From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #325 Dead-Flames Digest #325, Volume #48 Sun, 18 Sep 05 18:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? ("Brett") Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? ("ck") Re: Republican Criminals ("Criminal Fascist Monster") Re: I love a good Franklin's Tower ... ("Criminal Fascist Monster") Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? ("Dave Kelly") Re: Blues for Jimi (joker4153@comcast.net) Re: Republican Criminals (Joe) Re: Republican Criminals (Joe) Re: Clinton interviews.. (DG) Re: Clinton interviews.. (DG) Re: Republican Criminals ("band beyond description") Re: Clinton interviews.. (Joe) Re: Clinton interviews.. ("ck") Re: Clinton interviews.. ("band beyond description") Re: Clinton interviews.. (DG) Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? ("Brett") Re: Clinton interviews.. ("ck") Re: Clinton interviews.. ("band beyond description") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Brett" Subject: Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? Date: 18 Sep 2005 15:54:22 -0700 " i think you should wait a little more than 20 minutes to declare victory... " He wrote me an apology email basically letting me know I won. Brett ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:55:54 -0400 "Brett" wrote in message news:1127084062.320700.238800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > " i think you should wait a little more than 20 minutes to declare > victory... " > > He wrote me an apology email basically letting me know I won. > > Brett > LOL... now THAT i doubt! ------------------------------ From: "Criminal Fascist Monster" Subject: Re: Republican Criminals Date: 18 Sep 2005 16:17:21 -0700 Schmoe wrote: > Joe wrote: > > Schmoe wrote: > >> Joe wrote: > >>> Republicans hate you right on schmoe! enough is enough of this skulldeuggery from pinko joe...STFU i already offered PINKO SF CHRONICLE SUCK ASS a ticket out of the country, but he'd rather enjoy the fruits of such wonderful living that IS the USA yet also whine like there's no tomorrow. enough about saying WE, yes, WE republicans, the majority, want anyone dead, especially anyone's children ( regarding which, i am sure pinko Joe has none) i never expected to have a moniker such as criminal fascist pig, but Joe left me no choice, STFU who really cares, go download 5-15-77 from archive.org and let's have a PARTAY!!!! ------------------------------ From: "Criminal Fascist Monster" Subject: Re: I love a good Franklin's Tower ... Date: 18 Sep 2005 16:18:39 -0700 i'd put 11-9-79 up against any of those mentioned ------------------------------ From: "Dave Kelly" Subject: Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:42:52 GMT "Brett" wrote in message news:1127083659.777429.242610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Team Meisner Wins again! > > "Brett" * Listen up, you douchebags....cause I'm only gonna type this ONCE....you lame motherfuckers NEED to take it back to the drawing board...it just aint working out for you fools any longer....and who ever that front man is.... the clown with the overbite and the shades...listen, baby... TRY and grow a proper beard, will ya?....you're just embarrasing yourself...you morons represent all that is tired with internet prankster-ism Now listen up....ANY time you need another bitch slap.. just pull my coat. Kids. Sweetbac Produtions ------------------------------ From: joker4153@comcast.net Subject: Re: Blues for Jimi Date: 18 Sep 2005 16:39:08 -0700 A broom is drearily sweeping Up the broken pieces of yesterdays life Somewhere a queen is weeping Somewhere a king has no wife And the wind cries Mary ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: Republican Criminals Date: 18 Sep 2005 23:39:45 GMT Schmoe wrote: > Get involved where it counts (not here). Protest, organize protests, run for > office, support non-partison politicians in their bid for office, donate > funds to organizations with viable efforts to create change. Yo, Mister-Know-It-All. Who says I don't already do what you suggest I do? In any case, this isn't alt.fan.joe (or is it?), so STFU. Joe ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: Republican Criminals Date: 18 Sep 2005 23:41:30 GMT Criminal Fascist Monster wrote: > who really cares, go download 5-15-77 from archive.org and let's have a > PARTAY!!!! Yo, Nazi Boy. I don't have 5/15/77 and I don't have high speed net access. Are you going to mail it to me? Joe ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:42:09 -0700 ck wrote: > >DG wrote > >> ck wrote: >> > >> >"Don Bean" wrote >> > >> >> Did anyone see Clinton interviewed today ?? The guy still has the right >> >> answers. Its funny (and sad too) how stark a difference it is between his >> >> years/ideas compared to what we have now... Say what you want but Clinton >> >> represented this country well... >> >> Bean >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > sorry Don but you are nuts. >> >> >> Really? How about some examples? >> >> > > Did he or did he not preside as president over the theft of nuclear missle >guidance technology from white sands labs by China one of who's Generals >now boasts if we move against them if they crack down on Taiiwan they can >hit the continental USA with nukes? http://urlcut.com/1besl >http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/resources/1999/cox.report/ I understand that happened on his watch but it's not like he ordered the FBI to back off on nuclear secrecy. > Did Bill Clinton not launch a war in Yugoslavia to give what turned out to >be radical muslim extremeist terrorist drug trafficking white slavers power >where before they had been held at bay? >http://www.fff.org/freedom/0101e.asp > >http://urlcut.com/1besm What was/is the political backlash of that war? > Did he not have the means and opportunity to capture OBL but pass on it? I agree, big mistake. >His lame slacker attitude toward national security was a criminal joke on >us.To him the presidnecy was an big ego strokefest /babe magnate and his >globalist agenda wreaks. >http://urlcut.com/1besn I wish Clinton had done more after the WTC bombing the first time. >Never mind the fact that he committed purjory and was impeached by the full >house and carried on extramarital affairs showing how little regard he has >for OATHS like the oath he took to preserve, protect and defend the >constutution of the United States. What the fuck does a BJ have to do with protecting the Constitution? It was just a blowjob... I really don't care that much about it. If he didn't lie then I would think he was a total ass. ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:45:49 -0700 Don Bean wrote: > >Did anyone see Clinton interviewed today ?? The guy still has the right >answers. Its funny (and sad too) how stark a difference it is between his >years/ideas compared to what we have now... Say what you want but Clinton >represented this country well... >Bean Clinton ripped Bush a new one according to the articles I've read about it. http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050918/wl_afp/usweatheriraqeconomy_050918200308 Great to see him speak up. ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Republican Criminals Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:10 +0900 isn't that thread title an oxymoron? -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: Joe Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: 18 Sep 2005 23:52:31 GMT DG wrote: > Clinton ripped Bush a new one according to the articles I've read > about it. I rip Bush a new one every day on rmgd, but do I get asked to appear on television? No, no. All I get is a bunch of crap from a bunch of Nazi Dead Heads. Ain't America Great? Joe ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:59:22 -0400 "DG" wrote in message news:7jtri1d5mcv2nk5ndc49ol3th89icdnpj5@4ax.com... > ck wrote: > > > >DG wrote > > > >> ck wrote: > >> > > >> >"Don Bean" wrote > >> > > >> >> Did anyone see Clinton interviewed today ?? The guy still has the right > >> >> answers. Its funny (and sad too) how stark a difference it is between his > >> >> years/ideas compared to what we have now... Say what you want but Clinton > >> >> represented this country well... > >> >> Bean > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > sorry Don but you are nuts. > >> > >> > >> Really? How about some examples? > >> > >> > > > > Did he or did he not preside as president over the theft of nuclear missle > >guidance technology from white sands labs by China one of who's Generals > >now boasts if we move against them if they crack down on Taiiwan they can > >hit the continental USA with nukes? http://urlcut.com/1besl > >http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/resources/1999/cox.report/ > > > I understand that happened on his watch but it's not like he ordered > the FBI to back off on nuclear secrecy. > > > > Did Bill Clinton not launch a war in Yugoslavia to give what turned out to > >be radical muslim extremeist terrorist drug trafficking white slavers power > >where before they had been held at bay? > >http://www.fff.org/freedom/0101e.asp > > > >http://urlcut.com/1besm > > > What was/is the political backlash of that war? > > > > Did he not have the means and opportunity to capture OBL but pass on it? > > > I agree, big mistake. > > > >His lame slacker attitude toward national security was a criminal joke on > >us.To him the presidnecy was an big ego strokefest /babe magnate and his > >globalist agenda wreaks. > >http://urlcut.com/1besn > > > I wish Clinton had done more after the WTC bombing the first time. > > > >Never mind the fact that he committed purjory and was impeached by the full > >house and carried on extramarital affairs showing how little regard he has > >for OATHS like the oath he took to preserve, protect and defend the > >constutution of the United States. > > > What the fuck does a BJ have to do with protecting the Constitution? > It was just a blowjob... I really don't care that much about it. If > he didn't lie then I would think he was a total ass. > > going in reverse the impeachemnt was fro committing purjory before a grand jury investigating him on sexual harrassment charges. Purjoury whomever you are is a felony . The linking of his affair with ms. lewinski with the impeachment is bogus and had nothing to do with the impeachment which was only about his felony purjory during his testamony in the case of his sexual harrasment of Paula Jones. The fact that his starting a war for no good reason which ultimately left terrorist thugs with more land and power than they had previosly hasn't been raging thru the news or triggered a congressional hearing doesn't make it an any less regretable decision he did not have to make.While it may not have cost us as much as Iraq is it sure cost some innocent Bosnian serbs alot. Clinton apointed Reno to head Justice and chose his FBI head. They reflect his values and toed his lines.To suggest the responsible departments function in isolation from the executive is i think you'll admit a strech.Clintons overall world view which viewed Our superior position in the world as somehow fundementally unjust to the rest of the world made it possible for the lax security environments allowing these thefts.It may have been China would have eventually cought up in the areas our pilfered plans permitted but i for one don't like the idea under his watch they leapt ahead a few dozen years and can now make good on their threats to nuke california. Thank God i live on the east coast. ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:54:11 +0900 "DG" wrote in message news:0ruri1lom0tijiucvcoo2g8h4bfklkml14@4ax.com... > Don Bean wrote: > > > >Did anyone see Clinton interviewed today ?? The guy still has the right > >answers. Its funny (and sad too) how stark a difference it is between his > >years/ideas compared to what we have now... Say what you want but Clinton > >represented this country well... > >Bean > > > Clinton ripped Bush a new one according to the articles I've read > about it. > > http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050918/wl_afp/usweatheriraqeconomy_050918200308 > > Great to see him speak up. > > > it's about time; Clinton has laid off slamming Dumbya long enough. he had to appear bipartisan just because of the tsunami and Katrina due to that pesky presidential protocol of not criticizing one's predecessors... -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: DG Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:18:19 -0700 "ck" wrote: > > > going in reverse the impeachemnt was fro committing purjory before a grand >jury investigating him on sexual harrassment charges. Purjoury whomever you >are is a felony . Slow down... I can only imagine the froth coming from your mouth... >The linking of his affair with ms. lewinski with the >impeachment is bogus and had nothing to do with the impeachment which was >only about his felony purjory during his testamony in the case of his >sexual harrasment of Paula Jones. This is a non issue for me. > The fact that his starting a war for no good reason which ultimately left >terrorist thugs with more land and power than they had previosly hasn't >been raging thru the news or triggered a congressional hearing doesn't >make it an any less regretable decision he did not have to make.While it >may not have cost us as much as Iraq is it sure cost some innocent Bosnian >serbs alot. Problem is you have to deal with people. It's not as if Bush has made any major progress in the war on "Terra". Osama runs free. Zarqawi hits US troops and Iraqi civilians almost every day. The "insurgency" in Iraq is growing stronger. > Clinton apointed Reno to head Justice and chose his FBI head. They reflect >his values and toed his lines.To suggest the responsible departments >function in isolation from the executive is i think you'll admit a >strech.Clintons overall world view which viewed Our superior position in >the world as somehow fundementally unjust to the rest of the world made it >possible for the lax security environments allowing these thefts. What do you say about outing a CIA agent? What return do you see on our $300 billion "investment" in the Iraq war? >It may >have been China would have eventually cought up in the areas our pilfered >plans permitted but i for one don't like the idea under his watch they >leapt ahead a few dozen years and can now make good on their threats to >nuke california. Thank God i live on the east coast. How about using the shift key and work on your spelling? ------------------------------ From: "Brett" Subject: Re: Waters admits Darkside / Wizard of Oz connection? Date: 18 Sep 2005 17:27:32 -0700 Dave Kelly wrote: > "Brett" wrote in message > news:1127083659.777429.242610@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Team Meisner Wins again! > > > > "Brett" > > * Listen up, you douchebags....cause I'm only gonna type > this ONCE....you lame motherfuckers NEED to take it > back to the drawing board...it just aint working out for > you fools any longer....and who ever that front man is.... > the clown with the overbite and the shades...listen, baby... > TRY and grow a proper beard, will ya?....you're just > embarrasing yourself...you morons represent all that is > tired with internet prankster-ism > Now listen up....ANY time you need another bitch slap.. > just pull my coat. > Kids. > > Sweetbac Produtions TYPICAL "TEAM MEISNER" DAY: Brett Meisner arrives at Dave Kelly's Apartment and knocks on the door. Dave puts down his bong and let's Brett inside. Brett is carrying a steel garden rake. Brett lays the rake down on the floor. "Hey Dave, do you mind stepping on the steel end of this rake while a crowd looks on?" Dave thinks about it for a second and then say, "Sure." Dave places his foot down heavy on the rake - and sure enough - WHAM! The wooden handle flies up and smacks Dave in the face. Angry and embarrassed, Dave begins to vent. "Now I remember you. You're Brett Meisner. You and your team come by my place every single day and force me to step on the DAMN rake... You listen to me and YOU listen GOOD. This is the LAST time you will ever make me step on that DAMN RAKE... IF I ever see you again I will show you HOW to grow the PROPER beard... Hear me, boys?" With that, Brett and his imaginary team leave Dave's place. Brett climbs into the "Team Meisner" NASCAR Car - which is co-sponsored by SKOAL and Dunkin' Donuts - and they head to Team Meisner headquarters to plot new Internet tricks and pranks. THE VERY NEXT DAY... Brett Meisner arrives at Dave Kelly's Apartment and knocks on the door. Dave puts down his bong and let's Brett inside. Brett is carrying a steel garden rake. Brett lays the rake down on the floor. "What's with the rake, stranger?" Dave inquires. "Funny you should ask," Brett smiles. (REPEAT CYCLE FOR A FEW YEARS) Brett ------------------------------ From: "ck" Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:29:54 -0400 "DG" wrote in message news:uj0si1hgijpopcbo0hhp19gp8aiia767js@4ax.com... > "ck" wrote: > > > > > > going in reverse the impeachemnt was fro committing purjory before a grand > >jury investigating him on sexual harrassment charges. Purjoury whomever you > >are is a felony . > > > Slow down... I can only imagine the froth coming from your mouth... > > > >The linking of his affair with ms. lewinski with the > >impeachment is bogus and had nothing to do with the impeachment which was > >only about his felony purjory during his testamony in the case of his > >sexual harrasment of Paula Jones. > > This is a non issue for me. That speaks volumes about your character. That the governor of Arkansas sexually abused his subordinates then lied about it under oath when he was by one of them sued is a non issue. No wonder you like the bastard. > > The fact that his starting a war for no good reason which ultimately left > >terrorist thugs with more land and power than they had previosly hasn't > >been raging thru the news or triggered a congressional hearing doesn't > >make it an any less regretable decision he did not have to make.While it > >may not have cost us as much as Iraq is it sure cost some innocent Bosnian > >serbs alot. > > > Problem is you have to deal with people. It's not as if Bush has made > any major progress in the war on "Terra". Osama runs free. Zarqawi > hits US troops and Iraqi civilians almost every day. The "insurgency" > in Iraq is growing stronger. > Change the topic much?Because islamofascists are on a rampage in Iraq ,Clinton's criminal war in Bosnia can be forgotten? The guy is an ethical cesspool you can have him. > > Clinton apointed Reno to head Justice and chose his FBI head. They reflect > >his values and toed his lines.To suggest the responsible departments > >function in isolation from the executive is i think you'll admit a > >strech.Clintons overall world view which viewed Our superior position in > >the world as somehow fundementally unjust to the rest of the world made it > >possible for the lax security environments allowing these thefts. > > > What do you say about outing a CIA agent? > > What return do you see on our $300 billion "investment" in the Iraq > war? After seeing some of the evidence of Hussein's atrocities merely bringing him down is pay enough. If Iraq's liberation generates enough of a desire for freedom from islamic fudementalists in the greater mideast it will be worth it all. > > > >It may > >have been China would have eventually cought up in the areas our pilfered > >plans permitted but i for one don't like the idea under his watch they > >leapt ahead a few dozen years and can now make good on their threats to > >nuke california. Thank God i live on the east coast. > > > How about using the shift key and work on your spelling? > > ------------------------------ From: "band beyond description" <123@456.com> Subject: Re: Clinton interviews.. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:29:53 +0900 "band beyond description" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:3p6dgqF8sn38U1@individual.net... > > "DG" wrote in message > news:0ruri1lom0tijiucvcoo2g8h4bfklkml14@4ax.com... > > Don Bean wrote: > > > > > >Did anyone see Clinton interviewed today ?? The guy still has the right > > >answers. Its funny (and sad too) how stark a difference it is between his > > >years/ideas compared to what we have now... Say what you want but Clinton > > >represented this country well... > > >Bean > > > > > > Clinton ripped Bush a new one according to the articles I've read > > about it. > > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050918/wl_afp/usweatheriraqeconomy_050918200308 > > > > Great to see him speak up. > > > > > > > > it's about time; Clinton has laid off slamming Dumbya long enough. he had > to appear bipartisan just because of the tsunami and Katrina due to that > pesky presidential protocol of not criticizing one's predecessors... I meant successors or fellow presidents in general.. ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** .