From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #510 Dead-Flames Digest #510, Volume #48 Thu, 6 Oct 05 10:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: I'm quitting my job.... (webmaster.opr@gmail.com) Cream at Royal Albert Hall ("marklaw") Re: archive.org? (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: Favorite Space (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: Favorite Space (brew ziggins) Re: 21 years ago - 10/6/84 ("AwolfOutWest69") Re: Favorite Space ("Rogues Island's finest") Pride of Man (NDC) ("Richard Morris") Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (naught@nil.com) Re: New Riders Of The Purple Sage This Weekend! ("Richard Morris") OT: Bears QB Partying in Iowa City last Thursday ("marklaw") Re: tmnsp.net ("Richard Morris") Re: No Direction Home (polasus@my-deja.com) Re: No Direction Home (polasus@my-deja.com) Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (brew ziggins) Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall ("marklaw") Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall ("Richard Morris") Re: Pride of Man (NDC) ("besht2003") Re: Dead Dowqnload -- $12.75 for a single disc d/l??? ("besht2003") Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (JC Martin) Re: Cassidy question (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (brew ziggins) Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall ("Schmoe") Good nooz for all you lushes... (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: 21 years ago - 10/6/84 (DB) Re: 9/21/72 B&P offer! (JimK) Re: Favorite Space (leftie) Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (naught@nil.com) Tribal stomp ("Deke_Rivers") Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (leftie) Re: 9/21/72 B&P offer! (brew ziggins) New rackmount gear... ("The Iron Muffin") Re: *heh* ("garciyalater@hotmail.com") Re: greatest song ever ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Favorite Space ("Carlisle") Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall (naught@nil.com) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:37:09 -0700 "bigamps" wrote in message news:fD91f.9007$cg.5188@news02.roc.ny... > Chunk wrote: >> "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" wrote in >> message news:bAT0f.1138$aB1.6740@eagle.america.net... >> >>>"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message >>>news:fGR0f.2162$AY4.1427@newssvr24.news.prodigy.net... >>> >>>>Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >>>> >>>>> Its the American way, this is why we're fighting in Iraq, so >>>>>scum >>>>>like Delay can be brought to justice. ... >>> >>>>We're fighting in Iraq so we can have access to cheap oil, >>>>it has nothing to do with truth, justice or the American >>>>way. >>> >>>Hello, sarcasm........... >>> >>>Chunk is Mr. Iraq War. He needs to know what he's fighting for: The >>>American jury system. >>> >>>EGBH >>> >>> >> >> >> FOREMAN OF DELAY GRAND JURY MADE MIND UP BEFORE TESTIMONY >> >> THE FOREMAN OF THE TRAVIS COUNTY GRAND JURY THAT INDICTED >> CONGRESSMAN TOM DELAY SAYS HE FELT THERE WAS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY SURROUNDING >> DELAY, THE PAC TEXANS FOR A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY AND THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION >> OF BUSINESS LONG >> BEFORE HE WAS TAPPED TO SERVE ON THE GRAND JURY. WILLIAM GIBSON >> TOLD THE NEWSRADIO 590 KLBJ MORNING SHOW HE HIMSELF HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT >> THE ADS CONCERNING THE TEXAS LEGISLATIVE RACES IN 2002. >> >> http://www.590klbj.com/news.php?newsid=5774 >> >> Here's a transcript of the interview, Gibson is the Grand Jury >> Foreman: >> > ... >> >> GIBSON: That was already public knowledge there. > So everybody already knew Delay was a crook, how does that imply they > didn't give his side fair hearing before they indicted him? It takes more > than just one grand juror's vote to indict. That's kinda the thing. His crimes are so widespread, so well known, so obvious, it may be hard to find jurors who aren't already aware of his crime spree. Oh well, guys like this will do. EGBH ------------------------------ From: webmaster.opr@gmail.com Subject: Re: I'm quitting my job.... Date: 6 Oct 2005 08:38:52 -0700 band beyond description wrote: > "Ben" wrote in message > news:qum9k11fsjv2dtd7am9a9jg4ov9tgp6csu@4ax.com... > > I've been criticized for bitching about my job here before, but I'm > > finally quitting it. > > > > I'm sort of counting my chickens before they hatch, but I believe I'll > > get this one with no major problems and when I do, I'll get an > > effective salary increase of up to 66%. > > > > All I can say is 'fuck yeah' and 'fuck you' to my current boss. > > > > Plus, with this new job, I'll be about an hour away from Red Rocks. > > > > How's that for a fringe benefit? > > though I'm sure it's tempting, just don't literally "burn your bridges" like > Homer Simpson! Woo-hoo!! "In your face, Burns!" > -- > Peace, > ~ Steve My thoughts exactly. No matter how much I hated my boss, his boss or another co-worker I've never burned a bridge. You just never know if you'll run into to this guy or a friend of his again. Let me ask you one question. Will the new job want to call and verify your employment at the old one? ------------------------------ From: "marklaw" Subject: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: 6 Oct 2005 08:43:43 -0700 Performance pretty good for old geezers. Recording quality a major disappointment. In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: archive.org? Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:21:15 -0400 Jamie Fisher wrote: > > Anyone else having trouble? The 627.8KB/s download of 5/11/72 I've currently got happening suggests that it's working fine... ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:22:53 -0400 wyeknot wrote: > > Rogues Island's finest wrote: > > wyeknot wrote: > > > >>Nick's Picks wrote: > >> > >>>10-15 has no space. just the "bob and jerry jam" > >>>which...imo, is boaring. > >> > >>Oink, oink. > >> > >>OK, just a little ribbing. Now back to business - chop, chop. > > > > http://www.unexplained-bacon.com/ > > You swine! *snort* ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:45:15 -0400 Thus spake "The Iron Muffin" ... > wyeknot wrote: > > Rogues Island's finest wrote: > > > wyeknot wrote: > > > > Nick's Picks wrote: > > > > > > 10-15 has no space. just the "bob and jerry jam" > > > > > which...imo, is boaring. > > > > > > > > Oink, oink. > > > > > > > > OK, just a little ribbing. Now back to business - chop, chop. > > > > > > http://www.unexplained-bacon.com/ > > > > You swine! > > Stop hogging all the bandwidth. Bandwidth is a pork-barrel project for Republican Nitwit Deadheads -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ From: "AwolfOutWest69" Subject: Re: 21 years ago - 10/6/84 Date: 6 Oct 2005 08:46:46 -0700 LP wrote: > One of my favorite Scarlet B.-> Fire on the Mt. of all time. > Richmond VA - a typical coliseum with a special affinity for Phil's > bass bombs. The show had typical '84 character - some difficult vocals > for Garcia, but also some FIERY interludes by the band as a whole. Hey, look at that...the 21st anniversary of my first show! Thanks for the reminder - it would've passed me by. Now streaming the "unknown" audience from archive.org. I've never heard this version, but halfway into the first song it seems much more "present" than the NAK300 version I've had for so long. Nice surprise. It's going to take some willpower to resist skipping straight to the Scarlet-Fire. Anybody have a video? I think the Taper's Compendium lists one... ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: 6 Oct 2005 08:52:11 -0700 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > wyeknot wrote: > > > > Rogues Island's finest wrote: > > > wyeknot wrote: > > > > > >>Nick's Picks wrote: > > >> > > >>>10-15 has no space. just the "bob and jerry jam" > > >>>which...imo, is boaring. > > >> > > >>Oink, oink. > > >> > > >>OK, just a little ribbing. Now back to business - chop, chop. > > > > > > http://www.unexplained-bacon.com/ > > > > You swine! > > *snort* The race is on! http://www.hedricks.com/Pig%20Races.htm ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Pride of Man (NDC) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:52:23 -0700 Hamilton Camp, songwriter, musician, actor ... recently passed. Some of us remember the tune he wrote, "Pride of Man", from the Quicksilver days. R. -- Drop "trousers" to respond via email. ------------------------------ From: naught@nil.com Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:51:30 +0000 (UTC) marklaw wrote: > Performance pretty good for old geezers. > > Recording quality a major disappointment. > > In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live > recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? > Because Charlie Miller wasn't involved? ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: New Riders Of The Purple Sage This Weekend! Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:56:05 -0700 "BURT" wrote in message news:EZ61f.9074$Fc4.3107@twister.nyc.rr.com... > David Nelson and Buddy Cage tonight at Mexicali Blues in Teaneck NJ,and > tomorrow at the Joyous Lake in Woodstock NY doing the New Riders Of The > Purple Sage legendary songs.................. you WON'T be disappointed! > > Hear them Live tomorrow on WDST FM 100.1 "Live at Five" show on your way > to the Woodstock show > or on the 'net throught he following link: Booie, you gonna tape this one? R. ------------------------------ From: "marklaw" Subject: OT: Bears QB Partying in Iowa City last Thursday Date: 6 Oct 2005 08:58:45 -0700 http://www.deadspin.com/sports/nfl/bear-down-chicago-bear-128831.php ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: tmnsp.net Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:01:37 -0700 "3three3" wrote in message news:1128571412.152959.274690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >i wasnt sure how many people use/used this bit torrent site, but > theyve made some changes and its looking like if you were previously > banned b/c of your share ratio you can go join up again if you want > just thought id post a heads up > take it easy > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > http://tmnsp.net/forums.php?action=viewtopic&topicid=713&page=p3100#3100 > > As twiley previously announced, tmnsp.net is undergoing some major > internal alterations. Besides some basic code fixing/streamlining, we > are pleased to announce the following changes: > > 1. Until further notice, THERE IS NO LONGER A SHARE RATIO REQUIREMENT. > 2. All users that were banned can now rejoin! (Tell your friends that > may have been banned!) > 3. All accounts that were disabled have now been ENABLED! > > While the penalties for a low share ratio have been eliminated, it is > important that we remember the importance of "giving back." Staff will > still be monitoring users who abuse the tracker. See the updated > Rules/FAQ (will be up shortly) for more detail. > > Please help spread this news to the rest of the trading community. > Staff is very excited about this change and we hope that you are too. Whoop-te-do. What would really be nice would be if they would stop banning certain ports ... 'cause I don't intend to reconfigure just to suit their retentiveness. R. ------------------------------ From: polasus@my-deja.com Subject: Re: No Direction Home Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:02:32 -0700 You really owe it to yourself to slap on Bob's Time Out of Mind CD. The songs there are to an older person's maturity what the Highway 61/Blonde on Blonde tunes were to a young man's psssion. It is almost -- almost -- as good as Blood on the Tracks, and that isn't something I say lightly. Brew Ziggins said: Neither the Beatles nor Dylan have done anything interesting since 1966, with the possible exception of 'Blood on the Tracks'. Oh, and the 'Penny Lane'/'Strawberry Fields' single. ------------------------------ From: polasus@my-deja.com Subject: Re: No Direction Home Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:09:46 -0700 Duke Robllar's version of "Lovesick" is terrific. ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:11:08 -0400 Thus spake mkalina@ameritech.net... > Performance pretty good for old geezers. > > Recording quality a major disappointment. > > In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live > recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? I don't know what recording you're discussing, but the sound on the official DVD has been described as stunning on various audio boards. -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ From: "marklaw" Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:14:36 -0700 < don't know what recording you're discussing, but the sound on the Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:15:44 -0700 "brew ziggins" wrote in message news:MPG.1daf16a62f7ea3b5989806@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu... > Thus spake mkalina@ameritech.net... >> Performance pretty good for old geezers. >> >> Recording quality a major disappointment. >> >> In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live >> recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? > > I don't know what recording you're discussing, but the sound on the > official DVD has been described as stunning on various audio boards. Can't judge a disc by what is being streamed live! I tell ya, that sound brings back some memories ... good listen! R. ------------------------------ From: "besht2003" Subject: Re: Pride of Man (NDC) Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:16:29 -0700 broken in the dust again ... ------------------------------ From: "besht2003" Subject: Re: Dead Dowqnload -- $12.75 for a single disc d/l??? Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:20:15 -0700 It's worth it. Very interesting performance. Less spacey than I expected--stronger. GDM is a business. I would be surprised if the guys running it are not the remaining band members. ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 16:21:25 GMT marklaw wrote: > Performance pretty good for old geezers. > > Recording quality a major disappointment. > > In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live > recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? Shame on anyone for listening to this direction-less white blues, yet soulless vampin'. -JC ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: Cassidy question Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 11:59:51 -0400 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > > marklaw wrote: > > > > Anyone know of a live version of Cassidy sans bass guitar, like the > > studio version? > > IIRC, Bob did a solo acoustic version on XM Radio about a year ago. It > was torrented, so you should have some luck finding a copy at either > archive.org or etree. > > I might still have it on a drive somehere. If I can dig it up a little > later, I'll offer a B&P for anyone who might be interested. I haven't been able to find my archived copy, but I just happened across a copy that I burned to MD about a year ago. The date is 8/14/2004, and it was an appearance on NPR (not XM). http://db.etree.org/lookup_show.php?shows_key=233475 Thinking back, I may have deleted it but I'd be happy to dub an audio copy to CDR if anyone's interested in checking it out. ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:28:24 -0400 Thus spake jcmartin@sonic.net... > marklaw wrote: > > Performance pretty good for old geezers. > > > > Recording quality a major disappointment. > > > > In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live > > recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? > > > Shame on anyone for listening to this direction-less white blues, yet > soulless vampin'. That's harsh, dude! But I kinda agree with you. -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:29:09 -0400 Richard Morris wrote: > "> I tell ya, that sound brings back some memories ... good listen! I couldn't agree more. Jack Bruce's voice really is still brilliant. Streaming this is making me think I made a mistake by only going to 1 show later this month. On a side note, a friend who is having difficulty finding a taker for his extra Queen ticket in a couple of weeks is begging me to buy it ($80). Paul Rogers (Bad Company) is handling Freddie's job. I listened/watch some streaming video from the promo website and, while Brian May is still an wonderful guitarist, it doesn't work well for me without Freddie. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? http://www.queenpluspaulrodgers.com/ ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Good nooz for all you lushes... Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:06:24 -0400 Now you never need to stop drinking.. Thu Oct 6, 8:30 AM ET BERLIN (Reuters) - Fans of non-stop drinking may soon be able to cut down on time wasted ordering refills, thanks to a beer coaster that can tell when a glass is empty. The coaster, fitted with sensors, measures the weight of the beer and sends a signal behind the bar when it's time for a refill. Anxious drinkers can also attract the attention of staff by waving the plastic mat, thanks to a motion sensor. It was invented by students Matthias Hahnen and Robert Doerr for a project at the University of Saarbruecken in southwest Germany. The device has attracted the attention of beer vendors in North America, including a leading Canadian brewer, according to Michael Schmitz, one of the supervisors of the project. "They wanted to know if they could use it or make it themselves," he said. "The prototype cost about 84 euros to make one but if mass produced, it could be done for around 10 euros." ------------------------------ From: DB Subject: Re: 21 years ago - 10/6/84 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:25:11 -0400 LP wrote: > One of my favorite Scarlet B.-> Fire on the Mt. of all time. > Richmond VA - a typical coliseum with a special affinity for Phil's > bass bombs. The show had typical '84 character - some difficult vocals > for Garcia, but also some FIERY interludes by the band as a whole. > This Scarlet has one of the most RIPPIN' guitar solos Jerry ever gave > to this song. The drummers were playing double-time steam-train > chugging rythym throughout the entire song. And the Fire was lond and > luxurious with plenty of Mutron from JG. > > It's a good one, even a '70s zealot might think it doesn't suck. > > LP > Wow, I haven't listened to that one in a while. Isn't there a James Bond type jam in the middle of the Playing in the Band jam? I remember driving 7 to 8 hours down to Richmond from NYC and then turning around and going home again that night. We were just finishing up on the NJ Turnpike when we saw the sun rise over Manhattan. Great road trip. DB ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: 9/21/72 B&P offer! Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:31:19 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:18:04 -0400, brew ziggins wrote: >Thus spake DFspamoffskiBayne@aol.com... >> Tim Ujin wrote: >> > Here is how I see it: >> > >> > SNIP >> > >> > 9/21/72 : best show ever; best Dark Star ever. No shit. Very strong >> > He's Gone, Truckin' Cumberland Blues, GDRFB and a bunch of others. >> > >> > SNIP >> > >> >> The 9/21 Dark Star was used at the Jerry Memorial at Golden Gate Park in >> '95 according to my notes. So someone must agree with you. > >9/21/72 may very well have not even been the best show (or Dark Star) >that week. But we'll never know; scientists have yet to develop a way of >measuring how On Fire the band was the last quarter of 1972. But we know for certain it was the best show that day. JimK ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:35:21 -0700 brew ziggins wrote: > Thus spake "The Iron Muffin" ... > >>wyeknot wrote: >> >>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>> >>>>wyeknot wrote: >>>> >>>>>Nick's Picks wrote: >> >>>>>>10-15 has no space. just the "bob and jerry jam" >>>>>>which...imo, is boaring. >>>>> >>>>>Oink, oink. >>>>> >>>>>OK, just a little ribbing. Now back to business - chop, chop. >>>> >>>>http://www.unexplained-bacon.com/ >>> >>>You swine! >> >>Stop hogging all the bandwidth. > > Bandwidth is a pork-barrel project for Republican Nitwit Deadheads Talk about slop. Somebody call Wavy Gravy and the Hog Farm. ------------------------------ From: naught@nil.com Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:32:59 +0000 (UTC) brew ziggins wrote: > Thus spake jcmartin@sonic.net... >> marklaw wrote: >> > Performance pretty good for old geezers. >> > >> > Recording quality a major disappointment. >> > >> > In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live >> > recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? >> >> >> Shame on anyone for listening to this direction-less white blues, yet >> soulless vampin'. > > That's harsh, dude! But I kinda agree with you. > Could it be any less interesting than listening to Muddy Waters do a one chord vamp for a half hour? ------------------------------ From: "Deke_Rivers" Subject: Tribal stomp Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:37:09 -0700 Looking for a copy of the 1978 Tribal Stomp in Berkeley. Is it on any online archive? Thanks, pierre ------------------------------ From: leftie Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:37:40 -0700 naught@nil.com wrote: > brew ziggins wrote: > >>Thus spake jcmartin@sonic.net... >> >>>marklaw wrote: >>> >>>>Performance pretty good for old geezers. >>>> >>>>Recording quality a major disappointment. >>>> >>>>In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live >>>>recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? >>> >>>Shame on anyone for listening to this direction-less white blues, yet >>>soulless vampin'. >> >>That's harsh, dude! But I kinda agree with you. > Could it be any less interesting than listening to Muddy Waters do a one > chord vamp for a half hour? Yes. ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: 9/21/72 B&P offer! Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:42:39 -0400 Thus spake jkezwind@comcastDOTnet... > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:18:04 -0400, brew ziggins > wrote: > > >Thus spake DFspamoffskiBayne@aol.com... > >> Tim Ujin wrote: > >> > Here is how I see it: > >> > > >> > SNIP > >> > > >> > 9/21/72 : best show ever; best Dark Star ever. No shit. Very strong > >> > He's Gone, Truckin' Cumberland Blues, GDRFB and a bunch of others. > >> > > >> > SNIP > >> > >> The 9/21 Dark Star was used at the Jerry Memorial at Golden Gate Park in > >> '95 according to my notes. So someone must agree with you. > > > >9/21/72 may very well have not even been the best show (or Dark Star) > >that week. But we'll never know; scientists have yet to develop a way of > >measuring how On Fire the band was the last quarter of 1972. > > But we know for certain it was the best show that day. ....and that It Actually Happened -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: New rackmount gear... Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:56:15 -0400 Hey now, my freaky darlings. Those of you with musical proclivities will appreciate this: I have recently acquired a Lexicon MX200 digital reverb and effects processor, and a Behringer Bass V-Amp Pro is winging its way to me as I write this. They join my old Midiverb 4 and my Fuhrman power conditioner in the rack. My powers are growing with every passing moment! Next on my list are a rackmount tuner and a rackmount equalizer. I am looking at the dbx 231 equalizer, and the Korg DTR-2000 tuner. Anybody have experience with these tools? -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "garciyalater@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: *heh* Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:49:49 -0700 absolutley....... a help-->slip->franklins as good as any other..... a monster scarlet-->fire and a diggity Terrapin..... not to mention the So Many Roads and Althea...... every tune played is so well done it could be released as a "compilation of hits" ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: greatest song ever Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:51:19 -0700 Shawn Lucas wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:51:33 -0700, "Andrew Murawa" > > >9. Okay, lemme press my luck with Help>Slip>Frank > > Sheesh..lts about time one of you slackers dropped Franklin's into the > mix...I was afraid I'd have to post it myself. > > > Oh and I feel obliged to post everyone's favorite: > > "-->JAM-->..." > > Shawn Yeah. I wuz gonna say >Space>. Rick ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:52:25 -0700 "Pigs in Space" http://www.the-bridge.net/~jpetro24/pigsinsp.jpg ------------------------------ From: naught@nil.com Subject: Re: Cream at Royal Albert Hall Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) leftie wrote: > naught@nil.com wrote: > >> brew ziggins wrote: >> >>>Thus spake jcmartin@sonic.net... >>> >>>>marklaw wrote: >>>> >>>>>Performance pretty good for old geezers. >>>>> >>>>>Recording quality a major disappointment. >>>>> >>>>>In this day and age, why can't a band like this come up with live >>>>>recording quality that approaches '60s and '70s GD shows on archive.org? >>>> >>>>Shame on anyone for listening to this direction-less white blues, yet >>>>soulless vampin'. >>> >>>That's harsh, dude! But I kinda agree with you. > >> Could it be any less interesting than listening to Muddy Waters do a one >> chord vamp for a half hour? > > Yes. LOL ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .