From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #424 Dead-Flames Digest #424, Volume #48 Tue, 27 Sep 05 18:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: What's going on? (Joe) Hurricane Benefit show tomorrow (NYC) ("Greg Sasso") Re: The Ancestral Mansion (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: What's going on? ("pv34pv3p") Re: your favorite non-american or non-british pop star? (the.stugots@gmail.com) A Question for Deadheads (polasus@my-deja.com) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("king88uy7") Re: DAVE KELLY [NDC] ("Dave Kelly") Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (xxx) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Stuknot") Re: I'm a cum guzzlin Machine Hoo RAHHH ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Ken Fortenberry) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: SKB - Capistrano (rlrs@comcast.net) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Joe) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: FEMA rehires Brown (JC Martin) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (leftie) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Booing at GD shows? ("Bzl.") Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (Mark Hood) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (DG) Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (DG) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (DG) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (DG) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Joe Subject: Re: What's going on? Date: 27 Sep 2005 22:49:23 GMT Rogues Island's finest wrote: > I had no idea the University of Phoenix was so well regarded. Yo, Nantucket Ass-wipe. Trash UC Berkeley all you want. It'll simply prove that you're a Nitwit. Joe ------------------------------ From: "Greg Sasso" Subject: Hurricane Benefit show tomorrow (NYC) Date: 27 Sep 2005 11:35:34 -0700 Looks pretty great. This is from the Summerstage site. Wednesday, September 28, 2005 >From 4:00 PM to 10:00 PM Central Park SummerStage The 20th anniversary season wraps with a Benefit Concert FROM the Heart of New York City TO the Heart of New Orleans on September 28, 2005. Admission is free with a Suggested Donation of $25.00 - all net proceeds will donated to the New Orleans Musicians' Clinic. Doors open at 4:00, Show starts at 5:30pm. New Orleans Cuisine provided by Blue Ribbon and Jacques Imo's. T-shirts and screen printing provided by Amalgamated Culture Works, Burlington, Vermont. All T-shirt proceeds benefit New Orleans Musicians' Clinic. Amalgamated Culture Works Net proceeds of Snapple and soft drink purchases at Soul to Soul will also benefit New Orleans Musicians' Clinic. Have a drink! Featured Artists include: Cassandra Wilson, Allen Toussaint, Ivan Neville, Dr. John, Angelique Kidjo, Lou Reed with Mike Rathke, Lori Anderson, Cory Glover, Vernon Reid, Hubert Sumlin, DJ Logic, Soulive, Dar Williams, Drive By Truckers, J Mascis, Bettye Lavette, Charlie Hunter, Christian McBride, Rock'n Dopsie, Rob Wasserman and Tony Thunder Smith (list in formation) ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: The Ancestral Mansion Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:03:37 -0400 wyeknot wrote: > > Richard Morris wrote: > > Brisket and a beer, eh? For breakfast. Jeez man, you should be ashamed. > > Who in their right mind would have brisket for breakfast? > > Have you never experienced the culinary delights of corned beef hash?!?! Go to Johnny's Luncheonette in Newton Center for a Sunday breakfast sometime. If you're in the mood for hash, order "The Diner." It's a huge portion of delicious hash with a pair of fried eggs on top and a mountain of home fries. The coffee's good and the orange juice is either fresh squeezed or Tropicana (your choice). The prices are reasonable too. Just get there before 9am, otherwise you'll be waiting in line for at least 30 minutes. http://www.deepseamedia.com/Johnnys/home.htm > That's brisket baby! That's breakfast, baby! ~Ted (whose mouth is watering now) ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: What's going on? Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:04:50 -0700 >Trash UC Berkeley all you want. It'll simply prove that you're a Nitwit. I had no idea their quota system included microcephalics... pv34pv3p(Of course a lot could be explained by that....) ------------------------------ From: the.stugots@gmail.com Crossposted-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films,soc.culture.greek,rec.music.rock-pop-r+b.1960s Subject: Re: your favorite non-american or non-british pop star? Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:11:08 -0700 jovanotti ------------------------------ From: polasus@my-deja.com Subject: A Question for Deadheads Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:25:01 -0700 > This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By > giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. > The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which > you will have to make a decision. Remember that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous. Please scroll down slowly and give due > consideration to each line. > > THE SITUATION > You are in Florida, Miami to be specific. There is chaos all around > you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of > biblical proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major > newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless. You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. > Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury. > > THE TEST > Suddenly you see a man in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer. Somehow the man looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it is. It's George W. Bush! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him under forever. You have two options--you can save the life of George W. Bush, or you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize-winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful politicians. > > THE QUESTION > Here's the question, and please give an honest answer: > Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the > classic simplicity of black and white? > ------------------------------ From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:27:42 -0700 Joe wrote: > You didn't even attempt to answer a single question I asked of you, so > why the fuck should I bother with an anonymous troll? Joe's refusal to have an open debate that isn't based on liberal propaganda is pretty common around here, and it got me thinking... Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at expressing and defending political points ? I think it's because to be a conservative deadhead, one really would have had to think his way through things, because the culture in which he's submerged is so universally liberal. Liberal deadheads, on the other hand, just absorb the propaganda they are submerged in, but really haven't thought their way through it, and are therefore unable to argue and defend their points. I think that's why there's so much name calling and general ridiculousness, the liberals don't really have the tools to discuss, and it's frustrating to them. ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: DAVE KELLY [NDC] Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:30:33 GMT YO! I thought I TOLD you to contact me OFF board! I think it's HIGH time this...."Reverend"....this man of the CLOTH...this...this CHARLATAN was DEbunked once & for all! Lets set the record straight, shall we? This cry for help this guy just posted is easily explained. Ya see, "Aardvark" is simply code for...for..um....oh hell.. Penis Pumps. There...I said it....I aint ashamed! As a side hustle, I clean and refurbish penis pumps. Do a healthy mail order binniss too. The Rev here somehow got a hold of my e-mail address, and requested a "freebie"...OK....he's a dead head...I can throw him a bone, sure, why not.....off the "El Gigante 500" went... he sends it back....claims it "don't work"...claims the pump is too big....quote: "It aint suckin' nothing!...this thing is making my johnson turn blue...not big....just blue" I regret coming forth with this disclosure on a public chat group, but the barrage of e-mails from Chicago has been relentless as of late...you fucked with the WRONG penis pump salesman, there hotshot! What! Sweet-Pumps LLC ------------------------------ From: xxx Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite Date: 27 Sep 2005 18:32:02 -0500 Reply-To: newsgroup On 27 Sep 2005 04:35:47 -0700, "mjd" wrote: > >Stephen St. wrote: >> Wow, that was fun. >> >> The comments in England after the electric set are priceless. >> >> Part 2 tomorrow? > >yes - same time same channel. > >just an incredible show. the snippet of Ballad of a Thin Man from >England was nothing short of astounding. to think they booed and >heckled him for that stuff - wtf... The With God on our Side duet with Joan Baez brought a tear to my eye it was so beautiful and I'm one of those that ran out of the Kaiser Aud when Joan sang with the Dead. Jerry said of Dylan that he was one of the most slippery people that he had ever met. It was impossible to pin him down on just about anything. Lorenzo ------------------------------ From: "Stuknot" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:33:59 -0700 king88uy7 wrote: > Joe wrote: > > You didn't even attempt to answer a single question I asked of you, so > > why the fuck should I bother with an anonymous troll? > > Joe's refusal to have an open debate that isn't based on liberal > propaganda is pretty common around here, and it got me thinking... > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at expressing > and defending political points ? > > I think it's because to be a conservative deadhead, one really would > have had to think his way through things, because the culture in which > he's submerged is so universally liberal. Liberal deadheads, on the > other hand, just absorb the propaganda they are submerged in, but > really haven't thought their way through it, and are therefore unable > to argue and defend their points. I think that's why there's so much > name calling and general ridiculousness, the liberals don't really have > the tools to discuss, and it's frustrating to them. An exception to your own rule, eh? Cool. John H. ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: I'm a cum guzzlin Machine Hoo RAHHH Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:37:16 -0700 Hey Sean! Couldn't help but notice you outin' yourself via changing the title... Kind of a novel approach... > Once a cum guzzler always a cum guzzler. Gonna hafta defer to your vastly superior knowledge and experience on that particular subject... >Semper Fi!! And pledging loyalty to your particular source of satisfaction is way more than we needed to know... pv34pv3p ------------------------------ From: Ken Fortenberry Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:40:55 GMT king88uy7 wrote: > Joe's refusal to have an open debate that isn't based on liberal > propaganda is pretty common around here, and it got me thinking... > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at expressing > and defending political points ? ... The regular people here, the deadheads, aren't much interested in defending their politics. I've got my point of view, you've got yours, that's cool brother, peace, love and see you later. The right-wing nitwits have something to prove. Mostly because they're embarrassed of themselves I think, but it doesn't much matter *why* they have something to prove, somebody with an agenda, even a right-wing nitwit agenda, will necessarily be a more ardent, pugnacious and tenacious Usenet politician. That and most of them steal their talking points straight from Rush Limbaugh. -- Ken Fortenberry ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:41:09 -0700 king88uy7 wrote: > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at expressing > and defending political points ? This is a joke, right? In this thread alone we've got a conservative who won't even own up to whether he thinks that the stuff that he forwarded here is misleadingly biased or not. Ray ------------------------------ From: rlrs@comcast.net Subject: Re: SKB - Capistrano Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:45:38 -0700 I caught the new lineup at the Mystic on 9/11/05.Do not miss these guys if they come to your town. ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 23:47:35 GMT Excuse me, but I have a plane to catch, so... I just want to urge those of you who despise war-without-end, who are disgusted with FEMA, hate the fact that Bush has wrecked our economy, and anyone who is angry about $3 gas... Express yourself on 11/2. But, even before that, contact your Senators and Congressperson, and tell them they (and we) can do better than genocide, pollution, bribery, corruption and theft. And, best to ignore the RWNDH trolls. They just want to distract you. Have fun everyone, enjoy DNB on 10/15 and 10/16 (www.nelsonband.com), and dig the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass. And, again...ignore the trolls. Joe ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 16:50:09 -0700 SHhhhhhh... If we're vewwy vewwy quiet we can listen to Ken and Ray wrestle with their hyprocracy... Thanks king88uy7! pv34pv3p ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: FEMA rehires Brown Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:03:18 GMT houndish@netzero.net wrote: > yes - America is great. Don't like it? Leave dirtbag hippy. Ohhhhh, the hate! FYI, he has left it though. He lives in Marin dooood. Gotta get yourself up to date here. Joe left the east coast many years ago. -JC ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:01:50 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > SHhhhhhh... > > If we're vewwy vewwy quiet we can listen to Ken and Ray wrestle with > their hyprocracy... Hey upside down deadhead, I hear nothing but crickets in response to the direct questions Ray asked you. ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:00:31 -0700 >And, again...ignore the trolls. Make it easy for us and get on the damn plane already... And ya know what Joe... Even I wish you a safe trip... Mostly cuz us EMS folks never really enjoy pullin bodies from wrecked planes...But beyond that..Who's gonna come up with the crazy left wing shit ya'll spread while yer gone??? pv34pv3p(He really should appoint someone to fill in....) ------------------------------ From: "Bzl." Subject: Re: Booing at GD shows? Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:07:26 -0400 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:s8g_e.1031$Fi3.338@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... > Those Solo/Kahn gigs were brutal. > As much as I love jerry's guitar playing, > these proved how much he needed a band. > If he wanted to do a low key club gig, fine... > but to play large places and have the swirling > horde partying like it was a Dead show was a > mistake....The 1st gig at the Capitol Theater > was painful to witness....having John Kahn show > up later and add his...uh...unique take on the > stand up bass just made it worse. > Not to mention Garcias ragged chops on the acoustic. > Am I wrong here? > No. No. I was at that Capital Theatre gig, too. "History! Only Jerry solo show!" BFD. Jerry acoustic guitar playing needed embellishment, and more than Kahn. Though, I gotta say it was better than the next night at Nassau which was the worst GD show I ever saw. Brutal. I'm pretty sure I booed them that night. > This will be the final word in this thread. > ENOUGH allready. > You're KILLIN' me! > > Sweetbac Productions > > ------------------------------ Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite From: Mark Hood Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:05:57 -0700 "mjd" writes: > just an incredible show. the snippet of Ballad of a Thin Man from > England was nothing short of astounding. to think they booed and > heckled him for that stuff - wtf... The conventional wisdom is that they felt betrayed by the move from acoustic to electric instruments. It's really interesting to see how the folk community considered him to be the next bearer of the torch. I've only really listened to his electric work, so I had no idea. But I think a case can be made that some people were booing because the sound was terrible. Back in the days before decent sound reinforcement equipment, electric musicians had to crank their amps loud enough to be heard directly by the audience, and the sound was often atrocious. This was before most sound engineers really had a handle on how to deal with rock bands. Certainly the electric concert sound through my tv was awful for many of the segments. Is the dvd better? ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:07:58 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > >>And, again...ignore the trolls. > >Make it easy for us and get on the damn plane already... > >And ya know what Joe... > >Even I wish you a safe trip... We can tell you are concerned about bushies fuckups... Just have him call off the sowdeeeeezzzz this evening while he sucks offf the men in sheets... >Mostly cuz us EMS folks never really enjoy pullin bodies from wrecked >planes...But beyond that..Who's gonna come up with the crazy left wing >shit ya'll spread while yer gone??? > >pv34pv3p(He really should appoint someone to fill in....) You can't back up your assertions anyway, so cheer for the piece of shit while we all meditate on the good that will happen when he's gone. ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:09:28 -0700 Mark Hood wrote: > >mjd writes: >> just an incredible show. the snippet of Ballad of a Thin Man from >> England was nothing short of astounding. to think they booed and >> heckled him for that stuff - wtf... > >The conventional wisdom is that they felt betrayed by the move from >acoustic to electric instruments. It's really interesting to see how >the folk community considered him to be the next bearer of the torch. >I've only really listened to his electric work, so I had no idea. > >But I think a case can be made that some people were booing because >the sound was terrible. Back in the days before decent sound >reinforcement equipment, electric musicians had to crank their amps >loud enough to be heard directly by the audience, and the sound was >often atrocious. This was before most sound engineers really had a >handle on how to deal with rock bands. > >Certainly the electric concert sound through my tv was awful for many >of the segments. Is the dvd better? Don't sweat it, Dylan usually sounds like shit. ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:15:01 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > Ray wrote: > > king88uy7 wrote: > > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at > > > expressing and defending political points ? > > > > This is a joke, right? In this thread alone we've got a > > conservative who won't even own up to whether he thinks that > > the stuff that he forwarded here is misleadingly biased or not. > > SHhhhhhh... > > If we're vewwy vewwy quiet we can listen to Ken and Ray wrestle with > their hyprocracy... Ok PV - I'll bite. But only if you first answer this question that you keep running away from. (PV, running away from an open and honest discussion of something that he posted here? #Now there's a surprise.#) So PV: Do you REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what you forwarded here[1]? Please answer directly with: A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what I forwarded here -or- B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what I forwarded here Based on your record PV I'd say that the smart money is on you again not answering the question and instead yet again throwing mud and running away. But you never know - you might decide to engage in an honest, open and straightforward discussion and actually address and directly answer instead. Ray [1] PV forwarded here: ____________________________ 1. There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq during the month of January..... In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war torn country of Iraq. 2. When some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war, consider this ... FDR...led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. Truman....finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,334 per year. John F. Kennedy. ..started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson....turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year. Clinton...went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. 3. In the years since terrorists attacked us President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51-day operation. We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records. It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick killing a woman. ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:19:07 -0700 Ray wrote: > >pv34pv3p wrote: >> Ray wrote: >> > king88uy7 wrote: >> > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at >> > > expressing and defending political points ? >> > >> > This is a joke, right? In this thread alone we've got a >> > conservative who won't even own up to whether he thinks that >> > the stuff that he forwarded here is misleadingly biased or not. >> >> SHhhhhhh... >> >> If we're vewwy vewwy quiet we can listen to Ken and Ray wrestle with >> their hyprocracy... > >Ok PV - I'll bite. But only if you first answer this question that you >keep running away from. (PV, running away from an open and honest >discussion of something that he posted here? #Now there's a surprise.#) >So PV: > >Do you REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what >you forwarded here[1]? Please answer directly with: > >A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in >what I forwarded here > >-or- > >B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased >in what I forwarded here > >Based on your record PV I'd say that the smart money is on you again >not answering the question and instead yet again throwing mud and >running away. But you never know - you might decide to engage in an >honest, open and straightforward discussion and actually address and >directly answer instead. Don't hold your breath, he's a pussy. He can't back up the spew he puts forth. ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:25:50 -0700 >A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in >what I forwarded here >-or- >B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased >in what I forwarded here Uhhhh....What is Yes to both for 1000 Alex... pv34pv3p(That was easy....) ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:26:12 -0700 DG wrote: > Ray wrote: > > > >pv34pv3p wrote: > >> Ray wrote: > >> > king88uy7 wrote: > >> > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at > >> > > expressing and defending political points ? > >> > > >> > This is a joke, right? In this thread alone we've got a > >> > conservative who won't even own up to whether he thinks that > >> > the stuff that he forwarded here is misleadingly biased or not. > >> > >> SHhhhhhh... > >> > >> If we're vewwy vewwy quiet we can listen to Ken and Ray wrestle with > >> their hyprocracy... > > > >Ok PV - I'll bite. But only if you first answer this question that you > >keep running away from. (PV, running away from an open and honest > >discussion of something that he posted here? #Now there's a surprise.#) > >So PV: > > > >Do you REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what > >you forwarded here[1]? Please answer directly with: > > > >A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in > >what I forwarded here > > > >-or- > > > >B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased > >in what I forwarded here > > > >Based on your record PV I'd say that the smart money is on you again > >not answering the question and instead yet again throwing mud and > >running away. But you never know - you might decide to engage in an > >honest, open and straightforward discussion and actually address and > >directly answer instead. > > > Don't hold your breath, he's a pussy. He can't back up the spew he > puts forth. No worries, I'm not holding my breath - there's enough throwing mud and running away in PV's posting history now that smart money is definitely on him throwing mud and/or running away. But hey, if PV does that yet again instead of an honest discussion yet again at least it's entertaining to watch. Ray ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:28:48 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > >>A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in >>what I forwarded here > > >>-or- > > >>B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased >>in what I forwarded here > > >Uhhhh....What is Yes to both for 1000 Alex... > >pv34pv3p(That was easy....) Someone give this bitch a tampon... Bushy is a piece of shit. Wake up, nitwit... ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:28:50 -0700 >Don't hold your breath, he's a pussy. He can't back up the spew he >puts forth. Thanks for the encouragement....but I been thinkin' the same all along... pv34pv3p ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 17:29:09 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > >A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in > >what I forwarded here > > >-or- > > >B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased > >in what I forwarded here > > Uhhhh....What is Yes to both for 1000 Alex... > > pv34pv3p(That was easy....) Logic isn't your strong point, is it PV. Care to answer honestly now, or are you going to keep running away from an honest discussion here? ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .