From akriman@darwin.helios.nd.edu Mon Sep  4 02:42:37 2000
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA127152
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 02:42:35 -0700
Received: from mailspool.helios.nd.edu (mailspool.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.7])
	by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA23199
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 02:42:31 -0700
Received: from darwin.helios.nd.edu (darwin.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.114])
	by mailspool.helios.nd.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id EAA25611
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 04:42:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from akriman@localhost)
	by darwin.helios.nd.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/ND-cluster) id e849gQ902686
	for classics@u.washington.edu; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 04:42:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 04:42:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Alfred M Kriman <akriman@darwin.helios.nd.edu>
Message-Id: <200009040942.e849gQ902686@darwin.helios.nd.edu>
To: classics@u.washington.edu
Subject: RE: "Doch" auf Deutsch (a bit of holiday-weekend TAN)

In this thread, Rainer Thiel remarked parenthetically and ironically
>  ... [Classical content!] ...

Not at all!  (Should I say _doch_?)  It seems to me that the evolving
semantics of _doch_ offers a kind of model for the evolution of Latin
_sic_ into Spanish _sí_ (and similar in Italian, etc.).

.