From mcosand@u.washington.edu Mon Mar 22 19:33:43 1999 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA35500 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:33:43 -0800 Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id TAA05365 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:33:42 -0800 Received: from beauford (cs213-85.spmodem.washington.edu [140.142.168.188]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id TAA21617 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:33:40 -0800 Message-ID: <0af501be74dd$f25258f0$6565e7c4@beauford> From: "Matt Cosand" To: Subject: Pull testing (Equipment Strength) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:33:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 For those interested in the strengths of the climbing equipment they're using: I recently received the results from some pull tests (Pulling on two ends of a material until it fails) from Salt Lake County Sheriff's Search and Rescue. Tests include various pieces of webbing, rope, prusiks, various knots, as well as a carabiner and a litter. The tests are all based on static loads (constant strain), and does not figure in the dynamic forces from drops, etc... This isn't the final word in breaking strengths of materials, but it is a nice heads up. If you would like to see the results of these test, I'll be happy to forward them to you. -Matt Cosand mcosand@u.washington.edu .