From jajayo@bu.edu Sun Aug 19 08:31:02 2001 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f7JFV1010928 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 08:31:01 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f7JFV1u16329 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 08:31:01 -0700 Received: FROM acsrs1.bu.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Sun Aug 19 08:31:00 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (jajayo@localhost) by acsrs1.bu.edu ((8.9.3.buoit.v1.0.ACS)/) with ESMTP id LAA83700 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:30:56 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:30:56 -0400 (EDT) From: james jayo To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: converting English names to Latin Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII A friend asked me about converting English names to Latin. I told him what I knew--which is that you Latinize given names but leave surnames alone. My question is: what do you do with surnames in a sentence? Treat them as third declension nouns or leave them as they be? Subjunctively, ~James .