From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #588 Dead-Flames Digest #588, Volume #48 Sat, 15 Oct 05 15:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: The 'Lectric Lady called me "Boo" ("Carlisle") Re: What's on their .mp3 player (John Doherty) Re: Robert Hunter Journal update, 10/14/05 ("Rupert") Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? ("ck") FA: GRATEFUL DEAD "COME ALIVE" Austrailian Import (sharknews@aol.com) Re: August and September pics from Sandgate ("Roxanne McDaniel") Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... ("Roxanne McDaniel") Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("Stuknot") Re: The 'Lectric Lady called me "Boo" ("seraphim") Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("DGDevin") Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? ("Schmoe") Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? ("ck") Ye Olde-Fashioned B&P -- 6/17/91 ("CC") Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? (Jeff) Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? ("Pete") Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? (JimK) Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? ("ck") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: The 'Lectric Lady called me "Boo" Date: 15 Oct 2005 09:27:56 -0700 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > Carlisle wrote: > > > > Dave Kelly wrote: > > > > > > ...And dig...this was some old broad...I DONT know!... > > > 40's!....42?....43?......how the fuck should I know..... > > > Anybody know whats up with this "Boo" shit? > > > I need a drink. > > > > > > Sweet-Boo Productions > > > > .."some old broad...40's!...", etc. > > On behalf of ALL the females of rmgd who are from a few years shy of 40 > > or older, I say the magic bus trip out to see "Sweet-Boo" is put on > > hold...indefinitely. Watch yerself there, big guy. You sure know how to > > get yourself in the dog house, huh?! > > You BETTER start digging your way out!! > > your welcome, > > Sister Carlisle > > Errr... At your age, shouldn't you be referring to yourself as Mother > Carlisle? ;-> Look brother, I have one three year old and she calls me>>>"Mommy". Now if you'll excuse me, I have a Pumpkin Festival awaiting me!! Here's a link for your enjoyment- http://www.doublestink.com/index.html stay plush, Queen Carlisle ------------------------------ From: John Doherty Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:11:12 -0400 > > Schmoe wrote: > > > > I read about a game for iPodders - hit shuffle and post the first 10 > > songs you get on the net. Best 10 win. > > > > John H. > > > 1) Hoochie Coochie Man, Jimi Hendrix (BBC Sessions) 2) I'm a Long Gone Daddy, Hank Williams 3) Summertime, Paul McCartney (CHOBA CCCP) 4) Under A Blanket of Blue, Ella Fitzgerald & Louis Armstrong 5) Almost Blue, Elvis Costello 6) New Spanish Two Step, Bob Wills & his Texas Playboys 7) Oogum Boogum, Alex Chilton 8) Would you Lay With Me (In A Field of Stone), Johnny Cash 9) Grateful Dead, Uncle John's Band, 5/11/72 10) Scarecrow, Beck Synchroncity:, in doing this list, when I got to # 9, the previous respondent's list I was using as a template listed Dark Star from the very same date!!! 5/11/72 Yow! ------------------------------ From: "Rupert" Subject: Re: Robert Hunter Journal update, 10/14/05 Date: 15 Oct 2005 10:13:56 -0700 Well, I can bet that he was NOT helping move Phil's kid into his dorm. Too much heavy lifting! Wait, maybe he stayed and watched the car so nothing was stolen. Can't be too careful. ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:14:37 -0400 "bill c" wrote in message news:NM84f.1844$h25.888@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com... > > "Steve Terry" wrote in message > news:diqs9g$2qta$1@news.iquest.net... > > > > "ck" wrote in message: > > > > > Pull my coat if you have an interest in his ticket. It might be > > > available for $250ish. which is 45 above face. > > > > $45 above face? Ain't that scalping? What's wrong with selling it at face > > value? > > > > > probably trying to recoup the money he lost on his 2005 red sox world series > tix... > the funny part is that he could have just said the ticket was $250, but for > some > reason he wants you to know he's getting over on ya for $45. btw, i paid $80 > for my ticket first row 400 level and when i originally tried for "best > available" > got side stage for $350 before trying again, so 300 level for $250 really > just > sounds like a ripoff. and when you think about it, does a guy with a used > nissan > and an bmw m5 really need an extra $45. maybe if he's the type of guy that > name > drops what type of car he has...wait a minute... > > ughh.. reading comprehension wasn't something you mastered in school was it ? The Nissan in a resereved rental.. the M5 is a fun ride. These were mentioned in case someone was considering coming, kind of the coming attractions.The ticket is not mine... how you missed that is beyond me. The resale of a ticket for a meazley $45. profit is perfectly legal and was a guess on my part as my friend i'm sure if he can will want to sell it for as much profit as he can .I was suggesting that if someone i had had some friendly interaction with here had an interest i could convince Gino, my friend to let me get the one he won't be using for a small profit rather than sell it for a bigger one.I see no such friendly contacts exist here.I'll let you know how they played, or not. ------------------------------ From: sharknews@aol.com Subject: FA: GRATEFUL DEAD "COME ALIVE" Austrailian Import Date: 15 Oct 2005 10:21:17 -0700 http://cgi3.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=iam30 Hey, I Hope this is of interest. 1st pressing Early Rock, Soul, Jazz and even Rap. Sealed audiophile vinyl and classic collectibles. Thanks GRATEFUL DEAD "COME ALIVE" Austrailian Import 1966 PET SOUNDS Beach Boys Capitol T 2458 Mono Rainbow Jimi Hendrix with Jim Morrison of the THE DOORS Import http://cgi3.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=iam30 ------------------------------ From: "Roxanne McDaniel" Subject: Re: August and September pics from Sandgate Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:51:28 GMT "Sherry" > wrote in message ... > Thanks for sharing your lovely family with us! You're brave to grow those > morning glories up the side of your house... ours pulled a railing off once. > Strongest damn vine I know! The views from your front porch are simply > amazing though. This year I got smart - the glories are trained up jute rope I tied to a rock at the bottom, and the trim at the top. Much easier to pull down in winter, too, without trashing the trim I spent so much time painting last year. :) I love to just sit out on my porch and look at the mountain... I really appreciate our views. :) New neighbors just inherited the land across from us, and they've very nicely chosen to place their house over the ridge, so we can't really see it expect in winter... and when the other trees they planted grow in, we won't see it at all. Sherry in Vermont ******************************* That is a great idea about the jute rope, I'm gonna try it. And your painting job is most excellent! How many "painted ladies" are in Vermont? Although I know why you might day dream about SF (no, not you sweets)! ------------------------------ From: "Roxanne McDaniel" Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:55:25 GMT "Richard Morris" wrote in message ... "JC Martin" wrote in message snip > Well, you have a right to express these opinion and fact is, I would never > hold it against you. You care about me? Yeah. I do. And that is not something I say lightly. I finally figured it out one day, asking myself why it is that you piss me off sometimes. One does not get pissed off by people that one is indifferent to--it is that simple. Perhaps it is as simple as the fact that you are a fellow Dead freak, and folks with that common ground at least theoretically ought to hang together. I dunno. No point in analyzing it, so I will let it go. > Well, you could always send me a private email and bring up any point you > think I should consider. I can't but respond to sarcasm when the game is > one-upsmanship...even if that wasn't your intent, it's easy enough for me > to interpret it that way. Yes, you are correct. I could email you. Would you prefer that? Thing is, I wasn't trying to one-up you ... I was trying to get you to see that you were doing exactly the same thing to leftie that you were accusing him of. I don't see that as one-upsmanship. I guess I would also have to point out that you absolutely blasted Sherry on a personal level in the public forum ... yet at the same time you are suggesting that I bring my concern to you in the privacy of email. I think you have a double standard operating. One standard for you ... one for the rest of us. And I am pointing that out. > Also, you're inconsistent on who you choose to go after. For instance, > you never once criticized Sherry for her absolutist opinion on ADD/ADHD > and her insistence that I and others were misinformed cause she LIVES IT. Well, I think if you go back and look at the original thread, you will find that *I* am the one who first questioned her statement about the diagnosis of her son via the use of scanning technology. I didn't tell her that she was full of shit ... I just asked her if she knew something I didn't. I found out what I needed to know without the accompanying drama. At that point, the conversation kind of dissolved into an acrimonious and accusatory kind of interaction which I thought was unfortunate. Defenses went up, and the conversation went to hell. > Fact is, she was misinformed on several aspects of that subject. Probably she is. And you are as well, in my opinion. And I will be the first person to stand up and say that there is a lot I don't know about ADD, and even less that I understand about it. > But because you generally agree with her overall position, it was okay to > ignore that. And the way I see it I don't believe that I ever agreed one way or the other ... I just simply chose not to attack her personally because of some perceived failing on her part with respect to what she knows or doesn't know about ADD interventions. I saw you implying that she was negligent. Which changed the course of the conversation from what we could learn from one another regarding ADD, to how we can salvage our personal integrity from the interaction. See the difference? > is that you're holding a grudge because I stood my ground. Am I perfectly > civil? Hell no. In political discussion, I expect Not a grudge ... just an expectation that perhaps you will practice what you preach, and an urge to poke you when you don't, figuratively speaking. > participants to respect other opinions, cause that's the only way to learn > something about people. Of course, if someone makes it personal, I don't > always respond the right way. Gettin' better though. Some people just > rub me the wrong way with their tactics and the dishonesty they bring to > the table. Yep, me too. Can't say I have ever thought you were ever intentionally dishonest in anything you have said here, but sometimes I am uncomfortable with your tactics. That being said, I will let it go and leave you alone in the future. Richard *************** HRYK ------------------------------ From: "Stuknot" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: 15 Oct 2005 11:26:14 -0700 John Doherty wrote: > 7) Oogum Boogum, Alex Chilton Cool version. Has anyone bothered to listen to the new supposed Big Star album? Alex and Jody Stephens and the Posies guys. I keep seeing it, but I'm kind of torn between fascination and horror - kind of like when we heard Sammy Hagar was going to tour with the Other Ones. John H. ------------------------------ From: "seraphim" Subject: Re: The 'Lectric Lady called me "Boo" Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:31:40 GMT I got cher boo hangin' babe!!! ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:42:29 GMT "Stuknot" wrote in message news:1129233467.575167.54180@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > There won't be any money, but when you die, on your > deathbed you will receive total consciousness. Die? What's this "die" shit? ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:52:45 -0400 ck wrote: >I see no such friendly contacts exist here.I'll let you > know how they played, or not. Want some cheeze 'wit 'dat whine? ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:04:42 -0400 "Schmoe" wrote in message news:y_d4f.551$vV4.467@fe08.lga... > ck wrote: > >I see no such friendly contacts exist here.I'll let you > > know how they played, or not. > > Want some cheeze 'wit 'dat whine? > > thanks ,i love cheese but am aiming to lose some excess weight. ------------------------------ From: "CC" Subject: Ye Olde-Fashioned B&P -- 6/17/91 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:09:40 GMT FOB: B&K 4011 Microphones @ 110º > Neumann BS 48i-2 > Modified Sony TCD D-10 Pro 3 Discs Audio / No SHN or FLAC Disc 1 (Set I) Eyes of the World Walkin' Blues Brown-Eyed Women Dark Star Tease Masterpiece Loose Lucy Cassidy Might as Well Disc 2 (Set II) Space Saint of Circumstance Ship of Fools Dark Star Tease Truckin' New Speedway Boogie Uncle John's Band Jam Drums Disc 3 Space China Doll Playin' Reprise Sugar Magnolia The Weight (e) Notes: There are a few seconds of volume fluctuation in the opening notes of Eyes of the World (d1t01) and a few more seconds in Cassidy (d1t07). Set II is pristine. Good show! ------------------------------ From: Jeff Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:23:49 -0600 ck wrote: > my friend i'm sure if he can will want to sell it for > as much profit as he can Because everything is always all about the money. Especially when you're a scalper. Everyone I consider a "friend" either gives away extra tickets to things if they can afford it, or sells it for as low a price as they can afford to. Because it's all about the love. And before you tell me Gino isn't a scalper, from dictionary.com: scalper n : someone who buys something and resells it at a price far above the initial cost; "he got theater tickets through a scalper" ~Jeff ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Pete" From: "Pete" Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:40:18 GMT "gb" wrote in message news:M8Kdnfo0q4N5-c3eRVn-vQ@adelphia.com... > "Richard Morris" wrote in message > news:UYudnS3La5Lk_M3eRVn-hQ@comcast.com... > > > > "gb" wrote in message > > news:KrGdnWng5vo3yM3eRVn-pw@adelphia.com... > > > are there rumors they'll play more than just MSG? > > > > > > > > > > Yes! I started one yesterday ... they are going to come out to San > > Francisco in May and perform at Winterland. > > > > R. > > > > man, what is the deal with this newsgroup? I used to be on here all the > time. I took a break for a year or so, and now it seems like there's 90% > sarcasm. I'll bet someone replies to this post with a "genosteaks" link or > something.... We took a vote last year and switched to sarcasm becuase we were hurt that you abandoned us. No one to blame but yourself. See you at MSG! ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:45:00 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:14:37 -0400, "ck" wrote: > >"bill c" wrote in message >news:NM84f.1844$h25.888@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com... >> >> "Steve Terry" wrote in message >> news:diqs9g$2qta$1@news.iquest.net... >> > >> > "ck" wrote in message: >> > >> > > Pull my coat if you have an interest in his ticket. It might be >> > > available for $250ish. which is 45 above face. >> > >> > $45 above face? Ain't that scalping? What's wrong with selling it at >face >> > value? >> > >> > >> probably trying to recoup the money he lost on his 2005 red sox world >series >> tix... >> the funny part is that he could have just said the ticket was $250, but >for >> some >> reason he wants you to know he's getting over on ya for $45. btw, i paid >$80 >> for my ticket first row 400 level and when i originally tried for "best >> available" >> got side stage for $350 before trying again, so 300 level for $250 really >> just >> sounds like a ripoff. and when you think about it, does a guy with a used >> nissan >> and an bmw m5 really need an extra $45. maybe if he's the type of guy that >> name >> drops what type of car he has...wait a minute... >> >> > >ughh.. reading comprehension wasn't something you mastered in school was >it ? The Nissan in a resereved rental.. the M5 is a fun ride. These were >mentioned in case someone was considering coming, kind of the coming >attractions.The ticket is not mine... how you missed that is beyond me. The >resale of a ticket for a meazley $45. profit is perfectly legal and was a >guess on my part as my friend i'm sure if he can will want to sell it for >as much profit as he can .I was suggesting that if someone i had had some >friendly interaction with here had an interest i could convince Gino, my >friend to let me get the one he won't be using for a small profit rather >than sell it for a bigger one.I see no such friendly contacts exist >here.I'll let you know how they played, or not. > Don't bother. JimK ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: anyone going to check out CREAM? Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:45:49 -0400 "Jeff" wrote in message news:dirs16$lnm2@xco-news.xilinx.com... > ck wrote: > > my friend i'm sure if he can will want to sell it for > > as much profit as he can > > Because everything is always all about the money. Especially when you're a scalper. > > Everyone I consider a "friend" either gives away extra tickets to things if they can > afford it, or sells it for as low a price as they can afford to. Because it's all about > the love. > > And before you tell me Gino isn't a scalper, from dictionary.com: > > scalper > > n : someone who buys something and resells it at a price far above the initial cost; "he > got theater tickets through a scalper" > > > > ~Jeff who cares? He's free legally to do it. The fact that i was offering to impose upon him to let me sell his ticket for less than he might otherwise be able to get forit himself was in light of the fact that tickets are sold out and the only place you will be able to buy one is from a 'scalper', kind.Feel free to look elsewhere if you need one.I couldn't care less.I will enjoy the how whomever i end up next to sitting. A complete stranger couldn't be worse company than this crowd. ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .