From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #651 Dead-Flames Digest #651, Volume #48 Sun, 23 Oct 05 14:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: Review - Susan Tedeschi @ Irving Plaza ("Eli Renfro") Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) ("Ego Rancher") Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm (crashedlevee@yahoo.com) Re: Double Slim Line Jewel Cases Question.......{NDC}.. ("Rupert") Re: Jefferson Starship show? ("Rupert") Jerry`s acid park tee shirt ~ ("Jay") Re: Review - Susan Tedeschi @ Irving Plaza ("Schmoe") Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm (band beyond description) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Richard Morris") Re: Porky RIP ("Steve Terry") Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm ("Richard Morris") Re: Porky RIP ("Richard Morris") Re: any video capture freeware? (ndc) (band beyond description) Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Carlisle") Re: Porky RIP ("Dave Kelly") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Steve Lenier) Re: Double Slim Line Jewel Cases Question.......{NDC}.. ("The old geezer") Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("grtflmark") Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("grtflmark") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) ("grtflmark") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("Richard Morris") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) ("grtflmark") Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) ("Dave Kelly") Re: Jefferson Starship show? ("Dave Kelly") Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) ("Richard Morris") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (rosaleemcfall@hotmail.com) Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm ("minnehaha") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Ben) Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Steve Lenier) Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (Ben) Re: ANyone now why The Dead didn't tour last Spring or Summer? ("Nick's Picks") Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? (Steve Lenier) Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women ("RickNBarbInSD") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Eli Renfro" Subject: Re: Review - Susan Tedeschi @ Irving Plaza Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:53:33 -0400 > FWIW, Irving Plaza pours one helluva > healthy cocktail too! All for a healthy nine bucks a pop. ------------------------------ From: "Ego Rancher" Subject: Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) Date: 23 Oct 2005 08:55:13 -0700 Monty Python's Holy Grail . . . when on a natural high only of course ------------------------------ From: crashedlevee@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm Date: 23 Oct 2005 09:14:23 -0700 that price is insane. ------------------------------ From: "Rupert" Subject: Re: Double Slim Line Jewel Cases Question.......{NDC}.. Date: 23 Oct 2005 09:33:22 -0700 Definately am-dig.com! I've been shopping there for the past six years, and they have everything. Double CD and DVD cases, triple cases...the list goes on. Most items are available in a variety of colors and features. If they're out of stock on anything you'll get a phone call the same day. Great company. ------------------------------ From: "Rupert" Subject: Re: Jefferson Starship show? Date: 23 Oct 2005 09:35:38 -0700 Yeah, we all wanna see Geraldine kick DK's ass! I'm bringin' the camcorder and the still camera. ------------------------------ From: "Jay" Subject: Jerry`s acid park tee shirt ~ Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:21:22 -0400 anyone have a link or pic of that shirt off the play on Jurassic park ? Jay ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Re: Review - Susan Tedeschi @ Irving Plaza Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:28:41 -0400 Eli Renfro wrote: >> FWIW, Irving Plaza pours one helluva >> healthy cocktail too! > > All for a healthy nine bucks a pop. You're right but they were like doubles so I think of it more like $4.50 a pop. Meanwhile, other city bars charge the same nine bucks for single shot drink. ------------------------------ From: band beyond description <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 02:37:34 +0900 On 2005-10-23 12:16:02 +0900, "seraphim" said: > http://namm.harmony-central.com/SNAMM05/Content/Ibanez/PR/BWM1BS.html one more left of the 15 limited edition geetars as of Sept. 23: http://namm.harmony-central.com/SNAMM05/discussion/display.html?cid=6702&thread=5146&start_id=4591 -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:37:41 -0700 "Carlisle" wrote in message news:1130074508.988782.166000@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... snip > Hey R, > Mkay. > If any laws were broken even if there is no way that national security > and/or anyone's personal safety was at stake, then due punishment > should be applied. The perps should take their lumps. The rule of law > is the rule of law. How's that for reasonin' y'all?! > peace & awe, > Carlisle > Okay, now that is just half the pie though. The other half is, how do you feel about an administration that would use these kind of tactics, which appear to be unlawful (we will know after the jury makes a decision), in order to discredit someone who was critical of their propoganda machine? Remember, this was about yellow cake uranium, weapons of mass destruction, and the reasons we invaded Iraq. Remember that? Reason that, please. Richard ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:37:37 -0500 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:5vh6f.5090$BZ5.3743@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > > "Steve Terry" wrote in message > news:djc4sp$25k3$1@news.iquest.net... > >> I'm an Alfalfa man myself. His work on It's A Wonderful Life was >> brilliant, BRILLIANT I say. > > * Steve....you ignorant slut! > Late period "Alfalfa" is generally dismissed by most credible > "Our Gang" cognoscenti....he peaked too early by most > acounts with the classic "Mush & Milk"episode... > after that, he fell back on past glories... > Listen, man...if you want to set up a trade for that new > Dicks Picks '72 philly show, thats fine...when I get that > from you, I would rather you NOT contact me again!... > I choose NOT to have correspondence from the > "Alfalfa" carpetbagger contingent! > I decided to contact you directly....that lame Grateful Dead > chat group does NOT need to know our binniss. > > Sweetbac Productions It appears that we will just have to agree to disagree on this debate, but I think we can find some common ground here. I know it's hard to compare teams from different eras, but would you concur that the Little Rascals in their prime would have done dominated the '85 Bears? ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:40:54 -0700 "band beyond description" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:3s202tFm17hfU1@individual.net... > On 2005-10-23 12:16:02 +0900, "seraphim" said: > >> http://namm.harmony-central.com/SNAMM05/Content/Ibanez/PR/BWM1BS.html A quote from the site: " The explanation for the multitude of switches on the recreation also comes from what Bob Weir wanted in the Cowboy Fancy models. Said Jeff Hasselberger in an online reply as to the origins of the guitar: "We made a couple of the 'cowboy' models with a number of switching combos that were constantly going under the surgeon's soldering iron. Basically, Bob wanted as much flexibility of pickup selection as we could deliver. So he had a choice of single coils, series humbuckers, parallel humbuckers, phase reversals and so on. We also used the standard Artist EQ system on at least one of them." And the irony is that he was often so low in the mix as to be virtually undetectable. ;) R. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:42:33 -0700 "Steve Terry" wrote in message news:djgi3a$hm4$1@news.iquest.net... > > "Dave Kelly" wrote in message > news:5vh6f.5090$BZ5.3743@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... >> >> "Steve Terry" wrote in message >> news:djc4sp$25k3$1@news.iquest.net... >> >>> I'm an Alfalfa man myself. His work on It's A Wonderful Life was >>> brilliant, BRILLIANT I say. >> >> * Steve....you ignorant slut! >> Late period "Alfalfa" is generally dismissed by most credible >> "Our Gang" cognoscenti....he peaked too early by most >> acounts with the classic "Mush & Milk"episode... >> after that, he fell back on past glories... >> Listen, man...if you want to set up a trade for that new >> Dicks Picks '72 philly show, thats fine...when I get that >> from you, I would rather you NOT contact me again!... >> I choose NOT to have correspondence from the >> "Alfalfa" carpetbagger contingent! >> I decided to contact you directly....that lame Grateful Dead >> chat group does NOT need to know our binniss. >> >> Sweetbac Productions > > It appears that we will just have to agree to disagree on this debate, but > I think we can find some common ground here. I know it's hard to compare > teams from different eras, but would you concur that the Little Rascals in > their prime would have done dominated the '85 Bears? '85 Bears??? That is nothing ... They sure as hell would have dominated the Bush administration. R. ------------------------------ From: band beyond description <123@456.com> Subject: Re: any video capture freeware? (ndc) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 02:49:52 +0900 On 2005-10-23 21:27:52 +0900, "AwolfOutWest69" said: > > vitr9415@aol.com wrote: >> Hey all, >> I'm looking for a video capture program which does for video what cdwav >> editor does for audio? Any ideas? thanks. >> -tomv > > I'm not familiar with cdwav, but VirtualDub is a very popular capture > and editing program. And it is free. Check out the forums and guides > at www.doom9.org and www.videohelp.com for help with proper usage. > > HTH > awow69 any similar advice for Mac users? those programs are for Windows... what I'd really like to be able to do is convert .avi to SVCD or DVD, for free or cheaply with a Mac. -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 23 Oct 2005 11:11:49 -0700 Richard Morris wrote: > "Carlisle" wrote in message > news:1130074508.988782.166000@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > snip > > > Hey R, > > Mkay. > > If any laws were broken even if there is no way that national security > > and/or anyone's personal safety was at stake, then due punishment > > should be applied. The perps should take their lumps. The rule of law > > is the rule of law. How's that for reasonin' y'all?! > > peace & awe, > > Carlisle > > > > Okay, now that is just half the pie though. > > The other half is, how do you feel about an administration that would use > these kind of tactics, which appear to be unlawful (we will know after the > jury makes a decision), in order to discredit someone who was critical of > their propoganda machine? > > Remember, this was about yellow cake uranium, weapons of mass destruction, > and the reasons we invaded Iraq. Remember that? > > Reason that, please. > > Richard Well Richard since you want to make me out to be the poster child for the "vast right-wing conspiracy", I'll answer like this. They got arrogant and played hardball. It's not just republicans or conservatives that this happens to. "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely."...You want a scandle?! You're getting it with the weekly casualty lists that come back from Iraq. Did you remember that I was against our invasion and occupation of Iraq?? IMHO, it was/is not in our national interest and it sets a bad precedent. Howard Dean rightly criticized both Kerry and Edwards for voting to give the "Bush propaganda machine" the authorization to do this. But alas at the time, Bush's poll numbers were very high. It's a shame. I hope for the best possible outcome for the Bush dream now, if only for the fallen soldiers and so their sacrifice won't be in vain. Good DAY, sir- CPC ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:57:00 GMT "Steve Terry" wrote in message news:djgi3a$hm4$1@news.iquest.net... > It appears that we will just have to agree to disagree on this debate, but > I think we can find some common ground here. I know it's hard to compare > teams from different eras, but would you concur that the Little Rascals in > their prime would have done dominated the '85 Bears? Hmmm....a 1937 Spanky Vs. William Refridgerator Perry? In the Paint, I'm gonna HAVE to give it to Spanks. Fridge aint got a 3 shot. Point blank. Spanky Vs. Meadowlark Lemon?...tough call. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:18:14 -0700 Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) From: Steve Lenier in article 1130016121.584032.79540@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, scarletbgonias@hotmail.com at scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote on 10/22/05 2:22 PM: > I had to take a drug test, not for work, but for life insurance. I told > my agent (who is a Deadhead) that I thought I'd fail because I had just > recently seen a show and I smoked. He said not to worry. The insurance > lab technician then came to my job, gave me a specimen container and > asked for a sample. I totted off to the ladies room while she stayed at > the security desk. Passed with flying colors. When they called with the > results, I asked what they were looking for and they said cocaine or > any of the hard stuff. Minimum levels of pot was not a problem to them. > > Theresa > Seriously? I recently got life insurance too, my agent (a friend) said I should make sure I went THREE MONTHS without *anything* because the blood test goes back that far. So we scheduled my appointment for three months later, and all went fine. Steve ------------------------------ From: "The old geezer" Subject: Re: Double Slim Line Jewel Cases Question.......{NDC}.. Date: 23 Oct 2005 12:47:03 -0700 Thanx!!! The old geezer NP: Mojave Plain - Tangerine Dream ------------------------------ From: "grtflmark" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 23 Oct 2005 12:52:25 -0700 >GRT: you're joking about Gitmo prisoners having full POW >Geneva protections and even more? Should my sarcastic meter >be on? no - I'm not joking READ Barr;s testimony and LEARN something >POWs cannot >be interrogated Bullshit! - you're all wet! >--they only give rank and serial number. Al Qaeda has none of >that--part of the problem-- your statement is unvelievably wrong - POW's CAN most certainly BE interrogated - the fact that the prisoner is only REQUIRED by the Geneva Conventions to give n, r, and sr - does NOT preclude the jailers from interrogating them NOR the prisoners from giving MORE that n, r, and sr. >but one could not infer sparky: you're not qualified to infer - read Barr's testimony: he IS from the Geneva Conventions POW >protections were those afforded to Al Qaeda, that members of Al Qaeda could be interrogated for any other purpose. My understanding is that some of these guys were messed with. (I may have sent another post on this). POWs cannot be subjected to forced nudity, extremes of temperature, prolonged questioning following sleep deprivation, etc. ......... your statments are so weaved with inaccuracies and dissembling that there is no way to respond at all..... ------------------------------ From: "grtflmark" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 23 Oct 2005 12:54:24 -0700 >This leads me to assume that Al Qaeda could theoretically >change its behavior and be considered "lawful combatants". ....... don't assume, when you assume you make an ass out of you and, well - you...... your ass-umption is wrong, pal ------------------------------ From: "grtflmark" Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 23 Oct 2005 12:58:33 -0700 >so - your point is not only dumb - it's flat wrong....... >Unfortunately, most drug testing is by piss test, so you are not >only dumb, you are flat out wrong ......uhhhhhh - piss tests ALSO catch people who have used that day - AND the "Standard" "drug test" is usually a breathalyzer AND a piss test - it's the law in many states that you must administer both if you initiate a "drug test" program: otherwise you are discriminating......SOOO - you're not only FLAT WRONG And DUMB - you're fuckin' stupid - but the, that's not surprising ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:01:40 -0700 "Carlisle" wrote in message news:1130091109.084412.193270@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... snip > Well Richard since you want to make me out to be the poster child for > the "vast right-wing conspiracy", I'll answer like this. They got Eh? I posed a general question. You elected yourself to answer it. So if anyone made you a poster child, it was you. > arrogant and played hardball. It's not just republicans or > conservatives that this happens to. "Power corrupts, absolute power > corrupts absolutely."...You want a scandle?! You're getting it with the > weekly casualty lists that come back from Iraq. Did you remember that I > was against our invasion and occupation of Iraq?? IMHO, it was/is not > in our national interest and it sets a bad precedent. Howard Dean > rightly criticized both Kerry and Edwards for voting to give the "Bush > propaganda machine" the authorization to do this. But alas at the time, > Bush's poll numbers were very high. It's a shame. I hope for the best > possible outcome for the Bush dream now, if only for the fallen > soldiers and so their sacrifice won't be in vain. > Good DAY, sir- Bush dream? I wonder what that is/was .... You can divide gummint policy into foreign policy and domestic policy. Please tell me in which area of the two, Bush is making a positive difference, and cite a specific or two. Otherwise, my question remains ... what does it take for conservative types to come to the conclusion that their boy Bush is a disaster? R. ------------------------------ From: "grtflmark" Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:04:19 -0700 >so - your point is not only dumb - it's flat wrong....... >Unfortunately, most drug testing is by piss test, so you are not >only dumb, you are flat out wrong >.....uhhhhhh - piss tests ALSO catch people who have used that day - AND the "Standard" "drug test" is usually a breathalyzer AND a piss test - it's the law in many states that you must administer both if you initiate a "drug test" program: >otherwise you are discriminating...... ......ANOTHER reason that both are typical - is to eliminate aruments about one method or the other being "inaccurate" ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:05:34 GMT "The Harlem GlobeTrotters on Gilligans Island" from 1981 ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Jefferson Starship show? Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:10:19 GMT "Rupert" wrote in message news:1130085338.760977.174570@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Yeah, we all wanna see Geraldine kick DK's ass! I'm bringin' the > camcorder and the still camera. * HAH!....you kids and your weed! You REALLY wanna party?....I'll hook ALL you fools up with a nice DMT enema! Yer gonna forget ALL about your pin joints! Geraldeen WHO? I garontee! ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: The best stoner movie (NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:18:50 -0700 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:i2S6f.6674$7h7.6508@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > "The Harlem GlobeTrotters on Gilligans Island" > from 1981 oooo! You have that on DVD by any chance? Can ya hook a brother up? ------------------------------ From: rosaleemcfall@hotmail.com Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:37:35 -0700 Steve: I didn't give blood, just peed in their specimen cup. I've always been leary of giving life insurance companies blood because they could be looking to do some genetic testing to see what could possibly be creeping around in there. Perhaps I'm just to much of a skeptic. Theresa ------------------------------ From: "minnehaha" Subject: Re: Bob Wier Ibanez guitar hmmm Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:43:28 -0400 > And the irony is that he was often so low in the mix as to be virtually > undetectable. ;) The best rhythm guitarist is the one you never hear. Think about that one for a minute. ------------------------------ From: Ben Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:44:41 -0700 On 23 Oct 2005 12:58:33 -0700, "grtflmark" wrote: >>so - your point is not only dumb - it's flat wrong....... > >>Unfortunately, most drug testing is by piss test, so you are not >only dumb, you are flat out wrong > >.....uhhhhhh - piss tests ALSO catch people who have used that day - True, but there is no way to distinguish between the 2, unless you are talking only about the drug, alcohol. And if you REALLY need a piss test to tell that someone came to work drunk, there's a huge problem right there. Their poor performance alone should be enough reason to fire them - no need to actually prove that they were drinking on the job. >AND the "Standard" "drug test" is usually a breathalyzer AND a piss >test - I've never heard of that being standard anywhere, not by cops who arrest people on suspicion of DUI or by employers testing their employees. >it's the law in many states that you must administer both if you >initiate a "drug test" program: Could you name at least one and/or possibly provide a link stating so? I do know someone who has done pre-employment tests in Texas, Arizona, Florida and California and it has ALWAYS been urine only - never a breath test. I've known a few people who have been arrested for DUI as well, and in none of those cases were they ever urine tested. A breath test was deemed sufficient to convict them, and in most cases it was. >otherwise you are >discriminating...... How so? And how do they reconcile that a piss test shows positive for marijuana, but a breath test (or saliva or blood test) does not? That seems like they're just asking for trouble. >SOOO - you're not only FLAT WRONG And DUMB - you're >fuckin' stupid - but the, that's not surprising Damn, you are one hateful person. I think your employer might want to look into a hate and/or anger testing program - then again, you don't need a test to see that - I'm sure it shines through in your day to day work quite clearly. ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:44:40 -0700 And Tremors is on right now on AMC. Came on at 4. The kid is watching it while I cook dinner: roasted taragon chicken and a black angus top round roast, with onions and carrots. The potatoes are cooking on the stove and will be smashed in about 45 minutes. Man is it starting to smell real good in the kitchen. It's also warming up the house; I'll be damned if I turn the furnace on yet. I'm hungry... Theresa ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:47:36 -0700 Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) From: Steve Lenier in article 1130099855.710655.324040@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, rosaleemcfall@hotmail.com at rosaleemcfall@hotmail.com wrote on 10/23/05 1:37 PM: > Steve: > > I didn't give blood, just peed in their specimen cup. I've always been > leary of giving life insurance companies blood because they could be > looking to do some genetic testing to see what could possibly be > creeping around in there. Perhaps I'm just to much of a skeptic. > > Theresa > This was my first time ever looking into life insurance, I did what I was told to get through the process. I peed in a cup too, but they also stuck a needle in my arm. I've had so much blood taken in the last 6 months or so (since my kidney stone/hospital adventure) I didn't think twice about it. if they looked, I must not have anything too creepy creeping. Steve ------------------------------ From: Ben Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:16 -0700 On 23 Oct 2005 13:37:35 -0700, rosaleemcfall@hotmail.com wrote: >Steve: > >I didn't give blood, just peed in their specimen cup. I've always been >leary of giving life insurance companies blood because they could be >looking to do some genetic testing to see what could possibly be >creeping around in there. Perhaps I'm just to much of a skeptic. > I didn't notice that he said blood test - I've never heard of a blood test being capable of detecting anything for more than a couple of days. I've also never heard of a urine test being able to detect anything besides marijuana (and a few rarely abused prescription medicines) beyond a week, and usually it's much less than that. >Theresa ------------------------------ From: "Nick's Picks" Subject: Re: ANyone now why The Dead didn't tour last Spring or Summer? Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:50:17 -0700 Steve Terry wrote: > ...and the number one reason...because without Jerry, they suck! HRYK..unfortunately. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:51:37 -0700 Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? From: Steve Lenier in article 1130100280.535417.37080@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, scarletbgonias@hotmail.com at scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote on 10/23/05 1:44 PM: > And Tremors is on right now on AMC. Came on at 4. The kid is watching > it while I cook dinner: roasted taragon chicken and a black angus top > round roast, with onions and carrots. The potatoes are cooking on the > stove and will be smashed in about 45 minutes. Man is it starting to > smell real good in the kitchen. It's also warming up the house; I'll be > damned if I turn the furnace on yet. > > I'm hungry... > > Theresa > geeez, delicious chicken AND high quality roast, onions, carrots and mashed taters, in a nice warm home. Not too bad of a set-up :) When I lived in Iowa a friend of mine lived in a very small apartment and saved a LOT on heating by leaving his oven door open after cooking. Steve (not hungry after just having scrambled eggs with ham and an onion bagel with cream cheese) ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:56:48 -0700 naught@nil.com wrote: > My favorite: The Man With the X-Ray Eyes with Ray Milland. YOU called it!!!! YOU win the prize!!!! What a classic "B" flick!!! Rick ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: 23 Oct 2005 13:59:14 -0700 Roger wrote: > The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > > > > You once were cute and clever > > Now you're shitty and dull > > I don't love you anymore > > I wanna crush your skull > > > > -Elvis Hitler > > > > > I used to love her > But I had to kill her > I knew I'd miss her > So I had to keep her > She's buried right in my backyard > -G'n'R > > Roger Because I used to love her But It's all over now!!!!!! ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .