From dmeadows@idirect.com Sun Sep 24 03:07:24 2000
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA124498
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 03:07:21 -0700
Received: from ares.idirect.com (ares.idirect.com [207.136.80.180])
	by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA14595
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 03:07:20 -0700
Received: from ns.idirect.com (on-ham-a53-03-21.look.ca [216.154.52.149])
	by ares.idirect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA44259
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 06:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20000923200502.01e2d750@postoffice.idirect.com>
X-Sender: dmeadows@postoffice.idirect.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:05:48 -0600
To: classics@u.washington.edu
From: David Meadows <dmeadows@idirect.com>
Subject: Re: Epigraphy question
In-Reply-To: <39CBB9BD.C24BEA29@mail.montclair.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

I've forwarded your query to my inscriptiones-l list; hopefully someone 
will reply there and cc you.

regards,

dm

At Friday 9/22/00 01:58 PM, you wrote:
>In a 1992 article by C.P Jones,

.