From Hendrix564@aol.com Tue Aug 25 21:30:19 1998 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP id VAA62720 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 21:30:19 -0700 From: Hendrix564@aol.com Received: from imo25.mx.aol.com (imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.69]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP id VAA26255 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 21:30:18 -0700 Received: from Hendrix564@aol.com by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv14_b1.1) id JNXCa03745 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:30:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <866aa945.35e38f52@aol.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:30:09 EDT To: failure@u.washington.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: pigface Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 << Yeah, I saw pigface in chicago last year, and I had no idea who they were when I went, and I came out a fan. It was an excellent show...i'm still clueless on where to start on their discography though...any opinions on what album I should get first?? justi >> yeah, i'd say check out "a new high in low", their most recent release, and if you like that check out the re-mix of that album, "below the belt".....to me the newest album is the best, cause it's actually the most fluid "album-like" album yet, all the others are sorta that 80's industrial grungy cassette recording stuff, which are cool and all, but hardly entertaining....uhh, alright ben .