From ejt1@columbia.edu Sun Apr 25 06:56:21 1999 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id GAA36672 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 1999 06:56:21 -0700 Received: from ciao.cc.columbia.edu (IDENT:cu58912@ciao.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.11]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id GAA14249 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 1999 06:56:20 -0700 Received: from localhost (ejt1@localhost) by ciao.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA12045 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 1999 09:56:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 09:56:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Elias J Theodoracopoulos Sender: ejt1@columbia.edu To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: poets on poetry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Lisa Auanger quoted from > Archibald MacLeish, b. 1892 > > Ars Poetica [...] > A poem should not mean > But be Written by a poet in a poem about his art. The statement says nothing about the analysis, interpretation, and teaching of poetry to students who are not accomplished poets, or who know even less than their teachers about the art of poetry. The statement is significant for one school of criticism only (New Criticism). There is more to criticism than that. --Elias J. Theodoracopoulos .