From bridges@u.washington.edu Thu Jan 26 15:04:51 PST 1995
>From bridges@u.washington.edu  Thu Jan 26 15:04:50 1995
Return-Path: <bridges@u.washington.edu>
Received: from hardy.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW94.10/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA11325;
	Thu, 26 Jan 95 15:04:50 -0800
Received: by hardy.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW94.10/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA23630;
	Thu, 26 Jan 95 15:04:47 -0800
X-Sender: bridges@hardy.u.washington.edu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 1995 15:04:46 -0800 (PST)
From: George Bridges <bridges@u.washington.edu>
To: soc271-l@u.washington.edu
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <soc271-l@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91c.950126115100.35846B-100000@homer07.u.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.91a.950126150154.22319A-100000@hardy.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Folks:

Jason here makes a good point. I want you to start using e-mail to discuss 
issues we may not have time to cover in depth in class. I view myself as 
a participant, not the leader. So I don't really care how many messages 
there are, just whether people have views on these issues and what the 
views are.

George B.

On Thu, 26 Jan 1995, Jason Winston wrote:

> 
> 	Do you want use to think about it or answer it directly?  I 
> assume if I answered it, by the time you checked your box you would have 
> some 100's of messages.
> 
> -winston 
> 
.