From akriman@darwin.helios.nd.edu Sun Dec 3 02:01:04 2000 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA338594 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 02:01:03 -0800 Received: from mailspool.helios.nd.edu (mailspool.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.7]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA12024 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 02:01:02 -0800 Received: from darwin.helios.nd.edu (darwin.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.114]) by mailspool.helios.nd.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id FAA11208 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 05:01:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (from akriman@localhost) by darwin.helios.nd.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/ND-cluster) id eB3A12G13375 for classics@u.washington.edu; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 05:01:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 05:01:02 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred M Kriman Message-Id: <200012031001.eB3A12G13375@darwin.helios.nd.edu> To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: [Re: Professor Lupher's barb] Eric Laupot wrote .... > What Mr. Glueck wrote in his message of 12/2 was > that your "outraged slings and arrows" were the bard does a spinning handstand in his grave > "fortuitous," by which I agree with you that he > probably meant "gratuitous," i.e., unwarranted. This > hardly sounds like an endorsement of your views, so > let's not include him as your ally here (in fact, I ****> admit that on account of Mr. Glueck's gratuitous > choice of "fortuitous," I misinterpreted his earlier > message, for which I apologize; Mr. Glueck's motives > in his message of 12/2 were in fact honest and > straightforward). .... At ****, I urge that "unfortunate" would be more felicitous than "gratuitous," and make more felicitous than gratuitous oxymorons. Yours, Rita von Carruthers Pech Wiesbaden Office Supplies .