From brabkin@u.washington.edu Mon Nov 25 17:10:30 2002 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.11) with SMTP id gAQ1ATrw041310 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:10:29 -0800 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Nov 25 17:10:29 2002 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.11) with ESMTP id gAQ1ATDe009692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:10:29 -0800 Received: from mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.138]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.11) with SMTP id gAQ1ATVM025989 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:10:29 -0800 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Nov 25 17:10:28 2002 -0800 Received: from astro (D-128-95-201-131.dhcp4.washington.edu [128.95.201.131]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.11) with SMTP id gAQ1ASmX024926 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:10:28 -0800 Message-ID: <002601c294e8$756ff430$83c95f80@astro> From: "Brian Rabkin" To: Subject: BurkeGilman Link - The End. Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:09:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01C294A5.67407F30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C294A5.67407F30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey gang! Time to vote for a better choice on cycling route. follow the following link to place a vote on what theroute of the = Ballard end of the BG trail should take. 1) do this by Dec 1. 2) the green route is most strongly supported by cyclists - but please = pick your own choice. (see an attached discussion below). http://www.seattle.gov/td/bcds11thlocks.asp > > For those of you who were not able to make it to Tuesday nights = Public > meeting on the Burke Gilman Trail extension. There is a website where = you > can fill out a comment form by DECEMBER 2, 2002. See: > >http://www.seattle.gov/td/bcds11thlocks.asp > > > > There are three alternatives (Blue, Red, & Green)that the city needs > citizen input on: > > Blue alt - strongly supported by the some of the industries = surrounding > the proposed trail. They want to see the trail go up north on 11th = then west > on 57th to eventually connect with the trail develpment happening from = THE > Locks to Shilshole. This is such a huge detour that I am strongly > encouraging people to tell the City NO TO BLUE Alternative! > > > > Red alt - When you first look at the proposed route it looks = good...but if > you look more in detail there is a section of route that takes you = from > Ballard Ave on to Market. This section gives a biker no room to = manuever > between moving traffic and park cars...NOT SAFE! > > > > Green Alt - This is the one route we should be encouraging the city = to > focus their energies on. There is an existing right away along the = railway > corridor own mostly by the city. There are section that need to be = mitigated > to make it safer, but overall it is the most direct route that makes = sense > to connect it with the existing trail that ends at Fred Meyer and the = new > one that will be constructed from the Locks to Shilshole. In addition = there > are businesses and property owners along this proposed trail route who = would > like to see this trail happen. > > > > PLEASE MAKE YOUR COMMENTS BY DEC.2, 2002. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C294A5.67407F30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey gang! Time to vote for a better = choice on=20 cycling route.
 
follow the following link to place a = vote on what=20 theroute of the Ballard end of the BG trail should = take.
1) do this by Dec 1.
2) the green route is most strongly = supported by=20 cyclists - but please pick your own choice.  (see an attached = discussion=20 below).
http://www.seattle.g= ov/td/bcds11thlocks.asp
 
 
 
 
> > For those of you who were not able to make it to Tuesday = nights=20 Public
> meeting on the Burke Gilman Trail extension.  There = is a=20 website where you
> can fill out a comment form by DECEMBER 2, = 2002.=20 See:
> >http://www.seattle.g= ov/td/bcds11thlocks.asp
>=20 >
> > There are three alternatives (Blue, Red, & = Green)that the=20 city needs
> citizen input on:
> > Blue alt - strongly = supported=20 by the some of the industries surrounding
> the proposed trail. = They want=20 to see the trail go up north on 11th then west
> on 57th to = eventually=20 connect with the trail develpment happening from THE
> Locks to=20 Shilshole.  This is such a huge detour that I am strongly
>=20 encouraging people to tell the City NO TO BLUE Alternative!
> = >
>=20 > Red alt - When you first look at the proposed route it looks = good...but=20 if
> you look more in detail there is a section of route that = takes you=20 from
> Ballard Ave on to Market. This section gives a biker no = room to=20 manuever
> between moving traffic and park cars...NOT = SAFE!
>=20 >
> > Green Alt - This is the one route we should be = encouraging the=20 city to
> focus their energies on.  There is an existing = right away=20 along the railway
> corridor own mostly by the city. There are = section=20 that need to be mitigated
> to make it safer, but overall it is = the most=20 direct route that makes sense
> to connect it with the existing = trail that=20 ends at Fred Meyer and the new
> one that will be constructed from = the=20 Locks to Shilshole. In addition there
> are businesses and = property owners=20 along this proposed trail route who would
> like to see this trail = happen.
> >
> > PLEASE MAKE YOUR COMMENTS BY DEC.2,=20 2002.
------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C294A5.67407F30-- .