From sgolding@xmission.com Wed Aug 28 17:31:56 2002 Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with SMTP id g7T0Vs97122232 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:31:54 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Aug 28 17:31:53 2002 -0700 Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7T0Vrbq012299 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:31:53 -0700 Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17kDE1-0000qF-00 for forensicguidelines@u.washington.edu; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:53 -0600 Received: from [166.70.14.176] (helo=golding) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17kDE0-0003AW-00 for forensicguidelines@u.washington.edu; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:52 -0600 From: "stephen golding" To: Subject: RE: REVIEW FORENSICGUIDELINES Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:31:48 -0600 Message-ID: <003d01c24ef3$764ef260$0200000a@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 I am receiving mine as well. Steve. Stephen L. Golding, Ph.D. Professor Department of Psychology Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry and College of Law University of Utah 390 S. 1530 East Room 502 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0251 Phone: 801-581-8028 Fax: 801-581-5841 Email:sgolding@xmission.com Web:www.xmission.com/~sgolding -----Original Message----- From: FORENSICGUIDELINES-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:FORENSICGUIDELINES-owner@u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Fulero, Sol Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:19 PM To: SGFP Revisions Disscussion Subject: RE: REVIEW FORENSICGUIDELINES Working fine. Stu, I'd like us to use the APA model that was used for the Code of Ethics. If we do, we are not open to criticism, and in fact can cite the use of the same model in front of the Council of Reps, who will vote on our product. Trust me that this will help. If you want the exact details on how to do all this, contact Donna Beavers at dbeavers@apa.org. Essentially, we would post a first draft, ask for comments, log them all, etc etc., and then do that for every iteration. It is my hope that if we decide to break the SGFP into sections, that we do sub-groups and pass the products around before we decide on an official first draft. Anyway, I'm here!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sol -----Original Message----- From: Christina Studebaker [mailto:cstudebaker@csopp.edu] Sent: Wed 8/28/2002 6:03 PM To: SGFP Revisions Disscussion Cc: Subject: RE: REVIEW FORENSICGUIDELINES got it. Christina -----Original Message----- From: FORENSICGUIDELINES-owner@u.washington.edu [mailto:FORENSICGUIDELINES-owner@u.washington.edu]On Behalf Of Stuart Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:41 PM To: SGFP Revisions Disscussion Subject: REVIEW FORENSICGUIDELINES ForensicGuidelines List members, This is a check to make sure that the new list is working properly now for everyone. Would each of you post a reply message to acknowledge receipt? Randy, please double-check the subscriptions below. Sol, I've been thinking more about the PsyLaw list. I'm concerned that I'm going to get swamped with perhaps hundreds of subscriptions (and all the attendant later error messages) if we post an open notice on PsyLaw for anyone interested to sign up to this list. What does the group think of the idea to instead offer to post a weekly or monthly archive of the discussions on this list to the PsyLaw list? In addition, maybe one of us or someone else (other than me) could offer to copy any SGFP-related PsyLaw post back to this list. The announcement note that we post on PsyLaw could say that we will copy to PsyLaw every message for their information and only people interested in actively working on the revision process should sign up here. Thanks, Stu Stuart A. Greenberg, PhD, ABPP President, American Board of Forensic Psychology Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Washington 2815 Eastlake Ave East, Suite 220 Seattle, WA 98102 Ph 206-320-0044 Fax 206-320-7733 mailto:StuartGreenberg@attbi.com -----Original Message----- From: listproc@u.washington.edu [mailto:listproc@u.washington.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:24 PM To: stuartg@u.washington.edu Subject: REVIEW FORENSICGUIDELINES *** *** forensicguidelines@u.washington.edu: "SGFP Revisions Disscussion" *** *** Date created: Wed Aug 28 00:27:02 2002 --- The current list settings are as follows: PRIVATE: subscriptions controlled by stuartg@u.washington.edu otto@fmhi.usf.edu . USER NAME REQUIRED TO SUBSCRIBE: yes. SUBSCRIPTION CONFIRMATION: required for all subscriptions. UNSUBSCRIPTION CONFIRMATION: required for all unsubscriptions. ALTERNATE ADDRESS COMMANDS: not allowed. SEND: open to all. VISIBLE: the list shows up in listings. UNPUBLISHED: the list is visible on the local listproc only. ARCHIVE: messages are archived in the forensicguidelines archive. File spec is log%y%m STATS: open to owners only. REVIEW: open to owners only. ARCHIVES: available to owners only. UNMODERATED: postings not controlled. DIGEST: digests distributed daily at 00:01 MESSAGE-LIMIT: unlimited daily postings. FORWARD-REJECTS: no; all listproc-generated errors sent to sender. REPLY-TO-LIST-ALWAYS AUTO-DELETE-SUBSCRIBERS: yes. KEEP-RESENT-LINES: yes; Resent- header lines preserved. DELIVERY-ERRORS: non-delivery reports are sent to the owners. REFLECTOR: no; To: and Cc: header lines converted to X-To: and X-Cc:. OWNERS: stuartg@u.washington.edu otto@fmhi.usf.edu --- Here is the current list of all subscribers: cstudebaker@csopp.edu Christina Studebaker david@damartindale.com David Martindale mcgottlieb@juno.com Michael Gottlieb otto@fmhi.usf.edu Randy Otto sgolding@xmission.com Steve Golding shart@ARTS.SFU.CA Steve Hart sol.fulero@sinclair.edu Sol Fulero stuartg@u.washington.edu Stuart Greenberg .