From jfgannon@cloud9.net Sun Mar 18 17:49:06 2001 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW00.12) with ESMTP id RAA82006 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:49:05 -0800 Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA20858 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 17:49:04 -0800 Received: from jfgannon (203-180.dialup.cloud9.net [168.100.203.180]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 614B42A17A for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:49:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000401c0b017$a2aa9ac0$b4cb64a8@jfgannon> From: "J.F. Gannon" To: References: <5.0.0.25.2.20010316233021.0608fb00@pop.bol.ucla.edu> <01031711284600.03186@dhcp10> Subject: Re: Procopius in the Wall Street Journal Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:55:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Smith" To: Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: Re: Procopius in the Wall Street Journal > > > >1. It's interesting and surprising, and maybe even thrilling, to hear of a > > >non-classicist who has even heard of Procopius, and finds him relevant to > > >contempary concerns. > > Here's what probably happened: > > 1) Peggy Noonan had some dim memory from college days that there > was a book called "the secret history." (Cf. her "points of light" speech > for Bush pere, which some have thought reflects a vague memory of > the Greek campfires in the Iliad.) > > 2) She did a Web search on this phrase and came up with Procopius. > > 3) Perhaps she's got Procopius mixed up with Belisarius? I bet she > actually _has_ read Graves' book. Anyway her characterization clearly depends > entirely on secondary, not to say tertiary and quaternary sources. > > Noonan's an interesting character -- one of those vox-et-praeterea-nihil > types who actually have a real literary gift and not a shred of > intelligence. It is fair to conclude from Noonan's remarks that she is not well versed in the history of the Empire in the time of Justinian. Your further inference that she has "not a shred of intelligence" suggest that your own has its limitations. In her milieu, a whhiff of classical learning is considered > an adornment, and she's certainly clever enough to pass muster with those > not-very-exigent folks. Indeed. J.F. Gannon > .