. ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: Ocktoberfest jam!!!!! Date: 24 Oct 2005 13:39:19 -0700 volkfolk wrote: > "Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message > news:1130157889.008723.267630@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > > volkfolk wrote: > >> This past Saturday night, I had the distinct pleasure of finally having > >> the > >> opportunity to make music with our own Iron Muffin. > >> > >> The Place: Neil X's Octoberfest party (More specificly the room where > >> green > >> leave substances were turned into carbon molecules > >> > >> Boy did I (we?) have fun!!!!!!! > >> > >> I will leave it to others to determine the quality of the music, but I > >> sure > >> did have a good time. Snorkey is one hell of a great guy. It was a > >> pleasure > >> to finally meet him. > >> > >> More details to follow. > > > > I'm so bummed that I wasn't able to attend this soiree and meet the > > Muffin man (and many others) for myself, but family obligations > > prevented me from doing the Jamaica Plain shuffle....damn! > > Yeah you are. It was quite a little shindig. Piles of Pork, Perrogies, > Bratwurst and many adult beverages. The company didn't suck either. > > > Did Neil end up naked and passed out in the living room again? > > Unfortunately Jane developed a migraine, and we left before Neil lost his > pants Normally it happens the other way around. Mark ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:04:26 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > They got arrogant and played hardball. All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? Ray ------------------------------ From: TunedInDude@webtv.net (Wayne) Subject: Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:52:27 -0700 The Man With the X-Ray Eyes The Cool and the Crazy Duel The Pusher Breezy Go Ask Alice The Game ------------------------------ From: John Metzger Subject: Re: (NDC) Album/Box Set Review - Miles Davis - The Cellar Door Sessions Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:08:12 GMT JC Martin wrote: > No, but Pat makes the logical point. Holland is probably one of the top > 5 jazz bassists in the musical form's history. Henderson isn't much a > jazz player at all. And comparing Holland to Lesh is just plain dumb. > > -JC Oy, sorry about that. My browser jammed, and it didn't look like those messages were going through......oh well. ------------------------------ From: Brian Beuchaw Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:15:59 +0000 (UTC) grtflmark wrote: > [snip] > However, the > point remains - drug testing DOES catch people who have used "recently" > AS WELL AS people who came to work or are working "under the influence" > its not true that these programs are designed to "mostly" catch people > for "past use". Metabolites from pot can be detected a long time after use (long time being up to 4 weeks and that's not really "recently"), and there's almost no other drug that is detectable that long after use (Google for it if you want backup data). That would indicate to me that drug tests *can* and *do* catch people for past use, even though they may not be *designed* to do that. Cokeheads can abstain for a few days and they're safe, as can alcoholics, and probably crackheads, meth users, etc., but for pot smokers, it's a whole different bag (no pun intended). So if you smoke one joint and take a drug test 2 weeks later, you could test dirty even if that was the only joint you smoked in that whole year, and that dirty drug test gives no indication of your job performance (past, present, or future). brian -- If you want to reply to this message by mail, you will have to change the reply address to beuchaw@beuchaw.net ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:28:55 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Rush is an entertainer...he gets is stuff from others, namely the WSJ, > National Review, Cato, Heritage Foundation, AEI and the White House. > Write that down. The man is given too much credit, really. Ditto THAT! Really. So if you think Limbaugh is just an entertainer, and his radio show/propaganda has no significant influnce on the electorate, then why do you think that Cheney called Rush on-air to defend the Miers nomination, saying amongst other things that Limbaugh should trust him on this one? Also, why then do you think that top Republican luminaries heap praise upon Limbaugh for his influence on the electorate? __________________________ Dear Rush, Thanks for all you're doing to promote Republican and conservative principles. Now that I've retired from active politics, I don't mind that you have become the Number One voice for conservatism in our Country. I know the liberals call you "the most dangerous man in America," but don't worry about it, they used to say the same thing about me. Keep up the good work. America needs to hear the way things ought to be. Sincerely, Ron [Reagan] __________________________ "When Rush Limbaugh talks, you know you're listening to the real world." - Bob Dole "[Limbaugh] has had a profound impact on conservative thinking in America... He says things other people are afraid to say. As an opinion maker and thinker he is very intelligent and, like Ronald Reagan, a very effective communicator. There are many days when I think he's doing a lot more good than the Republicans in the Senate are doing." - Phil Gramm "He's certainly out there carrying his fair share. I'd say he's leading the charge right now... I know the Republican Party listens to him. He's got the pulse of our rank and file." - Dan Quayle "[Limbaugh] is doing to the culture what Ronald Reagan did to the political movement. He tells his audience that what you believe inside you can talk about in the marketplace. People were afraid of censure by gay activists, feminists, environmentalists - now they are not because Rush takes them on. And he does it with humor. We have a reputation as somewhat prim and priggish, and Rush is absolute death to liberals: a conservative with humor." - William Bennett _______________________ Limbaugh isn't merely an entertainer at the fringes of the Republican Party - he's a propagandist at the center of it. Ray ________________________ "Limbaugh, more than anyone, is responsible for beginning what might be called the Coulterization of the American right. Conservatism as partisan sport--the opposite of principled, ideological debate--has become major entertainment and helped debase much right-aisle political debate into an undifferentiated noise of team-rooting." - David Skinner, assistant managing editor at the conservative Weekly Standard ------------------------------ From: "pbleers@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:29:45 -0700 * Carlisle, you ignorant slut! How DARE you....HOW dare you mock my upbringing! Just because I grew up in a Peyote commune on Maui is NO reason to pass judgement. While YOU were stuffing your face with Froot Loops and watching Magilla Gorilla cartoons, I was tending to the button fields and attending tantric yoga sessions at Crater Head....DONT judge me on that! I was devouring Solzhenitsayn's "Gulag Archipelago" by flashlight, while YOU were most likely pleasuring yourself to the Fonzi poster on your trailers bedroom wall! Since your new to this chat group, I have VERY little to go on concerning you....from the posts I've seen, I imagine you an acne riddled teenager...leg braces from a bout with polio... a bed sheet fashioned into a grotesque excuse for a mu mu... Your goal in life to be a guest on the Jerry Springer Show... I decided against posting this on RMGD....you dont MERIT a public responce from us....so this will be the 1st and LAST interaction with you! Now if you will EXCUSE me, a wheat grass colonic awaits! Good DAY miss! Sweetbac Productions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. I've admitted to being easily amused before.....and this really tickled me. My smirk is ear to ear. ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:30:07 -0700 Ray wrote: > Carlisle wrote: > > They got arrogant and played hardball. > > All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all > indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert > CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you > didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the > responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not > see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? > > Ray No, I haven't changed my perspective. The law should be enforced...I'll quote from the WSJ/Opinion Journal today: "In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA consultant to accuse the Bush Administration of lying about Iraq WMD as an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President campaign...Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush Administration officials fought back. One way they did this was to tell reporters that Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst *Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true-though Mr. Wilson denied it at the time-as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee documented in 2004" *"Ms. Plame was surely not undercover, and her own husband had essentially made her 'outing' inevitable when he exploited his own CIA consulting status to inject himself into the middle of a presidential campaign."-from same piece 10/24/05 Any of that off the mark? May the rule of law prevail over politics. Carlisle ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: (NDC) Album/Box Set Review - Miles Davis - The Cellar Door Sessions Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:45:49 GMT John Metzger wrote: > > > JC Martin wrote: > > No, but Pat makes the logical point. Holland is probably one of the top > >> 5 jazz bassists in the musical form's history. Henderson isn't much a >> jazz player at all. And comparing Holland to Lesh is just plain dumb. >> >> -JC > > > > Oy, sorry about that. My browser jammed, and it didn't look like those > messages were going through......oh well. No problem. In a broader sense, all of Miles's electric period has elements of funk and rock in it, which is why is turned off a lot of jazz fans way back when. The jazz elite deemed it not sophisticated enough. In some ways that's true. But taken on its own merit, this is some very dynamic and complex band interplay. The heads or abstract lines are really cool too. Miles had a way with coming up with simple little themes that presented a unique environment for improvisation to take place. And free of harmonic cages, Miles's playing was as strong as it ever was. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 14:53:13 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Ray wrote: > > Carlisle wrote: > > > They got arrogant and played hardball. > > > > All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all > > indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert > > CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you > > didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the > > responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not > > see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? > > > > Ray > > No, I haven't changed my perspective. The law should be enforced...I'll > quote from the WSJ/Opinion Journal today: > "In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA > consultant to accuse the Bush Administration of lying about Iraq WMD as > an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson > became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President > campaign...Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush Administration > officials fought back. One way they did this was to tell reporters that > Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst *Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in > getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true-though Mr. Wilson > denied it at the time-as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence > Committee documented in 2004" > *"Ms. Plame was surely not undercover, and her own husband had > essentially made her 'outing' inevitable when he exploited his own CIA > consulting status to inject himself into the middle of a presidential > campaign."-from same piece 10/24/05 > Any of that off the mark? Yes, starting off with the very first sentence, which is a lie. If you disgree, then re-read Wilson's July 2003 essay, which I've already posted in this thread. As you can see if you actually read Wilson's essay, it did not accuse Bush Administration of lying but instead merely raised the possibility. This disinformation was published in, not suprisingly, a WSJ editoral. Did I mention that the WSJ editorial page is a rag? There are things that are not "on the mark" as well, including most importantly the declaration that Plame "was surely not undercover" - which is another lie. If you disagree, then substantiate how it is known that Plame "was surely not undercover" - thanks. You are far too credulous re- what you read in right wing rags, Carlisle - you're being playing played. Ray ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: ANyone now why The Dead didn't tour last Spring or Summer? Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:53:53 -0700 "BVT" wrote in message news:1130181278.887237.280650@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > no Don...that was you...and the sign read "line forms at rear"..now get ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > back to sucking up to Latvala's corpse you crusty old fool! > IAAHSWYPII? R. ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:11:40 -0700 Ray wrote: > Carlisle wrote: > > Ray wrote: > > > Carlisle wrote: > > > > They got arrogant and played hardball. > > > > > > All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all > > > indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert > > > CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you > > > didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the > > > responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not > > > see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? > > > > > > Ray > > > > No, I haven't changed my perspective. The law should be enforced...I'll > > quote from the WSJ/Opinion Journal today: > > "In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA > > consultant to accuse the Bush Administration of lying about Iraq WMD as > > an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson > > became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President > > campaign...Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush Administration > > officials fought back. One way they did this was to tell reporters that > > Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst *Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in > > getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true-though Mr. Wilson > > denied it at the time-as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence > > Committee documented in 2004" > > *"Ms. Plame was surely not undercover, and her own husband had > > essentially made her 'outing' inevitable when he exploited his own CIA > > consulting status to inject himself into the middle of a presidential > > campaign."-from same piece 10/24/05 > > Any of that off the mark? > > Yes, starting off with the very first sentence, which is a lie. If you > disgree, then re-read Wilson's July 2003 essay, which I've already > posted in this thread. As you can see if you actually read Wilson's > essay, it did not accuse Bush Administration of lying but instead > merely raised the possibility. > > This disinformation was published in, not suprisingly, a WSJ editoral. > Did I mention that the WSJ editorial page is a rag? > > There are things that are not "on the mark" as well, including most > importantly the declaration that Plame "was surely not undercover" - > which is another lie. If you disagree, then substantiate how it is > known that Plame "was surely not undercover" - thanks. >From what I've heard on Hardball with Chris Matthews> it was not a secret that Mrs. Valerie Plame-Wilson worked for the CIA. With that said, if Bush Administration officials got arrogant & disregarded the letter of the law, then they should pay. Don't we agree here? > > You are far too credulous re- > Carlisle - you're being playing played. It won't be the first time, Brother Ray. > Ray cpc ------------------------------ From: fogdog Subject: jams you enjoy other than gdead Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:14:13 -0400 I got blind faith's self-titled album with the chick on the front of it and man its a rockin' album. Does anyone have any other recommendations for hard rocking albums much like this? ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:19:44 GMT Carlisle wrote: > Ray wrote: > >>Carlisle wrote: >> >>>Ray wrote: >>> >>>>Carlisle wrote: >>>> >>>>>They got arrogant and played hardball. >>>> >>>>All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all >>>>indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert >>>>CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you >>>>didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the >>>>responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not >>>>see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? >>>> >>>>Ray >>> >>>No, I haven't changed my perspective. The law should be enforced...I'll >>>quote from the WSJ/Opinion Journal today: >>>"In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA >>>consultant to accuse the Bush Administration of lying about Iraq WMD as >>>an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson >>>became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President >>>campaign...Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush Administration >>>officials fought back. One way they did this was to tell reporters that >>>Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst *Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in >>>getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true-though Mr. Wilson >>>denied it at the time-as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence >>>Committee documented in 2004" >>>*"Ms. Plame was surely not undercover, and her own husband had >>>essentially made her 'outing' inevitable when he exploited his own CIA >>>consulting status to inject himself into the middle of a presidential >>>campaign."-from same piece 10/24/05 >>>Any of that off the mark? >> >>Yes, starting off with the very first sentence, which is a lie. If you >>disgree, then re-read Wilson's July 2003 essay, which I've already >>posted in this thread. As you can see if you actually read Wilson's >>essay, it did not accuse Bush Administration of lying but instead >>merely raised the possibility. >> >>This disinformation was published in, not suprisingly, a WSJ editoral. >>Did I mention that the WSJ editorial page is a rag? >> >>There are things that are not "on the mark" as well, including most >>importantly the declaration that Plame "was surely not undercover" - >>which is another lie. If you disagree, then substantiate how it is >>known that Plame "was surely not undercover" - thanks. > >>From what I've heard on Hardball with Chris Matthews> it was not a > secret that Mrs. Valerie Plame-Wilson worked for the CIA. With that > said, if Bush Administration officials got arrogant & disregarded the > letter of the law, then they should pay. Don't we agree here? Yeah, and we should blame Kerry and Edwards for Iraq because the Bush administration misled America. ### Rap yo head in that conundrum. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:26:45 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Ray wrote: > > Carlisle wrote: > > > Ray wrote: > > > > Carlisle wrote: > > > > > They got arrogant and played hardball. > > > > > > > > All indications suggest as much, yes. In this case, however, all > > > > indications suggest "playing hardball" included the outing of a covert > > > > CIA officer. Carlisle, earlier in this thread you stated that you > > > > didn't see why the outing of Plame was a big deal. After reading the > > > > responses here, including Marcinkowski's testimony, do you still not > > > > see what the big deal is, or have you changed your perspective on this? > > > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > No, I haven't changed my perspective. The law should be enforced...I'll > > > quote from the WSJ/Opinion Journal today: > > > "In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA > > > consultant to accuse the Bush Administration of lying about Iraq WMD as > > > an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson > > > became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President > > > campaign...Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush Administration > > > officials fought back. One way they did this was to tell reporters that > > > Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst *Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in > > > getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true-though Mr. Wilson > > > denied it at the time-as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence > > > Committee documented in 2004" > > > *"Ms. Plame was surely not undercover, and her own husband had > > > essentially made her 'outing' inevitable when he exploited his own CIA > > > consulting status to inject himself into the middle of a presidential > > > campaign."-from same piece 10/24/05 > > > Any of that off the mark? > > > > Yes, starting off with the very first sentence, which is a lie. If you > > disgree, then re-read Wilson's July 2003 essay, which I've already > > posted in this thread. As you can see if you actually read Wilson's > > essay, it did not accuse Bush Administration of lying but instead > > merely raised the possibility. > > > > This disinformation was published in, not suprisingly, a WSJ editoral. > > Did I mention that the WSJ editorial page is a rag? > > > > There are things that are not "on the mark" as well, including most > > importantly the declaration that Plame "was surely not undercover" - > > which is another lie. If you disagree, then substantiate how it is > > known that Plame "was surely not undercover" - thanks. > > From what I've heard on Hardball with Chris Matthews it was not a > secret that Mrs. Valerie Plame-Wilson worked for the CIA. Hardball with Chris Matthews has guests on who lie and disinform on the program all the time - Cheney lying about alleged Iraq/al-Qaeda connections, for instance. Like I said, if you disagree, then SUBSTANTIATE how it is known that Plame "was surely not undercover" - all you are doing here is echoing the highly-effective right-wing echo chamber. All indications, in fact, suggest the contrary - Plame was a covert operative. These indications include the fact that it was the CIA who requested a federal investigation into her outing, and the fact that a federal investigation has been going on for 2 years as a result. Granted, there *might* be some other explanation for these events, but FROM WHAT WE KNOW RIGHT NOW that is not the case. Plame was "surely not undercover"?!? There's no there there, Carlisle. You are being played. Stop being so credulous - especially re- sources like the WSJ editorial page that rourtinely distort and lie. Look for SUBSTANCE. > With that > said, if Bush Administration officials got arrogant & disregarded the > letter of the law, then they should pay. Don't we agree here? Sure. Do you in turn agree that, if Plame was a covert operative and the Bush Administration outed her, that that is a big deal? > > You are far too credulous re- > > Carlisle - you're being played. > > It won't be the first time, Brother Ray. I showed you right here where the WSJ editorial page lied to you (and everyone, FTM). Doesn't that disgust you, and make you less inclined to believe them in the future? Ray ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: jams you enjoy other than gdead Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:28:57 -0700 fogdog wrote: > I got blind faith's self-titled album with the chick on the front of it > and man its a rockin' album. Does anyone have any other recommendations > for hard rocking albums much like this? This album is truly one of a kind, BUT If you like this I would try some of these: Disraeli Gears ~ Cream Layla ~ Derek & Dominos The Low Spark Of High-Heeled Boys ~ Traffic Rick ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .