From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #438 Dead-Flames Digest #438, Volume #48 Wed, 28 Sep 05 20:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("king88uy7") 30 years ago today ("Bill") Re: essential AUD recordings... ("Bill") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("Richard Morris") Re: essential AUD recordings... ("Richard Morris") Re: essential AUD recordings... ("Steve Terry") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("king88uy7") Re: essential 87' AUD recordings?... ("Jamie Fisher") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (JC Martin) Re: Todays Lunch. ("toledo44") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("king88uy7") Re: Todays Lunch. ("toledo44") Re: Todays Lunch. ("toledo44") Re: 30 years ago today ("Mizshely") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) ("DGDevin") Re: essential AUD recordings... (Kelly Humphries) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) (Tom Beck) Re: Collect a Check on U.S. (Tom Beck) Re: 30 years ago today ("Bill") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: etree down... (Gary & Ellie) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JimK) "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue ("Dave Kelly") Re: ndc-hand washing post bathroom? (Kelly Humphries) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JimK) Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue (JC Martin) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("DGDevin") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (JC Martin) Re: 10/12/84 and Phil (JimK) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: 28 Sep 2005 18:43:47 -0700 Richard Morris > it is about integrity, honesty, and poetic justice. >One more criminall scumball out of office means one more step toward the >three things that you mention above that are desirable. I'm sure you felt the same way about the Clinton impeachment too, right ? Since you're all about honesty and integrity and all... ------------------------------ From: "Bill" Subject: 30 years ago today Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:45:35 GMT The Grateful Dead played their last free concert ever at Lindley Meadows in San Francisco. Anybody here go? bongo? What bands played besides the Dead and Starship? And in what order (Dead or Starship close it?)? This is also the site of another free concert this Saturday (Strictly Bluegrass). They also did a great show 33 years ago today. Hard to believe how different a band they were just 3 years later in '75. Bill ------------------------------ From: "Bill" Subject: Re: essential AUD recordings... Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:48:32 GMT 7-21-74 is a killer aud recording done by Rob Bertrano. Great show too - of course any show from July '74 will have that quality. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:49:45 -0700 "king88uy7" wrote in message news:1127958227.676732.311800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Richard Morris >> it is about integrity, honesty, and poetic justice. >>One more criminall scumball out of office means one more step toward the >>three things that you mention above that are desirable. > > I'm sure you felt the same way about the Clinton impeachment too, right > ? Since you're all about honesty and integrity and all... > You fuckers just can't turn loose of Clinton, can you ... I guess you think that two wrongs make a right, and somehow you think Clinton got away with something, so DeLay should too, huh? So you tell me who the hypocrite is? R. ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: essential AUD recordings... Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:51:08 -0700 "Dave Kelly" wrote in message news:EDH_e.7530$6e1.1298@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com... > Quite frankly, I dont have TIME to mess around > with audience recordings...granted, I can dig it if > it's your hobby...you and your mini disc player recording > the hair meatl band at the enormo-dome...a souvenir if > you will...but if i can be honest here, there is a plethora > of crisp board tapes just waiting to be plundered over > on the archives site..I dont have the patience to download > and compare different sources of the same show from people > who had no BINNISS procuring condenser mics and D-6's... > is the Sennheiser 1200 source better than the shotgun radio shack > directional pointed at the stacks 30 feet up with a MOTHERFCKIN > WIND sock attached to the cardoids!...I have NO time for such games. > My life is complicated enough. > Dont you people read my OTHER posts? Yes, I read them. What I want to know is, did you sell Sean a breast pump by mistake? R. ------------------------------ From: "Steve Terry" Subject: Re: essential AUD recordings... Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:55:40 -0500 "Richard Morris" wrote in message: > Yes, I read them. What I want to know is, did you sell Sean a breast pump > by mistake? Either that or maybe Sean is a midget. ------------------------------ From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:01:10 -0700 Richard Morris >somehow you think Clinton got away with something, so DeLay should too, >huh? I don't think DeLay should get away with anything, I'm glad he got indicted. I was just curious if you were consitent in your judgements, or if you were just sharing lame-ass partisan talking points with us, and really, you can care less about honesty and integrity, you're just partisan. But I don't know, I was just curious. You can still answer the question if you want to. ------------------------------ From: "Jamie Fisher" Subject: Re: essential 87' AUD recordings?... Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:03:07 GMT SSIA ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:05:06 GMT king88uy7 wrote: > Richard Morris > >>it is about integrity, honesty, and poetic justice. >>One more criminall scumball out of office means one more step toward the >>three things that you mention above that are desirable. > > > I'm sure you felt the same way about the Clinton impeachment too, right > ? Since you're all about honesty and integrity and all... I don't think most of America does actually. Most Americans in fact were appalled at the investigation that took place under the direction of Ken Starr and appalled that a civil suit could be filed against a sitting President. Talk about a national security issue! I've some beefs with Clinton (his extramarital affair included) but not on any lie he told to protect his family from what was a witch hunt. Tom Delay is just a greedy scumbag. He has no morals nor empathy for the common guy or gal out there. -JC ------------------------------ From: "toledo44" Subject: Re: Todays Lunch. Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:09:51 -0700 Dave Kelly wrote: > Went down to the Car Wash Taco jernt on Bayshore Blvd. > 2 Al Pastor tacos with fresh cilantro/salsa/onions > $4.10 > The meat was grilled marinated pork that had a smokey/ > sweet/spicy quality...2 fresh corn tortillas...let me say that > again in case you missed it.....FRESH corn tortillas....brilliant. > Fresh tortilla chips on the side. > Drove to Golden Gate Park and watched the weekend free > bluegrass festival folks set up the stage as I feasted and washed > it down with a couple frosty Newcastle Ales. > The main stage in speedway meadows is huge. > There are 2 smaller stages being set up in Lindley & Marx Meadows. > Beautiful indian summer day....the sky is a deep blue... > Lets hope the weather will hold out all weekend. Yeah right. > Anyhows, Peep REAL game: > http://www.burritoeater.com/restaurant.php?taqueria_id=13m ------------------------------ From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:12:10 -0700 JC Martin >I've some beefs with Clinton (his extramarital affair included) but not on any lie >he told to protect his family from what was a witch hunt. I believe, technically, that would be affair_S_. I think the tricky thing is the lies could also be called perjury, which is a bigger deal. Having people under oath pick and choose when to tell the truth is bad. I'd agree with you that he probably shouldn't have been asked those questions while president though. But, yeah, Delay sucks. ------------------------------ From: "toledo44" Subject: Re: Todays Lunch. Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:13:41 -0700 MAN YOU ARE LIVIN THE LIFE. SOUNDS LIKE THE PERFICT DAY IN SF. ------------------------------ From: "toledo44" Subject: Re: Todays Lunch. Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:13:46 -0700 MAN YOU ARE LIVIN THE LIFE. SOUNDS LIKE THE PERFICT DAY IN SF. ------------------------------ From: "Mizshely" Subject: Re: 30 years ago today Date: 28 Sep 2005 19:16:56 -0700 I was there! I was there! But I cannot honestly say that I remember anything about it other than running into my high school friend, Ann Auerbach, backstage and being comepletely surprised to see her. ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:20:21 GMT "Richard Morris" wrote in message news:bc2dnUNyk6sN2KbeRVn-vw@comcast.com... > > > Eh? This isn't about politics ... it is about integrity, honesty, and > poetic justice. > > One more criminall scumball out of office means one more step toward the > three things that you mention above that are desirable. Okay, who has the list of Clinton business associates and political subordinates who went to prison.... ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: essential AUD recordings... Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:23:18 -0700 Dunno if it's even at the archive, but 4/17/84 Niagara Falls is an example of a not-that-great show enshrined on a terrific audience tape. Details already provided by (former) rmgd'er Gordon Sharpless: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.gdead/msg/91df5319a47e3c94?hl=en& ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:26:32 GMT "Ray" wrote in message news:1127945817.818255.143340@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > I don't believe that fear of losing progressive cred is a major > motivator here, but otherwise agreed. It's disgustingly ironic that > when anti-Bush protests start getting violent and windows get smashed > and the like that it helps the Bush Whitehouse keep doing what they are > doing. > > Ray Yeah, and I seem to recall some feds coming to the same conclusion in the Nixon era and at least planning if not actually encouraging violent radicals with provocateurs to discredit the whole peace movement, amazing that lesson seems to have been lost on the current crop of protest organizers. ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:31:33 GMT "Paul" wrote in message news:rndmj114dl3v6ec6i502vmhnk96j4huup0@4ax.com... > There was a technique for isolating agent provacateurs and troublemakers > that was taught at pre-demonstraion non > violence training sessions back in the 70's. It involved many people > surrounding the troublemaker and with arms at our > side, we move in to form a tight group with the troublemaker at the > center. We then would move as a unit to deliver the > troublemaker to the authorities. It took practice and commitment, but it > worked. I saw some photos of organized troublemakers being arrested in San Francisco during the first big wave of Iraq demonstrations, the cops were emptying their backbacks onto the sidewalk, a bunch of them for some reason were carrying brand-new 18" pipe-wrenches in their packs, so while I admire the technique you describe, I'm afraid that helmets would be a useful addition these days.... ------------------------------ From: Tom Beck Subject: Re: DeLay Indicted! (ndc) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:37:39 -0500 leftie wrote: > Tom DeLay has finally gone from unidicted co-conspirator to indicted > conspirator! Plus, he's resigned the Speaker of the House position! > > Woohoo! Send that motherfucker to jail where he belongs!!!! > > But let's get him out of congress completely first. > > http://action.ourfuture.org > > > > "ding dong, the witch is dead...." "Trench Town Rock, everyone knows, Trench Town Rock, gonna' reap what you sow ..." Bob Marley, "Trench Town Rock" ------------------------------ From: Tom Beck Subject: Re: Collect a Check on U.S. Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:40:02 -0500 leftie wrote: > pv34pv3p wrote: > >> And finally back to Sean... >> >> >>> So, what is it hot shot, what "job" do you hold at the behest of the >>> taxpayers? >> >> >> >> Physician's Assistant... > > > > It's all starting to make sense now... > > pv34pv3p is Private Shelby! (aka bedpan boy) Do you have the cajones to do it? Tom ------------------------------ From: "Bill" Subject: Re: 30 years ago today Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:35:26 GMT "Mizshely" wrote in message news:1127960216.184122.296090@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > I was there! I was there! But I cannot honestly say that I remember > anything about it other than running into my high school friend, Ann > Auerbach, backstage and being comepletely surprised to see her. Did she have a brother named Bob who played (a great) lead guitar in a band in SF sometime between '77 and '80 and who was born probably sometime between '60 and '65? ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:36:49 GMT "JC Martin" wrote in message news:ZBC_e.607$Aw.9147@typhoon.sonic.net... > No difference in your logic. Rush Limbaugh represents the majority > mindset of the Republican Party. He's by no means fringe. > > Try again. > > -JC Okay, Right-wingers are better at organization, that they have people like Rush merely shows they can get their shit together while the left is trying to decide whether to call itself the People's Revolutionary Front of Judea or the Revolutionary Judean People's Front. Thus an equivalent number of lefties appear to be fewer simply because they are so lame at making themselves heard and persuading others to share their views. Feel better? Meanwhile, Air America is asking listeners for donations.... ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:36:31 -0400 From: Gary & Ellie Reply-To: gary.and.ellie@gmail.com Subject: Re: etree down... band beyond description wrote: > On 2005-09-29 07:27:03 +0900, Gary & Ellie said: > >> DG wrote: >> >>> Gary & Ellie wrote: >>> >>>> DG wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gary & Ellie wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Josh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> "DG" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:9dflj1hqb6shm5d5eqql1nojqaakkhtevd@4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyone know why? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's working now... 12:25 PM EDT. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Josh >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll bet that 15 minutes it was down was very painful. Come back >>>>>> in off the ledge. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well dipshit, when you have a few torrents going and the tracker is >>>>> down, there are issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And lots of them, apparently. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you even know what a torrent is? >>> >> Yes. Is there something I can help you with? > > > post of the....(hour!) > > now everyone get back to their torrents -- and thanks for seeding so > many, Gary! I wish I could do more. It's my pleasure. I'm waiting on a hard drive to come in the mail for a bunch of GD stuff that I'm sending to the archive. Then, I hope I can seed some more stuff. E-axe, that was funny... ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:40:31 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 15:16:57 -0700, "Ray" wrote: >DGDevin wrote: >> I suggested assigning crowd marshalls to follow the guys in black with the >> backbacks full of ballistic objects, the marshalls have video cameras and >> cellphones, when they see someone winging lug-nuts at the cops or smashing a >> window or chaining together newspaper vending boxes to block a street, they >> shoot video and call the police. This is not without risk, the anarchist >> types are clearly more than willing to see blood spilled, so you'd need some >> big, ugly crowd marshalls to handle this. But in many cases I suspect just >> contronting the violence-vampires would be enough, if the bandanas were >> yanked from their faces and they realized they were surrounded by people who >> weren't going to tolerate their bullshit I bet many of them would go home to >> brood and plot rather than risk being identified and locked up. > >Yeah, although you'd need a large number of Hells' Angels-type crowd >marshalls to be there before you want to start yanking bandanas - >otherwise that would be a foolhardy action at best. And so >realistically I don't see yanking bandanas as a viable option. Video >taping and the like is another story, although that too would carry >significant risks. > >> Beyond that the non-violent organizers need to be more forceful in >> condemning the violent factions and in cooperating with the authorities to >> help see the trouble-makers behind bars, and that's not something I see >> happening, the "us vs. them" mentality is too entrenched in the anti-war >> movement, the idea of helping the cops just wouldn't digest too well. > >I think it has more to do with fear of the protest movement splintering >into even less power than they have now, although again I consider >putting that concern over distancing from the fascists to be the wrong >call - and possibly a fatal one. > >> How >> many people here, finding themselves marching beside someone wearing a mask, >> would ask that person why they need to conceal their identity, much less >> stop that person from smashing a shop window? > >I think that rarely (if ever) happens because the risk/reward ratio is >too low: for individuals to initiate such activity there is high risk >of getting hurt and very low chance for making any difference. Most >people know that the 'violence-vampires' won't listen to reason on the >issue, esp. during a protest. > >> Let's not kid ourselves, a >> lot of the people marching are actually sympathetic to the idea of a >> Starbucks being trashed or even an Army recruiting office being burned. > >I believe that, at the large rallies anyway, only a very small >percentage of the protestors want or are even sympathetic to such >activities. I believe that most protestors are instead against such >actions. > >> I watched this several decades ago up close and I'm seeing it again today, >> "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," it was bullshit then and its bullshit >> now. But it won't change, as Ray points out, the non-violent groups are too >> afraid of splitting the movement and I believe of losing their progressive >> cred, so they won't lift a finger when the Stalinist/fascist/anarchist >> mobsters show up, masked, packs full of wrenches and frozen cans of soda, >> and afterwards when the city is cleaning up the mess the whole damn movement >> looks like a bunch of apes and the clowns in the Whitehouse get to smile and >> go on with fucking up something else, just lovely. > >I don't believe that fear of losing progressive cred is a major >motivator here, but otherwise agreed. It's disgustingly ironic that >when anti-Bush protests start getting violent and windows get smashed >and the like that it helps the Bush Whitehouse keep doing what they are >doing. > >Ray So then it seems we're all in agreement that as a practical matter, there's little the nonviolent protestors can do to prevent the violent ones from doing their thing, at least not without placing themselves at risk. There's no need for peaceful protestors to act as spies and vigilantes. This really boils down to a P.R. issue, and the best thing the nonviolent groups can do is be more effective in publicly distinguishing themselves from the hardcore troublemakers. JimK ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:43:06 GMT Yesterday, I found the newest re-ish of Paul Kantners 1970 masterpiece "Blows Against The Empire" I think this is the 3rd time it's been remastered on cd. I'm a sucker for this album...the packaging is wonderful... 2 booklets of stuff...new interviews....grace slick drawings... 5 bonus cuts...Grace's acoustic "Sunrise" demo...a '70 Fillmore West Airplane version of "Starship"...2 hidden tracks at the end with radio ads for the album...who plays what on each track....Peter Kaukonen - Lead guitar on "Mau-Mau"?....Cool!... Essential. Sweetbac Productions ------------------------------ From: Kelly Humphries Subject: Re: ndc-hand washing post bathroom? Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:45:24 -0700 Also sprach "Stephen St." : > For years, I have noticed that the majority of men dont wash up after using > the bathroom. Most of this opinion is from standing in mens rooms waiting to > use the urinal at bars and sporting events. I have calculated the average to > be around 60% of guys do NOT wash up after using the bathroom. I used to > cringe when someone would introduce me a guy they worked with, usually > grabbing a cigarette immediately to avoid the hand shake and subsequent > urine sharing. Ever since a round of Norwalk Virus ran its course during post-fair cleanup at the Oregon Country Fair a couple of years ago, I ALWAYS wash up afterwards. You do NOT want to fall victim to Norwalk (aka the Cruise Ship Virus). I didn't get it too bad -- just a little dizziness, probably a contact high -- but I was surrounded by good friends who fell one by one during the night, endlessly puking their guts out in their tent then at the crack of dawn wandering off to find sunlight to warm their shivering bodies. It's the worst 24-hour-flu you've ever had, its transmission is made easier with large groups of people in close quarters, and its transmission is almost completely avoidable with basic hygiene. Once you've had an encounter with Norwalk, you'll realize it's a lot easier to just wash your hands after taking a dump. ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:47:42 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On 28 Sep 2005 14:49:46 -0700, "king88uy7" wrote: >Joe >>NO. We don't have to accept that. We can't except that. > >Strange. It's tough to make the correct decision when you don't live >in the real world. Pretending it won't be worse for the Iraqui people >if we leave isn't that compelling for me, so I guess I'll miss the >protest. I guess you still don't have an opinion on what will happen >to the Iraqui people if we remove all our troops tomorrow. Maybe you >don't care ? > >Enough talking point propaganda bullshit. Think for yourself. Or >don't. So when do you suggest that we do move our troops out? All we're doing by staying is postponing the inevitable. Please don't try to tell us, as Bush has, that we're in Iraq for the benefit of the Iraqis. If you do, you're both liars. JimK ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: "Blows Against The Empire" re-re-reissue Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:51:55 GMT Dave Kelly wrote: > Yesterday, I found the newest re-ish of Paul Kantners > 1970 masterpiece "Blows Against The Empire" > I think this is the 3rd time it's been remastered on cd. > I'm a sucker for this album...the packaging is wonderful... > 2 booklets of stuff...new interviews....grace slick drawings... > 5 bonus cuts...Grace's acoustic "Sunrise" demo...a '70 > Fillmore West Airplane version of "Starship"...2 hidden > tracks at the end with radio ads for the album...who plays > what on each track....Peter Kaukonen - Lead guitar on > "Mau-Mau"?....Cool!... > Essential. I've had this on vinyl for years. Really, this is the ultimate Grace Slick record. She's just on fire. Her trippy, dubbed out, harmonized vocals are a real treat. Intense and dark. One to pick up this weekend. Peas, JC ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:52:59 GMT "Ray" wrote in message news:1127943269.657536.113890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > In my view Repubs are much more blindly partisan (aka 'loyal') than > Dems. Consider, for example, Gray Davis: he was pretty-much disliked > by everyone in CA, Dems and Repubs. Which, of course, is why he was > able to have been recalled from office. Excepting my wife, lifelong Dem and staunch trade unionist, who voted against the recall regardless of the Davis history of incompetence and corruption. ;-) But that brings up the point of what it takes to turn people against their party, and in the case of Davis his administration oversaw real hardship for Californians, the (engineered) power outages and prices increases, the dot-com meltdown and economic slowdown, people had specific issues that had caused them pain and Davis was there to catch the blame. But if you're the cartoon-character Republican many folks around here believes populates that party, what do you have to be unhappy about? If your job is outsourcing-proof, you have a profitable stock portfolio, don't have any kids in the army in Iraq -- what painful issues are there for you to associate with Bush? Enough hyperbole -- Of course, many Republicans are unhappy about the Bush admin, but don't say that too loud in r.m.gd, the notion that anyone with an "R" after his name could be a thinking moral creature might result in some popped arteries.... ------------------------------ From: "DGDevin" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:53:38 GMT "JC Martin" wrote in message news:FzC_e.606$Aw.9154@typhoon.sonic.net... > .......which is why I have DG pegged as a Bush apologist. ;-) > > -JC You fascists, all the same. ;-) ------------------------------ From: JC Martin Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:56:19 GMT DGDevin wrote: > "JC Martin" wrote in message > news:ZBC_e.607$Aw.9147@typhoon.sonic.net... > > >>No difference in your logic. Rush Limbaugh represents the majority >>mindset of the Republican Party. He's by no means fringe. >> >>Try again. >> >>-JC > > > Okay, Right-wingers are better at organization, that they have people like > Rush merely shows they can get their shit together while the left is trying > to decide whether to call itself the People's Revolutionary Front of Judea > or the Revolutionary Judean People's Front. Thus an equivalent number of > lefties appear to be fewer simply because they are so lame at making > themselves heard and persuading others to share their views. Feel better? > > Meanwhile, Air America is asking listeners for donations.... Lying daily and apologizing for criminal behavior is getting one's shit together? Sad. -JC ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: 10/12/84 and Phil Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:57:49 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:23:46 -0400, "Bzl." wrote: > >"Dylanstubs" wrote in message >news:1127917795.355219.64000@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> Phil mentions in his book how this was the first GD tour with Phil & >> Jill as a married couple, and how Jerry winked at him during >> Jack-a-Roe. He forgot to mention that Bob followed that up with It's >> All Over Now, and then Jerry hit him with Cold Rain & Snow in the 2nd >> set. What a bunch of pranksters. :) >> > >Brent did Don't Need Love that night, too. > And the whole band did a stunning version of Morning Dew. And a pretty damned good UJB>Drums>Playin' Reprise>UJB before that. JimK ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .