From lockyert@mweb.co.za Wed May 15 10:02:47 2002 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g4FH2jw3015340 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:02:46 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed May 15 10:02:45 2002 -0700 Received: from quake.mweb.co.za (quake.mweb.co.za [196.2.45.76]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g4FH2gl3030108 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:02:44 -0700 Received: from rdg-dial-196-30-236-184.mweb.co.za ([196.30.236.184] helo=al40) by quake.mweb.co.za with smtp (Exim 4.01) id 17829r-0000cv-00 for classics@u.washington.edu; Wed, 15 May 2002 19:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c1fc32$35ebe160$b8ec1ec4@al40> From: "Terrence Lockyer" To: "Classics List" Subject: How not to proof-read Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:28:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Is it merely my imagination, or are the presses growing more careless by the year? The following appear in the introductions to recent translations from two major UPs: 1. On p. xlviii of the pbk P. G. Walsh (tr.), Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy (Oxford and New York : OUP 2000), W. is surveying post-Chaucerian early English translations and gives us the following: "The second rendering was noteworthy more for the identity of the translator than for the merit of the version, for it came from the pen of Elizabeth I, and is by no mans free of errors". The immediate context may, of course, be thought to lend this minor slip a certain charm, entirely lacking from my second, more obviously mechanical example: 2. On p. xvii of Daryl Hine (tr.), Puerilities (Princeton and Oxford : Princeton UP 2001), a version of Book 12 of the Palatine Anthology, we are told that "Aratus, one of the light-versifiers here included, also edited Homer, as did Callimachus and Apologies Rhodes, and wrote, besides other, lost works, a poem on astronomy, Phaenomena". It is perhaps worth noting that, for example, the English (UK) spell-check in MS Word 6.0 offers 'apologias' and 'apologies', and 'rhodes', for the phrase 'Apollonius Rhodius', while Word 2000 is rather more sophisticated and less helpful, adding two more possibilities for 'Apollonius' ('Apollonian' and 'Polonium'), but offering only 'Rhodium' for 'Rhodius'. But I suppose the real mystery here is how whatever tool was used upon the text failed to mangle Callimachus or drop the 'a' from Aratos' Latinized title. Terrence Lockyer Johannesburg, South Africa .