From asalzberg@nyc.rr.com Thu Jul 1 13:08:04 2004 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i61K84hw110396 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:08:04 -0700 Received: from ms-smtp-03.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.7]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i61K807o012709 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:08:01 -0700 Received: from herps (24-90-217-134.nyc.rr.com [24.90.217.134]) by ms-smtp-03.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i61K7v20004253 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <006601c45fa7$1ae244b0$86d95a18@herps> From: "Allen Salzberg" To: "Conservation Biology Listserv" Subject: Monk Parakeets and electrical towers He is not on list, Please respond to him directly at kaarnold@tamu.edu Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:07:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01C45F85.9386CA70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_50_70 0.092, MAILTO_LINK 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __NEXTPART_ALL 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEXTPART_NORMAL 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C45F85.9386CA70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable He is not on list, Please respond to him directly at=20 kaarnold@tamu.edu One of the participants in TexBirds questioned why Monk Parakeet tended to build their nests on or around electrical substation or towers on transmission lines. At least one respondent suggested that the electrical power [or magnetic waves created by that power] might have an added attraction for these birds. At least two other respondents felt that the sturcture itself was the attraction and pointedout that this parakeet often uses palm trees in some situations. Does anyone know of studies on this species in the U.S. that addresses WHY Monk Parakeet seem to prefer these electrical substations or is it, indeed, the structure the birds find so arttractive? Thanks, Keith Arnold WFSC TAMU College Station kaarnold@tamu.edu =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C45F85.9386CA70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

He is not on list, Please respond to him directly at =

kaarnold@tamu.edu

 

One of the participants in TexBirds questioned why Monk = Parakeet=20 tended
to build their nests on or around electrical substation or = towers=20 on
transmission lines.  At least one respondent suggested that=20 the
electrical power [or magnetic waves created by that power] might = have=20 an
added attraction for these birds.  At least two other = respondents=20 felt
that the sturcture itself was the attraction and pointedout that = this
parakeet often uses palm  trees in some = situations.

Does=20 anyone know of studies on this species in the U.S. that addresses
WHY = Monk=20 Parakeet seem to prefer these electrical substations or is = it,
indeed, the=20 structure the birds find so arttractive?

Thanks,

Keith=20 Arnold
WFSC TAMU
College Station

kaarnold@tamu.edu

 

------=_NextPart_000_0063_01C45F85.9386CA70-- .