From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #497 Dead-Flames Digest #497, Volume #48 Wed, 5 Oct 05 09:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("Everybody's Gonna Be Happy") Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 ("Bzl.") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (Ken Fortenberry) Re: Wookiee Content! You Write The Caption ("dyrewlf") Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 (kpnnews@yahoo.com) Re: I tried to grow a beard ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... ("Ray") Re: I tried to grow a beard ("The Iron Muffin") Re: Bimbo's! (kpnnews@yahoo.com) Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! (JC Martin) Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. ("Schmoe") Re: greatest song ever ("Carlisle") Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... (JC Martin) Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("The Iron Muffin") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:32:52 -0700 "Ray" wrote in message news:1128452737.624708.295220@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> "Ray" wrote: >> > Thanks for the source for Leahy. Two prominent Democratic senators >> > (one Minority Leader, the other the ranking Dem on the Judiciary >> > Committee) is still not the same as "The Democrats" requesting that >> > Bush nominate a non-judge, however. >> >> Oh please. >> >> The Top Democrat in the Senate and the Top Democrat on the committee that >> matters asked for a non-judge. Of course that doesn't mean every single >> congressional Democrat, it means the most important ones that consulted >> with >> the president on the potential nominee. >> >> The Democrats asked for a non-judge. > Reid, the Top Democrat in the Senate, is anti-choice. Does that mean > that "The Democrats" are anti-choice? Of course not. > > The Top Democrat in the Senate and the Top Democrat on the committee > that matters asked for a non-judge - we agree on that. Why can't you ever just have a discussion with someone without trying to semantically nitpick everything they say? I let tons of stuff you say go by, because we're just talking, ya know? This isn't a Supreme Court oral argument. You must be a blast at pot parties. >> >> The fact is nobody has any idea about this woman. >> >> > Bush and Cheney have worked with her for years - they must have at >> > least *some* idea of her judicial philosophy. >> They don't seem to know much else................ > And you know this... how? By living in the US for the entire Bush administration and by seeing how incredibly stupid Bush and Cheney are? They haven't made one good decision yet. Asking for "proof" or a "source" for that opinion is pretty lame Ray. They suck! They're stupid! They thought Iraq was gonna be another 6 day war! Cheney doesn't know this broad from Adam. > Of course Bush and Cheney are going to keep > any specific info they have under wraps until after the hearings, if > even then, and will only divulge as much as they have to to keep the > right mollified. They don't know anything except this is another one of Bush's old dykey broad girlfriends. Bush probably thinks she's his mother or something. >> This is the best the Dems could hope for. > Under this administration, agreed. Which is why I predict, barring any > major surprises, that she'll be confirmed. Yeah, unless she says some really stupid stuff, which is unlikely, but still possible. >> > Agreed (unless major surprises get uncovered during the background >> > check). >> Maybe she smoked weed with Jerry Garcia. > That might do it, dunno. Drank with Pig? >> >> The interest groups on both sides are in a frenzy because they have >> >> nothing >> >> to campaign about for or against. >> > There are emerging indications that she's anti-choice: a declaration by >> > her former campaign manager ("She is on the extreme end of the >> > anti-choice movement"), and giving money to an anti-abortion group. >> I read that pro-life thing; this person heard her make one comment and >> then >> classified her as an "extremist". > The "extreme" quote, as reported in the Dallas Morning News, is in > reference to a discussion, not a "comment": > > __________________________________________ > > "She is on the extreme end of the anti-choice movement," said Lorlee > Bartos, who managed Ms. Miers' first and only political campaign and > said they discussed abortion once during the race. > > "I think Harriet's belief was pretty strongly felt," Ms. Bartos said > Monday. "I suspect she is of the same cloth as the president." ... > > Ms. Bartos said Ms. Miers was supportive of abortion rights in her > youth. She said Ms. Miers then underwent "a born-again, profound > experience" that caused her to oppose abortion. That's a comment. Less than a sentence. Not that it matters to anyone but you who simply has to act like an attorney in every post, even when engaging in casual conversation with someone who is agreeing with you about 95% of this. __________________________________________ > > http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/news/nation/stories/100405dnnatabortion.d644831.html > > Is this, along with the fact that she gave money to an anti-choice > organization, proof that Meirs is today, anti-choice? Of course not. > But it is an indication of such. Like I said, most people are against abortion, hardly unusual or extreme. She's not an activist though. Maybe she can keep her religious views out of things; other judges do. >> I don't doubt she's against abortion, >> most people are, its hardly an unusual position to take. > Most people may be anti-abortion, but most people are also pro-choice - > not anti-choice. Most people are against abortion. Most are for making it illegal in some circumstances. >> IF (if if if) this woman is just some normal conservative who doesn't >> like >> abortion that's the best anyone could have hoped for considering who gets >> to >> make the nominations. > Again agreed. Can I go to the restroom now? >> The right always says they don't anyone >> who "legislates from the bench", when in fact that's exactly what they >> want. >> They want an activist right wing judge instead of an activist left wing >> judge. > Agreed. >> Maybe this woman will just be a normal person doing her job as a >> justice. >> >> Or maybe not. > Agreed. >> The hearings will tell the story. > I think you're too optimistic on that one. Huh? No one knws anything about her. Obviously the hearings are what will tell the tale. The senators have nothing else to go on. Duh. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:34:08 -0700 "JC Martin" wrote in message news:dEA0f.1198$Aw.21500@typhoon.sonic.net... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> "Ray" wrote in message >> news:1128446932.608723.271240@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> >>>Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >>> >>>>The Democrats asked that Bush consider nominating someone outside of the >>>>usual suspects, someone who is not a judge. That's who he nominated. >> >> >>>Reid recommended to Bush that Miers be considered, but it's not clear >>>me that "The Democrats" asked that Bush nominate a non-judge. I'm not >>>saying that isn't the case, or whether it's good or bad, but aside from >>>Reid's recommendation and your declaration that Leahy recommended that >>>a non-judge be nominated (which I also haven't read anywhere else - >>>source?), I haven't read as much. Can you elaborate? Thanks. >> >> >> As usual, my source is C-Span. Leahy, Spector and a couple other >> senators were outside the White House after meeting with Bush about who >> he might nominate. Leahy said he once again brought up his long held >> idea that someone who was not a judge be nominated. Spector said he did >> the same. When asked Bush's reaction, Leahy said Bush smiled (smirked) >> but that was it. He said he didn't hold out much hope after getting that >> reaction, but he got what he asked for anyway. >> >> Leahy has been saying this for years in the Judiciary Commitee; that he >> wanted a president to nominate somebody other than a judge. >> >> >>>>She could be horrible, but no one really knows. She could be great. >> >> >>>True. Though the fact that she's a longtime Bush loyalist who >>>reportedly declared that he's the most brilliant man she'd ever met >>>isn't promising - regardless of whether that's because she's a >>>sycophant or because she really needs to read and get out more often >>>(or both). >>> >>>And neither is the fact that Cheney made a call to the Rush Limbaugh >>>show yesterday (thus also demonstrating that Rush is still a major >>>player in Republican circles) and made the following declarations: >>> >>>CHENEY: I'm confidant that she has a conservative judicial philosophy >>>that you would be comfortable with, Rush. I've worked closely with >>>Harriet for five years. I've seen her and worked closely with her ... >>> >>>LIMBAUGH: [P]eople think they [Democrats] are ripe to be buried, Mr. >>>Vice President. >>> >>>CHENEY: Well, we're working on it. You'll be proud of Harriet's record, >>>Rush. Trust me. >> >> >> Since Cheney can't be trusted as far as you can throw a pacemaker, I >> wouldn't be too thrilled if I was Limbaugh. >> >> The fact is nobody has any idea about this woman. The right is mightily >> pissed because there were so many obvious right wingers that could have >> been nominated. She even contributed money to Al Gore, Lloyd Bentsen, > > > Both were known as conservative Democrats back in the 80's and both were > on record as being pro-life. One of the reasons I can't stand Gore is > that he's changed his positions far more often than even the average > politician. Yet the right wing is pissed anyway. Any connection to any Democrat at any time is considered a disqualifying factor. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:36:11 -0700 "JC Martin" wrote in message news:cFA0f.1199$Aw.21715@typhoon.sonic.net... > Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > >> It all boils down to the hearings and what she says in response to >> questions. > Not really IMO. She'll just repeat the John Roberts formula...say > nothing. Reading comprehension around here seems to be slipping. Since no one knows anything about her, whatever she says in the hearings will be the deciding factor. Roberts' performance certainly was. Maybe you people should actually watch the hearings like I did the Roberts hearings, then listen to the senators make their statements about their votes. It all boils down to what she says in the hearings. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:41:21 -0700 "Chunk" wrote in message news:KoF0f.1738$Uk7.1638@fe05.lga... > > "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" wrote in message > news:E2c%e.810$aB1.5465@eagle.america.net... >> >> "Ray" wrote in message >> news:1128035229.656126.287420@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> Chunk wrote: >>>> "leftie" wrote in message >>>> news:dhetk1$1rtf$1@agate.berkeley.edu... >>>> > Tom DeLay has finally gone from unidicted co-conspirator to indicted >>>> > conspirator! Plus, he's resigned the Speaker of the House position! >>>> > >>>> > Woohoo! Send that motherfucker to jail where he belongs!!!! >>>> > >>>> > But let's get him out of congress completely first. >>>> > >>>> > http://action.ourfuture.org >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > "ding dong, the witch is dead...." >>>> >>>> Is this the same DA Ronnie Earle that went that tried to go after Kay >>>> Baily >>>> Hutchinson when she ran for Senate and had his baseless case thrown >>>> out? >>>> Travis County, the home of Bill Burkitt and the forged memos? Don't >>>> get >>>> your hopes up. >> >>> "Is this the same... Travis County, the home of Bill Burkitt and the >>> forged memos?" >>> >>> ?!? >>> >>> LOL - I think you may have outdone yourself in the ridiculous >>> mud-slinging dept. this time around, Chunk. And given your lengthy >>> record of ridiculous mud-slinging here on rmgd that's no small >>> accomplishment. >>> >>> Congrats, and keep up the, um, amusing work. >>> >>> Ray >> >> Don't forget that Travis County is in Texas, the state that gave us Bush >> and Delay. >> >> Obviously all Texas politicos from county DA's to congressmen to >> presidents are all lying scum. >> >> Therefore Delay is obviously guilty. >> >> Which he is, BTW. The problem is so is every other politician in >> Washington. Its illegal for corporate contributions to be spent on Texas >> state races. The only reason Delay has this PAC is to funnel corporate >> money to state races. Everyone knows this. Everyone in Texas DOES this. >> Delay is the majority leader because he does this more and better than >> anyone else. >> >> He should have been charged and he should be found guilty. Duh. >> >> EGBH > The law that was broken was passed in 2003, the act he has been indicted > for was in 2002. So, he charged with something that wasn't even illegal. > Perhaps Mr. Earle should open a law book before he convenes a GJ and has > the camera crew roll tape. Delay may be a major league asshole, but this > Earle guy is on a serious witch hunt. Sometimes in Washington, its the > things that are legal that are scandalous. Two separate grand juries of citizens have indicted the scumbag. Obviously quite a few more people besides the DA think a crime was committed. Now another 12 citizens will get to decide. Its the American way, this is why we're fighting in Iraq, so scum like Delay can be brought to justice. Keep at 'em Chunk. EGBH ------------------------------ From: "Bzl." Subject: Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:45:37 -0400 "ba ba booie" wrote in message news:23406-4343D7BE-66@storefull-3272.bay.webtv.net... > Bob Weir joins Merlefest in 2006 > > > > WILKESBORO, N.C. - Bob Weir, a guitar player and singer for the Grateful > Dead, will make his first appearance at MerleFest 2006, the annual > celebration of Americana music begun by Doc Watson. > Weir will perform with a veteran Merlefest band, The Waybacks. > > Among the other headliners are Emmylou Harris, Gillian Welch, Bela Fleck > and the Flecktones, and Nickel Creek. Watson and his grandson, Richard > Watson, also are scheduled to perform. > > The 19th annual festival will be held April 27-30 on the campus of > Wilkes Community College. It raises money for the Eddy Merle Watson > Garden for the Senses, named for Watson's son and fellow musician, who > was killed in a 1985 tractor accident. > > > bbb wrote: > Wooo hoooo, Bob Weir. > Looks like a good show. > I hope Bob doesn't ruin the Waybacks. Donna the Buffalo is strangely absent from the announced lineup so I guess this is a way to keep the wookie audience. But, they tend to stick big draws on the Thursday schedule. ------------------------------ From: Ken Fortenberry Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:45:31 GMT Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > > Its the American way, this is why we're fighting in Iraq, so scum like Delay > can be brought to justice. ... We're fighting in Iraq so we can have access to cheap oil, it has nothing to do with truth, justice or the American way. -- Ken Fortenberry ------------------------------ From: "dyrewlf" Subject: Re: Wookiee Content! You Write The Caption Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:47:10 GMT "Kelly Humphries" wrote in message news:p1h6k1tuhrqe1uam45o0o4to753eo1jgve@4ax.com... > If you can explain why Chewbacca tossed out the first pitch at a Red > Sox game last week, your 15 minutes of fame await: > > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/sports2day/243226_capcontest04.html > > I'd also like to point out a longstanding pet peeve of mine, namely > that "Wookiee" has two e's. Thank you. I thought it was just David Wells taking the mound after another bender. ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:02:41 -0400 Nick's Picks wrote: > Booie.. > coming back to the Stone church? > that's probably the only show i'm doing. maybe Sat. show in boston > too...but unsure. I have a lot of taping this month. the wife might > get a little pissy if I leave her w/the kids for the 6th time that > month. > :) > If you come to NH, i'll have some cables for you.... Heh. -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: kpnnews@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bob Weir joins MerleFest in 2006 Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:04:40 -0700 ba ba booie wrote: > Bob Weir joins Merlefest in 2006 > Looks like a good show. Why don't you go? I think you'd like Merlefest. It's long days of great music in a great setting. Kurt ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: I tried to grow a beard Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:15:53 -0400 Tom Beck wrote: > How did a discussion of growing beards descend > to this sort of stuff? You know the narrative voice in Estimated? Crissy is that guy. He's so in love with himself and his messiah complex that his self-righteous narcissism taints every discussion he participates in. I mean, seriously... > My focus is directly on the camera without pretense > or artifice, total openess and surrender.I have large > eyes, which the women love.You just can't stand not > being the focus of my attention." ....this guy needs to get over himself. Me? I just enjoy moments of irony, like a fake christian who knows nothing about my spirituality other than that I think his nightmarish, hallucinatory religion is a steaming pile of horseshit condemning me to "outer darkness". -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:09:02 -0700 Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > Why can't you ever just have a discussion with someone without trying to > semantically nitpick everything they say? I let tons of stuff you say go > by, As do I with you. > because we're just talking, ya know? This isn't a Supreme Court oral > argument. Your statement that "The Democrats" asked for it was unclear. And because you repeatedly declared it I had thought that there might have been more to it that I wasn't aware of. Which is why I had asked about it, and made it clear that I wasn't saying one thing or the other about it - I honestly didn't know and thought that maybe you had read something that I wasn't aware of, as was the case with Leahy's position. Which wasn't the case. > >> >> The fact is nobody has any idea about this woman. > >> > >> > Bush and Cheney have worked with her for years - they must have at > >> > least *some* idea of her judicial philosophy. > > >> They don't seem to know much else................ > > > And you know this... how? > > By living in the US for the entire Bush administration and by seeing how > incredibly stupid Bush and Cheney are? They haven't made one good decision > yet. > > Asking for "proof" or a "source" for that opinion is pretty lame Ray. I'm not asking for "proof" - I'm disagreeing with your asserting that "The fact is nobody has any idea about this woman". Bush and Cheney sure do, and though we don't know how much it's reasonable to assume that they might know a fair amount more than they are letting on. > Cheney doesn't know this broad from Adam. She's the White House Council. He's worked with her for 5 years. It's possible that he knows relatively little about her, but it's also possible that he knows a lot about her - we don't know. In any event he has some idea about her - more than the rest of us. > > Of course Bush and Cheney are going to keep > > any specific info they have under wraps until after the hearings, if > > even then, and will only divulge as much as they have to to keep the > > right mollified. > > They don't know anything except this is another one of Bush's old dykey > broad girlfriends. Bush probably thinks she's his mother or something. Trolling? > >> > Agreed (unless major surprises get uncovered during the background > >> > check). > > >> Maybe she smoked weed with Jerry Garcia. > > > That might do it, dunno. > > Drank with Pig? Now yer talkin'. > Like I said, most people are against abortion, hardly unusual or extreme. > She's not an activist though. Maybe she can keep her religious views out of > things; other judges do. And like I said, agreed. > >> I don't doubt she's against abortion, > >> most people are, its hardly an unusual position to take. > > > Most people may be anti-abortion, but most people are also pro-choice - > > not anti-choice. > > Most people are against abortion. Most are for making it illegal in some > circumstances. And most people are pro-choice, not anti-choice in the way that, according to Meirs' former campaign manager, Meirs was when they campaigned together. > Can I go to the restroom now? Sure. Is someone forcing you to be here? > >> The hearings will tell the story. > > > I think you're too optimistic on that one. > > Huh? > > No one knws anything about her. Obviously the hearings are what will tell > the tale. The senators have nothing else to go on. Because we know so little about Meirs the hearings will tell us some things, but they won't tell us the whole story - far from it. Meirs knows that the less she tells the better - and so she'll tell us as little as she possibly can. And with Roberts as an immediate precident, we know that she'll be able to tell us relatively little about her tale. > Duh. Whatever. Ray ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: I tried to grow a beard Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:17:23 -0400 The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > Tom Beck wrote: > > How did a discussion of growing beards descend > > to this sort of stuff? > > Welcome to rmgd! WIIAAHSWYP? -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ From: kpnnews@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Bimbo's! Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:12:12 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Dave Kelly wrote: > > "Harry Bournazian" wrote in message > > news:tcmdnQ_n9tt1m97eRVn-iA@comcast.com... > > > Dave, did you have to use the word "spade". Come on man. Huge insult to > > > our > > > fellow man. > > > > * And you have NO problem with a club named "Bimbos"..right? > > I guess the womens movement was a blip on yer radar, huh > > Harry?..an inconvienance in your male dominated world..... > > The "Chicks" on the commune were refusing to do your bidding.. > > no more forced 3 somes for Harry....boo fucking hoo! > > I would SUGGEST you get your priorities straight before > > you decide to pass judgement on others... > > OK there, hotshot? > > Yeah for real. Bimbos, Hooters and Mellons are just fine,,,but don't > you dare say spade. It could offend the many African-American Deadheads > that hang out around here. BTW, no one ran to MY defense when I got > called a "Cracker"..How's that fair??!! ;> > Good nite dear brothers. Testify! A new restaurant opened up here in Garner, as in scenic Garner NC. High Beams. For all the guys, nudge nudge wink wink, we all know what the deal is, but according to my coworker, you can bring your family there and the food is pretty good. Whatever. Bring on the topless waitresses serving decent wings! Oh, and add a decent taplist. Now there's an adult establishment I would consider visiting. Also, I don't anyone to hand me a towel in the bathroom. Thanks anyway. Kurt ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Steve Kimock on the road again! Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:13:14 GMT Kelly Humphries wrote: > Also sprach "Dave Kelly" : > > >>"Spider Dawg" wrote in message >>news:slrndk6drg.c4k.Spidergawdnospam@linux.site... >> >>>On 2005-10-04, Dave Kelly wrote: >>> >>>>"Olompali4" wrote in message >>>>news:1128460275.853754.264130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>>>New, new CM soundboard matrix just uploaded at LMA: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=29824 >>>> >>>>SWEET! >>> >>>DUDE! >> >>* BRAH! > > > DANK! WANK! -JC ------------------------------ Reply-To: "Schmoe" From: "Schmoe" Subject: Re: Police make dozens of arrests @ Rolling Stones concert. Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:14:59 -0400 ba ba booie wrote: > > bbb wrote: > Where is all the hash? > I have not seen/smoked that in years. Ain't that a shame too? The sweetest of all smokes. Can you still get it readily in Amsterdam? ------------------------------ From: "Carlisle" Subject: Re: greatest song ever Date: 5 Oct 2005 08:15:01 -0700 Sure this is a toughie. As far as Grateful Dead masterpieces go, I'd say the greatest go in this order...Terrapin>Uncle John's Band>Wharf Rat>Eyes> Not an easy call at all. I just think Terrapin has that mythic quality that can speak to everyone on some level and has the beautiful music/hook to go with along. Although the Terrapin Suite from the studio version gets criticism for not sounding like live Dead, it is some of the loveliest music every recorded. Blair Jackson summed it up nicely: "The suite of songs and instrumental interludes that became known as Terrapin-Part One represent a culmination of sorts for the Hunter-Garcia writing partnership--a place where their deep folk roots blossomed into a mythic dimension outside of time, space and place; ancient yet eternal; a swirling galaxy of images, ideas and archetypal characters." Inspiration. Carrie ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Bushie is a piece of shit... Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:17:59 GMT Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:cFA0f.1199$Aw.21715@typhoon.sonic.net... > >>Everybody's Gonna Be Happy wrote: >> >> >>>It all boils down to the hearings and what she says in response to >>>questions. > > >>Not really IMO. She'll just repeat the John Roberts formula...say >>nothing. > > > Reading comprehension around here seems to be slipping. > > Since no one knows anything about her, whatever she says in the hearings > will be the deciding factor. > > Roberts' performance certainly was. I completely disagree. Roberts said nothing of substance during the hearings and it was a forgone conclusion by most Democrats that he would get a pass BEFORE the hearings even took place. This was widely reported on in the national and international media. > Maybe you people should actually watch the hearings like I did the Roberts > hearings, then listen to the senators make their statements about their > votes. I did watch a good portion of it. > It all boils down to what she says in the hearings. Disagree. -JC ------------------------------ Reply-To: "The Iron Muffin" From: "The Iron Muffin" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:27:39 -0400 Ray wrote: > Oh by the way, wanna buy the Brooklyn Bridge? SOLD for a dollar: The Brooklyn Bridge! -- The Iron Muffin DEAD FREAKS UNITE Who are you? Where are you? How are you? ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .