From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #636 Dead-Flames Digest #636, Volume #48 Fri, 21 Oct 05 17:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. ("Dave Kelly") Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. ("pookietooth") Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. ("uNjoyMiceElf") Re: Greg S. How was... ("Greg Sasso") Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. (leftie) Re: The Best Hangover Movie (supineinsd@gmail.com) Re: Greg S. How was... (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("Steve Terry") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women (the wharf rat) Re: Ol' Max gets after Pat Robertson (JC Martin) Re: Greg S. How was... ("Dave Kelly") Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) (JimK) Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women (the wharf rat) Re: An Announcement from Phil Lesh & Friends ("The Iron Muffin") Passionate what??? ("Richard Morris") Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women ("The Iron Muffin") Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: FEMA E-Mails ("Richard Morris") Re: FEMA E-Mails ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Ol' Max gets after Pat Robertson (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) ("dyrewlf") Re: Porky RIP (ba ba booie) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Porky RIP ("Dave Kelly") Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. Date: 21 Oct 2005 14:55:08 -0700 Dave Kelly wrote: > ...whats your name? Pigpen said it was alright. ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:57:33 GMT wrote in message news:1129931204.693654.310340@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > >BTW...whats your name? > > You misspelled "what are you wearing about now?" * Hey!....you gonna wash that Kimock shirt b4 the moe. gig tonite, old man? ------------------------------ From: "pookietooth" Subject: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. Date: 21 Oct 2005 15:04:18 -0700 DB wrote: > > All kidding aside, go back and listen to last year's Jammy Awards which > Phil hosted. John Mayer was surprisingly good. > > DB He's OK, but what's with all that mugging while he's playing? Looks like he's taking a painful dump. And seems like he's trying to pull off a 'bluesman' type image that I just don't buy. ------------------------------ From: "uNjoyMiceElf" Subject: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. Date: 21 Oct 2005 15:04:40 -0700 joker4153@comcast.net wrote: > Huh. So Ryan Adams is out for "personal reasons". Somebody--I forget > who-- said it here a week or so ago. And Joan (whom I like) is back. fuck yeah! Thank god my tip was right. Joan rocks the house! Vegas baby. Oh yeah. ------------------------------ From: "Greg Sasso" Subject: Re: Greg S. How was... Date: 21 Oct 2005 15:10:43 -0700 Dissappointing. I'm not a big Mule fan. I like them in small doses, so I stayed for the first 60 minutes of their set, then hung out in the lobby for the next 45 minutes. Possibly the worst moe. show (out of 6) that I've seen as well. For me, moe. is all about the setlist, as a lot of their jams are very samey. Only in one of the shows I've seen (11/27/04) have the jams really stood out. With that, the setlist wasn't that great, and the playing was standard. I had a good time, but left a bit dissappointed. ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: GDTSTOO - New Year's with Phil Lesh and Friends. Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:14:52 -0700 just ribbin' ya, DK.... ------------------------------ From: supineinsd@gmail.com Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 15:23:23 -0700 I like old classics for a day of hungover viewing. I can watch: Rear Window To Kill a Mockingbird or North by Northwest everytime one comes on TCM and enjoy them. ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Greg S. How was... Date: 21 Oct 2005 15:30:35 -0700 Sorry it wasn't a better show for you. But hopefully that means they got the weekly "off night" out of the way and they're ready to kick it off for 'Frisco. I like Mule okay, but it's moe. I wanna see. I've seen them about 15 times or so. Never a show I didn't have massive fun at. Larry ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:34:32 -0500 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:kgU5f.17803$6e1.5057@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com... > Road House (1989) > Patrick Swayze at his peak...kickin' ass and taking names > at the "Double Deuce"...that blind motherfucker, Jeff Healy, > kicks out the jams in the house band...they also give him a > few lines of dialogue.....fuckin' hysterical!....this dude acts > as well as he sees...the blonde chick, Kelly Lynch, was > a goddamn hottie...where is she now?...Ben Gazzara gives > a master class on over acting...absolutely essential viewing > after a night of heavy drinking. > > Runners Up: > Smokey & the Bandit 1&2 > Disorderlys ( The Fat Boys ) > Caddyshack Barfly (if ya wanna keep on drinking) Night of the Hunter Scary Movie Conair ....and while not technically a movie I've found the best remedy for a hangover to be chicken noodle soup and an all day marathon of Little House on the Prairie. ------------------------------ From: wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:41:35 +0000 (UTC) In article <1129929951.681043.193860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, RickNBarbInSD wrote: > >Is not the cup that holds your wine the very cup that was >burned in the potter's oven? > Mine's Dixie. Paper and carnauba wax, and like the real subject of our analogies a frail temporary creation of a man's mind that will leak all over your shorts if you hold it for too long. I've had the blues the reds and pinks One thing's for sure: Love stinks. ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Ol' Max gets after Pat Robertson Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:50:47 GMT grtflmark wrote: > JC Martin wrote: > >>Interesting little article on Hurricane relief and Patty Rob: >>---------- >> >> Pat Robertson's Katrina Cash >> Max Blumenthal >> >> >> Every cloud has a silver lining. Hurricane Katrina has devastated >>New Orleans, leaving >>thousands dead and hundreds of thousands homeless, and plunging the >>entire city into chaos. In the >>hurricane's wake, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and its >>director, Michael Brown, >>forced out of his former job at the International Arabian Horse >>Association, with no credentials >>in disaster relief, have become targets of withering criticism. Yet >>FEMA's relief efforts have >>brought considerable assistance to at least one man who stands to >>benefit from Hurricane Katrina >>perhaps more than any other individual: Pat Robertson. >> > > shrill yaps> > > I wouldn't expect anything less of you and Blumethal - the Christian > Hate-Monger, than something as stupid as this - and shooting at the > hand of the healer. > > I have friends in New Orleans - and I guess you don't and, like Max are > either completely ignorant of what is and has been going on down therr > or don't really give a fuck if it gets in the way of shootng > Christians. > > Turns out one of the worst things that happened down there is how Red > Cross handled things. They deprived refugees of clothes and other > items sent to them to provide refugees and either sold them for > straight-up cash or to a Goodwill Store that was making money on the > dollar charging the refugees for things they got donated to them. > > Red Cross and "Goodwill" weren't the only organizations engaging in > this kind of stupidity and avarice. Many of the State agencies were > doing the same kind of crap. > > Funny thing - the organizations that have been the most helpful and > productive in their activity to provide relief to these folks according > to local press and people I know down there are two "faith-based" > orgnaizations: > > The Salvation Army, and > > Operation Blessing (see article) > > Catholic Charities has also been effective. SO - here is the bigoted, > Jew Christian-hater, Max Blumenthal - pissing all over the very > organizations that are doing the most good there. > > Typical. You didn't dispute any of the actual points of the article though. I have no argument that faith based charities do good work. I don't trust Robertson however. Never have. He's a hate activist. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Greg S. How was... Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:51:43 GMT wrote in message news:1129933835.342052.287270@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Sorry it wasn't a better show for you. But hopefully that means they > got the weekly "off night" out of the way and they're ready to kick it > off for 'Frisco. * Larry Shouldn't you be on Market/6th with your "I Need a Miracle" cardboard sign about now?....and TRY and your pitbull, "Mayhem", on the twine "leash" while you have your finger in the air! One would THINK you would have this down by now. Guess not. Recreational Sweetbac ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: White House Indictment vigil(NDC) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:55:50 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net You really should learn how to snip, you know. JimK ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:04:28 -0400 Hateful Narc wrote: > Now that I have correct you use of words *snicker* Thanks for coming by, Narc. I needed a good laugh. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:10:22 -0400 the wharf rat wrote: > RickNBarbInSD wrote: > > Is not the cup that holds your wine the very cup that was burned > > in the potter's oven? > > Mine's Dixie. Paper and carnauba wax, and like the real subject of > our analogies a frail temporary creation of a man's mind that will leak > all over your shorts if you hold it for too long. Ewww. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:06:31 +0000 (UTC) In article , The Iron Muffin wrote: > >Ewww. > Feeling sheepish? ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: An Announcement from Phil Lesh & Friends Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:14:35 -0400 ba ba booie wrote: > The Iron Muffin wrote: > > Yow! > > Are you saying that in a good Yow or a bad Yow sort of way? That would be the former. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Passionate what??? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:08:10 -0700 http://www.thetoiletonline.com/leaveit.htm IAAHSWTPII? -- Drop "trousers" to respond via email. ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: Open Apology to the RMGD Women Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:15:28 -0400 the wharf rat wrote: > The Iron Muffin wrote: > > Ewww. > > Feeling sheepish? Nope. I just don't want to hear abour your love life. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:16:01 -0700 The Iron Muffin wrote: > Hateful Narc wrote: > > > Now that I have correct you use of words > > *snicker* http://www.portfoliage.com/portfoliage/animation/html/4k%20hrs.htm ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:16:50 -0700 wrote in message news:1129903124.135549.81910@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Richard Morris wrote: >> wrote in message >> news:1129863586.761501.229950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> > >> > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> >> I assume most of you have heard of this by now. >> >> >> >> Unreal, yet its real. >> > >> > Prove it. Links? Not that I don't believe you, but, you know, >> > trust but verify. Jeez, did I just ask for one of those annoying >> > links in a post.... >> >> Yeah ... it is a bitch when your worldview starts to collapse, eh? > > Huh? What are you talking about? My worldview that GWB is really > the second coming? I only asked for a source. C'mon, after the > National Guard memos and the DSM, I question everything. Hell, I > can go type up a letter tonight from GWB to Brownie stating to let > the damn coloureds die! So you find it easier to be sceptical that a person on the scene is genuinely begging for help, than be sceptical that FEMA/DHS/Bushies know what they are doing? Exactly what would count as proof for you that the folks minding the shop are, at best, incompetent, and at worst, corrupt? R. ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:19:29 -0700 http://www.kodakgallery.com/PhotoView.jsp?collid=82529508306.11283957906.1129920684887&photoid=674706493106&view=1&page=1&sort_order=0&albumsperpage=12&navfolderid=2005& ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Ol' Max gets after Pat Robertson Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:22:47 -0700 Cartman, is that you?! ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:33:10 -0700 An all day marathon of Little House on the Fairy would actually cause me to drink...heavily. Theresa ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:35:30 -0700 scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote: > An all day marathon of Little House on the Fairy would actually cause > me to drink...heavily. > > Theresa Hehe. Yeah. I wuz gonna ask if that wuz his strategy to induce vomiting. Rick ------------------------------ From: "dyrewlf" Subject: Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:40:48 GMT "JC Martin" wrote in message news:qtb6f.341$te3.5146@typhoon.sonic.net... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > >> But the irony of folks who rail endlessly about the corrupt, evil, >> murderous republican regimes demanding they be given MORE power; power to >> decide what you EAT for crissakes, sort of took over my post. > > > What I liked about your post is that you did an excellent of showing the > absurdity, inconsistencies and hypocrisies of the "thought police" crowd. > You have many of these folks on both the right and the left. Yes, alcohol > is regulated only in the sense that one doesn't drive under the influence > or is under the legal age limit (debatable). Fairly reasonable in that > those two regulations actually address not merely the lives of the alcohol > user, but the lives and freedoms of those who have to drive on the road > with these people. Food is a choice. It affects no one but the person > eating it. McDonalds (which I never eat) isn't unhealthy because the food > is any worse than Mexican food (which I do eat a lot). It's unhealthy > because we have a nation of people who overeat. Education on that point > is valid. Forcing people to not eat certain foods however is ludicrous. > If I die of a heart attack, can my wife then sue the local Taqueria? > Shit! Where do you draw the line on that one? Only corporate take-outs > can be sued? Insanity! > > -JC What I want to know is, if after suing fast food companies because I now have diabetes, can I then turn around and sue my dealers from high school and college, without whos help I would never have had the munchies in the first place. Steve ------------------------------ From: Jazare@webtv.net (ba ba booie) Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:34:52 -0400 ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:46:04 -0700 Although not hungover, I did spend an entire day watching the Lord of the Rings trilogy (yes, expanded editions). Theresa ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:49:10 -0700 scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote: > Although not hungover, I did spend an entire day watching the Lord of > the Rings trilogy (yes, expanded editions). > > Theresa Me too!! :o Home sick from work one day. I even watched some of the special features to boot!! How geeky are we?!?!? ;D Rick ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Porky RIP Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:54:42 GMT Gordon "Porky" Lee's movies were a MAJOR influence on my youth....and served as a road map on my way to finally becoming a man. NOBODY rocked a pin wheel hat...AND got the chicks like "Porky" When he bounced the screen, he had me at "Otay" I will be in seclusion until further notice. ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 16:57:17 -0700 I guess we're members of the geek squad, fer shur. Of all the expanded editions, LoTR The Two Towers is probably my favorite. Much better movie than the theater version (also more Boramir). Theresa ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .