From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #439 Dead-Flames Digest #439, Volume #48 Wed, 28 Sep 05 21:00:01 PDT Contents: Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JimK) "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue ("Dave Kelly") Re: ndc-hand washing post bathroom? (Kelly Humphries) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JimK) Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue (JC Martin) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JC Martin) Re: 10/12/84 and Phil (JimK) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JC Martin) Re: Flying Spaghetti Monster (JimK) Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue (bigchuck51@aol.com) Re: ndd-A Rose is a rose (JimK) Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue (bigchuck51@aol.com) Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue ("volkfolk") Re: 69 limited 10 cd set ~ ("titanarch@gmail.com") Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue ("ck") Re: Comes a Time Rex Benefit ... do we need an offer? (DG) Re: Download Series Vol. 6 (DG) Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (JimK) Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (DG) Re: etree down... (DG) No Direction Home ("volkfolk") Re: essential 87' AUD recordings?... (JimK) Re: New Riders next week! ("volkfolk") Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (Mark Hood) Re: Nemo and the Giant Squid [NDC] ("volkfolk") Re: New Riders next week! ("Dave Kelly") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: JimK Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:40:31 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 15:16:57 -0700, "Ray" wrote: >DGDevin wrote: >> I suggested assigning crowd marshalls to follow the guys in black with the >> backbacks full of ballistic objects, the marshalls have video cameras and >> cellphones, when they see someone winging lug-nuts at the cops or smashing a >> window or chaining together newspaper vending boxes to block a street, they >> shoot video and call the police. This is not without risk, the anarchist >> types are clearly more than willing to see blood spilled, so you'd need some >> big, ugly crowd marshalls to handle this. But in many cases I suspect just >> contronting the violence-vampires would be enough, if the bandanas were >> yanked from their faces and they realized they were surrounded by people who >> weren't going to tolerate their bullshit I bet many of them would go home to >> brood and plot rather than risk being identified and locked up. > >Yeah, although you'd need a large number of Hells' Angels-type crowd >marshalls to be there before you want to start yanking bandanas - >otherwise that would be a foolhardy action at best. And so >realistically I don't see yanking bandanas as a viable option. Video >taping and the like is another story, although that too would carry >significant risks. > >> Beyond that the non-violent organizers need to be more forceful in >> condemning the violent factions and in cooperating with the authorities to >> help see the trouble-makers behind bars, and that's not something I see >> happening, the "us vs. them" mentality is too entrenched in the anti-war >> movement, the idea of helping the cops just wouldn't digest too well. > >I think it has more to do with fear of the protest movement splintering >into even less power than they have now, although again I consider >putting that concern over distancing from the fascists to be the wrong >call - and possibly a fatal one. > >> How >> many people here, finding themselves marching beside someone wearing a mask, >> would ask that person why they need to conceal their identity, much less >> stop that person from smashing a shop window? > >I think that rarely (if ever) happens because the risk/reward ratio is >too low: for individuals to initiate such activity there is high risk >of getting hurt and very low chance for making any difference. Most >people know that the 'violence-vampires' won't listen to reason on the >issue, esp. during a protest. > >> Let's not kid ourselves, a >> lot of the people marching are actually sympathetic to the idea of a >> Starbucks being trashed or even an Army recruiting office being burned. > >I believe that, at the large rallies anyway, only a very small >percentage of the protestors want or are even sympathetic to such >activities. I believe that most protestors are instead against such >actions. > >> I watched this several decades ago up close and I'm seeing it again today, >> "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," it was bullshit then and its bullshit >> now. But it won't change, as Ray points out, the non-violent groups are too >> afraid of splitting the movement and I believe of losing their progressive >> cred, so they won't lift a finger when the Stalinist/fascist/anarchist >> mobsters show up, masked, packs full of wrenches and frozen cans of soda, >> and afterwards when the city is cleaning up the mess the whole damn movement >> looks like a bunch of apes and the clowns in the Whitehouse get to smile and >> go on with fucking up something else, just lovely. > >I don't believe that fear of losing progressive cred is a major >motivator here, but otherwise agreed. It's disgustingly ironic that >when anti-Bush protests start getting violent and windows get smashed >and the like that it helps the Bush Whitehouse keep doing what they are >doing. > >Ray So then it seems we're all in agreement that as a practical matter, there's little the nonviolent protestors can do to prevent the violent ones from doing their thing, at least not without placing themselves at risk. There's no need for peaceful protestors to act as spies and vigilantes. This really boils down to a P.R. issue, and the best thing the nonviolent groups can do is be more effective in publicly distinguishing themselves from the hardcore troublemakers. JimK ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:43:06 GMT Yesterday, I found the newest re-ish of Paul Kantners 1970 masterpiece "Blows Against The Empire" I think this is the 3rd time it's been remastered on cd. I'm a sucker for this album...the packaging is wonderful... 2 booklets of stuff...new interviews....grace slick drawings... 5 bonus cuts...Grace's acoustic "Sunrise" demo...a '70 Fillmore West Airplane version of "Starship"...2 hidden tracks at the end with radio ads for the album...who plays what on each track....Peter Kaukonen - Lead guitar on "Mau-Mau"?....Cool!... Essential. Sweetbac Productions ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: ndc-hand washing post bathroom? Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:45:24 -0700 Also sprach "Stephen St." : > For years, I have noticed that the majority of men dont wash up after using > the bathroom. Most of this opinion is from standing in mens rooms waiting to > use the urinal at bars and sporting events. I have calculated the average to > be around 60% of guys do NOT wash up after using the bathroom. I used to > cringe when someone would introduce me a guy they worked with, usually > grabbing a cigarette immediately to avoid the hand shake and subsequent > urine sharing. Ever since a round of Norwalk Virus ran its course during post-fair cleanup at the Oregon Country Fair a couple of years ago, I ALWAYS wash up afterwards. You do NOT want to fall victim to Norwalk (aka the Cruise Ship Virus). I didn't get it too bad -- just a little dizziness, probably a contact high -- but I was surrounded by good friends who fell one by one during the night, endlessly puking their guts out in their tent then at the crack of dawn wandering off to find sunlight to warm their shivering bodies. It's the worst 24-hour-flu you've ever had, its transmission is made easier with large groups of people in close quarters, and its transmission is almost completely avoidable with basic hygiene. Once you've had an encounter with Norwalk, you'll realize it's a lot easier to just wash your hands after taking a dump. ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:47:42 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 14:49:46 -0700, "king88uy7" wrote: >Joe >>NO. We don't have to accept that. We can't except that. > >Strange. It's tough to make the correct decision when you don't live >in the real world. Pretending it won't be worse for the Iraqui people >if we leave isn't that compelling for me, so I guess I'll miss the >protest. I guess you still don't have an opinion on what will happen >to the Iraqui people if we remove all our troops tomorrow. Maybe you >don't care ? > >Enough talking point propaganda bullshit. Think for yourself. Or >don't. So when do you suggest that we do move our troops out? All we're doing by staying is postponing the inevitable. Please don't try to tell us, as Bush has, that we're in Iraq for the benefit of the Iraqis. If you do, you're both liars. JimK ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:51:55 GMT Dave Kelly wrote: > Yesterday, I found the newest re-ish of Paul Kantners > 1970 masterpiece "Blows Against The Empire" > I think this is the 3rd time it's been remastered on cd. > I'm a sucker for this album...the packaging is wonderful... > 2 booklets of stuff...new interviews....grace slick drawings... > 5 bonus cuts...Grace's acoustic "Sunrise" demo...a '70 > Fillmore West Airplane version of "Starship"...2 hidden > tracks at the end with radio ads for the album...who plays > what on each track....Peter Kaukonen - Lead guitar on > "Mau-Mau"?....Cool!... > Essential. I've had this on vinyl for years. Really, this is the ultimate Grace Slick record. She's just on fire. Her trippy, dubbed out, harmonized vocals are a real treat. Intense and dark. One to pick up this weekend. Peas, JC ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:52:59 GMT "Ray" wrote in message news:1127943269.657536.113890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > In my view Repubs are much more blindly partisan (aka 'loyal') than > Dems. Consider, for example, Gray Davis: he was pretty-much disliked > by everyone in CA, Dems and Repubs. Which, of course, is why he was > able to have been recalled from office. Excepting my wife, lifelong Dem and staunch trade unionist, who voted against the recall regardless of the Davis history of incompetence and corruption. ;-) But that brings up the point of what it takes to turn people against their party, and in the case of Davis his administration oversaw real hardship for Californians, the (engineered) power outages and prices increases, the dot-com meltdown and economic slowdown, people had specific issues that had caused them pain and Davis was there to catch the blame. But if you're the cartoon-character Republican many folks around here believes populates that party, what do you have to be unhappy about? If your job is outsourcing-proof, you have a profitable stock portfolio, don't have any kids in the army in Iraq -- what painful issues are there for you to associate with Bush? Enough hyperbole -- Of course, many Republicans are unhappy about the Bush admin, but don't say that too loud in r.m.gd, the notion that anyone with an "R" after his name could be a thinking moral creature might result in some popped arteries.... ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:53:38 GMT "JC Martin" wrote in message news:FzC_e.606$Aw.9154@typhoon.sonic.net... > .......which is why I have DG pegged as a Bush apologist. ;-) > > -JC You fascists, all the same. ;-) ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:56:19 GMT DGDevin wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:ZBC_e.607$Aw.9147@typhoon.sonic.net... > > >>No difference in your logic. Rush Limbaugh represents the majority >>mindset of the Republican Party. He's by no means fringe. >> >>Try again. >> >>-JC > > > Okay, Right-wingers are better at organization, that they have people like > Rush merely shows they can get their shit together while the left is trying > to decide whether to call itself the People's Revolutionary Front of Judea > or the Revolutionary Judean People's Front. Thus an equivalent number of > lefties appear to be fewer simply because they are so lame at making > themselves heard and persuading others to share their views. Feel better? > > Meanwhile, Air America is asking listeners for donations.... Lying daily and apologizing for criminal behavior is getting one's shit together? Sad. -JC ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: 10/12/84 and Phil Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:57:49 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:23:46 -0400, "Bzl." wrote: > >"Dylanstubs" wrote in message >news:1127917795.355219.64000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> Phil mentions in his book how this was the first GD tour with Phil & >> Jill as a married couple, and how Jerry winked at him during >> Jack-a-Roe. He forgot to mention that Bob followed that up with It's >> All Over Now, and then Jerry hit him with Cold Rain & Snow in the 2nd >> set. What a bunch of pranksters. :) >> > >Brent did Don't Need Love that night, too. > And the whole band did a stunning version of Morning Dew. And a pretty damned good UJB>Drums>Playin' Reprise>UJB before that. JimK ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:00:37 GMT JC Martin wrote: > DGDevin wrote: > >> "JC Martin" wrote in message >> news:ZBC_e.607$Aw.9147@typhoon.sonic.net... >> >> >>> No difference in your logic. Rush Limbaugh represents the majority >>> mindset of the Republican Party. He's by no means fringe. >>> >>> Try again. >>> >>> -JC >> >> >> >> Okay, Right-wingers are better at organization, that they have people >> like Rush merely shows they can get their shit together while the left >> is trying to decide whether to call itself the People's Revolutionary >> Front of Judea or the Revolutionary Judean People's Front. Thus an >> equivalent number of lefties appear to be fewer simply because they >> are so lame at making themselves heard and persuading others to share >> their views. Feel better? >> >> Meanwhile, Air America is asking listeners for donations.... > > > > > Lying daily and apologizing for criminal behavior is getting one's shit > together? Sad. ....and I'm sincere in this statement. People like Delay and Rove have moved to bar up a large notch when it comes government abuse of power and the lies they're willing to tell to forward their own agenda. I have no doubt the Democrats will eventually follow their lead. That's not good for America. -JC ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Flying Spaghetti Monster Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:00:47 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 13:25:32 -0700, "Randy G" wrote: >This topic is so fuSILLI ! Fusilli Jerry! (Uh, that's the other Jerry....Seinfeld) Jimk ------------------------------ From: bigchuck51@aol.com Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:05:22 -0700 JC Martin wrote: > I've had this on vinyl for years. yeah, me too. the next album was good also... then, god forbid me, they started to suck. later- ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: ndd-A Rose is a rose Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:05:11 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:03:04 -0500, "Sean Baker" wrote: >Anybody catch the interview of "Marty" Scorsesi with Charlie Rose. I don't >think I've ever seen a bad interview by Rose. This was a fun interview for >both. A great end to two nights of excellent PBS tee vee. > >Peace, > >Sean Charlie Rose is underrated almost to the point of being ignored. To think that so many morons in this country fawn all over Barbara WaWa while Charlie toils in anonymity. 'Tis a shame. JimK ------------------------------ From: bigchuck51@aol.com Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:07:41 -0700 damn alcolhol, meant "forgive me" not forbid. hated to see the Airplane go down. ------------------------------ From: "volkfolk" Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:08:08 -0400 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:_wI_e.7541$6e1.1337@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com... > Yesterday, I found the newest re-ish of Paul Kantners > 1970 masterpiece "Blows Against The Empire" > I think this is the 3rd time it's been remastered on cd. > I'm a sucker for this album...the packaging is wonderful... > 2 booklets of stuff...new interviews....grace slick drawings... > 5 bonus cuts...Grace's acoustic "Sunrise" demo...a '70 > Fillmore West Airplane version of "Starship"...2 hidden > tracks at the end with radio ads for the album...who plays > what on each track....Peter Kaukonen - Lead guitar on > "Mau-Mau"?....Cool!... > Essential. > > Sweetbac Productions We ARE the egg snatchers!!!!! nuff said Scot ------------------------------ From: "titanarch@gmail.com" Subject: Re: 69 limited 10 cd set ~ Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:08:50 -0700 Ordered mine the day of the pre-order announcement (7/28), probably within an hour and a half of receiving the message. It was the day before my birthday, so good timing in that regard. Also, I haven't seen the song list for the 3CD version of this set previously posted here. So this might be new to someone other than me. Came across these on Google News (search for "Grateful Dead"): http://music.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1050801.php/Grateful_Deads_69_Fillmore_stand_gets_release http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=musicNews&storyID=2005-09-23T161752Z_01_YUE358526_RTRIDST_0_MUSIC-GRATEFUL-DEAD-DC.XML ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:09:29 -0400 wrote in message news:1127963261.007736.113410@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > damn alcolhol, meant "forgive me" not forbid. hated to see the Airplane > go down. > Man ,chuck are you gonna email me your next post too LOL!! Last Call! ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Comes a Time Rex Benefit ... do we need an offer? Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:14:16 -0700 DB wrote: > >Richard Morris wrote: >> Where are you finding the Nak bt? >> > >http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=18435 > >DB > >> >> "DB" wrote in message >> news:dhekhl$4cv$1@eri0.s8.isp.nyc.eggn.net... >> >>>There are actually 2 audience recordings in circulation as BT's right now. >>>Rob R's 3 Nak 300's and a source labeled "MBHO 603a/ka200n>Sound Devices >>>722 @ 24bit/96khz" taped by Ian Stone. >>> >>>Any consensus on which sounds better? Well, maybe consensus is a bad >>>choice of words around here. I'll just take a few opinions if anyone has >>>compared to the 2 sources. >>> >>>DB I've downloaded the MBHO's and they sound good. Nothing great but a decent recording. The guy who plays with JGB is a Jerry vocal clone. Might just be the day but the inflections are dead on. ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Download Series Vol. 6 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:15:51 -0700 Olompali4 wrote: > >>The price should be $9.99. > >Testify Brother! >You have a witness. >Gans, spread the word! How many have you bought, preacher? ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:15:56 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 18:43:47 -0700, "king88uy7" wrote: >Richard Morris >> it is about integrity, honesty, and poetic justice. >>One more criminall scumball out of office means one more step toward the >>three things that you mention above that are desirable. > >I'm sure you felt the same way about the Clinton impeachment too, right >? Since you're all about honesty and integrity and all... So then you believe that even if Delay is guilty he should go free because Clinton beat the impeachment rap? Same old bullshit argument designed to deflect attention from the criminals you support. JimK ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:17:17 -0700 greek_philosophizer@hotmail.com wrote: > >This will not affect policy as far as I can tell. > >Why are people so moved by this event? He's the guy who successfully moved bills through congress. >He may have broken a minor law of no great import. > >So what? Ending his political career now is much better than later. >It won't get the uninsured health care. >It won't get the squeezed middle class jobs. >It won't get the stupid drug war restructured. > >Maybe I do not understand the politics. You sure don't... ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: etree down... Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:18:27 -0700 Gary & Ellie wrote: > >Yes. Is there something I can help you with? Nope... ------------------------------ From: "volkfolk" Subject: No Direction Home Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:19:03 -0400 I just watched this for the second time. I have always loved Dylan, but after watching No Dirrection Home, I came away with a new respect for Bob. He might not like the label "voice of his generation" but it really is true. Matt and I watched it together and he said (correctly IMO) that Dylan is like Shakespeare, timelesss and ageless in his writing, Of all of the songwriters of the 20th centure he (and Lennon/McCartney) will be the ones whose songs will survive If you haven't watched it, check it out. PBS will be playing it all month, and it is definitely worth the 3 1/2 hours that it takes to watch it. Scot ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: essential 87' AUD recordings?... Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:20:52 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:03:07 GMT, "Jamie Fisher" wrote: >SSIA > 9/18, mainly for the Shakedown and the Dew. JimK ------------------------------ From: "volkfolk" Subject: Re: New Riders next week! Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:28:01 -0400 "Mizshely" wrote in message news:1127943417.230780.244610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Well, at least these guys (Nelson and Cage) were actually in the band > when it was a viable, productive unit. And David was there from the > beginning (or as he says, before time began). While I have issues with > McDuke not being there, nobody knows better than *I* do why he isn't, > since I spent this past spring ferrying him around and I know how ill > he truly is. But this project has John's blessing. What is up with Marmaduke anyway. I had heard he was sick, but I didn't realixe that it was so serious. NRPS was always one of my favorite bands. "Henry" was on of the first songs I ever learned to play, along with "Lonesome LA Cowboy" and the NRPS version of "Dead Flowers" > Once and Always President of Marmaduke's Marauders (don't ask) Hey, you brought it up, what is Marmaduke's Marauders? :^) Scot ------------------------------ Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite From: Mark Hood Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:31:30 -0700 "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy" writes: > Seeger is on film grimacing as he utters the horrible words "rock and roll" > and how Dylan dared to play that total crap. He complained about the sound > too, but he simply hated all music other than his own. Well, it *was* the Newport *Folk* Festival, after all. After listening to acoustic folk music all day, a band coming on stage with loud distorted electric instruments and vocals had to be somewhat jarring even for folks who liked the new electric songs. Was Highway 61 in release at the time of this performance? Bringing It All Back Home was apparently half electric (I need to get that album...), but I wonder how many people at the time were even aware that Dylan was going electric. It must have been quite a shock (pun half-intended). It's really too bad that the shock contributed to the anger. I still find it a little hard to believe that Dylan didn't expect some of that response... I got the distinct impression he intended to produce a sharp reaction, despite his apparent surprise at what happened. On the other hand, the continuing angry reaction to his subsequent performances seems pretty unreasonable given that his fans by that time would have some idea of what he was going to do on stage. Maybe some had already bought their tickets, but it seems to me the people booing and jeering at the later shows went specifically to disparage him. > Seeger also commented on Dylan writing about individuals instead of about > all the happy people in the movement going forward together like they're > supposed to. He was clearly disgusted to the bone by the change in Dylan's > lyrical content. Yeah, that was a really fascinating point of view. I tried my hand at being a folkie at one point, attending the People's Music Network festival in 1989 where Seeger and others held workshops and encouraged people to perform. I went mostly because I was in love with a singer/songwriter friend of mine who was going and I wanted to immerse myself in her world and hopefully make a romantic connection. She didn't want a romance, which was devastating at the time, but getting up and singing a song in front of that crowd was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. I had never felt so completely enveloped by love and support, and the thrill I had in performing before a substantial audience for the first (and only) time seemed to be reflected as a *genuine* thrill from the audience in seeing a newbie to the scene make his first halting performance. I have loved the folkies ever since. The group mind is very strong with them, though, and I felt a palpable, subtle pressure at almost every turn to commit myself and become one of them. For a time, I really *wanted* to, even though I realized that I didn't even really like most of the songs they were into. The fact that Dylan came to be so revered by the folkies and was still able to move on despite all the pressure he must have felt is a real testament to his dedication to his art. ------------------------------ From: "volkfolk" Subject: Re: Nemo and the Giant Squid [NDC] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:35:43 -0400 "Sean Baker" wrote in message news:11jlbg9ro284g73@news.supernews.com... > From the NYT > One tentacle was caught, and the creature moved violently for four hours > to break free. After 4 hours and 13 minutes of struggle, the animal tore > away, leaving the tentacle behind. mmmm,......... Pass the soy sauce and the wasabi. (Or perhaps it would be better deep fried with a nice marinara dipping sauce) Scot ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: New Riders next week! Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:39:51 GMT "volkfolk" wrote in message news:gcidnfd77a6iwqbeRVn-tg@comcast.com... > Hey, you brought it up, what is Marmaduke's Marauders? :^) > > Scot "Marmadukes Marauders" were a group of New Riders groupies that made plaster casts of visiting musicians Auras! ONLY in Marin! Sweetbac Productions ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .