From yedwest@utirc.utoronto.ca Wed May  3 10:49:18 1995
Return-Path: <yedwest@utirc.utoronto.ca>
Received: from mx5.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW95.02/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA12281;
	Wed, 3 May 95 10:49:17 -0700
Received: from fermat.utirc.utoronto.ca by mx5.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW95.02/UW-NDC Revision: 2.31 ) id AA24986;
	Wed, 3 May 95 10:49:15 -0700
Message-Id: <9505031749.AA24986@mx5.u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Mailing List Administrivia
To: crs@u.washington.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 13:49:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dr. Edmund West <yedwest@utirc.utoronto.ca>
Cc: pac-10@u.washington.edu (PAC-10 Sports )
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91i.950503090012.7577D-100000@saul4.u.washington.edu> from "Cliff Slaughterbeck" at May 3, 95 09:28:46 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 672       

Cliff:
  You wrote:
> 4)  As requested by several of you, the new default for replies will be 
> to send mail to the sender rather than the entire list.

  Given the opportunity, I would have voted for not changing that
feature. In my opinion the most useful reply address is the one that:

(1) causes my comments to go to the list by default (I suspect that
    most people reply to the whole list a lot more often than to the
    individual),
(2) allows me to file the message in a folder named "pac-10" with
    one key stroke, rather than having to erase the sender's name and
    keying in "pac-10" in its entirety.

  I request a return to the previous default.

Ed
.