From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #629 Dead-Flames Digest #629, Volume #48 Fri, 21 Oct 05 10:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: Hey Toad! ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: I feel weirded out this morning. ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: FEMA E-Mails (Sherry) Re: The Best Hangover Movie ("Randy G") Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? ("Dave Kelly") Re: I feel weirded out this morning. ("corky") Re: Paul McCartney (ndc) (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? (JonP) Re: The Best Hangover Movie (bill.robinette@gmail.com) Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? ("pookietooth") Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: FEMA E-Mails (kpnnews@yahoo.com) Re: FEMA E-Mails (Jeff) Ticket Scalpers/Companies SUCK!!! ("Schmoe") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (bill.robinette@gmail.com) Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) ("dyrewlf") Re: FEMA E-Mails (Sherry) Re: FEMA E-Mails (Sherry) Re: Any words to say about The Simpsons moving to the Arab world? ("Dave Kelly") Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (bill.robinette@gmail.com) Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (Sherry) Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (bill.robinette@gmail.com) Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) (bill.robinette@gmail.com) Tribal Stomp Scedule ("Dave Kelly") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: Hey Toad! Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:48:31 -0700 "Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message news:1129898112.649151.275850@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > So when are you going to come forward with your winning ticket? > > Hook a brother up! I bought my first powerball ticket a month ago. I've bought a couple since, and I never once checked to see if I won. When I heard the winner was in Oregon and hadn't come forward yet my heart skipped a few beats. 340 million would buy a lot of weed......... Alas, it wasn't me. Prolly some 90 year old guy....... EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: I feel weirded out this morning. Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:50:49 -0700 "ba ba booie" wrote in message news:19933-4358F1DB-450@storefull-3277.bay.webtv.net... >I feel weirded out this morning. > > > > I told one company that I out source work to (in MA) that we might be > going out of business, and they in turn started to mail out letters to > my old customers that they would take over our customers. > > When I heard this I felt like they just hijacked my customers. Paging Christopher Moltisante, Christopher Moltisante to the white courtesy phone........... EGBH ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: what should the United States do with combatants who don't belong to regular armies? Date: 21 Oct 2005 08:55:38 -0700 Start here: Americans who are ALLEGED to be members... HTH Larry ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? Date: 21 Oct 2005 08:57:56 -0700 Any film by Troma Productions. Surf Nazis Must Die Nuke 'Em High etc.... Larry ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:01:42 -0700 I bet Phil could get Grapefruit Ed to open for him! ------------------------------ Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails From: Sherry Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:02:08 GMT The term "people of color" means everyone who is not white: black, Asian, Indian, hispanic, etc. Essentially everyone who is not of European descent. Sherry in Vermont ------------------------------ From: "Randy G" Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:02:37 -0700 Leaving Las Vegas ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:36:25 GMT "Rupert" wrote in message news:1129904448.836896.21800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > At midnight, is he going to tell the audience to "Shut the fuck up"? * You GOTTA get new shtick, baby! ------------------------------ From: "corky" Subject: Re: I feel weirded out this morning. Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:08:27 GMT Send lawyers, guns and money The shit has hit the fan ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Paul McCartney (ndc) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:10:59 -0700 I grew up with the Beatles. Love most of their work, but I was never a big McCartney solo fan. Two and half years ago, my brother gave me tickets to McCartney's show in Oakland, for my b'day. I went, expecting to be mildly entertained. My bad. Paul rocked the hell out of the big old Coliseum. Had a great time, even if we were the only people smoking pot in our section. >From friends who saw the show in San Jose and Vegas, I gather he did the exact same show (songs and stage banter) for the whole tour. Like a script. BTW, nice interview with McCartney in the current issue of Guitar Player. Larry ------------------------------ From: JonP Subject: Re: So who should open for Phil on NYE? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:15:20 -0700 On 20 Oct 2005 19:15:12 -0700, "Rupert" wrote: >I'm thinking that the obvious choice is David Nelson Band! I mean, if >Barry and Mookie are playing with Phil that night, why not sandwich-in >a nice set of DNB for a couple of hours, first. > >Any other suggestions? Phils ego should open the show..But i doubt it could fit inside the building.Maybe do the show at portland meadows or something.. JonP ------------------------------ From: bill.robinette@gmail.com Subject: Re: The Best Hangover Movie Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:18:58 -0700 Dave Kelly wrote: > Road House (1989) > Patrick Swayze at his peak...kickin' ass and taking names > at the "Double Deuce"...that blind motherfucker, Jeff Healy, > kicks out the jams in the house band...they also give him a > few lines of dialogue.....fuckin' hysterical!....this dude acts > as well as he sees...the blonde chick, Kelly Lynch, was > a goddamn hottie...where is she now?...Ben Gazzara gives > a master class on over acting...absolutely essential viewing > after a night of heavy drinking. > > Runners Up: > Smokey & the Bandit 1&2 > Disorderlys ( The Fat Boys ) > Caddyshack Easy Money National Lampoon's Vacation National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation ------------------------------ From: "pookietooth" Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:19:41 -0700 The Car, with James Brolin. Watch it a couple times, then a couple times with the sound off and a 72-74 Dark Star playing in the background. Nice! ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:20:38 -0700 A label is one thing. And a very appropriate thing in some cases, like WHAT'S IN THE FOOD WE EAT. Toad is right; it is about CHOICE, not big brother laws. But you can't make a choice if you can't get the info. Like genetically modified foods. The Food Industry, Agribusiness, thinks American consumers are to dumb (or maybe too smart) to have this knowledge. When industry acts like this, perhaps lawsuits using smart, fat rich lawyers are very appropriate. Sue the shit out of industries like that. In the case of Mickey D and fat people, no. Larry ------------------------------ From: kpnnews@yahoo.com Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:26:42 -0700 Sherry wrote: > The term "people of color" means everyone who is not white: black, Asian, > Indian, hispanic, etc. Essentially everyone who is not of European descent. Ahhh... but does everyone feel the same under the umbrella. I know what the term means; I was just being ornery in my previous post. I think the usage tries to add legitimacy to its context by implying people other than blacks are impacted. Certain ethnicities don't want to be lumped with others. Like I said, it is an interesting term, not necessarily in its meaning, but in its usage. Kurt ------------------------------ From: Jeff Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:20:00 -0600 Sherry wrote: > The term "people of color" means everyone who is not white: black, Asian, > Indian, hispanic, etc. Essentially everyone who is not of European descent. Why can't we refer to those of European descent as "pigment challenged people", and everyone else as "people"? ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Ticket Scalpers/Companies SUCK!!! Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:32:48 -0400 Buying tickets online sucks. It used to be great. Now with these automatic brokers, we havn't got a chance. It sucks. ------------------------------ From: bill.robinette@gmail.com Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:33:31 -0700 Ben wrote: > On 18 Oct 2005 20:17:01 -0700, "Neil X." wrote: > > > > >> Ben wrote: > >> > >> But without going into excruciating detail the one that drug tests is > >> SO much better that there's no question in my mind about which to > >> take. (I did the math in my head on the way home from work today - > >> 20% salary increase). My current employer is gonna shit when I tell > >> them. I'm going to have a huge laugh if they try to ask what it would > >> take to get me to stay. > > > > > >I was regularly urine tested for over 2 years while I did consultant > >work for biotech companies. Many pharma companies asked for urine > >tests, it was quite common to show up for the first day at a new gig, > >work my first day, and at the end of the day be pointed to the > >Occupational Health Office to give urine. FWIW, there was no personal > >privacy for any of these tests. I don't know what you have planned for > >that dried urine of yours, but even a "whizzinator" wouldn't have done > >me any good at any of the places that tested me. They stood. They > >watched. I pissed. Very public. > > Really? - that surprises me. Maybe I'll have to abstain for Vegoose. > It would be a drag, but I did it at Jazzfest a few years ago because I > started a job the following week with a company that had a mail-order > pharmacy even though I had nothing to do with that. > > I had never turned down so much weed in my life - a friend of mine > even brought me a quarter because he was sure I'd want it - had to > turn that down too. > > The dehydrated stuff is supposed to be dissolved in water in a 50 ml > vial and heated to the proper temp with foot warmers. They suggest > stashing it in between 2 pairs of briefs but I might tape it under my > arm. > > The vials are watertight - already tested that out. It's got a strip > on the side to measure temp and I bought the digital thermometer for > added measure. > > Of course, it definitely won't work if they watch. I thought they > only did that for parolees. > > My friend who recommended this stuff works as a nurse and has used it > a number of times. > > Hopefully it will be spelled out in the offer letter I'll get > tomorrow, and I'm hoping they'll just tell me to go to a testing > facility here - at my convenience so I'll be able to have the temp > just right when I walk in. > > > > >I'm now working at a great company that didn't test. My > >recommendation--don't give into the fascists. In restrospect, it was a > >mistake for me to consent to this indignity. Never again. Quality of > >life is as important as a paycheck. > > Unfortunately, I see the 2 as permanently linked - the quality of life > sucks where I'm at now, and even if I can't indulge for a while, I > think this is best for me. > > Plus, if they wait 'til then, I'll almost certainly test negative > anyway. And they'll have a lot invested in me already. > > > Opt to work for the company that > >doesn't try to own your soul...... > > Oh, the other just expects me to work for slave wages and move 1100 > miles in 2 weeks time (just long enough to give notice at my current > job) with next to nothing as far as helping me relocate - they'll pay > for a u-haul is about it. The other company pays for movers to come > out, pack up my stuff, drive it there, break the lease at my apartment > which won't be cheap, 60 days temp. housing, 1 months salary for > incidentals and they're giving me nearly twice as much time to move. > > Not to mention a nearly 20% increase in salary - I can give up smoke > for that. I've been out of my own stash since Labor Day anyway, and > haven't smoked anything but crappy resin in a month - nearly 2 weeks > since I had any res-hits. > > >what looks like a great opportunity > >today won't necessarily look that way in 6 months. > > I'm thinking their philosophy is that they really don't care unless > I'm such an addict that I can't put down the crack-pipe or > smack-filled needle long enough to pass a drug test or if I'm not > intelligent to figure out how to pass a test for pot. > > Maybe I'm wrong, but we'll see. Too bad there isn't a database on the > web with people's experiences with specific companies - if there is > one I couldn't find it. Maybe I'll start one. > > And I don't have to worry about hard drugs - never touch the stuff > unless you count alcohol as a hard drug, which it definitely is > compared to pot. > > About 10 years ago, I had an offer from a company that actually told > me they'd waive the pre-employment test. Even though they would have > paid more than 2 other offers I had, I didn't take it just because I > didn't think they were the best job for me. > > > > >Peace, > >Neil X. > > > Thanks for the real-life experience - much better than being told the > company is right to test me or that I should just look for a different > job. > > I have no problem with them firing me if I'm incompetent - I know I'm > not, but I think it's just ridiculous that I could lose out on a good > opportunity for something I smoked weeks ago - while I was on > vacation, I might add. > > I'm determined to beat the system even if I have to give in to it > temporarily. I suspect the clause in the app saying I'd be willing to > submit to testing is 'for-cause' - in my case, that would have to be > showing up for work drunk or obviously stoned I think - I'm not > operating any heavy machinery unless you count computers. > > But even if it is random, if I can use the dehydrated stuff once, I > think I'll be able to do it again - they gotta give me a little time > to get to the testing facility. foot warming dehydrated piss???????? ------------------------------ From: "dyrewlf" Subject: Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition (NDC) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:38:25 GMT "Rupert" wrote in message news:1129904791.357896.257980@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > If Mickey D's has no accountability, then perhaps we can make them stop > marketing their product to children ie: putting toys in the fucking > meal! > They can market to children all they want, it's not the children who are buying these things for the kids. So as a parent grow a set and tell your kids No! Steve ------------------------------ Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails From: Sherry Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:39:49 GMT in article 1129912002.416822.246570@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, kpnnews@yahoo.com at kpnnews@yahoo.com wrote on 10/21/05 12:26: >> The term "people of color" means everyone who is not white: black, Asian, >> Indian, hispanic, etc. Essentially everyone who is not of European descent. > > Ahhh... but does everyone feel the same under the umbrella. I know what > the term means; I was just being ornery in my previous post. I think > the > usage tries to add legitimacy to its context by implying people other > than > blacks are impacted. Certain ethnicities don't want to be lumped with > others. > Like I said, it is an interesting term, not necessarily in its meaning, > but > in its usage. Sooo... are you saying other ethnicities do not experience racism here in the US? That only "real blacks" are impacted? That it shouldn't be a term used because every person of color is not united under a single umbrella? Sherry in Vermont ------------------------------ Subject: Re: FEMA E-Mails From: Sherry Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:41:05 GMT >> The term "people of color" means everyone who is not white: black, Asian, >> Indian, hispanic, etc. Essentially everyone who is not of European descent. > > Why can't we refer to those of European descent as "pigment challenged > people", and > everyone else as "people"? Personally, *everyone* as "people" works for me. Sherry in Vermont ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Any words to say about The Simpsons moving to the Arab world? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:42:25 GMT Mmmmm....Shwarma! ------------------------------ From: bill.robinette@gmail.com Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:44:37 -0700 Steve Lenier wrote: > in article dj3dlo01fab@news4.newsguy.com, The Lord of Eltingville at > tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote on 10/18/05 11:03 AM: > > > greek_philosophizer@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > >> joker4153@comcast.net wrote: > >>> Just where the hell do I get one of these drug testing jobs, anyway?!!? > >>> I'm ready! > >>> > >>> Larry > >> > >> I think sometimes they actually want to watch you pee. > >> > >> That would be a lousy job unless you were gay. > >> > >> . > > > > Whenever I had to take a piss test for my DOT physical card (required to > > drive trucks interstate), the doctor was in the restroom and it was > > shirt off and pants to the knees. He didn't go peering around to see my > > johnson, so I think it was just to make sure there were no plastic > > bladders hidden in the clothing. > > > > It's been almost 15 years since my last one, so things might have > > changed because of all the new devices that are being sold on the > > interenet. I've been thinking about doing some occasional driving for a > > bit of extra pocket money, so perhaps I'll get to find out at some point > > in the next couple months. > > > > > > ~Ted > > > I took one awhile back...they had me empty my pockets into a drawer which I > locked and took the key, no pat down or anything beyond that...then into a > small bathroom (alone) in which all the water was turned off so you couldn't > do the dehydrated thing, and you couldn't flush the toilet either...and the > sample container had a thermometer on it, and the urine had to fit within a > certain heat range or they figured you had brought it in...I chatted with > the guy out of interest for a couple minutes, he said people try a lot of > things but that not much works and they usually catch them. > > Steve Right out of college (daily smoking 1990-1997). I went for an interview and was told to report for a test the next day. Went and got some 'Naturally Clean' followed the directions and passed. I've since stopped abusing(1999) so I could care less about testing today. ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Republicans hate you and want you dead: the 10/20/05 edition From: Sherry Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:44:52 GMT > They can market to children all they want, it's not the children who are > buying these things for the kids. So as a parent grow a set and tell your > kids No! Steve You're absolutely right! Sherry in Vermont ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: What is a good "B" rated movie? Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:24:40 -0400 Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > > "ba ba booie" wrote in message > news:14095-4358DB2A-316@storefull-3273.bay.webtv.net... > > > What is a good "B" rated movie? > > Any 60's or 70's Peter Fonda. > > In my personal top ten movies of all time: Dirty Mary Crazy Larry. Fonda > himself does almost all the driving in this barely scripted driving movie, > endangering the lives of everyone in the car, including an amazingly sexy > Susan George (who was 19 at the time). Only the most radical driving stunts > are done by stuntmen. Fonda breaks 100 on narrow country roads all over > northern California as George displays her tight little ass to the camera at > every opportunity. Much damage is caused as they race a maniacal Vic Morrow > to the Mexican border. > > The Trip (coupled with Jack Nicholson in Psych Out on the DVD), and the Wild > Angels are two other great ones to start with. > > The Trip has Fonda on LSD in Hollywood, freaking out in a very loosely > scripted trip. Wild Angels is a great biker flick featuring a smokin' Nancy > Sinatra. Psych Out has Nicholson joining an acid rock band in the Haight > Ashbury at the height of the neighborhood's greatness. Much group sex and > drug taking, filmed right there in SF, with the Seeds and the Strawberry > Alarm Clock making appearances. Truly must see flicks. HRYK (on all counts). Each of those movies deserves at least one viewing in your lifetime, although DMCL deserves at least two -- never has a movie with so little plot/forethought been so satisfyingly watchable (due mostly, of course, to Ms George's perfect, little posterior). ------------------------------ From: bill.robinette@gmail.com Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:47:03 -0700 Roxanne McDaniel wrote: > "Steve Lenier" wrote in message > , The Lord of Eltingville at wrote > > greek_philosophizer@hotmail.com wrote: > >> > >> joker4153@comcast.net wrote: > >>> Just where the hell do I get one of these drug testing jobs, anyway?!!? > >>> I'm ready! > >>> > >>> Larry > >> > >> I think sometimes they actually want to watch you pee. > >> > >> That would be a lousy job unless you were gay. > >> > >> . > > > > Whenever I had to take a piss test for my DOT physical card (required to > > drive trucks interstate), the doctor was in the restroom and it was > > shirt off and pants to the knees. He didn't go peering around to see my > > johnson, so I think it was just to make sure there were no plastic > > bladders hidden in the clothing. > > > > It's been almost 15 years since my last one, so things might have > > changed because of all the new devices that are being sold on the > > interenet. I've been thinking about doing some occasional driving for a > > bit of extra pocket money, so perhaps I'll get to find out at some point > > in the next couple months. > > > > > > ~Ted > > > I took one awhile back...they had me empty my pockets into a drawer which I > locked and took the key, no pat down or anything beyond that...then into a > small bathroom (alone) in which all the water was turned off so you couldn't > do the dehydrated thing, and you couldn't flush the toilet either...and the > sample container had a thermometer on it, and the urine had to fit within a > certain heat range or they figured you had brought it in...I chatted with > the guy out of interest for a couple minutes, he said people try a lot of > things but that not much works and they usually catch them. > > Steve > *********************** > Ususally they have someone in there with you to make sure > you don't dip into the toilet first so you can't dilute the specimen... > hence the thermometer. Not in the 5 tests I've taken. ------------------------------ From: bill.robinette@gmail.com Subject: Re: drug tests for jobs (NDC) Date: 21 Oct 2005 09:51:15 -0700 Effty wrote: > Work to live, or live to work? > > This whole thread really highlights a problem unique to our modern > society. Why do we tolerate employers owning the biggest portions of > our souls? > > I wonder where these employers will lead us in the end. As long as > it's profitable for them I'm sure it will be okay. I'll gladly trade pot for $75k+ in salary, 3 weeks vacation, paid training, good health insurance and the decreased lung cancer risk. YMMV ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Tribal Stomp Scedule Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:55:03 GMT Chet Helms Tribal Stomp October 30th Set Times Drum Circle starts, bagpipe player walks the stage and around the meadow, flag people wave flags. When the bagpipe player reaches the stage, the horn people blow their horns and horn ceremony begins. Then Americans do their prayer and dance, then the South American Indian does a prayer and song. 9:00 - 9:30 Drum Circle 9:30 - 9:40 Bag Pipes and flags 9:40 - 9:45 Horn Ceremony 9:45 - 9:52 American Indian Prayer 9:52 - 10:00 South America Indian Show begins: Boots introduction 10:00 - 10:20 Jeff Blackburn 10:20 - 10:40 James Gurley 10:40 - 11:00 Rowan Brothers 11:00 - 11:05 Stephen Gaskin, Announcer 11:05 - 11:25 Dan Hicks/Hot Licks 11:25 - 11:45 Roy Rogers/Jack Elliot 11:45 - 12:05 Charlatans 12:05 - 12:10 Michael McClure Announcer 12:10 - 12:30 Country Joe Mc Donald 12:30 - 12:50 Barry Melton 12:50 - 1:10 Sons of the Highway Richi Ray, Singer/guitar (Freedom Highway), James Preston Drums (Sons of Champlin), Judge Murphy, Singer Terry Haggerty Guitar David Schallock Bass 1:10 - 1:15 Bruce Latimer, Announcer 1:15 - 1:35 Blue Cheer 1:35 - 1:55 Paul Kantner & The Planet Earth Rock & Roll Orchestra , Slick Aguilar David Freiberg Prairie Prince Pete Sears Diana Mangano Peter Kaukonen, Chris Smith Darby Gould 2:00 - 2:20 Natural Act Mitchel Holma Hal Wagenet Tim Dawe Ralph Benkus 2:20 - 2:40 Jerry Miller 253 535-0921 Fuzzy John Oxendine Drum Tiran Porter Bass Dale Ockerman Keys 2:40 - 2:45 Wavy Gravy Announcer/Fish 2:45 - 3:05 David LaFlamme Val Fuentes Drumes Toby Gray Bass Rob Espinosa Gutiar Mikel Pritchard Congos Linda LaFlamme Singer 3:10 - 3:30 Quicksilver Gold 3:30 - 3:35 Lobster Announcer 3:35 - 3:55 Canned Heat 3:55 - 4:00 Howard Hesseman Announcer (Schedule Permitting), 4:00 - 4:20 Lee Michaels 4:20- 4:40 Squid B. Viscous Jorge Santana Howard Wales, Orgen Harvey Mandel, Guitar Herman Eberitzsch Keys (Lee Oskar ,War), Greg Errico Drums (Sly and the Family Stone), David Denny Guitar (Steve Miller), Rock Hendricks Sax 4:40 - 5:00 Lydia Pense Singer, Annie Samson Singer Stone Ground, Nick Gravenites 5:05 - 5:25 Zero Greg Anton Liam Hanrahan Base Vince Welnick Keys Martin Fierro Futoshi Morioka Guita Judge Murphy Singer Miss Loretta Singer 5:25 - 5:30 Doug Green Announcer 5:30 - 5:50 Michael narda Walden 5:50 - 5:55 Close Boots Hughston Announcer Fire guy with torches starts at stage, Dixie land band follows him, they walk through the audience and lead people to their cars. ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .