From JackShank@aol.com Fri Jan 29 15:10:41 1999
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id PAA26188
	for <failure@lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:10:41 -0800
From: JackShank@aol.com
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2])
	by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.2+UW99.01/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id PAA11675
	for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JackShank@aol.com
	by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id 9KJUa04794
	 for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:05:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <f0bc8811.36b23eae@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:05:18 EST
To: failure@u.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: not failure
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 4

>From now on when people post non-failure subject matter, could they please
remove the word Failure from the subject line and change it to something that
hints to what the post is really about.  It usually isn't so bothersome, but
there has now been about ten of these posts in a row, with not one mention of
Failure.  As interesting as non-failure subject matter may sometimes be, the
posts recently seem to be 1-2 line irrelevant responses to previously made
irrelevant remarks.  Sorry if I offend, but it is becoming a bit tedious, much
like this very letter.
.