From DStaub11@aol.com Sat Feb 14 14:25:37 1998
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id OAA44942 for <index-nw@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 14:25:37 -0800
From: DStaub11@aol.com
Received: from imo25.mail.aol.com (imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.19.153])
          by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
	  id OAA07246 for <index-nw@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 14:25:25 -0800
Received: from DStaub11@aol.com
	by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv12/Dec1997) id 4OXOa29118
	for <index-nw@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 17:25:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <6a925ae2.34e619d1@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 17:25:18 EST
To: index-nw@u.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Indexing software
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38

In a message dated 98-02-14 08:53:17 EST, you write:

<<For a
  while I got Index-L mail (until it got too voluminous for someone with 40+
  hours of another job to read!) & everyone seemed to mainly use Cindex.
  Since I've worked in Windows for years, I 'm not interested in DOS -based
  programs, and Cindex for windows requires Win 95.  >>

Hi! Just wanted to comment that there are LOTS of us (on Index-L and in
general) who use Macrex. It also runs fine in a Windows environment.

Do Mi
.