From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #554 Dead-Flames Digest #554, Volume #48 Tue, 11 Oct 05 21:00:01 PDT Contents: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: Genesis Reunion in the works? ("Rupert") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans ("Steve Terry") Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("Dave Kelly") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (DG) Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans ("Steve Terry") Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? ("frndthdevl") "they're all the same" (ndc) (John Doherty) Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: MUCH cheese this week ("tim_ratdog") Re: MUCH cheese this week ("tim_ratdog") Re: Hardly Strictly Bluegrass photos! (Steve Lenier) Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (DG) Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) ("Carlisle") Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: Cramps & What's Everyone Planning for Halloween? (NDC) ("band beyond description") Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("Richard Morris") Re: White Sox: the most unsexiest drought in baseball history (NDC) ("band beyond description") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? ("The Iron Muffin") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn ("scarletbgonias@hotmail.com") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? ("The Iron Muffin") Re: YIPPIE MUSEUM PRESS PRESENTS THE DYLAN TO ENGLISH DICTIONARY ("Stig") Re: Professor Lesh ("band beyond description") Re: Muffin ("The Iron Muffin") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? ("Neil X.") Re: Professor Lesh (dkhedmo) Feedback on my new music site? (carboneau@gmail.com) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: 11 Oct 2005 18:51:30 -0700 I hope I have all the info to do this in a good way. Downloading the show first, then will grab the software, etc. to do the duty. The show: 3/31/73 - looks like it should be a goodie and if successful,I'll be well on my way to becoming '73 certified (then, the remainder of the archive (that I don't have), yeah baby). ------------------------------ From: "Rupert" Subject: Re: Genesis Reunion in the works? Date: 11 Oct 2005 18:51:55 -0700 Shit yeah! I've only been waiting my entire adult life for these geezers to get back together. I think Gabriel finally realized that no matter how goofy he makes himself look, his solo work is no longer getting anyone's attention. Time to see if the 'ol Slipperman costume fits! ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: 11 Oct 2005 18:59:10 -0700 I've met Geraldine. She's a sweetie! Larry ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:02:56 -0700 Man, this download is taking foooooorevvvvvvvvvvvvvaaah (think Sand Lot), hope there are enough Sierras. ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:04:46 -0500 "DG" wrote in message news:2gpok1pb1kk81drn3v01eueposfk471ols@4ax.com... > wyeknot wrote: >> >>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>> Nothing for us Sox fans to brag about, a flawed team got smoked in the >>> first round. Pretty much the same as the Yankees: flawed team, out >>> after one round. >> >>That's exactly correct. Claiming the Yankees "screwed up" rather than >>admitting the obvious (flawed team, Angels beat 'em fair and square) is >>kind of pathetic. > > > Did you miss Arod's error? Did you miss Crosby and Sheffield running > into one another? > > >>Not suprising I suppose given the (relatively) long >>drought in their post-season success yet with a ballooning payroll. > > > A payroll that pays for two other teams besides the Yanks... > > I got an idea. Why don't the Yankees and Red Sox have their own World Series on pay per view. You East coasters can drool and ooze all over it while the rest of us watch the real World series. Would that make youze all feel better? Buncha crybabies, you are. ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:04:16 GMT wrote in message news:1129081890.888583.194280@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >I hope I have all the info to do this in a good way. Downloading the > show first, then will grab the software, etc. to do the duty. The show: > 3/31/73 - looks like it should be a goodie and if successful,I'll be > well on my way to becoming '73 certified (then, the remainder of the > archive (that I don't have), yeah baby). * Oh lordy...that "Truckin'>Other One>Know You Rider" WILL mash ya potatoes, I Gah-Ron-Tee! Spuds Sweetbac ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:09:09 -0700 Steve Terry wrote: > >DG wrote > >> wyeknot wrote: >>> >>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>>> Nothing for us Sox fans to brag about, a flawed team got smoked in the >>>> first round. Pretty much the same as the Yankees: flawed team, out >>>> after one round. >>> >>>That's exactly correct. Claiming the Yankees "screwed up" rather than >>>admitting the obvious (flawed team, Angels beat 'em fair and square) is >>>kind of pathetic. >> >> >> Did you miss Arod's error? Did you miss Crosby and Sheffield running >> into one another? >> >> >>>Not suprising I suppose given the (relatively) long >>>drought in their post-season success yet with a ballooning payroll. >> >> >> A payroll that pays for two other teams besides the Yanks... >> >> > >I got an idea. Why don't the Yankees and Red Sox have their own World Series >on pay per view. Why? >You East coasters can drool and ooze all over it while the >rest of us watch the real World series. Would that make youze all feel >better? Buncha crybabies, you are. LOL... Who's your team? ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:13:33 -0500 "DG" wrote in message news:21sok1pns29q05sjtgth5sfhhrhl1ckclm@4ax.com... > Steve Terry wrote: >> >>DG wrote >> >>> wyeknot wrote: >>>> >>>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>>>> Nothing for us Sox fans to brag about, a flawed team got smoked in the >>>>> first round. Pretty much the same as the Yankees: flawed team, out >>>>> after one round. >>>> >>>>That's exactly correct. Claiming the Yankees "screwed up" rather than >>>>admitting the obvious (flawed team, Angels beat 'em fair and square) is >>>>kind of pathetic. >>> >>> >>> Did you miss Arod's error? Did you miss Crosby and Sheffield running >>> into one another? >>> >>> >>>>Not suprising I suppose given the (relatively) long >>>>drought in their post-season success yet with a ballooning payroll. >>> >>> >>> A payroll that pays for two other teams besides the Yanks... >>> >>> >> >>I got an idea. Why don't the Yankees and Red Sox have their own World >>Series >>on pay per view. > > > Why? > > >>You East coasters can drool and ooze all over it while the >>rest of us watch the real World series. Would that make youze all feel >>better? Buncha crybabies, you are. > > > LOL... Who's your team? > > Umm, the Cincinnati Reds, actually. We've won 9 straight World Series games, dating back to game 7 of '75 against the Red Sox. We then swept the Yankees in '76 and the Athletics in '90. Since then we've just been complaining about the Yankees winning all of the time. ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:13:57 -0700 Oh Sweet Spuds, and it looks like Donna doesn't ruin another GSET. I've finally made it to the 21st century and tons of blanks to boot. ------------------------------ From: "frndthdevl" Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:34:44 -0700 joker4153@comcast.net wrote: > I've met Geraldine. She's a sweetie! > > Larry she's over rated. Too much makeup and publicity. Some of you may need to get out a bit more. ------------------------------ From: John Doherty Subject: "they're all the same" (ndc) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:37:17 -0400 > "leftie" wrote in message > news:dhjomt$7gs$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > > Outing a CIA agent is not orders of magnatude different than lying to > > cover up a blowjob? In article , "volkfolk" wrote: > Without rehashing the tired old debate about Clinton's sexual history and > the witch hunt that the Republicans conducted in it's wake, ....(a prelude to him doing just that...;-)... it wasn't "just > about a blow job". There is compelling evidence that Clinton was (and may > still be for all I know) a sexual predator, and if you believe Juanita > Brodrick, a rapist. He used his power and position to seduce women who > worked for him. Everytime he brings this up, I have to counter: "compelling evidence"? Outside of Juanita's accusations (that she sat on for like 15 years before seeking redress)? What other "compelling" evidence are you privy to? In Monica's very detailed recollections, she was every bit the aggressor with Bubba, much to Ken Starr's (& apparently your) befuddlement. If Clinton were some sort of predator, wouldn't the long list of women who claim to have had sex with him include more thna just one with a semi-credible allegation? We know more about his sex life than just about any figure in history. > > It was a rather damning indictment of the Feminists and the left who made a > big deal about Anita Hill's allegations about Clarence Thomas, that they > didn't share the same outrage when the allegations were about someone who > was on their side > (I don't believe that Thomas was a qualified nominee for the Supreme Court, > I was just using him as an example of the hypocrisy that runs rampant inside > the Beltway, and in the media) I think you proceed from a presumption of criminality re: Clinton, and many of us do not. > > I stand by my statement. All politicians are scumbags. Power corrupts, and > absolute power corrupts absolutely. > I think your statement is ridiculous. Clinton was a far, far better public servant than Bush, who has served to enrich his cronies hand over fist while appointing incompetents to wreck federal government in order to discredit the idea. By the way, this moral equivalency is the end game of negative campaigning. Though all politicians disdain it publicly, the sad fact is it works. If many citizens resign themselves to your attitude, many of them will not vote at all leaving the far worse pigs in power. Nixon does not equal Carter, and Clinton does not equal GW Bush. JD ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:42:26 -0700 85% of the women in the White House Administration under William Jefferson Clinton said they'd never have sex with him again. I don't condone a man's (or woman's) infidelity, but what is happening now to the collective whole is far more serious than what happened between a man and a wife. ------------------------------ From: "tim_ratdog" Subject: Re: MUCH cheese this week Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:47:01 -0700 Andy Gefen wrote: > CHEEEEEEEEEEESE, Gromit! > I do like a bit of Gorgonzola -tim ------------------------------ From: "tim_ratdog" Subject: Re: MUCH cheese this week Date: 11 Oct 2005 19:55:30 -0700 wyeknot wrote: > was my first concert at the Casino (a personal low water mark as I have > lived in the area for over 10 years now) and I thought it was a very fun > place - lots of space maybe due to post-RI-Station fire tendency not to > oversell. I was 30 ft from the stage both nights at the 7-8 o'clock > position with the left PAs staring me in the face and with plenty of > room to move around. Yeah, it is pretty much my favorite venue now (along with the Stone Church), not just because it is near-by and avoids Boston - you also get the GA, the ocean, the free parking and easy access to the front of the stage. Great venue if you don't have to use the bathroom. Seeing SCI in such a small sized, accessible venue is great. > be out. The sound was noticably less muddy for the Sunday night show. Holy cow. Muddy would describe the sound I heard on Sunday. I just listened to some of that torrent and it sounds better than I remembered it. Strange how that works ;-) -tim ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:04:36 -0700 Subject: Re: Hardly Strictly Bluegrass photos! From: Steve Lenier in article YEX1f.2655$AY4.256@newssvr24.news.prodigy.net, Roxanne McDaniel at theothr1@sbcglobal.net wrote on 10/8/05 3:22 PM: > http://www.strictlybluegrass.com/2005/artists.shtml There are some crowd > shots in there too. Can anyone find themselves? Steve Lenier? Dave Kelly? > > sorry Rox, I wasn't there...besides, I'm trying to limit my internet appearances to comic strips these days :) Steve ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:08:45 -0700 Steve Terry wrote: > >Umm, the Cincinnati Reds, actually. We've won 9 straight World Series games, >dating back to game 7 of '75 against the Red Sox. We then swept the Yankees >in '76 and the Athletics in '90. Since then we've just been complaining >about the Yankees winning all of the time. I'm thinking that Jr might wind up on the Yanks. ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) Date: 11 Oct 2005 20:11:13 -0700 scarletbgonias@hotmail.com wrote: > 85% of the women in the White House Administration under William > Jefferson Clinton said they'd never have sex with him again. > > I don't condone a man's (or woman's) infidelity, but what is happening > now to the collective whole is far more serious than what happened > between a man and a wife. You nailed that, sister!! (Now watch someone perceive a sexual connotation from that sentence!) I do agree with you contrary to the political rap I've brought on myself around here. "Politically Incorrect" w/ Bill Maher was especially good tonight. I found myself agreeing with...Ben Affleck! Word. Carrie "poli-many tics-blood sucking insects" ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: "they're all the same" (ndc) Date: 11 Oct 2005 20:17:08 -0700 I'd think that many folks on either side of the political spectrum would agree that we're fucked. ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Cramps & What's Everyone Planning for Halloween? (NDC) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:13:34 +0900 "marklaw" wrote in message news:1129044455.660894.258960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > >I'm gonna be a Chicago Cub!! > > That's truly scary. > yeah, I was thinking Count Floyd (SCTV's Joe Flaherty): "Ooh kids...that's a scary movie! Aaahooooooo!" -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:25:07 -0700 wrote in message news:1129081890.888583.194280@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >I hope I have all the info to do this in a good way. Downloading the > show first, then will grab the software, etc. to do the duty. The show: > 3/31/73 - looks like it should be a goodie and if successful,I'll be > well on my way to becoming '73 certified (then, the remainder of the > archive (that I don't have), yeah baby). > Hmm. I read the subject line out of the corner of my eye, and it looked like, "Oooh, attempting to do my first sin". I wondered what took you so long to get around to it! R. ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: White Sox: the most unsexiest drought in baseball history (NDC) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:15:46 +0900 "leftie" wrote in message news:dih00u$2r3o$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > band beyond description wrote: > > > http://www.ribs.com/video-broadband.html > > > > no, sorry Rox, I meant this link: > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20051011/sp_usatoday/whitesoxlooktoendtheotherdrought > > It is possible that there is a racial element that is not discussed in > the article (unless I missed it?). > > Wrigley Field, the home of the Cubs, is almost exclusively filled with > white fans. The White Sox's crowd more closely resembles the diverse > crowd at an A's home game. Does this affect the amount of media coverage > and hype? Quite possibly... > well, in a very *general* sense (exceptions abound), the Sox have always been the blue-collar working class team, whereas the Cubs have been Yuppie white urban/suburban, much like the North Side/South Side divide that is Chicagoland. -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:32:50 -0400 k sturm wrote: > Iron Muffin because I think he has to be one of the sweetest guys > in the world. Aww, shucks. *blushing, shuffling feet* -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:34:51 -0400 Don "nuke Mexico" Goodwin wrote: > Sherry wrote: > > ps Iron Muffin IS a really sweet guy. :) > > Most of us already knew he's limp wristedly sweet. You're just jealous. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "scarletbgonias@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: Oooh, attempting to do my first shn Date: 11 Oct 2005 20:28:17 -0700 I'm a good ole' Roman Catholic Irish Girl, no sins over heah ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:37:09 -0400 Sherry wrote: > ps Iron Muffin IS a really sweet guy. :) Likewise, I'm sure! > And a good musician, too! I do my humble best and hope that it's sufficient... -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "Stig" Crossposted-To: alt.culture.us.1960s,rec.music.folk,rec.music.dylan,alt.music.byrds Subject: Re: YIPPIE MUSEUM PRESS PRESENTS THE DYLAN TO ENGLISH DICTIONARY Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:32:07 -0700 Dylan's garbage? Perhaps Bob had a good reason to kick the shit outa this clown. "ARON KAY" wrote in message news:C6V2f.5195$Iq3.1614@trndny01... > http://pieman.org/dylanology.htm > > YIPPIE! MUSEUM PRESS > > 9 Bleecker Street > > New York, New York > > 10012 > > yippiemuseumpress@nyc.rr.com > > > > PRESENTS: THE DYLAN TO ENGLISH DICTIONARY > > > > BY AJ WEBERMAN > > > > Not since Verlaine and Rimbaud has there been a relationship like Alan > Jules > Weberman and Robert Allen Zimmerman. Weberman has made sense of out what > has > been a puzzle to everyone before and put it in a form unheard in the world > of rock. The Dictionary runs 560 pages, costs $33 and is complemented by a > Dylan Written Word Database http://dylanology.com/wrtwrddb.htm that > contains > all of Dylan's writings, including Chronicles and Tarantula. You can also > read samples from this book by clicking http://dylanology.com/sample.pdf. > Requires PDF Reader. > > > > A.J. Weberman is best known for his analysis of Dylan's garbage and for > having been attacked by Bob Dylan on Elizabeth Street in Manhattan in the > early 1970's. Dylan viewed this incident as the "laughter down on > Elizabeth > Street / And a lonesome bell tone in that valley of stone / where [he] > bathed in a stream of pure heat" (Where Are You Tonight, 1978). A.J. being > the anti-Dylan fits into Dylan prophecy that Joan Baez related in NO > DIRECTION HOME: "Dylan would always say, 'What do you think of this?' 'I > didn't understand the thing at all but I loved it so I said, 'Okay, I'm > gonna figure this one out.' So I read it and gave back my interpretation > of > what it was about and he said, 'That's pretty fuckin' good.' And he said > 'Years from now all these people, all these assholes, are going to be > writing about all the shit I write...and what it means.'" > > > > A.J. is featured on Joel Gilbert's DVD Bob Dylan World Tours 1966 to 1974, > and will appear on Gilbert's next DVD. Chromedreams in the UK released > Weberman's legendary telephone conversations with Bob Dylan. Rolling Stone > Books will soon publish an interview Weberman did with Dylan. AJ is > mentioned in numerous articles and books about Bob Dylan and two > independent > filmmakers in the UK are currently putting together The Ballad of AJ > Weberman. He is the author of My Life In Garbology (Stonehill Press, 1980) > and Coup D'Etat In America: The CIA and the Assassination of JFK (The > Third > Press, 1975, Quick Publishing Co 1992). The latter book is in its fourth > edition and also available from amazon.com as is The Dylan To English > Dictionary. > > > > ABOUT THE YIPPIE MUSEUM PRESS > > > > The Yippie! Museum Press (YMP) is the publications division of The Yippie! > Museum, an institution dedicated to preserving the works and artifacts of > the leaders and members of the Youth International Party, a loose-knit > organization founded by Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Paul Krassner, Stew > Alpert and others in 1968, prior to the National Democratic Convention in > Chicago. Irvin Dana Beal, an organizer for Cures-Not-Wars, serves as > Curator > of The Yippie! Museum. Board Members of The Yippie! Museum include: > William > Prop of WBAI radio, John Sinclair, former Prisoner Of Weed (POW) and > founder > of the White Panther Party, Stewart Albert, founding member of the > Yippies! > and Vietnam Day Committee, Paul DeRienzo, radio journalist, and several > other surviving political activists. > > > > The YIPPIE! MUSEUM PRESS can be reached at 212-677-4899 > > > > To order a book go to BookSurge http://booksurge.com or Amazon or email > IDIOT WIND idiotwind1971@yahoo.com for an autographed copy. You can also > write to AJ at The National Institute of Garbology 318 Third Avenue #520 > New > York, New York 10010. > > > > WEBERMAN'S FUNERAL ORATION FOR BOB DYLAN: > > > > Hipsters, tripsters, and finger-poppin' daddies, > > Knock me your lobes, > > I came to lay Dylan out, > > And to hip you to him > > > > The bad jazz that a cat blows, > > Wails long after he's cut out. > > The groovy poetry is often stashed with their frames, > > So I don't put Dylan down as a poet. > > > > The old A.J. hath laid a story on you > > That Dylan was hungry for heroin > > If it were so, it was a sad drag, > > And sadly hath the Dylan cat answered it. > > > > And when the chicks with the empty kicks hath copped > > Yea, Dylan hath copped too, > > And he cried up a storm. > > > > To be a meaning grabber a stiffer riff must be blown. > > Without the Dylanological Method a stud can't even rule an anthill. > > Yet for many years I was swinging for the moon. > > And, yea, A.J. is a worthy stud. > > > > I came to wail at Dylan's wake. > > He was my buddy, but he leveled me > > Yet I can still dig that Dylan has eyes for poetry, > > And A.J. is a solid cat. > > > > It is true I returned with many freaks > > And brought them to Dylan's crib for a "Birthday Party". > > Yea, Dylan's garbage was my booty > > Though it smelled of Jakob's doody > > > > Some claim that A.J.s' Dylan to English Dictionary is a gag. > > But read the book and find out it is solid. > > I came here to blow. > > Now, stay cool while I blow. > > > > You all dug him once > > Because you were hipped that Dylan was solid > > How can you now come on so square > > Now and not advance to another level of meaning? > > > > Academia is flipped > > And swung to a drunken zoo > > And all of you cats are goofed to wig city. > > Dig me hard. > > My ticker is in the coffin there with Dylan's poetry, > > And, yea, I must stay cool til it flippeth back to me. > > ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Professor Lesh Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:24:50 +0900 "leftie" wrote in message news:dihcjk$2v6t$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > http://www.learningannex.com/default.taf?sctn=A&_function=detail&cnum=240HSF&cat do we have to do dorm-moving duty? -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: Muffin Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:47:17 -0400 LP wrote: > Is today the anniversary of some type of concert for you? > IIRC????? Nope, that would be 10/15...the 22nd anniversary of my second Grateful Dead show (the one at which I "got it"), and my first time experiencing several recreational substances. Thanks for reminding me, though. Good call. "Whoa, oh, what I want to know: Where does the time go?" -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "Neil X." Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: 11 Oct 2005 20:44:02 -0700 > Kathy wrote: > > I want to meet Neil because I've always been curious about what > he looks like. Hey, if it helps, I used to regularly be told I looked like Bob Seger. That was back in the late 70s, when people knew who Bob Seger was. But now my beard is starting to turn grey (thankfully, only my beard, not my head hair), and I cut off the waist-length pony-tail over 4 years ago. I'm still pretty hairy, though--beard, mustache, hair as long as a corporate scientist can have it. Peace, Neil X. ------------------------------ From: dkhedmo Subject: Re: Professor Lesh Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:45:44 GMT pookietooth wrote: > leftie wrote: > >>http://www.learningannex.com/default.taf?sctn=A&_function=detail&cnum=240HSF&cat > > > I thought he said he couldn't remember any of the 60's or 70's? That's > gonna be one short class. > The class is only an hour and a half. -Karen- ------------------------------ From: carboneau@gmail.com Subject: Feedback on my new music site? Date: 11 Oct 2005 20:36:33 -0700 Anyone wanna give me feedback on my new music site? It's a site where you can meet fans of your favorite bands...it's called meetfans.com I'd love to hear what people think of it. Thanks ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .