From galya@u.washington.edu Thu Apr 13 11:13:58 PDT 1995
>From galya@u.washington.edu  Thu Apr 13 11:13:57 1995
Return-Path: <galya@u.washington.edu>
Received: from carson-oms1.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW95.02/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA06989;
	Thu, 13 Apr 95 11:13:57 -0700
Received: from carson.u.washington.edu by carson-oms1.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW95.02/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA06488;
	Thu, 13 Apr 95 11:13:55 -0700
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 1995 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Galya Diment <galya@u.washington.edu>
To: Richard Dunn <dickd@u.washington.edu>
Cc: slavic-uw@u.washington.edu, Daniel Waugh <dwaugh@u.washington.edu>,
        John Simpson <simpson@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Czech? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91i.950413093229.23741H-100000@homer19.u.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.PTX.3.91a.950413110603.26995H-100000@carson.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Does not this contradict Dean Simpson statement in his letter to 
Gerberding that we have too many people teaching for the needs of the 
department and its offering? Even for your "unit" to operate along the 
lines you have proposed, you will need at least one more lecturer in 
Russian, at least two more TAships, and an instructor or lecturer in 
Czech. That is the very bare minimum -- and even that is pretty 
unworkable. You will really be much better off simply restoring the 
department. One should not try to fix what is not broken -- I suspect you 
are probably beginning to realize it yourself. GD

On Thu, 13 Apr 1995, Richard Dunn wrote:

> I will talk to Karl about this; this has been a problem in the past, I 
> believe, and I will consider it when I get the entire proposal for next 
> year's courses from the Department.
> 
> On Thu, 13 Apr 1995, Galya Diment wrote:
> 
> > Who is then going to teach Czech in the "unit" of six when there are not 
> > even enough people available to teach Russian?
> > 
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 1995, Richard Dunn wrote:
> > 
> > > That decision can be made only after the department submits a proposed 
> > > plan for next year's total instruction.  The intention is to provide as 
> > > many of the necessary languages as possible.
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 12 Apr 1995, Galya Diment wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Here is one question I obviously cannot answer so I hope you will. Are 
> > > > their any plans to teach Czech next year in the "unit" you are creating? 
> > > > Quite a few students would like to know the answer to that one.
> > > > 
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 95 17:05:49 -0700
> > > > From: Regina Berry <cicely@u.washington.edu>
> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list <slavic-uw@u.washington.edu>
> > > > Subject: Czech?
> > > > 
> > > > Will Czech continue to be taught here? This is vital to my course of 
> > > > study, and those of a number of other students as well. We would like to 
> > > > know any information we can...
> > > > Gina Berry
> > > > M.A. student 
> > > > Slavic linguistics
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
.