From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #426 Dead-Flames Digest #426, Volume #48 Tue, 27 Sep 05 21:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: First in line for a .... Handout ("Sean Baker") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Joe) Re: FEMA rehires Brown (brew ziggins) Re: First in line for a .... Handout (Joe) Re: Bush Drinking, part 2 (ndc) (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (back_from_the_dead@getgoin.net) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("king88uy7") Re: Goin' where the Chilly Winds don't blow ("Sean Baker") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("RickNBarbInSD") Re: Collect a Check on U.S. ("pv34pv3p") Re: What's going on? (The Lord of Eltingville) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Bush (NDC) ("Richard Morris") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Tim Donohoe) Re: Booing at GD shows? (Andy Gefen) Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (Tom Beck) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite (Tom Beck) Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Tim Donohoe) Re: 33 years old and never been on a date ("Jerry Lobrowski") Re: 33 years old and never been on a date ("Jerry Lobrowski") Re: 33 years old and never been on a date ("Jerry Lobrowski") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("king88uy7") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Richard Morris") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("Ray") Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") Re: Shut Down The War Machine (Tim Donohoe) Re: Shut Down The War Machine ("pv34pv3p") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Sean Baker" Subject: Re: First in line for a .... Handout Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:47:55 -0500 "455^d v w,!" <455^d v w,!@yahoo.com> wrote in message >SNIP< > >455^d v w,! Yeah but you're still a welfare suckin' PUSSY. Peace, Sean -- And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover. -Mark 16:17-18 My music list for trades: http://db.etree.org/fionarcb ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 28 Sep 2005 01:52:56 GMT king88uy7 wrote: > More to my point, Joe's refusal to explain what he thinks would happen > if the US cut out of Iraq tomorrow. Since he's promoting this rally > that's calling for exactly that, it seems like that's something he > should have thought through already. But, since it wasn't included in > the liberal propaganda he received, he doesn't have an answer. Who was king88uy7 yesterday? One day on rmgd, and you're already in mad-dog attack mode. Listen up, child... One does not have to justify peace, or explain why peace is the preferred way to live. It is you war mongerers who have to explain why you think murder is just fine. Murder, after all, is what the Americans are doing to the Iraqis. Another day, another right wing nitwit troll. The odds of that happening are nil. Who are you, and why do you have to hide behind a made-up-20-seconds-ago nom-de-computer? Right Wing Nazi Dead Heads eat shit! As "they" used to say in California, oh, about 30 years ago: AMF! LOL Joe ------------------------------ From: brew ziggins Subject: Re: FEMA rehires Brown Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:11:42 -0400 Thus spake no@spam.com... > The Lord of Eltingville wrote: > > > Joe wrote: > > > >>houndish@netzero.net wrote: > >> > >>>yes - America is great. Don't like it? Leave dirtbag hippy. > >> > >>Sounds like a plan. Will Wednesday morning be soon enough, Herr Houndish? > >> > >>But, I'll be back in time to march through the streets of San Francisco, > >>while chanting: "Abu Ghraib-USA For All Right Wing Nitwit Deadheads." > >> > >>I'll be the tanned and rested hippie Dead Head. > > > > A tanned and rested hippicrite is more like it... > > HEY, MODERATOR! I thought you were working on this! I was moderator last week. Somebody look at the bulletin board and tell us who it is this week. -- bruce higgins ithaca ny most of the day, we were at the machinery ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: First in line for a .... Handout Date: 28 Sep 2005 01:58:53 GMT Sean Baker wrote: > Yeah but you're still a welfare suckin' PUSSY. Maybe his job in the military was to service Private Shelby? Joe ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Bush Drinking, part 2 (ndc) Date: 27 Sep 2005 18:59:48 -0700 "Thirty-six military trained-dolphins with toxic dart guns were reported missing in the Gulf of Mexico."?! Bad week to be a tuna captain down there, I guess. Larry ------------------------------ From: back_from_the_dead@getgoin.net Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:01:03 -0700 Stephen St. wrote: > Wow, that was fun. > > The comments in England after the electric set are priceless. > > Part 2 tomorrow? He was the voice of a generation. ------------------------------ From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:01:50 -0700 Ken Fortenberry >somebody with an agenda, even a right-wing nitwit agenda, will necessarily be >a more ardent, pugnacious and tenacious Usenet politician. Great answer, I'll think about this. Thanks. ------------------------------ From: "Sean Baker" Subject: Re: Goin' where the Chilly Winds don't blow Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:49:57 -0500 "k sturm" wrote in message > most of the day, we were at the machinery > > That's kinda what I was thinking. How on earth can they complain about > "winter" when they don't even get snow?? Sheesh, they oughta come here > for the winter, they'd NEVER complain about cold again!! You know it's cold in Chicago when you have to use anti-freeze on your EYEBALLS. We ain't lookin' forwerd to January. Boots or no boots. Peace, Sean -- "Every now and then when your life gets complicated and the weasels start closing in, the only real cure is to load up on heinous chemicals and then drive like a bastard from Hollywood to Las Vegas." Hunter S. Thompson My music list for trades: http://db.etree.org/FionaRCB ------------------------------ From: "RickNBarbInSD" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 11:50:41 -0700 Paul wrote: > I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition! NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise... and ruthless efficiency.... Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency... and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our four... no... Amongst our weapons... Amongst our weaponry... are such elements as fear, surprise... I'll come in again. ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Collect a Check on U.S. Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:12:44 -0700 >So, what is it hot shot, what "job" do you hold at the behest of the >taxpayers? >I'm glad to know that the taxpayers put your daughter through school and >supported your sorry ass for 22 years. I guess it's price ya pay for supporting your ability to spew stupid shit like that... Ossama don't care what your dumbass thinks... >what do you say, let's end entitlements!!!! I'll gladly relinquish my stipend...As soon as you relinquish your right to say stupid shit like that... Taliban don't care what your dumbass thinks... pv34pv3p Peace, Sean ------------------------------ From: The Lord of Eltingville Subject: Re: What's going on? Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:55:03 -0400 Joe wrote: > > pv34pv3p wrote: > > >Bush lies about everything. > > > >But hey, anyone with a brain already knows that. > > > >Joe > > > If true...the question that goes begging is how the fuck did you get > > hip to it? > > Yo, putz34pv3p. I have a Master's degree from one of the most prestigious > universities in the country. Do you even have a GED? Didn't think so... http://tinyurl.com/8hut2 > But hey, what's Bush's blood-thirsty empire building have to do with me? > Nothing, Mister Anonymous. > > Jose ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:18:05 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > Ray wrote: > >pv34pv3p wrote: > >> >A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in > >> >what I forwarded here > >> > >> >-or- > >> > >> >B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased > >> >in what I forwarded here > >> > >> Uhhhh....What is Yes to both for 1000 Alex... > >> > >> pv34pv3p(That was easy....) > > > >Logic isn't your strong point, is it PV. > > > >Care to answer honestly now, or are you going to keep running away from > >an honest discussion here? > > Way stronger than you reading skills...Assuming that you don't use your > lips when reading multiple choice questions...Try it... > > A) Does your wife approve of you molesting your children? > > or > > B) Does your wife disapprove of you molesting your children? > > A simple yes or no will do... Again logic isn't your strong point, is it PV. Unlike the mud you are throwing here that insinuates that I did something that I didn't do, I'm simply asking you to tell us whether you think that what you posted was misleadingly biased or not. Care to answer my question directly and honestly now, or are you going to keep throwing mud / running away from an honest discussion here? Ray ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Bush (NDC) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:22:16 -0700 "band beyond description" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:3puam0Fcbv9fU1@individual.net... > http://www.wimp.com/presidential/ Hard to believe that folks voted for that dumb sumbitch, ain't it? R. ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:28:11 -0700 >Care to answer my question directly and honestly now, or are you going >to keep throwing mud / running away from an honest discussion here? >Ray For (dare I say it...Christ sakes Ray)....Ya can't even fuckin' frame a question that would have any statistical meaning... Don't pull a Joe and tell me about your fuckin' Masters from some highly (Ahemm...) respected Una Vers I Tee... It'd just be further proof both ya'll are educated way beyond your intelligence... pv34pv3p(Your parent's should demand a refund....) ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:35:48 -0700 king88uy7 wrote: > Ray > >In this thread alone we've got a conservative who won't even own up to > >whether he thinks that the stuff that he forwarded here is misleadingly biased > >or not. > > I think he did answer > > pv34pv3p > >Well Ray, howz 'bout you start applying the same standard to all posts here... > >Talk about bias... > > I read that as "it's no more or less valid than the liberal propoganda > that gets posted here regularly" So in your interpretation you think PV's using the blame game as an excuse for posting bullshit-laden propaganda - which basically amounts to the 'reasoning' that others here post bullshit, so he's excused for doing it too. 2 points: 1) What you wrote here is your interpretation of why he posted bullshit-laden propaganda in this thead, but PV has yet to even acknowledge that it IS bulshit-laden propaganda. Which is to say, PV has not answered my question. 2) Do you believe in personal responsibility, king88uy7? Or do believe, as PV's rhetoric suggests that he does, that the negative actions of others somehow excuses similar actions? > More to my point, Joe's refusal to explain what he thinks would happen > if the US cut out of Iraq tomorrow. Since he's promoting this rally > that's calling for exactly that, it seems like that's something he > should have thought through already. But, since it wasn't included in > the liberal propaganda he received, he doesn't have an answer. > > I bet pv34pv3p could answer that question, and I bet his answer to that > question would explain why he doesn't support the protest. Which is > the difference between the liberals and conservatives on this board. You are way overgeneralizing here, king88uy7. What any one poster on this board does and does not do cannot be generalized into "the difference between the liberals and conservatives on this board." Using your 'reasoning' here, PV's refusal to even nswer whether he even believes in the propaganda that he posts here is 'proof' that conservatives won't even declare they believe their propaganda, let alone defend it. Which of course is an overgeneralization - it applies to PV, but not to conservatives in general. Ray ------------------------------ From: Tim Donohoe Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:37:40 GMT JC Martin wrote: > DGDevin wrote: > >> "Ray" wrote in message >> news:1127832887.614506.161250@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>> Yeah, unfortunately the anarchist fuck-wads in bandanas and black will >>> almost assuredly be there, to exploit the scene for their own idiotic >>> ends (which, as near as I can tell, amounts to a bizarre need to break >>> busines windows and injure or kill cops). At least they are small in >>> number - maybe a couple of dozen of so - so provided that the rest of >>> the protest is orderly and isn't dedicated to shutting down downtown SF >>> the cops will have the resources keep those idiots under relative >>> control. >> >> >> >> I have to wonder what would happen if the non-violent groups stepped >> up and told the wingnuts they weren't welcome, > > > > > I think you're making an assumption that they don't do this. In fact, > usually the organizers of such events along with peace activists make it > clear to the media and to the anarchists that they don't accept or > appreciate this kind of behavior. On the flip side, I agree with Ray in > regards to shutting down the city, unless a permit is gotten to use a > certain section of the city of course. > > -JC Maybe they can hire the Hells Angels to do security. ------------------------------ From: Andy Gefen Subject: Re: Booing at GD shows? Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:37:58 -0400 On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:07:26 -0400, "Bzl." wrote: >No. I was at that Capital Theatre gig, too. "History! Only Jerry solo >show!" BFD. Jerry acoustic guitar playing needed embellishment, and more >than Kahn. Sacrilege! I really enjoy listening to the Just Jerry shows. It has such an intimate feel to it. -- Andy (remove z's to respond) ------------------------------ From: Tom Beck Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:46:28 -0500 Stephen St. wrote: > Wow, that was fun. > > The comments in England after the electric set are priceless. > > Part 2 tomorrow? > > Yup. Watching it now. Tom ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:44:04 -0700 >Which of course is an overgeneralization - it applies to PV, but not to >conservatives in general. >Ray Mamma always said I was exceptional.... pv34pv3p ------------------------------ From: Tom Beck Subject: Re: ndc-Dylan special on PBS tonite Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:49:37 -0500 mjd wrote: > Stephen St. wrote: > >>Wow, that was fun. >> >>The comments in England after the electric set are priceless. >> >>Part 2 tomorrow? > > > yes - same time same channel. > > just an incredible show. the snippet of Ballad of a Thin Man from > England was nothing short of astounding. to think they booed and > heckled him for that stuff - wtf... > They booed him for "Like A Rolling Stone" too, didn't they? Tom ------------------------------ From: Tim Donohoe Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:45:06 GMT king88uy7 wrote: > Joe wrote: > >>You didn't even attempt to answer a single question I asked of you, so >>why the fuck should I bother with an anonymous troll? > > > Joe's refusal to have an open debate that isn't based on liberal > propaganda is pretty common around here, and it got me thinking... > > Why are (most of) the conservatives here so much better at expressing > and defending political points ? > > I think it's because to be a conservative deadhead, one really would > have had to think his way through things, Or else they can listen to AM radio and repeat everything Limbaugh says as if it were written in stone. ------------------------------ From: "Jerry Lobrowski" Subject: Re: 33 years old and never been on a date Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:48:18 -0700 Carlisle wrote: > Jerry Lobrowski wrote: > > Its true. It sucks to be me. > > "Cheer up, Palmer- > You'll soon be dead." > I have no idea where this quote originated, but I find more comfort than fear in my own mortality. > So I've heard there are some old hippies out in San Francisco who could > hook you up right nice, man. ;~} At this point I am too drunk to read internet posts coherently so I hope you aren't offering to set me up with a man from San Francisco, especially all the way from Kentucky. > Stay Grateful Always. > Carrie ------------------------------ From: "Jerry Lobrowski" Subject: Re: 33 years old and never been on a date Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:50:19 -0700 Dylanstubs wrote: > 8/10/82 was a pretty good date. So was 10/12/84. 1983 is conspicuously absent > > But seriously, ever try asking anyone out? Not really. ------------------------------ From: "Jerry Lobrowski" Subject: Re: 33 years old and never been on a date Date: 27 Sep 2005 19:56:57 -0700 Steve Terry wrote: > "leftie" wrote in message > news:dhcest$14ga$1@agate.berkeley.edu... > > Steve Terry wrote: > > > >> "Jerry Lobrowski" wrote in message > >> news:1127849177.246390.166720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > >> > >>>Its true. It sucks to be me. > >> > >> If only you were a chick, then you and the Jizzlobber could hook up. > > > > What woman would want a part of *that*? > > Rosie? Either you are a comedic genius or you haven't "cleverly" realized who you are responding to. ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 13:29:23 -0700 Ray wrote: > pv34pv3p wrote: > > >True, you did carbon-sopy forward a very long, factually misleading and > > >incorrect-ridden propaganda piece that takes some time and effort to > > >demonstrate how bullshit-laden the thing really is, but try to pay > > >attention - this stuff has been posted and debunked here before. Check > > >google. > > > > I said it was nothin' new... > > > > What's factually misleading??? > > Do you REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what > you forwarded here, PV? If you answer that with an unqualified: > > A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleading in what I > forwarded here > > -or- > > B) No - I REALLY don't think that there is anything misleadingly biased > in what I forwarded here D'oh! I worded these incorrectly. Here's the correct wording: A) Yes - I REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what I forwarded here -or- B) No - I don't REALLY think that there is nothing misleadingly biased in what I forwarded here Looking forward to your direct, unqualified answer, Ray > Then I'll go on to demonstrate how it is, in fact, misleadingly > biased/bullshit-laden. > > Or, you can save the trouble of explicitly demonstrating that you are > either A) far too gullible about what you read on the internet as well > as misinformed and incapable of independent reasoning, or B) trolling, > by googling this newsgroup as to how what you forwarded is > bullshit-laden for yourself. > > cheers, > Ray ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:01:03 -0700 >Or else they can listen to AM radio and repeat everything Limbaugh says >as if it were written in stone. And the MSM that you swallow your shit from is somehow different??? My observations are nearly entirely based upon a lifetime of saving lives, and living in, and spending time all around this world... Yours on the other hand are not... pv34pv3p ------------------------------ From: "king88uy7" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:01:48 -0700 Joe >Who was king88uy7 yesterday? You should put in a little effort, it'd make you seem smarter http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.gdead/browse_thread/thread/512414236d192da7/4452716ec1377233?q=king88uy7&rnum=46#4452716ec1377233 king88uy7 Apr 18 2002, 2:53 pm Joe >One does not have to justify peace I agree, but if we cut out of Iraq, it seems like the killing will just get worse. We shouldn't be in Iraq in the first place, but we are there, so we have to accept that. A horrible civil war seems likely if we leave the region unstable (which we caused by attacking). Given that, I'd prefer to have the US stay and see if we can stabilize the region. OK, your turn. What do you think will happen to Iraq and the innocent Iraquis if we leave tomorrow, which you are calling for. Simple question, what's the expected effect of what you're protesting for ? Do you expect the protest will have any effect ? ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:02:22 -0700 pv34pv3p wrote: > >Care to answer my question directly and honestly now, or are you going > >to keep throwing mud / running away from an honest discussion here? > > > >Ray > > For (dare I say it...Christ sakes Ray)....Ya can't even fuckin' frame a > question that would have any statistical meaning... 'Statistical meaning'?!? LOL. It's a simple yes or no question, PV - no statistics required. Care to answer my question directly and honestly now, or are you going to keep throwing mud / running away from an honest discussion here? Ray ------------------------------ From: "Richard Morris" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:03:20 -0700 "Ray" wrote in message news:1127797129.129383.67470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Joe wrote: >> The day the bombs started falling on Iraq, the streets in San Francisco >> were shut down by those opposed to the war launched solely on the absurd >> lies of Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Powell. > > And who picked up the tab for that? Not Bush and Co. - it was instead > the people of San Francisco. > >> They lied about everything, and >> now it's time for us to shut their fucking war machine down, and to shut >> their fascist country down. > > Shutting down San Francisco will do no such thing. > >> The Festival Of Resistance is coming to your town. November 2nd. >> >> Call in sick. Take to the streets. Let those criminals in DC know that >> their gig is up. Fuck them! > > Bush and Co. are well aware that the people of the San Francisco Bay > Area, on balance, are not their political allies. So if anti-Bush > protestors shut down San Fransico again Bush and Co. won't know that > their 'gig' is up - they will instead laugh that 'friends' of San > Francisco shut down the city again. > >> LET'S TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK! > > I very much hope that happens in the next election. But shutting down > San Francisco will only result in San Francisco taxpayers picking up > the tab for a bunch of angry people -- most of whom don't live in SF -- > shouting into the ether. Again. Last I recall, in the constitution of the United States, there was some language about the right of the people to peaceably assemble. Does that ring a bell to you? I would much rather pay the tab for people to assemble (peacefully) on behalf of promoting a peaceful world, than pay the tab to make war in the Middle East. It is a sorry thing that peaceful assembly boils down to dollars. From my perspective, the more publicity about peace, the more people will get on the bandwagon. Worth every penny. R. ------------------------------ From: "Ray" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:07:04 -0700 Richard Morris wrote: > "Ray" wrote in message > news:1127797129.129383.67470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > Joe wrote: > >> The day the bombs started falling on Iraq, the streets in San Francisco > >> were shut down by those opposed to the war launched solely on the absurd > >> lies of Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Powell. > > > > And who picked up the tab for that? Not Bush and Co. - it was instead > > the people of San Francisco. > > > >> They lied about everything, and > >> now it's time for us to shut their fucking war machine down, and to shut > >> their fascist country down. > > > > Shutting down San Francisco will do no such thing. > > > >> The Festival Of Resistance is coming to your town. November 2nd. > >> > >> Call in sick. Take to the streets. Let those criminals in DC know that > >> their gig is up. Fuck them! > > > > Bush and Co. are well aware that the people of the San Francisco Bay > > Area, on balance, are not their political allies. So if anti-Bush > > protestors shut down San Fransico again Bush and Co. won't know that > > their 'gig' is up - they will instead laugh that 'friends' of San > > Francisco shut down the city again. > > > >> LET'S TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK! > > > > I very much hope that happens in the next election. But shutting down > > San Francisco will only result in San Francisco taxpayers picking up > > the tab for a bunch of angry people -- most of whom don't live in SF -- > > shouting into the ether. Again. > > Last I recall, in the constitution of the United States, there was some > language about the right of the people to peaceably assemble. Does that > ring a bell to you? Why yes. Is the difference between peaceable assembly and illegally 'shutting down' parts of a city lost on you? Ray ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:09:49 -0700 >What do you think will happen to Iraq and the innocent >Iraquis if we leave tomorrow, which you are calling for. Simple >question, what's the expected effect of what you're protesting for ? >Do you expect the protest will have any effect ? 'Bout the same shit that happened to the Cambodians at the hand of Pol Pot...and at the behest of the same bunch of fuckin' idiots (and their children) that facilitated it then.... pv34pv3p(Let's all hope the answere to the 3rd question is no....) ------------------------------ From: Tim Donohoe Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:14:22 GMT pv34pv3p wrote: >>Or else they can listen to AM radio and repeat everything Limbaugh says >>as if it were written in stone. > > > And the MSM that you swallow your shit from is somehow different??? > > My observations are nearly entirely based upon a lifetime of saving > lives, and living in, and spending time all around this world... > > Yours on the other hand are not... > > pv34pv3p > Are these facts you are presenting here? This is an example of where you stray from reality. It also explains the popularity of Rush Limbaugh, you can't understand the difference between things you KNOW are true and things you WISH were true. There are a few million Limbaugh fans all across the US with a similar reality problem. Reminds me of a tee shirt "Join the marines, travel to exotic places, meet interesting people ..... and kill them" ------------------------------ From: "pv34pv3p" Subject: Re: Shut Down The War Machine Date: 27 Sep 2005 20:22:29 -0700 >Are these facts you are presenting here? This is an example of where >you stray from reality. >you can't understand the difference between things you KNOW >are true and things you WISH were true. And Joe gets a free fuckin' pass??? He started the shit to begin with... pv34pv3p(You freakin Joe appologist morons are amazing....) ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .