From kolb@ucla.edu Sat Apr  1 23:42:13 2000
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA40646
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:42:12 -0800
Received: from serval.noc.ucla.edu (serval.noc.ucla.edu [169.232.10.12])
	by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA24270
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:42:11 -0800
Received: from kolb (remote3.humnet.ucla.edu [128.97.208.83])
	by serval.noc.ucla.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA27295
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.1.20000401233956.024f4f00@pop.ben2.ucla.edu>
X-Sender: kolb@pop.ben2.ucla.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 23:42:58 -0800
To: classics@u.washington.edu
From: Jack Kolb <kolb@ucla.edu>
Subject: Julian Jaynes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Since this is at least a moribund thread, I'll simply mention here that I
posed the question of Jaynes reputation to the SKEPTIC list.  I received a
number of interesting responses, not all negative.  I'd be glad to forward
them privately, unless anyone would like to see a public response.

Jack Kolb
Dept. of English, UCLA
kolb@ucla.edu
.