From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #571 Dead-Flames Digest #571, Volume #48 Thu, 13 Oct 05 14:00:05 PDT Contents: Re: why baseball sucks? (DG) Re: why no JGB on archive.org ("Carl Sparndan") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: yeehaw! ("Schmoe") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (leftie) Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("Ray") Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... (JC Martin) Re: why baseball sucks? ("Stuknot") Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... (JC Martin) Re: yeehaw! ("Dave Kelly") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (Brad Greer) Re: why no JGB on archive.org (nbndtrain@yahoo.com) Re: 8/8/82 Satisfaction ("Carlisle") Re: your favorite road trip songs? favorite blaster song? (¤ Alias) Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("DGDevin") Re: Hey Brew... (brew ziggins) Re: Good Yom Tov ("Stuknot") Re: why no JGB on archive.org ("AirtimeJunkie") Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("Stuknot") Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("Andrew Murawa") Re: Dead desktop pics? (jwadetjpp@yahoo.com) Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... (leftie) Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? (Spider Dawg) Re: What's on their .mp3 player ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: DG Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:38:35 -0700 Stuknot wrote: > > >bill c wrote: >> > >> not a chicagoan and not wishful thinking....check the replay and you'll see >> the ball takes a short hop into the glove. >> umps made the right call, > >What ump? The home plate ump who was behind it, couldn't see it, >called a third strike and an out and then reversed himself while the >Angels were on their way to the dugout? That ump made the right call? The ump called strike three. He never called him out. >Not a chance. BTW, there's enough blame to go around, but Scioscia was >a class act in the post game news conference. No whining, just, "we >didn't play well enough to absorb a call like that." Right... They still gave up a double to end the game. It was a bad play by the catcher. ------------------------------ From: "Carl Sparndan" Subject: Re: why no JGB on archive.org Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:43:39 GMT jealous misogynists ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: 13 Oct 2005 11:50:25 -0700 DG wrote: > Rogues Island's finest wrote: > > > >DG wrote: > >> Brad Greer wrote: > >> > > >> >DG wrote: > >> >>He's done just fine. Sure the last ring was 2000 but that doesn't > >> >>matter. They are the cream of the crop every year. > >> >> > >> >No, they aren't. The cream of the crop is the team that wins the > >> >World Series by definition. So, the Yankees haven't been the cream of > >> >the crop since 2000. Unless you have some other definition of what is > >> >the best team in baseball. > >> > >> > >> The regular season shows who is the best. The post season shows who > >> is the hottest at the moment. > > > >Cool, so the Red Sox and the Yankees were exactly the same this year. > > > Except that the Yanks beat them head to head. I know, I was at the game the clinched the AL East. Painful. > >> Do they need to win it all every year for you? > >> Not for me... > > > >Hmmmm, I do believe they're zero for the millenium, including the > >greatest collapse in sports history, despite outspending every other > >team in the league by $70million or so per season. Satisfied? > > > Sure am... Great team year in year out... I don't need them to win > it every year. Sure they do. They spend shitloads more than anyone else, and if you think that George, the players, or for that matter the overwhelming majority of the fans are satisfied with winning 95 games and not making it past the first few rounds of the playoffs, you're kidding yourself. The last 5 years have most certainly *not* been considered a success for the NY Yankees. > >> Over four million tickets were sold for Yankees games. More people > >> see them than any other team because of their lineup. > > > >....and the fact that Fenway only holds 35k. > > > That's on your owner. What's the name? John Henry. He's doing a brilliant job, and he's letting baseball people run the team. Fenway still sucks though. Mark ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Re: yeehaw! Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:50:55 -0400 Roxanne McDaniel wrote: > This Saturday is my 11th wedding anniversary, and the ole man is > taking me to see the Greencards!!! Happy Anniversary and many more to follow... Dinner and music, nuttin' wrong wit' 'dat! ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:54:19 -0700 Rogues Island's finest wrote: > Fenway still sucks though. I hope I get to see a game there next summer though. Never been... ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: 13 Oct 2005 11:54:24 -0700 pookietooth wrote: > Ray wrote: > > Dar Es Salam - Anouar Brahem - Astrakan Cafe > > That's an awesome CD. Agreed - I love that CD. 'Barzakh' is great too. My favorite Brahem CD however is 'Madar', where saxophonist Jan Garbarek gets top-billing in a trio with Brahem and a tabla player. Gorgeous interplay - a must-have in my book. > The oud is a trippy concept in itself, basically > playing a lute like a guitar, from what I understand. In addition to having great technique Brahem plays the oud with so much soul - really beautiful stuff. Ray ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:58:04 GMT leftie wrote: > JC Martin wrote: > >> leftie wrote: > > >> JC Martin wrote: > > >>> "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the >>> merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini >>> >>>> > >>>>> I mean, the only good wars with some of the extreme left folks are >>>>> wars against fascist Europeans. If it's an Arab fascist or any >>>>> other race, it's a bad war. >> >> >> I think you're proving the point I made above. > > > But here's the thing. Both Saddam and bin Laden cannot both be > understood as "Islamofascist." I don't use the word myself. >Saddam's regime was secular, so it may > have been fascist but it was not Islamic in the sense that Saudi Arabia > or bin Laden, for example, are. Saddam was more secular than other Arab nations. Doesn't mean he didn't head up an Islamic state or play to extremist ideology. He in fact did. >The term loses any useful meaning if > both Hussein's secular regime and bin Laden's dreams of religious-based > empire fall under it. What's your point though? You have no argument from me that Bin Laden was a more immediate and primary threat to us than Saddam. But give Saddam power and the money of an oil rich nation and he's doubly dangerous. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Stuknot" Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: 13 Oct 2005 11:58:36 -0700 DG wrote: > Stuknot wrote: > > > > > >bill c wrote: > >> > > >> not a chicagoan and not wishful thinking....check the replay and you'll see > >> the ball takes a short hop into the glove. > >> umps made the right call, > > > >What ump? The home plate ump who was behind it, couldn't see it, > >called a third strike and an out and then reversed himself while the > >Angels were on their way to the dugout? That ump made the right call? > > > The ump called strike three. He never called him out. > Nonsense. He called a swing and a miss with the arm motion and then the out with a clenched fist in front of his chest. There's plenty of blame for the catcher who forgot to make a tag which should have been automatic, but the ump's story is just lame. John H. ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:00:22 GMT leftie wrote: > JC Martin wrote: > >> You're kiddin', right? No corporatism or nationalism under Sadam? >> Talk about being misinformed. > > > If you're truly opposed to fascist regimes in the Middle East, then > clearly countries like Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and even Pakistan should > be invaded right away, no? No. >Or is it that you're just opposed to these > dictatorial regimes in the Middle East when they oppose US interests? No. Work on your reading comprehension. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: yeehaw! Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:02:34 GMT Your "Old Man" is getting you a greencard? I thought you was in Chicago? Confused. ------------------------------ From: Brad Greer Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:06:15 -0400 On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:25:43 -0700, DG wrote: >Brad Greer wrote: >> >>DG wrote: >> >>>Brad Greer wrote: >>>> >>>>DG wrote: >>>> >>>>>wyeknot wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>DG wrote: >>>>>>> wyeknot wrote: >>>>>>>>DG wrote: >>>>>>>>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>>>>>>>>>I stayed up until midnight just to watch them lose. Good job, Arod! >>>>>>>>>Thankfully, the Yanks outlasted the BoSox. Beat them in a come from >>>>>>>>>behind division victory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yeah, their marathon-like stamina is stunning. ### >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Imagine that... Sox fans back to their bitchy whiny ways. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pointing out dumbass analysis is neither bitchy nor whiny. Both teams >>>>>>were knocked out in the first round of the playoffs. And the Yankees >>>>>>looked nearly as bad as the Red Sox as they embraced defeat again. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Red Sox got swept. Yankees took it to the final game. Sure the Yanks >>>>>screwed up but they will reload. >>>> >>>>The Yankees massively under-achieved. They had the same >>>>regular-season record as the Red Sox and finished one game worse than >>>>the Angels. They have been "re-loading" for the past five years >>>>without succeeding, given how much money they have tied up in players >>>>who are not producing (especially their pitching staff) it's hard to >>>>see how they will be able to re-load effectively. Even Steinbrenner >>>>has limits to how much he will spend. They appear to be reverting to >>>>their style in the '80s - get expensive free agents with no real >>>>thought to how they will perform as a team. >>> >>> >>>They lost a close game 5. No big deal to this Yankee fan. >>> >>It certainly seems to be a big deal to Yankee fans here in the New >>York/New Jersey area. > > >Right... I certainly don't miss the all or nothing of the NYC area. >California has mellowed me. > > >>There is a lot of discussion on whether Torre >>should be fired, how much A-Rod sucked in the playoffs (again), how >>disappointing Randy Johnson was, how "the Angels didn't really beat >>us, we beat ourselves", etc. The Yankees are in decline and have been >>so for the past 5 years. Yes, there version of "decline" is better >>than most other teams, but declining they are. > > >LOL!!! In the past ten years they have four rings. No wonder you >choose the past 5. I chose the last 5 years because the Yankee decline has begun over the past 5 years. The team of the late '90s was an awesome team (much as it pains me to admit it). The team of the past 5 years has been a good team but hardly awesome, witness their lack of World Series championships and a couple of early losses in the playoffs. The team this year barely won the AL East. That sounds like a decline over the past 5 years to me. >>They have emptied the >>farm system to a great extent to make mid-season trades and >>Steinbrenner is allowing the Tampa braintrust to have too much input >>in the free agent buying decisions instead of relying on the solid >>baseball people (such as Stick Michaels) who built the dynasty of the >>late '90s. If you fail to see the parallels to the teams of the '80s >>it's because you're in denial. > > >How many playoff games did they play in the 1980's compared to the >last ten years? They are extremely successful compared to any time >during the 1980s'. > The current team is winning more and doing better in overall than the team of the 80s, no doubt. Comparing playoff wins would be an incorrect comparison, though, because there were no wild card rounds in the '80s. However, my point is this - the teams of the '80s were had the highest payrolls in baseball (or close to them) but didn't win championships (or even make the playoffs) because Steinbrenner was intent on collecting superstars with no thought to team chemistry or complementary players. The team of the late '90s was put together when Steinbrenner was officially suspended by MLB and player decisions were made largely by Stick Michaels. Those teams were outstanding, and they have the rings to prove it. Over the past few years Steinbrenner has been reverting to his habit of collecting superstars for the sake of superstars and there has been (not by coincidence) a decline in their post season performance. You are free to assert that the Yankees are the best team in baseball, that the Angels didn't beat them but the Yankees beat themselves, whatever. But I think you're not viewing your team objectively (and who does, after all?) when you do that. ------------------------------ From: nbndtrain@yahoo.com Subject: Re: why no JGB on archive.org Date: 13 Oct 2005 12:20:29 -0700 Agreed. Everyone seems to want to blame Deborah for enforcing a policy Jerry started, or at least didn't resist. Audience taping was not allowed at JGB shows. ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: 8/8/82 Satisfaction Date: 13 Oct 2005 12:31:33 -0700 Does anyone recall the Satisfaction from the early 80's where Bobby introduces the band during the song..then Jerry says something like. "And one of the best guys in the whole wide world, Mr. Bob Weir"??!! That was fun. cc ------------------------------ From: ¤ Alias <.@.> Crossposted-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.music.dylan,rec.music.beatles,rec.music.classical Subject: Re: your favorite road trip songs? favorite blaster song? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:36:09 GMT Another crosspost to the classical music group? Can't we leave them be already? OK - fuck it - lets all form a convoy and blast "Ride of the Valkyries" out of our windows. It'll scare the hell out of them............ pedestrians. ¤ Alias ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:41:05 GMT "Stuknot" wrote in message news:1129223494.272659.92840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > >> By looking at what's on the their .mp3 player. It's a theory I'm >> developing. > > I read about a game for iPodders - hit shuffle and post the first 10 > songs you get on the net. Best 10 win. What's the prize? Status Quo -- Big Fat Mama The Who -- Love Ain't For Keeping (live) The Who -- Emminence Front (live) Ben E. King -- I Who Have Nothing Bela Fleck -- Off The Top (The Gravity Wheel) Rolling Stones -- Sweet Black Angel Ray Charles -- (Night Time Is) The Right Time The Who -- I Can't Explain CCR -- Green River Dylan -- Masters of War Hmmmm, looks like The Who occupies a buttload of my iPod, yup. ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: Hey Brew... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:46:47 -0400 Thus spake sweetbac@pacbell.net... > > "brew ziggins" wrote in message > news:MPG.1db84aec7795a876989816@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu... > > > SCI hasn't been doing much for me lately, so I was 15 miles away in my > > living room grooving to Debashish Bhattacharya's "Calcutta Slide-Guitar, > > Vol. 3". > > * LOL....Bhattachatya was FINISHED by the time Vol 3 > was released!....his prime years were 1957 thru late '68... > An example of his genius can be found on his seminal > "Bhattacharya plays The Ragas of The Tikka Masala Orchestra" > released on the Chutney label out of Bangladesh. > This contains the famous version of "Biryani Blues" from the > "Aloo Mutter" sessions > Essential. > Listen up, Brewster, you keep this up, and we WILL pull ya hip card! > > Sweet-Nan Sweetz, you elitist Indian-er-than-thou swine, don't make me come out there and show you where to get the best burritos in SF or Detroit, or wherever the hell you pretend to live because I know you're really a pussy-whipped house-husband living in a split-level in Parsippany wearing pink bunny slippers trying to decide which casserole to defrost for the kids (NOT named Joni and Jaco BTW, more like Tyler and Marissa, eh?) before you all settle down for another night in front of The Disney Channel. -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ From: "Stuknot" Subject: Re: Good Yom Tov Date: 13 Oct 2005 12:47:38 -0700 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: .. > > Fugeddaboutit It's a great accent. I was well into high school on L.I. before I realized that "hoo-a" was actually the same word as "whore." John H. Who actually went out with the Great Hoo-a of Babylon a couple of times. ------------------------------ From: "AirtimeJunkie" Subject: Re: why no JGB on archive.org Date: 13 Oct 2005 12:52:51 -0700 Isn't pasting the link to Geno Steaks getting sort of old by now? ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. Kevin Dave Kelly wrote: > "gb" wrote in message > news:w9qdncrIZN92WtDeRVn-tg@adelphia.com... > > does anyone know why there is no Jerry Band on Archive.org? Or is it > > there > > and I'm just blind? > > http://www.genosteaks.com/ ------------------------------ From: "Stuknot" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: 13 Oct 2005 12:57:47 -0700 DGDevin wrote: > "Stuknot" wrote in message > news:1129223494.272659.92840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > >> By looking at what's on the their .mp3 player. It's a theory I'm > >> developing. > > > > I read about a game for iPodders - hit shuffle and post the first 10 > > songs you get on the net. Best 10 win. > > > What's the prize? > There won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed you will receive total consciousness. John H. ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:01:20 -0700 "Ray" wrote in message news:1129226700.522067.135990@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> "Ray" wrote: >> > Of course. But Saddam was far from being in that position. Again: >> > being a Hitler wannabe does not make one Hitler. Saddam was no Hitler, >> > not even close. >> >> Saddam wasn't even a Mussolini. >> >> He had no notion that Iraqis were a master race, or that Arabs were a >> master >> race. > He did consider Arabs superior to Jews however. Did he? Or were they nothing but convenient scapegoats for his every failure and the strawman designed to keep the populace in some sort of pan-Arab frenzy? Hamas hates the Jews. Saddam? Eh. Hitler made them scapegoats, but his hate was real, abiding, and demonstrated. He had the means to do something about it as well. Remember when Iraq was lobbing scud missiles at Isreal? When everyone was wearing gas masks? Saddam had nothing, not even a single chemical or germ or dirty nuclear bomb. Or if he did he decided not to use them. I think that scud deal was more to frighten us off than to destroy Isreal. >> His actions prior to our latest invasion led to the complete >> destruction of his military, national infrastructure, and economy, while >> Hitler marshalled the forces inside Germany to create what was the >> strongest >> military in the world. Hitler created a manufacturing and industrial >> powerhouse. Saddam created wreckage. Hitler was backed by his people, >> who >> enthusiastically bought into and participated in his dreams to rule the >> world. Saddam could barely keep the south of his country from seceding. >> Hitler forged strong alliances with like minded nations such as Italy, >> Japan, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria. Saddam had Jordan sending him >> some >> food in a few hundred trucks. Hitler conquered all of continental >> Europe. >> Saddam conquered the military-less Kuwait, the Arab version of >> Luxembourg. >> Hitler, with the aid of his insane occult minded cronies, created the >> world's first industrial death factories, designed to mechanically >> eliminate >> millions of people, all to serve this master reace theory. Saddam had no >> desire or ability to implement such a mad plan. > Yes and no. I have little doubt that Saddam had the desire to drive > Israel into the sea - Saddam fancied himself to be a modern-day > Saladin, who amonsgt other things drove the 'infidels' out of > Jerusalem. Not the same thing as death-camps, but nonetheless a desire > to initiate a racially-motivated war. Maybe. He never did. He could have. He could have participated more fully in all of the Arab Isreal wars, he could have really poured aid and training into the Palestinian areas, he could have harbored all of the Palestinian groups. He did some of that, but he was no more helpful than any other Arab country. Saudi Arabia did far more for the islamofascist terrorists than did Saddam. Saddam wasted most of his resources invading Muslim countries, mainly because he thought he could get away with it. Invade Isreal and get nuked, he knew that. >> Saddam was a brutal dictator who at one time was backed by the US. He >> was >> no different than your typical central or south American military >> strongman, >> except for his proclivity to start and lose small regional wars. Hitler >> declared war on the US and was a threat to the existence of civilization. >> Saddam was a threat only to Arabs and Iranians who wanted to spread their >> mad religion across the world. > Saddam was a serious threat to the Israelis. And if he had messed with > Israel in a substantial way that most-likely would have drawn us into > the fray as well. Which is to say, for that reason alone Saddam posed > a threat to US security interests. Saddam was also a threat to our > continued access to large quanities of middle-east oil, which of course > also translates - until the day when we finally wean ourseleves from > our oil addiction - to a major US security threat. He was a pain in the ass, not a threat; at least after our first invasion and the imposition of sanctions. He killed hundreds of thousands if not millions of muslims inside his own country and by invading muslim countries. How many jews did he kill? > > Sanctions and complaints and protests had no effect on Hitler's mad > > plans. >> UN sanctions and the policy of containment used between the invasions had >> Saddam totally locked down and out of action in the world. If sanctions >> had >> continued he would only have become weaker. > Agreed. >> Saddam's enemies, the islamofascists, far more resemble proto-Hitlers >> than >> does Saddam. > Also agreed. Wish you lived around here so we could talk for hours about this stuff. I guess you are one rmgd'er I'd like to meet. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:02:30 -0700 "leftie" wrote in message news:dim7es$1bme$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > After a lovely morning feeding the fawns (and a 23 year old stripper named > Fawn), a retired Toad settles in on the north-facing porch, gets tanked on > bourbon and spends the evening flipping off Canada. "Fuck you, Canda! FUCK > YOU!" ;-) You got it right, 'cept bourbon doesn't pass my lips. Molsen is another story. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:04:43 -0700 "Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message news:1129229425.268129.303730@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > The last 5 years have most certainly *not* been considered a success > for the NY Yankees. There are actually millions of people alive today who have never seen the Yankees win a World Series. Those 5 year olds are gonna be at least ten before they ever do. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Andrew Murawa" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:02:44 -0700 "Stuknot" wrote in message news:1129233467.575167.54180@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > DGDevin wrote: >> "Stuknot" wrote in message >> news:1129223494.272659.92840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> > >> >> By looking at what's on the their .mp3 player. It's a theory I'm >> >> developing. >> > >> > I read about a game for iPodders - hit shuffle and post the first >> > 10 >> > songs you get on the net. Best 10 win. >> >> >> What's the prize? >> > > There won't be any money, but when you die, on your > deathbed you will receive total consciousness. So, at least ya got that going for ya... ------------------------------ From: jwadetjpp@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Dead desktop pics? Date: 13 Oct 2005 13:08:54 -0700 Dylanstubs wrote: > 8/1/82 OKC Zoo > http://dylanstubs.com/okc82.jpg Set as my desktop pic now; very nice indeed. ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: (ndc) Ever Wonder.... Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:12:47 -0700 Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > "leftie" wrote in message > news:dim7es$1bme$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > > >>After a lovely morning feeding the fawns (and a 23 year old stripper named >>Fawn), a retired Toad settles in on the north-facing porch, gets tanked on >>bourbon and spends the evening flipping off Canada. "Fuck you, Canda! FUCK >>YOU!" ;-) > > > You got it right, 'cept bourbon doesn't pass my lips. > > Molsen is another story. Molson, eh? Don't you feel a little bit conflicted about flipping Canada off so much then? ------------------------------ From: Spider Dawg Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:15:07 -0500 On 2005-10-11, kpnnews@yahoo.com wrote: > > OK folks, who on rmgd would you like to meet? > That's easy! The ones that got the biggest....... biggest truck in town! Jim ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: What's on their .mp3 player Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:22:57 -0700 "Stuknot" wrote in message news:1129223494.272659.92840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Schmoe wrote: >> ba ba booie wrote: >> > How do you tell the character of a person? >> > >> >> By looking at what's on the their .mp3 player. It's a theory I'm >> developing. > > I read about a game for iPodders - hit shuffle and post the first 10 > songs you get on the net. Best 10 win. 1) Santa Monica: Everclear 2) I Walk the Line: Johnny Cash 3) Them Bones: Alice in Chains 4) Lava: the B-52's 5) Samson & Delilah: Grateful Dead, live from somewhere 6) Please Please Me: The Beatles Anthology 7) Shake My Tree: Jimmy Page & David Coverdale 8) Friend of the Devil: Other Ones, live from somewhere 9) All Apologies: Nirvana Unplugged 10) My Little Red Book: Love 2nd try: 1) Sunny Afternoon: The Kinks, live from somewhere 2) Tennesse Jed: Grateful Dead, live from somewhere 3) Three Cool Cats: The Beatles Anthology 4) Dark Magic: Moby Grape, live, Hot SF Nights 5) Electric Guitar: Talking Heads 6) Pictures of Home: Deep Purple 7) She Walks On Me: Hole 8) Are You Lovin' Me More: The Electric Prunes 9) 3 Strange Days: School of Fish 10) Fume: Beck Guess the Knack and Conway Twitty are in hiding today.............. EGBH ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .