From dgw1@nyu.edu Mon Aug 20 04:58:02 2001 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f7KBw1054478 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 04:58:01 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f7KBw1T06854 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 04:58:01 -0700 Received: FROM e1g1.home.nyu.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 20 04:58:00 2001 -0700 Received: from homemail.nyu.edu (d2 [192.168.78.12]) by e1g1.home.nyu.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7KBvvI01621 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:57:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Diana Wright To: classics@u.washington.edu Message-ID: <14e6e4014e3c83.14e3c8314e6e40@homemail.nyu.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:57:57 -0400 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Re: classics cartoon pool X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I may have missed a key point in this discussion, but what is wrong with the old-fashioned, traditional, photocopy machine? I give my classes a good 20+ pages of Homer- or myth-related cartoons each semester. DW > KK is right about the 'instant lawsuit bait' thing, unfortunately > (especially for things that are syndicated, like the Far Side). I > have been > collecting a pile of urls, though, for classics-oriented cartoons > available > online (mostly from the new yorker, but a few more). I'll put them > together > on a page some time this week. > > What my always-looking-for-loopholes-brain wonders, though, is > whether > other (i.e. non-syndicated ones) cartoons might not get around > this (for a > while, anyway) by some sort of 'classics cartoon of the day' thing > wherein > a new cartoon was posted everyday (and *not* archived), with > source > acknowledged where available. > > Most of the big syndication sites have something about reprint > rights; if a > source is known, perhaps they'd grant such a right? > > Another possibility, of course, for private distribution purposes > would be > a private archive, accessible only via password, which privileged > folks > could draw upon or a private mailing list. > > dm > > .