From danielrr@retemail.es Mon Sep  4 01:54:40 2000
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA77494
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 01:54:39 -0700
Received: from smtp1.alehop.com ([62.81.160.67])
	by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA21469
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 01:54:38 -0700
Received: from [62.82.254.219] ([62.82.254.219]) by
          smtp1.alehop.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id
          G0CU4304.EGR for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 4 Sep 2000
          10:55:15 +0200 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: idd00i7w@62.81.31.3
Message-Id: <a04320400b5d9135199ae@[62.82.254.146]>
In-Reply-To: <39B2CF92.F42047D8@home.com>
References: <39B2CF92.F42047D8@home.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 10:59:49 +0200
To: classics@u.washington.edu
From: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ria=F1o?=  <danielrr@retemail.es>
Subject: Re: epicharmus quote
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>A friend has just written me to ask if I can identify the source of a
>saying by Epicharmus that ran something like: "It is obvious, that a man
>who is not envied is of no account.
>
>I do **not** know it. So I'm passing on the question to the List. Does
>anyone here happen to know the ref.?
>
>If you wish, you may reply directly to the address in the cc field
>above.

	Fr. 285 Kaibel-Latte =3D 235 Olivieri =3D 302 Noriega, source 
Stobaeus 3.38.21. (cf. Pi.P.1.85) It is usually taken as 
pseudepicharmeum
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Daniel Ria=F1o Rufilanchas
Madrid, Espa=F1a
.