From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #498 Dead-Flames Digest #498, Volume #48 Wed, 5 Oct 05 10:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... (JC Martin) Re: Favorite Space ("The Iron Muffin") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (JC Martin) Re: Favorite Space ("Bzl.") Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 ("katrinka") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JC Martin) Re: Favorite Space (nbndtrain@yahoo.com) Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 ("Bzl.") Re: One man takes on the scalpers (DG) Re: gdead ("besht2003") Re: I tried to grow a beard Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. (JimK) Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. (JimK) Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... ("besht2003") Re: Janis Joplin - 35 years gone ("mizshely") [BT] gd1976-06-29 bertha.flac (Gary & Ellie) Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! ("Roxanne McDaniel") Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! (JC Martin) Re: One man takes on the scalpers ("Jerry Lobrowski") Re: Favorite Space (JC Martin) Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. ("DGDevin") Re: Baseball playoffs: don't get me started! (NDC) ("Roxanne McDaniel") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:21:57 GMT Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:dEA0f.1198$Aw.21500@typhoon.sonic.net... > >>Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> >>>"Ray" wrote in message >>>news:1128446932.608723.271240@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>>>Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>The Democrats asked that Bush consider nominating someone outside of the >>>>>usual suspects, someone who is not a judge. That's who he nominated. >>> >>> >>>>Reid recommended to Bush that Miers be considered, but it's not clear >>>>me that "The Democrats" asked that Bush nominate a non-judge. I'm not >>>>saying that isn't the case, or whether it's good or bad, but aside from >>>>Reid's recommendation and your declaration that Leahy recommended that >>>>a non-judge be nominated (which I also haven't read anywhere else - >>>>source?), I haven't read as much. Can you elaborate? Thanks. >>> >>> >>>As usual, my source is C-Span. Leahy, Spector and a couple other >>>senators were outside the White House after meeting with Bush about who >>>he might nominate. Leahy said he once again brought up his long held >>>idea that someone who was not a judge be nominated. Spector said he did >>>the same. When asked Bush's reaction, Leahy said Bush smiled (smirked) >>>but that was it. He said he didn't hold out much hope after getting that >>>reaction, but he got what he asked for anyway. >>> >>>Leahy has been saying this for years in the Judiciary Commitee; that he >>>wanted a president to nominate somebody other than a judge. >>> >>> >>> >>>>>She could be horrible, but no one really knows. She could be great. >>> >>> >>>>True. Though the fact that she's a longtime Bush loyalist who >>>>reportedly declared that he's the most brilliant man she'd ever met >>>>isn't promising - regardless of whether that's because she's a >>>>sycophant or because she really needs to read and get out more often >>>>(or both). >>>> >>>>And neither is the fact that Cheney made a call to the Rush Limbaugh >>>>show yesterday (thus also demonstrating that Rush is still a major >>>>player in Republican circles) and made the following declarations: >>>> >>>>CHENEY: I'm confidant that she has a conservative judicial philosophy >>>>that you would be comfortable with, Rush. I've worked closely with >>>>Harriet for five years. I've seen her and worked closely with her ... >>>> >>>>LIMBAUGH: [P]eople think they [Democrats] are ripe to be buried, Mr. >>>>Vice President. >>>> >>>>CHENEY: Well, we're working on it. You'll be proud of Harriet's record, >>>>Rush. Trust me. >>> >>> >>>Since Cheney can't be trusted as far as you can throw a pacemaker, I >>>wouldn't be too thrilled if I was Limbaugh. >>> >>>The fact is nobody has any idea about this woman. The right is mightily >>>pissed because there were so many obvious right wingers that could have >>>been nominated. She even contributed money to Al Gore, Lloyd Bentsen, >> >> >>Both were known as conservative Democrats back in the 80's and both were >>on record as being pro-life. One of the reasons I can't stand Gore is >>that he's changed his positions far more often than even the average >>politician. > > > Yet the right wing is pissed anyway. Any connection to any Democrat at any > time is considered a disqualifying factor. True. But putting our disagreements aside for a moment, let's face it, she's going to get a pass and in the process won't reveal her stance on abortion, which for whatever reason is the issue that matters most to those on the extreme right and left. That's what this is really about for better or worse...whether or not Roe vs. Wade can be overturned. I once thought it an impossibility. I'm not so sure now. -JC ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:29:49 -0400 Thanks for all the great suggestions, my freaky darlings. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:26:15 GMT http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9558565/site/newsweek/ Decent article on Delay's tactics and background. -JC ------------------------------ From: "Bzl." Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:27:53 -0400 I'll tell ya a great one, just because I happened to be listening to it this morning. 10/5/94 (yes '94)... the pre-drums portion, especially. Jerry is just going nuts. Very good tour, btw. ------------------------------ From: "katrinka" Subject: Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:28:10 -0400 "Bzl." writes: > I hope Bob doesn't ruin the Waybacks. ? ? ? I've seen Bob Weir with the Waybacks twice now, and each time the resulting sets have been excellent. Sure, Bob forgets lyrics, but that hasn't detracted a bit from the excellence of the performance. And I just saw the Waybacks last Sunday at the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass Festival - playing with Weir doesn't seem to have harmed their efforts without him, either. ;-) Daryl Anger was sitting in on fiddle, and the band was excellent - as usual. They ended their set with Cumberland Blues. Daryl intro'd the song with a very high and lonesome Dark Star theme. I was wondering how the heck they were going to do Dark Star bluegrass style, but then they suddenly switched to a wild and raucous version of Cumberland Blues, with a traditional song (I forget the name of it) worked into the middle instrumental break. Those who are going to MerleFest are in for a real treat. katrinka ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:29:43 GMT DGDevin wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:nJI_e.651$Aw.9677@typhoon.sonic.net... > > >>Lying daily and apologizing for criminal behavior is getting one's shit >>together? Sad. >> >>-JC > > > Losing election after election and letting the opposition have their way > with the country for want of political competence, now *that* is sad. Surely. But what's more sad is those who focus on the past to justify present criminal behavior. That's a sign of partisanship. You don't fool me. -JC ------------------------------ From: nbndtrain@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:42:06 -0700 No doubt. Now for a little musicly generated mind alteration. ------------------------------ From: "Bzl." Subject: Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:46:47 -0400 "katrinka" wrote in message news:87dd57c25f5cefa69fdb6d47b6eac04f@localhost.talkaboutthemusic.com... > "Bzl." writes: > >> I hope Bob doesn't ruin the Waybacks. > > ? ? ? > > I've seen Bob Weir with the Waybacks twice now, and each time the > resulting sets have been excellent. Sure, Bob forgets lyrics, but that > hasn't detracted a bit from the excellence of the performance. > > And I just saw the Waybacks last Sunday at the Hardly Strictly Bluegrass > Festival - playing with Weir doesn't seem to have harmed their efforts > without him, either. ;-) > > Daryl Anger was sitting in on fiddle, and the band was excellent - as > usual. > > They ended their set with Cumberland Blues. Daryl intro'd the song with a > very high and lonesome Dark Star theme. I was wondering how the heck they > were going to do Dark Star bluegrass style, but then they suddenly > switched to a wild and raucous version of Cumberland Blues, with a > traditional song (I forget the name of it) worked into the middle > instrumental break. > > Those who are going to MerleFest are in for a real treat. > > katrinka > Cool! Good to hear that. Booie: Merlefest drawbacks: -- shitty bathrooms -- shitty food -- enforced ban on audience recording Plusses: -- XM and FM live broadcasting. If I was a taper, I'd bring a decent FM tuner to a place nearby the campus and patch into that. The XMs circulate, but the FMs don't, and they don't always broadcast the same sets. (FM carries the Midnight Jam, for instance, XM does not.) -- It's an amazing 4 day orgy of acoustic music. ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: One man takes on the scalpers Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:55:13 -0700 DGDevin wrote: > >DG wrote > >> What is corrupt about two people agreeing on a price? > >So when Enron and other companies engineered power shortages in California >and hiked up the price of electricity, did consumers "agree" to those >prices? Of course not... We were talking about tickets to a concert. >Did you "agree" to gas going over three bucks a gallon? I rarely buy gasoline so it doesn't matter to me. I'm not upset with gas stations because they are acting as a middle man. >How >exactly did consumers "agree" to see up to two thirds of the tickets to >popular concerts or shows or sporting events held back from public sale at >the prices printed on the tickets and instead go to brokers who would >increase the selling price several hundred percent? Obfuscation... The consumer either buys the ticket at the seller's price or doesn't. >"Corruption" is fairly >easy to spot when an Attorney General's Office known for busting corporate >misbehavior says the diversion of tickets from public access is widespread, >that the public *never* has a chance to buy many tickets at face value, or >does the payment of bribes to hijack a scarce commodity not bring to mind >the word "corruption" for you? Why the quotes on corruption? Shouldn't you also be able to drive up to a refinery and fill your tank up at a cut price? >> Sounds like you need a better job if you can't afford tickets. > >Sounds like your reputation for pointless stupidty is still well-deserved, >and I'll match pay stubs with you any time sunshine. I spend months vacationing in Palm Beach every year. I don't have a 9 to 5 because I worked wisely in the 90's. Try again, stubbie... >>>That isn't what you posted, you actually seemed to think oil was still >>>being >>>formed, >> >> >> What makes you think it isn't? > >Right, back to the cartoon network kid, you've run out of silly things to >say. How was petroleum created in the first place? You seem to think that process has stopped. Why? How? >>>your zeal for argument is rarely matched by your knowledge of the >>>subject being discussed. > >> Again, at what point did the earth quit squeezing petroleum out of >> porous rock? > >At the point when it started squeezing the last particles of brain matter >out of the porous rock between your ears.... > >Geez, how did I forget what an airhead you are, adios.... So does this mean that you realize the error of your ways. I can rest easy as the earth still squeezes petroleum out of porous sedimentary rock. ------------------------------ From: "besht2003" Subject: Re: gdead Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:56:17 -0700 I think for many Democrats being a Democrat is like belonging to a religion--minus the ritual. Some Dead are now effectively Democrats (say Mickey). Jerry and Hunter were Libertarians. My own 2 cents is that people way overestimate what even the best government can do for them. On the other hand it can do some things and it pays for many of our parents and grandparents' medical care. Can't live with it. Can't live without it. ------------------------------ From: Subject: Re: I tried to grow a beard Date: 5 Oct 2005 16:01:03 GMT Tom Beck wrote: > aborgman@redshark.goodshow.net wrote: >> Spider Dawg wrote: >> >>>On 2005-10-02, Tom Beck wrote: >>> >>>>Personally, I love the heat. But I shaved my neck >>>>and trimmed my beard constantly. Nothing quite like >>>>the special treat of of having your facial hair freeze >>>>into the zipper of your Parka, know what I mean? >>> >>>The sensation of nose hairs freezing is much worse than the beard >>>freezing IMO. Facial hair is a useful thermometer: mustache freezes it's >>>below +10F, nose hair freezes it's below +5F, nose hair freezes despite >>>face mask, it's below -5F, heart stops beating it's........ >> >> >> I couldn't agree more... my favorite is a blowing icy wind that not only >> freezes facial and nose hair but also freezes together... and as someone >> else living in SW Michigan, we have the perfect climate for all sorts of >> facial hair uncomfortability - freezing in winter, hot and humid in summer. >> > > I live in Minnesota, and let me assure you, your > heart does not stop beating at -5F. Heck, it > doesn't even come close at -20F. Where do you get > your information? Maybe he gets his information the same place you got your guide on quoting and attributions (hint, you responded to the wrong guy). -- Aaron ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:06:40 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:48:24 -0400, ba_ba_b00ie@webtv.net (ba ba booie) wrote: >Police make cocaine, methamphetamine and hashish arrests at Rolling >Stones concert > > >Police made dozens of arrests at Saturday's Rolling Stones concert in >Hershey. > >Most of the arrests were for drug-related offenses: Twenty-four were >charged with marijuana possession. Three were charged with cocaine >possession. Two were charged with methamphetamine possession. Two were >charged with hashish possession. > > >bbb wrote: >Where is all the hash? >I have not seen/smoked that in years. > >Wow, drugs at concerts, >who would have thought? > > And notice how the headline plays up the coke and meth busts, even though the article indicates that there were a total of five such offenders out of dozens arrested. The media is just another foot soldier in the War on Drug Users. JimK ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:07:10 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 5 Oct 2005 07:01:18 -0700, "Rogues Island's finest" wrote: > >ba ba booie wrote: >> Most of the arrests were for drug-related offenses: Twenty-four were >> charged with marijuana possession. Three were charged with cocaine >> possession. Two were charged with methamphetamine possession. Two were >> charged with hashish possession. > >And that was just from Keef's dressing room! > >Mark Yuks! JimK ------------------------------ From: "besht2003" Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: 5 Oct 2005 09:09:27 -0700 It's interesting that the rhetorical force of the statement depends on the "fuck". Without the prepotted punch of the "fuck" (although kudos for recognizing that "fuck" must be deployed in parallel, rather than serially, as one fuck after another fuck after another fuck starts to get pretty fucking repetitious). Otherwise this comment reduces to "One incompetent screw-up appointing another incompetent screw-up" which is a pretty fucking stupid thing to say as Ms. Meirs or whoever she is is actually a very competent private attorney. ------------------------------ From: "mizshely" Subject: Re: Janis Joplin - 35 years gone Date: 5 Oct 2005 09:11:13 -0700 I was AT the party. But if you are referring to my 15 minutes of fame, please remember that was 40 years ago and we have ALL moved on... :) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:13:05 -0400 From: Gary & Ellie Reply-To: gary.and.ellie@gmail.com Subject: [BT] gd1976-06-29 bertha.flac I have this up here: http://server2.deadacated.com:9000/index.html Grateful Dead 6-29-76 Auditorium Theatre Chicago IL Bertha Remaster of the Master Reel Betty Board source. SBD>>MR > PCM(Analog) > DAT > CDA > SHN > DAW(Bertha) > Audio DVD files > DVD Audio Extractor v.3.3.2 (audio files extracted prior to burning to DVD disc) > wav > downsampled to 44.1 wav with Wave Lab v.5.00a > SBEs fixed with shntool v.2.0.3 > files renamed with File Renamer v.1.0.0 > FLAC encoding with FLAC Frontend v.1.7.1 Etree Edition, FLAC v.1.1.2 (audio DVD extraction through FLAC encoding by Gary F. 10/2005) (2 discs FLAC/3 discs audio) Set1 d1t01-Tuning d1t02-Tennessee Jed d1t03-Cassidy d1t04-Peggy-O d1t05-Mama Tried d1t06-Mission In The Rain d1t07-Looks Like Rain d1t08-Tuning d1t09-Brown Eyed Women d1t10-Lazy Lightnin' >> d1t11-Supplication d1t12-Row Jimmy d2t01-The Music Never Stopped >> d2t02-Might As Well Set2 d2t03-Samson and Delilah d2t04-Candyman d2t05-Tuning d2t06-Playin' In The Band >> d2t07-Space Jam >> d2t08-The Wheel >> d2t09-Playin' In The Band Reprise d3t01-Tuning d3t02-Saint Stephen >> d3t03-Not Fade Away >> d3t04-Saint Stephen d3t05-One More Saturday Night Encore d3t06-Tuning d3t07-U.S. Blues Notes: Thanks to Jay Ashley for the audio DVD source. Digitally Remastered using a custom built, Dual-DAW, nicknamed Bertha, by jashley@deadacated.com. Completed sometime in June 2005. From the original text file, prior to Bertha Remastering: 7" two track BBD reel @ 7 1/2 ips > PCM501ES @ 44.055 kHz PCM501ES analog out > Fostex D5 @ 48 kHz > DAT > ZA2 > CDR > EAC > SHN This is the complete Betty Board recording (interleaf reels spliced in & all) Thank You David Hollister & Jeff Tiedrich for this seamless beauty! ------------------------------ From: "Roxanne McDaniel" Subject: Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:20:43 GMT "JC Martin" > wrote in message ... Kelly Humphries wrote: > Also sprach "Dave Kelly" >>"Spider Dawg" < wrote in message >> Dave Kelly > wrote: >>"Olompali4" wrote in message >>>>>New, new CM soundboard matrix just uploaded at LMA: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=29824 >>>> >>>>SWEET! >>> >>>DUDE! >> >>* BRAH! > > > DANK! WANK! ********************************* Male bonding at it's finest. Ahhhhh...... ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! Date: 5 Oct 2005 09:22:27 -0700 Roxanne McDaniel wrote: > "JC Martin" > wrote in message ... > Kelly Humphries wrote: > > Also sprach "Dave Kelly" > >>"Spider Dawg" < wrote in message > >> Dave Kelly > wrote: > >>"Olompali4" wrote in message > >>>>>New, new CM soundboard matrix just uploaded at LMA: > >>>>> > >>>>>http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=29824 > >>>> > >>>>SWEET! > >>> > >>>DUDE! > >> > >>* BRAH! > > > > > > DANK! > > > WANK! > ********************************* > Male bonding at it's finest. Ahhhhh...... Ohhhhhh, a girl! SPANK! ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:28:25 GMT Rogues Island's finest wrote: > Roxanne McDaniel wrote: > >>"JC Martin" > wrote in message ... >>Kelly Humphries wrote: >> >>>Also sprach "Dave Kelly" >>> >>>>"Spider Dawg" < wrote in message >>>>Dave Kelly > wrote: >>>>"Olompali4" wrote in message >>>> >>>>>>>New, new CM soundboard matrix just uploaded at LMA: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=29824 >>>>>> >>>>>>SWEET! >>>>> >>>>>DUDE! >>>> >>>>* BRAH! >>> >>> >>>DANK! >> >> >>WANK! >>********************************* >>Male bonding at it's finest. Ahhhhh...... > > > Ohhhhhh, a girl! > > SPANK! CLANK! -JC Masterpiece ------------------------------ From: "Jerry Lobrowski" Subject: Re: One man takes on the scalpers Date: 5 Oct 2005 09:32:00 -0700 DG wrote: > DGDevin wrote: > > > >DG wrote > > > >> What is corrupt about two people agreeing on a price? > > > >So when Enron and other companies engineered power shortages in California > >and hiked up the price of electricity, did consumers "agree" to those > >prices? > > > Of course not... We were talking about tickets to a concert. > > > >Did you "agree" to gas going over three bucks a gallon? > > > I rarely buy gasoline so it doesn't matter to me. I'm not upset with > gas stations because they are acting as a middle man. > > > >How > >exactly did consumers "agree" to see up to two thirds of the tickets to > >popular concerts or shows or sporting events held back from public sale at > >the prices printed on the tickets and instead go to brokers who would > >increase the selling price several hundred percent? > > > Obfuscation... The consumer either buys the ticket at the seller's > price or doesn't. > Not quite right. Often, around here at least, the seller sells at the buyers price or doesn't sell the ticket at all. Then again I am not stupid enough to clear out my bank account just because Ticketmaster says "no tickets available" three months in advance. Then again, concert tickets can be even more of a finite resource than oil or energy. If the Grateful Dead only makes 50,000 tickets available yet there are 100,000 people who want to see the show, then its going to drive the price up. > > >"Corruption" is fairly > >easy to spot when an Attorney General's Office known for busting corporate > >misbehavior says the diversion of tickets from public access is widespread, > >that the public *never* has a chance to buy many tickets at face value, or > >does the payment of bribes to hijack a scarce commodity not bring to mind > >the word "corruption" for you? > > > Why the quotes on corruption? Shouldn't you also be able to drive up > to a refinery and fill your tank up at a cut price? > I think there should be a law. Right now the Rolling Stones guarantee for a stadium show is in the neighborhood of $5 million for a stadium gig when it was only a million in 1989. I don't think they should be allowed to charge that much money. And they should also keep adding shows until demand at the governments price is satisfied and they should be forced to play those shows, at gunpoint if necessary. Also, any fans buying tickets should submit a list of their favorite songs and the band should only play the songs with the most votes. Can you imagine the outrage if all those people pay so much money for tickets and they decide to just skip Satisfaction like they did in 1999? It would be a rip off if they decide to arbitrarily drop some hits in favor of obscure songs or new songs the majority of the crowd doesn't really want to hear. Thats not what the people are paying their money for. > > >> Sounds like you need a better job if you can't afford tickets. > > > >Sounds like your reputation for pointless stupidty is still well-deserved, > >and I'll match pay stubs with you any time sunshine. > > > I spend months vacationing in Palm Beach every year. I don't have a 9 > to 5 because I worked wisely in the 90's. Try again, stubbie... > I only make $9 an hour and have no problem affording to go to whatever concerts I want to go. But then I don't ask people what they are charging, I just tell them what I am paying and eventually someone will meet my price. > > >>>That isn't what you posted, you actually seemed to think oil was still > >>>being > >>>formed, > >> > >> > >> What makes you think it isn't? > > > >Right, back to the cartoon network kid, you've run out of silly things to > >say. > > > How was petroleum created in the first place? You seem to think that > process has stopped. Why? How? > I never run out of silly things to say. At least not yet. > > >>>your zeal for argument is rarely matched by your knowledge of the > >>>subject being discussed. > > > >> Again, at what point did the earth quit squeezing petroleum out of > >> porous rock? > > > >At the point when it started squeezing the last particles of brain matter > >out of the porous rock between your ears.... > > > >Geez, how did I forget what an airhead you are, adios.... > > > So does this mean that you realize the error of your ways. I can rest > easy as the earth still squeezes petroleum out of porous sedimentary > rock. You can all rest easy I am never so stupid to pay too much for a concert ticket and hope none of you are too stupid to buy more overpriced concert tickets than you can use or you just might be stuck selling it on my terms. ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Favorite Space Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:32:38 GMT Bill wrote: > "Andrew Murawa" wrote > >>How about 2/27/81... very spooky, doors creaking, barking dogs, women >>shrieking, rusted gates swinging. > > > Sounds like a winner! It just went on my "must get" list. > > 12-31-84 has a nice space segment (along with all the other nice things in > that underrated show) until it goes into Spanish Jam unfortunately (SJ bores > me). > > I think the best space, though it wasn't called that, is probably in the '68 > and '69 years (and maybe '67 too). They seemed to be into playing with the > electronics then and getting feedback and thus really did some brilliant > stuff. I don't think post-hiatus spaces had that element of craziness that > they pre-hiatus ones had. Mickey seemed to be the only one way into it in > the post-hiatus space segments. He must have been "into it" from back stage since he rarely played space segments. > And would great jams in the pre-hiatus Playins and Dark Stars be called > "space"? No. They were jams...epic as they were. -JC ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:38:29 GMT "JimK" wrote in message news:ldu7k1h7a6b83omcs5oe9r9m0p83g6tg9m@4ax.com... > And notice how the headline plays up the coke and meth busts, even > though the article indicates that there were a total of five such > offenders out of dozens arrested. The media is just another foot > soldier in the War on Drug Users. > > JimK If these people are too stupid to be able to smuggle a joint into a concert, maybe it's best they be taken off the streets before they try to drive on the sidewalk. ------------------------------ From: "Roxanne McDaniel" Subject: Re: Baseball playoffs: don't get me started! (NDC) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:47:53 GMT "Roxanne McDaniel" wrote in message ... White Sox! White Sox! White Sox! ************************************ Oh yeah! Oh Yeah! ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:55:36 -0700 "Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message news:fGR0f.2162$AY4.1427@newssvr24.news.prodigy.net... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> Its the American way, this is why we're fighting in Iraq, so scum >> like Delay can be brought to justice. ... > We're fighting in Iraq so we can have access to cheap oil, > it has nothing to do with truth, justice or the American > way. Hello, sarcasm........... Chunk is Mr. Iraq War. He needs to know what he's fighting for: The American jury system. EGBH ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .