From rhoskins@home.com Wed Apr 21 19:30:56 1999 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA38544 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 19:30:56 -0700 Received: from ha1.rdc1.wa.home.com (siteadm@ha1.rdc1.wa.home.com [24.0.2.66]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA08669 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 19:30:55 -0700 Received: from c501552a ([24.5.121.123]) by ha1.rdc1.wa.home.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA2491 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 19:29:21 -0700 Message-ID: <02de01be8c67$e2cda280$7b790518@olmpi1.wa.home.com> From: "Richard E. Hoskins" To: Subject: WAPHGIS: comversion from e00to Mapinfo Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 19:28:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02DB_01BE8C2D.34BA63C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02DB_01BE8C2D.34BA63C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I reported that I took e00 (ESRI export format) files from various free = data GIS sites (12 of them) from around the county and converted them to = various formats using Caliper's Maptitude. (www.caliper.com) Complete = success.=20 I repeated the same experiment using MapInfo Pro (www.mapinfo.com). I = had the same results. I had a little glitch, but it was pointed out to = me politely that I had not read the directions quite carefully enough. = It all works now. (it is far simpler than getting a style change in MS = word document.)=20 I now have all this free data in the format of two different GIS vendors = other than ESRI (ArcInfo & ArcView). The point I make here is that in fact, although the standard these days = is ESRI GIS formats (and that is by no means not a bad idea) for those = who choose something else, this is OK because our favorite software can = likely do the conversion and we can use the tools to get the job done = with the tool we need and choose rather than being forced to choose = something that has less or something different from what we need.=20 Richard E. Hoskins ------=_NextPart_000_02DB_01BE8C2D.34BA63C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I reported that I took  e00 (ESRI = export=20 format) files from various free data GIS sites (12 of them) from around = the=20 county and converted them to various formats using Caliper's Maptitude. = (www.caliper.com)  Complete = success.=20
 
I repeated the same experiment using = MapInfo Pro=20 (www.mapinfo.com).   I had = the same=20 results. I had a little glitch, but it was pointed out to me politely = that I had=20 not read the directions quite carefully enough. It all works now. = (it is=20 far simpler than getting a style change in MS word document.) =
 
I now have all this free data in the = format of two=20 different GIS vendors other than ESRI (ArcInfo & = ArcView).
 
The point I make here is that in fact, = although the=20 standard these days is ESRI GIS formats (and that is by no = means not a bad=20 idea) for those who choose something else, this is OK because our=20 favorite software can likely do the  conversion and we can use = the=20 tools to get the job done with the tool we need and choose rather than = being=20 forced to choose something that has less or something different from = what we=20 need.
 
Richard E. = Hoskins
------=_NextPart_000_02DB_01BE8C2D.34BA63C0-- .