From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #637 Dead-Flames Digest #637, Volume #48 Fri, 21 Oct 05 18:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: Porky RIP ("Dave Kelly") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: "Jefferson Airplane Galactic Reunion" ("Dave Kelly") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("Steve Terry") 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Tony & Beth") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Richard Morris") Re: Porky RIP (Ben) Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Tony & Beth") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Richard Morris") Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Tony & Beth") Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org ("Dave Kelly") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:54:42 GMT Gordon "Porky" Lee's movies were a MAJOR influence on my youth....and served as a road map on my way to finally becoming a man. NOBODY rocked a pin wheel hat...AND got the chicks like "Porky" When he bounced the screen, he had me at "Otay" I will be in seclusion until further notice. ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:57:17 -0700 I guess we're members of the geek squad, fer shur. Of all the expanded editions, LoTR The Two Towers is probably my favorite. Much better movie than the theater version (also more Boramir). Theresa ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:00:27 -0700 scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote: > I guess we're members of the geek squad, fer shur. Of all the expanded > editions, LoTR The Two Towers is probably my favorite. Much better > movie than the theater version (also more Boramir). > > Theresa http://www.geocities.com/thak98/nerd.wav Rick ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:04:13 -0700 SHIT!!! See if this works: http://www.geocities.com/colosseum/7652/comic6.wav Rick ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:09:09 -0700 scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote: > I guess we're members of the geek squad, fer shur. Of all the expanded > editions, LoTR The Two Towers is probably my favorite. Much better > movie than the theater version (also more Boramir). > > Theresa Yup. Seriously speaking I agree. The expanded versions are better in the case of all three. Galadriel's gifts and all that. Damn, my geekiness is REALLY showing now. Thanks!! : / ;D Rick ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:13:00 -0700 Nope. T ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: "Jefferson Airplane Galactic Reunion" Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:13:53 GMT "JC Martin" wrote in message news:LO66f.255$te3.4880@typhoon.sonic.net... > Last time I saw JS with Darby was in Santa Cruz at the 'Capitalist'. She > used to be in a local band at the time called World Entertainment War. > What a cutie she was. But as good as she was, she t'ain't no Grace in her > prime. But in her defense, no one really is. * I gotta agree with Jay here...NO one can come close to Grace. In her prime, Grace had it ALL....she could sing her ass off.. was COMPLETELY sexy as hell...smart....funny....these other broads are merely shadows of grace. I gotta say though, that the other chick singer in this version of the Starship is one SEXY goddamn lady....Diana Mangano.....my GOODNESS! > > -JC > NP: Funkadelic - One Nation Under A Groove (in the morning no less!) ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:54:32 -0400 the wharf rat wrote: > > In article <1129929951.681043.193860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, > RickNBarbInSD wrote: > > > >Is not the cup that holds your wine the very cup that was > >burned in the potter's oven? > > > > Mine's Dixie. Paper and carnauba wax, and like the real subject of > our analogies a frail temporary creation of a man's mind that will leak > all over your shorts if you hold it for too long. > > I've had the blues > the reds and pinks > One thing's for sure: > Love stinks. You once were cute and clever Now you're shitty and dull I don't love you anymore I wanna crush your skull -Elvis Hitler BTW, I'm curious what newsgroup Joe's ex-love slave participates in. I'd love to read her side of what went down in ol' Mexico... ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:15:35 -0700 Dazed and Confused Sideways Raiders of the Lost Ark The Last Crusade Sabrina (got to get that chick flick in) Dumb and Dumber (just for the broken toilet scene - priceless) Theresa ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:16:12 -0700 I believe she's not internet saavy. Theresa ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:55:07 -0400 The Iron Muffin wrote: > > the wharf rat wrote: > > The Iron Muffin wrote: > > > > Ewww. > > > > Feeling sheepish? > > Nope. I just don't want to hear abour your love life. Why? Does it get your goat? ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:22:37 -0500 wrote in message: > An all day marathon of Little House on the Fairy... You cut me deep wit dat. ------------------------------ From: "Tony & Beth" Subject: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:31:18 GMT I was wondering if anyone has picked this up and would be willing to please b/p this show for me. I would appreciate anyone's help, as it's not on the archive (I don't know why). Please contact me via email. You will need to alter my email address a bit. Thank you for any help. NFA, Tony ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:31:29 -0700 Sorry Mr. Ingalls. Theresa ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:35:03 -0700 Tony, I have already downloaded it and can send it to you on the same disc as the 1972 show that I am gonna send you this weekend. R. "Tony & Beth" wrote in message news:qLf6f.1260$c4.1193@trndny03... >I was wondering if anyone has picked this up and would be willing to please >b/p this show for me. > > I would appreciate anyone's help, as it's not on the archive (I don't know > why). > > Please contact me via email. You will need to alter my email address a > bit. > > Thank you for any help. > > NFA, > Tony > > > > ------------------------------ From: Ben Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:37:29 -0700 On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:31:42 -0400, The Lord of Eltingville wrote: >Lee played one of the younger members in the "Our Gang" shorts in the >1930s, appearing in more than 40 of them from 1935 to 1939. Sounds like a career in porn these days. ------------------------------ From: "Tony & Beth" Subject: Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:39:10 GMT Now that was quick!! Thanks, Richard. I owe you twice now. Looks like that 72 I was gonna pass on thanks to you just got a buddy. Much, much, and much thank you, Richard. I'm very good in English. NFA, Tony "Richard Morris" wrote in message news:UvednRQOb5umFMTenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com... > Tony, I have already downloaded it and can send it to you on the same disc > as the 1972 show that I am gonna send you this weekend. > > R. > > > "Tony & Beth" wrote in message > news:qLf6f.1260$c4.1193@trndny03... >>I was wondering if anyone has picked this up and would be willing to >>please b/p this show for me. >> >> I would appreciate anyone's help, as it's not on the archive (I don't >> know why). >> >> Please contact me via email. You will need to alter my email address a >> bit. >> >> Thank you for any help. >> >> NFA, >> Tony >> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 17:45:20 -0700 I read this over on the Think Progress blog (the link below is from the original post on AlterNet) and, while skeptical, it's very interesting. It very well could be fiction, but an interesting read none the less. Hopefully we'll know something by the end of next week when the Grand Jury is dismissed. Theresa ======================================= http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/frel/27082/ I just got this e-mail from a Democratic House member's staffer with tons of good dirt on the Plame investigation. I'm reprinting it whole cloth to share all, and show that while these Hill staffers are well-informed, they sure could use some capitalization classes. Among the things I hadn't seen before: -Fred Flights, an assistant to John Bolton, is a named name who could be indicted. -Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been suggested as replacements for Dick Cheney. -Colin Powell told John McCain he showed the infamous memo with Plame's identity on it two just two people; Dick Cheney and George Bush. -Fitzgerald is looking at the precedent set from the indictment of Tricky Dick's veep Spiro Agnew to pursue against Cheney. That's red meat folks. Text of the e-mail: below, some extremely sensitive information about the impending conclusion of the valerie plame investigations. the sources include two senior members of senate and key staffers; counsel for individuals that have been called before the grand jury; and two journalists taking a lead position in investigating the case. the following represents a composite of the information from those sources. plamegate coming to conclusion. the investigation has focused mostly closely on vice president cheney and his staff, as well as us ambassador to the un (and former undersecretary of state for arms control) john bolton and his staff. we are told that eight indictments have already prepared, with the possibility of another ten. these indictments include senior white house staff, most notably vice president cheney's chief of staff scooter libby, fred flights (special assistant to john bolton), and--very surprisingly--national security adviser steve hadley. apparently, libby and hadley have both been told by their lawyers to expect indictments. the indictment of senior bush political advisor karl rove seems highly probable. most critically, a plea bargain process has evidently been opened with vice president cheney's lawyer. that does not mean that an indictment is coming. but i've some critical background around the issue. in the past several days, former secretary of state colin powell had a meeting with senator john mccain (R-AZ), primarily about the mccain-sponsored amendment on inserting a rider prohibiting torture onto the us defense budget (a bill which powell has himself been lobbying heavily for, against objections of president bush). during the meeting, powell recounted to the senator that he had traveled on air force one with bush and cheney, and brought to their attention a classified memorandum about the issue of whether there was indeed a transaction inolving niger and yellow cake uranium. the document included ambassador joe wilson's involvement and identified his wife, valerie plame, as a covert agent. the memorandum further stated that this information was secret. powell told mccain that he showed that memo only to two people--president and vice president. according to powell, cheney fixated on the wilson/plame connection, and plame's status. powell testified about this exchange in great length to the grand jury investigating the plame case. according to sources close to the case, powell appeared convinced that the vice president played a focal role in disclosing plame's undercover status. in his conversation with mccain, powell felt that--at a minimum--there would be a serious shakeup at national security council as a consequence. in particular, vice president cheney would no longer hold a pivotal role in us national security affairs. powell apparently did not discuss the potential of a cheney resignation. lead prosecutor patrick fitzgerald has apparently been looking at the precedent of formerly indicted nixon vice president spiro agnew. this shows the likely path, because addressing executive immunity and privilege questions would necessarily begin start with a plea-bargain deal that would entail a resignation. this is all likely to occur within the next week. 28 october (next friday) is the last day of the grand jury, and no requests have been made to extend their session. the investigator is expecting to wrap up by then. there are enormous implication for what would be the biggest white house shakeup since the iran-contra scandal in the reagan era. president bush's approval rating at 39% has already led to a significant decrease in policy efficacy with key legislators in congress. i'll spin out the broader policy implications when i have some time to write at greater length, but i wanted to get this out immediately. one interesting point though--it is worth noting that a parade of senior republican senators have evidently been privately pushing mccain to lobby to be cheney's replacement. senator lindsey graham (R-SC) has also been mentioned. meanwhile, the white house has already been developing countermeasures--notably including senior white house officials privately voicing president bush's disappointment in karl rove's involvement in the case, calling it "misconduct." an urgent search for a rove replacement is already underway. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:49:31 -0700 I will work on it this weekend ... get it out to you Monday. Two things gonna slow me down: one is I have a gig tomorrow night, but more importantly, there is some other tasty stuff up on bt etree, and I am pulling it in as I type. Will include that as well. R. "Tony & Beth" wrote in message news:OSf6f.35$Db7.29@trndny05... > Now that was quick!! > > Thanks, Richard. I owe you twice now. Looks like that 72 I was gonna > pass on thanks to you just got a buddy. > > Much, much, and much thank you, Richard. > > I'm very good in English. > > NFA, > Tony > > > > > "Richard Morris" wrote in message > news:UvednRQOb5umFMTenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com... >> Tony, I have already downloaded it and can send it to you on the same >> disc as the 1972 show that I am gonna send you this weekend. >> >> R. >> >> >> "Tony & Beth" wrote in message >> news:qLf6f.1260$c4.1193@trndny03... >>>I was wondering if anyone has picked this up and would be willing to >>>please b/p this show for me. >>> >>> I would appreciate anyone's help, as it's not on the archive (I don't >>> know why). >>> >>> Please contact me via email. You will need to alter my email address a >>> bit. >>> >>> Thank you for any help. >>> >>> NFA, >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ------------------------------ From: "Tony & Beth" Subject: Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:53:45 GMT Don't sweat it. You've been very kind and helpful, and I very much appreciate it. I'm in no hurry. And thank you for the extras! NFA, Tony "Richard Morris" wrote in message news:8eGdnaeC3JU5EcTenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com... >I will work on it this weekend ... get it out to you Monday. Two things >gonna slow me down: one is I have a gig tomorrow night, but more >importantly, there is some other tasty stuff up on bt etree, and I am >pulling it in as I type. Will include that as well. > > R. > > "Tony & Beth" wrote in message > news:OSf6f.35$Db7.29@trndny05... >> Now that was quick!! >> >> Thanks, Richard. I owe you twice now. Looks like that 72 I was gonna >> pass on thanks to you just got a buddy. >> >> Much, much, and much thank you, Richard. >> >> I'm very good in English. >> >> NFA, >> Tony >> >> >> >> >> "Richard Morris" wrote in message >> news:UvednRQOb5umFMTenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com... >>> Tony, I have already downloaded it and can send it to you on the same >>> disc as the 1972 show that I am gonna send you this weekend. >>> >>> R. >>> >>> >>> "Tony & Beth" wrote in message >>> news:qLf6f.1260$c4.1193@trndny03... >>>>I was wondering if anyone has picked this up and would be willing to >>>>please b/p this show for me. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate anyone's help, as it's not on the archive (I don't >>>> know why). >>>> >>>> Please contact me via email. You will need to alter my email address a >>>> bit. >>>> >>>> Thank you for any help. >>>> >>>> NFA, >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: 2/23/71 on bt.etree.org Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:57:38 GMT "Richard Morris" wrote in message news:8eGdnaeC3JU5EcTenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com... >I will work on it this weekend ... get it out to you Monday. Two things >gonna slow me down: one is I have a gig tomorrow night * Richard...I KNOW the $$ is good...But could you please consider giving some of the younger Chippendale Dancers a shot at the weekend bread?...maybe give you a chance to finally wash the construction worker outfit? Just a thought. Sweetbac Productions ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .